Environmental Biology of Fishes

, Volume 60, Issue 1–3, pp 267–282 | Cite as

Ultrasonic Telemetry, Tracking and Automated Monitoring Technology for Sharks

  • Frederick A. Voegeli
  • Malcolm J. Smale
  • Dale M. Webber
  • Yanko Andrade
  • Ronald K. O'Dor


Sharks were among the first marine animals to carry telemetry systems because of their size and the need to understand their interactions with humans. Modern telemetry systems can gather many kinds of data (limited only by imagination, funding and sensor types), indicating which animals are near telemetry receivers and what they are doing. Receivers now range from simple autonomous detector units for deployment in mid-water in large-scale grids, to sophisticated automated benthic recorders, to triangulating radio-linked buoy systems (RAP), to ship-borne transponders. In addition, archival tags can now gather and store data even while the shark is away, to be downloaded later. Older types had to be recovered, but popup tags release from sharks automatically, surface and transfer data to satellites, while CHAT tags download whenever queried by a nearby transponding acoustic receiver. Sophisticated animal-borne tags dramatically increase the information gathered about sharks and their environment. The examples provided show the parallel progression of shark biology and acoustic biotelemetry illustrating that telemetry systems are tools for gathering data, which can often be honed to facilitate biological experiments. Future visions include sensors that directly measure shark swimming power and cardiac output, compressing the data so that it can be delivered to RAP systems tracking multiple animals with meter resolution in near real time. CHAT tags as small as 22 mm diameter should be able to return similar data from trips of hundreds of kilometers. Continued communication between biologists and engineers is essential to develop these technologies.

acoustic positioning remote pinger transponder sensors code archival 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Bagley, P.M. & I.G. Priede. 1997. An autonomous free-fall acoustic tracking system for investigation of fish behaviour at abyssal depths. Aquat. Living Res. 10: 67–74.Google Scholar
  2. Baldwin, H.A. & G.F. Ingle. 1964. A remote control technique for the study of olfaction in sharks. National Biomedical and Scientific Instrumentation Symposium 2: 217–228.Google Scholar
  3. Bass, G.A. & M. Rascovich. 1965.A device for the sonic tracking of large fishes. Zoologica 50: 75–82.Google Scholar
  4. Carey, F.G. & K.D. Lawson. 1973. Temperature regulation in a free-swimming bluefin tuna. Comp. Biochem Physiol. 44A: 375–392.Google Scholar
  5. Carey, F.G. & J.V. Scharold. 1990. Movement of blue sharks (Prionace glauca) in depth and course. Mar. Biol. 106: 329–342.Google Scholar
  6. Carey, F.G., J.M. Teal, J.W. Kanwisher, K.D. Lawson & J.S. Beckett. 1971. Warm bodied fish. Amer. Zool. 11: 137–145.Google Scholar
  7. Carey, F.G., J.W. Kaniwisher, O. Brazier, G. Garielson, J.G. Casey & H.L. Pratt Jr. 1982. Temperature and activities of a white shark, Carcharodon carcharias. Copeia 1982: 254–260.Google Scholar
  8. Carey, F.G., J.G. Casey, H.L. Pratt, D. Urquhart & J.E. McCosker. 1985. Temperature, heat production and heat exchange in Lamnid sharks. pp. 92–108. In: G. Sibley, J.A. Seigel & C.C. Swift (ed.) Biology of the White Shark, Mem. S. Cal. Acad. Sci. 8.Google Scholar
  9. Casey, J.G. 1985. Trans-Atlantic migrations of the blue shark: a case history of cooperative shark tagging. pp. 253–268. In: R.H. Stroud (ed.) World Angling Resources and Challenges, International Game Fish Association, Fort Lauderdale.Google Scholar
  10. Casey, J.G. & N.E. Kohler. 1992. Tagging studies on the shortfin mako shark (Isurus oxyrinchus) in theWestern North Atlantic. Aust. J. Mar. Freshwater Res. 43: 45–60.Google Scholar
  11. Engas, A., S. Lø kkeborg & J.T. Ovredal. 1996. Natural and fishing gear induced behaviour of tagged fish, studied by means of a stationary positioning system. pp. 203–211. In: E. Baras & J.C. Philippart (ed.) Underwater Biotelemetry, University of Liege, Liege.Google Scholar
  12. Engas, A., E.K. Haugland & J.T. Ovredal. 1997. Reactions of cod (Gadhus morhua L.) in the pre-vessel zone to an approaching trawler under different light conditions. Hydrobiologia 371/372: 109–206.Google Scholar
  13. Goldman, K.J., S.D. Anderson, J.E. McCosker & A.P. Klimley. 1996. Temperature, swimming depth andmovements of a white shark at the South Farallon Islands, California. pp. 111–120. In: A.P. Klimley & D.G. Ainley (ed.) Great White Sharks: The Biology of Carcharodon carcharias, Academic Press,San Diego.Google Scholar
  14. Hammill, M.O., V. Lesage, G. Lobb, P. Carter & F.A. Voegeli. 1999. A remote release mechanism to recover time-depth recorders from marine mammals. Mar. Mam. Sci. 15: 584–588.Google Scholar
  15. Klimley, A.P., S.B. Butler, D.R. Nelson & A.T. Stull. 1988. Diel movements of scalloped hammerhead sharks (Sphyrna lewini Griffith and Smith) to and from a seamount in the Gulf of California. J. Fish Biol. 33: 751–761.Google Scholar
  16. Klimley, A.P., F.A. Voegeli, S.C. Beavers & B.J. LeBoeuf. 1998. Automated listening stations for tagged marine fishes. Mar. Tech. Soc. J. 32: 94–101.Google Scholar
  17. Klimley, A.P., B.J. LeBoeuf, K.M. Cantara, J.E. Richert, S.F. Davis & S. Van Sommeran. 2000. Radio-acoustic positioning: a tool for studying site-specific behavior of large marine animals. Mar. Biol. (in press).Google Scholar
  18. Kohler, N.E. & P.A. Turner. 2001. Shark tagging: a review of conventional methods and studies. Env. Biol. Fish. 60: 191–223 (this volume).Google Scholar
  19. Lø kkeborg, S. & A. Fernö. 1999. Diel activity pattern and food search behaviour in cod, Gadus morhua. Env. Biol. Fish. 54: 345–353.Google Scholar
  20. Lowe, C.G. 1996. Kinematics and critical swimming speed of juvenile scalloped hammerhead sharks. J. Exp. Biol. 199: 2605–2610.Google Scholar
  21. Lowe, C.G. & K.J. Goldman. 2000. Physiological telemetry of elasmobranchs: taking the laboratory into the field. Env. Biol. Fish. (in press).Google Scholar
  22. McKibben, J.N. & D.R. Nelson. 1981. A portable real-time, x- y plotting system for ultrasonic tracking of fish. pp. 105–115. In: F.M. Long (ed.) Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference onWildlife Biotelemetry, University of Wyoming, Laramie.Google Scholar
  23. McKibben, J.N., D.R. Nelson & S.H. Gruber. 1985. A data logging monitor for aquatic biotelemetry. pp 90–96. In: F.M. Long (ed.) Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Wildlife Biotelemetry, University of Wyoming, Laramie.Google Scholar
  24. Nelson, D.R. 1978. Telemetering techniques for the study of free-ranging sharks. pp. 419–482. In: E.S. Hodgson & R.F. Mathewson (ed.) Sensory Biology of Sharks, Skates and Rays, Office of Naval Research, Department of the Navy, Arlington.Google Scholar
  25. Nelson, D.R. & J. McKibben. 1981. Timed release, recoverable, ultrasonic/radio transmitters for tracking pelagic sharks. pp. 90–104. In: F.M. Long (ed.) Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Wildlife Biotelemetry, University of Wyoming, Laramie.Google Scholar
  26. Nelson, D.R., J.N. McKibben, W.R. Strong, Jr., C.G. Lowe, J.A. Sisneros, D.M. Schroeder & R.J. Lavenberg. 1997. An acoustic tracking of a megamouth shark, Megachasma pelagios: a crespuscular vertical migratory. Env. Biol. Fish. 49: 389–399.Google Scholar
  27. O'Dor, R.K., D.M. Webber & F.A. Voegeli. 1989.A multiple buoy acoustic/radio telemetry system for automated positioning and telemetry of physical and physiological data. pp. 444–452. In: A. Uchiyama & C.J. Amlaner (ed.) Proceedings of the 10th International Symposium on Biotelemetry, Waseda Univ. Press, Tokyo.Google Scholar
  28. O'Dor, R.K., J. Forsythe, D.M. Webber, J. Wells & M.J. Wells. 1993. The cost of living for Nautilus in the wild. Nature 363: 626–628.Google Scholar
  29. O'Dor, R.K., J.A. Hoar, D.M. Webber, F.G. Carey, S. Tanaka, H. Martins & F.M. Porteiro. 1994. Squid (Loligo forbesi) performance and metabolic rates in nature. Mar. Fresh. Behav. Physiol. 25: 163–177.Google Scholar
  30. O'Dor, R.K., Y. Andrade, D.M. Webber, W.H.H. Sauer, M.J. Roberts, M.J. Smale & F.A. Voegeli. 1998. Applications and performance of radio-acoustic positioning and telemetry (RAPT) systems. Hydrobiologia 371/372: 1–8.Google Scholar
  31. Pincock, D.G. & F.A. Voegeli. 1992. Quick course in underwater telemetry systems. VEMCO Limited, Shad Bay. 31 pp.Google Scholar
  32. Sauer, W.H.H. & M.J. Smale. 1991. Predation patterns on the inshore spawning grounds of the squid Loligo vulgaris reynaudii (Cephalopoda: Loliginidae) off the south-eastern Cape, South Africa. S. Afr. J. Mar. Sci. 11: 513–523.Google Scholar
  33. Sauer, W.H.H., M.J. Roberts, M.R. Lipinski, M.J. Smale, R.T. Hanlon, D.M. Webber & R.K. O'Dor. 1997. Choreography of the squid's ‘nuptial dance’. Biol. Bull. 192: 203–207.Google Scholar
  34. Scariotta, T.C. & D.R. Nelson. 1977. Diel behaviour of the blue shark, Prionace glauca, near Santa Catalina Island. Calif. Fish. Bull. 75: 519–528.Google Scholar
  35. Scharold, J., N. Chin Lat, W.R. Lowell & J.B. Graham. 1989. Metabolic rate, heart rate, and tail beat frequency during sustained swimming in the leopard shark Thiakis semifasciata. J. Exp. Biol. 48: 223–230.Google Scholar
  36. Scharold, J. & S.H. Gruber. 1991. Telemetered heart rate as a measure of metabolic rate in the lemon shark, Negaprion brevirostris. Copeia 1991: 942–953.Google Scholar
  37. Skajaa, K., A. Ferno, S. Lokkeborg & E.K. Haugland. 1998. Basic movement pattern and chemo-oriented search towards baited pots in edible crab (Cancer pagarus L.) Hydrobiologia 371/372: 143–153.Google Scholar
  38. Stasko, A.B. & D.G. Pincock. 1977. Review of underwater biotelemetry, with emphasis on ultrasonic techniques. J. Fish. Res. Board Can. 34: 1261–1285.Google Scholar
  39. Stevens, J.D. 1976. First results of shark tagging in the north-east Atlantic, 1972- 1975. J. Mar. Biol. Ass. UK 56: 929–937.Google Scholar
  40. Stevens, J.D. 1990. Further results from a tagging study of pelagic sharks in the North-East Atlantic. J. Mar. Biol. Ass. UK 70: 707–720.Google Scholar
  41. Trefethen, P.S., J.W. Dudley & M.R. Smith. 1957. Ultrasonic tracer follows tagged fish. Electronics 30: 156–160.Google Scholar
  42. Voegeli, F.A. 1988. Ultrasonic tracking, position monitoring and data telemetry systems. pp. 279–284. In: A. Uchiyama & C.J. Amlaner (ed.) Proceedings of the 10th International Symposium on Biotelemetry, Waseda Univ. Press, Tokyo.Google Scholar
  43. Voegeli, F.A. 1990. Ultrasonic telemetry of swimming speed data. pp. 279–284. In: C.J. Amlaner (ed.) Proceedings of the 11th International Symposium on Biotelemetry, Yokohama, Japan.Google Scholar
  44. Voegeli, F.A & D.G. Pincock. 1981. Determination of fish swimming speed by ultrasonic telemetry. Biotelemetry and Patient Monitoring 7: 215–220.Google Scholar
  45. Voegeli, F.A., G. Hoar & D.W. Church. 1983. A new generation of ultrasonic receivers for biotelemetry. pp. 63–75. In: D.G. Pincock (ed.) Proceedings of the 4th International Conference onWildlife Telemetry, Applied Microelectronics Inst., Halifax.Google Scholar
  46. Voegeli, F.A, G.L. Lacroix & J.M. Anderson. 1997. Development of miniature pingers for tracking Atlantic salmon smolts at sea. Hydrobiology 371/372: 35–46.Google Scholar
  47. Wartzok, D., S. Sayegh, H. Stone, J. Barchak & W. Barnes. 1992. Acoustic tracking system for monitoring under-ice movements of polar seals. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 92: 682–687.Google Scholar
  48. Webber, D.M. 1999. Respiratory and cardiovascular correlates of activity metabolism in the Atlantic cod Gadus morhua. Ph.D. thesis, Cambridge University, Cambridge. 280 pp.Google Scholar
  49. Webber, D.M. & R.K. O'Dor. 1986. Monitoring the metabolic rate and activity of free swimming squid with telemetered jet pressure. J. Exp. Biol. 126: 205–224.Google Scholar
  50. Webber, D.M., R.G. Boutilier & S.K. Kerr. 1998. Cardiac output as a predictor of metabolism in cod (Gadus morhua). J. Exp. Biol. 201: 2779–2789.Google Scholar
  51. Webber, D.M., F.A. Voegeli & M.J. Smale. 2000. The development of differential pressure techniques to measure swimming speed in fish. In: J. Eiler (ed.) Proceedings of the 15th International Symposium on Biotelemetry (in press).Google Scholar
  52. West, G.J. & J.D. Stevens. 2001. Archival tagging of school shark, Galeorhinus galeus, in Australia: initial results. Env. Biol. Fish. 60: 283–298 (this volume).Google Scholar
  53. Wolcott, T.G. 1995. New options in physiological and behavioural ecology through multichannel telemetry. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 193: 239–256.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Frederick A. Voegeli
    • 1
  • Malcolm J. Smale
    • 2
  • Dale M. Webber
    • 3
  • Yanko Andrade
    • 3
  • Ronald K. O'Dor
    • 4
  1. 1.VEMCO LimitedShad BayCanada
  2. 2.Port Elizabeth MuseumPort ElizabethSouth Africa
  3. 3.Dalhousie UniversityHalifaxCanada
  4. 4.Dalhousie UniversityHalifaxCanada (e-mail

Personalised recommendations