Advertisement

A Cross-Cultural Comparison of Managers' Whistleblowing Tendencies*

  • Randi L. Sims
  • John P. Keenan
Article

Abstract

In a global marketplace, managers often face major difficulties when it comes to handling ethical problems within a different cultural context. Whistleblowing is one possible response to ethical problems. This study considers the differences in culture between a United States sample of managers and a Jamaica, West Indies sample of managers using Hofstede's (1991) theory of International Cultures. The study explores how those cultural differences may help in our understanding of the differences in reported whistleblowing tendencies.

whistleblowing cross-cultural ethical decision making 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Adler, N. (1983). ‘Cross-cultural management research: The ostrich and the trend.’ Academy of Management Review 8 (2), 226–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Graham, J. W. (1986). ‘Principled organizational dissent: A theoretical essay.’ In B. M. Staw and L. L. Cummings (eds.), Research in Organizational Behavior 8, Greenwich CT: JAI Press, pp. 1–52.Google Scholar
  3. Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture's Consequences. Beverly Hills: Sage.Google Scholar
  4. Hofstede, G. (1991). Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind. London: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  5. Kedia, B. L. and R. S. Bhagar (1988). ‘Cultural constraints on transfer of technology across nations: Implications for research in international and comparative management.’ Academy of Management Review 13 (4), 559–571.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Keenan, J. P. (1988). ‘Communication climate, whistleblowing, and the first-level manager: A preliminary study.’ Academy of Management Best Paper Proceedings, 247–251.Google Scholar
  7. Keenan, J. P. (1990). ‘Upper-level managers and whistleblowing: Determinants of perceptions of company encouragement and information about where to blow the whistle.’ Journal of Business and Psychology 5 (2), 223–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Keenan, J. P. (1991). ‘Upper-level managers, middle-level managers, and whistleblowing: A comparative study and evaluation.’ Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management, Miami Beach.Google Scholar
  9. Keenan, J. P. (1995). ‘Whistleblowing and the first-level manager: Determinants of feeling obliged to blow the whistle.’ Journal of Social Behavior and Personality 10 (3), 571–584.Google Scholar
  10. Keenan, J. P. and D. A. McLain (1992). ‘Whistleblowing: A conceptualization and model.’ In J. L. Wall and K. R. Jauch (eds.),Academy of Management Best Papers Proceedings, August 10–12, Las Vegas, NV, pp. 350–352.Google Scholar
  11. Keenan, J. P. and K. Xin (1993). ‘Comparing Indian and American managers on whistleblowing: An exploratory study and evaluation.’ In D. F. Rogers and A. S. Raturi (eds.), 1993 Proceedings of the Decision Sciences Institute, Washington D.C., pp. 368–371.Google Scholar
  12. Krueger, C. A. and C. Thompson (1986). Unpublished survey developed for management education programs at Management Institute-School of Business, University of Wisconsin-Madison.Google Scholar
  13. Miceli, M. P. and J. P. Near (1988). ‘Individual and situational correlates of whistleblowing.’ Personnel Psychology 41, 267–281.Google Scholar
  14. Miceli, M. P. and J. P. Near (1992). Blowing the Whistle: The Organizational and Legal Implications for Companies and Employees. New York: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
  15. Sims, R. L. and J. P. Keenan (1998). ‘Predictors of external whistleblowing: Organizational and intrapersonal variables.’ Journal of Business Ethics 17, 411–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Sondergaard, M. (1994). ‘Hofstede's consequences: A study of reviews, citations and replications.’ Organizational Studies 15 (3), 447–456.Google Scholar
  17. United States Merit Systems Protection Board (USMSPB) (1981). Whistleblowing and the Federal Employee. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Governing Printing Office.Google Scholar
  18. Wines, W. A. and N. K. Napier (1992). ‘Toward an understanding of cross-cultural ethics: A tentative model.’ Journal of Business Ethics 11, 831–842.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • Randi L. Sims
    • 1
  • John P. Keenan
    • 2
  1. 1.Business and Administrative Studies DivisionNova Southeastern UniversityFort LauderdaleU.S.A
  2. 2.School of Business – Management InstituteUniversity of Wisconsin-MadisonMadisonU.S.A

Personalised recommendations