Journal of Risk and Uncertainty

, Volume 15, Issue 2, pp 107–114 | Cite as

Characterizing QALYs by Risk Neutrality

  • Han Bleichrodt
  • Peter Wakker
  • Magnus Johannesson
Article

Abstract

This paper shows that QALYs can be derived from more elementary conditions than thought hitherto in the literature: it suffices to impose risk neutrality for life years in every health state. This derivation of QALYs is appealing because it does not require knowledge of concepts from utility theory such as utility independence. Therefore our axiomatization greatly facilitates the assessment of the normative (non)validity of QALYs in medical decision making. Moreover, risk neutrality can easily be tested in experimental designs, which makes it straightforward to assess the descriptive (non)validity of QALYs.

QALYs value of life utility independence risk neutrality 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Allais, Maurice. (1953). “Le Comportement de l';Homme Rationnel devant le Risque: Critique des Postulats et Axiomes de l'Ecole Américaine,” Econometrica 21, 503–546.Google Scholar
  2. Bleichrodt, Han. (1995). “QALYs and HYEs: Under What conditions Are They Equivalent?” Journal of Health Economics 14, 17–37.Google Scholar
  3. Bleichrodt, Han, and John Quiggin. (1997). “Characterizing QALYs Under a General Rank Dependent Utility Model,” Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 15, 151–165.Google Scholar
  4. Edwards, Ward. (1992, Ed.), Utility Theories: Measurement and Applications. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  5. Eeckhoudt, Louis. (1996). “Expected Utility Theory: Is It Normative or Simply ‘Practical’?”, Medical Decision Making 16, 12–13.Google Scholar
  6. Johannesson, Magnus. (1995). “Quality-Adjusted Life-Years Versus Healthy-Years Equivalents: A Comment,” Journal of Health Economics 14, 9–16.Google Scholar
  7. Johannesson, Magnus, and Per-Olov Johansson. (1996). “To Be, or not to Be, That Is the Question: An Empirical Study of the WTP for an Increased Life Expectancy at an Advanced Age,” Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 13, 163–174.Google Scholar
  8. Keeney, Ralph, and Howard Raiffa. (1976). “Decisions with Multiple Objectives.” New York: Wiley; (Second edition, 1993 Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
  9. Loomes, Graham, and Lynda McKenzie. (1989). “The Use of QALYs in Health Care Decision Making,” Social Science and Medicine 28, 299–308.Google Scholar
  10. Machina, Mark J. (1982). “ ‘Expected Utility’ Analysis without the Independence Axiom,” Econometrica 50, 277–323.Google Scholar
  11. McNeil Barbara J., Ralph Weichselbaum, and Stephen G. Pauker. (1978). Fallacy of the Five-Year Survival in Lung Cancer, New England Journal of Medicine 299, 1397–1401.Google Scholar
  12. Miyamoto, John M., and Stephen A. Eraker. (1988). “A Multiplicative Model of the Utility of Survival Duration and Health Quality,” Journal of Experimental Psychology 117, 3–20.Google Scholar
  13. Moore, Michael J., and W. Kip Viscusi. (1990). “Models for Estimating Discount Rates for Long-term Health Risks Using Labor Market Data,” Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 3, 381–401.Google Scholar
  14. Peters, Hans J.M. (1992). Axiomatic Bargaining Theory. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  15. Pliskin, Joseph S., Donald S. Shepard, and Milton C. Weinstein. (1980). “Utility Functions for Life Years and Health Status,” Operations Research 28, 206–24.Google Scholar
  16. Stiggelbout Anne M., et al. (1994). “Utility Assessment in Cancer Patients: Adjustment of Time Tradeoff Scores for the Utility of Life Years and Comparison with Standard Gamble Scores,” Medical Decision Making 14, 82–90.Google Scholar
  17. Torrance George W., and David Feeny. (1989). “Utilities and Quality-Adjusted LifeYears,” International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care 5, 559–575.Google Scholar
  18. Viscusi, W. Kip, and Michael J. Moore. (1989). “Rates of Time Preference and Valuations of the Duration of Life,” Journal of Public Economics 38, 297–317.Google Scholar
  19. von Neumann, John, and Oskar Morgenstern. (1947). Theory of Games and Economic Behavior. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  20. von Winterfeldt, Ditmar, and Ward Edwards. (1986). Decision Analysis and Behavioral Research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Weinstein, Milton. C., et al. (1980). Clinical Decision Analysis. Philadelphia: Saunders.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  • Han Bleichrodt
    • 1
  • Peter Wakker
    • 2
  • Magnus Johannesson
    • 3
  1. 1.Erasmus University RotterdamThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Leiden UniversityThe Netherlands
  3. 3.Stockholm School of EconomicsSweden

Personalised recommendations