Environmental Biology of Fishes

, Volume 60, Issue 1–3, pp 191–224 | Cite as

Shark Tagging: A Review Of Conventional Methods and Studies

  • Nancy E. Kohler
  • Patricia A. Turner
Article

Abstract

The tagging of sharks using conventional tags has long been recognized as a valuable means for studying various aspects of their life history, migrations and movements, and population structure. Conventional tags are defined as those that can be identified visually without the use of special detection equipment. Tagging studies specifically targeting sharks began in the late 1920's, and today numerous cooperative shark tagging programs exist worldwide. Cooperative programs depend on the joint participation of scientists and public volunteers to accomplish research objectives. Benefits and problems of these programs are discussed using the tagging methodologies, protocols, and results of the National Marine Fisheries Service Cooperative Shark Tagging Program. An additional 63 shark tagging studies and programs of all types are reviewed. Information useful for behavioral, biological, and fishery management studies can be derived from data resulting from these studies, including species and size composition, sex ratios, spatial and temporal distribution, migrations, movement patterns, rates of travel, delineation of pupping grounds, distribution of maturity intervals, indices of relative abundance, and recognition of individuals. Specific tagging experiments can be designed to provide additional data on age and growth, homing and site fidelity, dispersal rate, residence time, movement rates, tag shedding, and population parameters (e.g. size, mortality, recruitment, exploitation, interaction rates, and stock identity). Sources of bias inherent in tagging and recapture data include mortality, variation in tagging effort and fishing pressure, non-recovery and non-reporting of tags, and tag shedding. Recent advances in tagging methodologies that complement and extend conventional tagging studies will further our knowledge on shark movements and migrations, particularly in the areas of resource utilization and management, space utilization, and population dynamics.

elasmobranch mark tag recapture migration movement 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References cited

  1. Aasen, O. 1960. The Norwegian taggings of spiny dogfish (Squalus acanthias). Annales Biologiques 17: 85–95.Google Scholar
  2. Aasen, O. 1961. Pigghaundersokelsene. Fisken Havet 1: 1–9.Google Scholar
  3. Aasen, O. 1962. Norwegian dogfish tagging. Annales Biologiques 18: 106–107.Google Scholar
  4. Backus, R.H., S. Springer & E.L. Arnold, Jr. 1956. A contribution to the natural history of the white-tip shark, Pterolamiops longimanus (Poey). Deep-Sea Res. 3: 178–188.Google Scholar
  5. Baglin, R.E., Jr., M.I. Farber, W.H. Lenarz & J.M. Mason, Jr. 1980. Shedding rates of plastic and metal dart tags from Atlantic bluefin tuna, Thunnus thynnus. U.S. Fish. Bull. 78: 179–185.Google Scholar
  6. Bane, G.W. 1968. The great blue shark. Calif. Currents 1: 3–4.Google Scholar
  7. Bass, A.J. 1977. Long-term recoveries of tagged sharks. Copeia 1977: 574–575.Google Scholar
  8. Bass, A.J., J.D. D'Aubrey & N. Kistnasamy. 1973. Sharks of the east coast of southern Africa. I. The genus Carcharhinus (Carcharhinidae). Invest. Rep. Oceanogr. Res. Inst. Durban 33. 168 pp.Google Scholar
  9. Bergman, P.K., F. Haw, H.L. Blankenship & R.M. Buckley. 1992. Perspectives on design, use, and misuse of fish tags. Fisheries 17: 20–25.Google Scholar
  10. Beverton, R.J.H., J.A. Gulland & A.R. Margetts. 1959. Whiting tagging: how the tag return rate is affected by the condition of fish when tagged. J. du Cons. 25: 53–57.Google Scholar
  11. Bonham, K., F.B. Sanford, W. Clegg & G.C. Butcher. 1949. Biological and vitamin A studies of dogfish landed in the State of Washington (Squalus suckleyi). Wash. Dept. Fish. Biol. Bull. 49A: 83–114.Google Scholar
  12. Branstetter, S. 1987. Age and growth validation of newborn sharks held in laboratory aquaria, with comments on the life history of the Atlantic sharpnose shark, Rhizoprionodon terraenovae. Copeia 1987: 291–300.Google Scholar
  13. Brooks, E.N., K.H. Pollock, J.M. Hoenig & W.S. Hearn. 1998. Estimation of fishing and natural mortality from tagging studies on fisheries with two user groups. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 55: 2001–2010.Google Scholar
  14. Brownie, C., D.R. Anderson, K.P. Burnham & D.S. Robson. 1978. Statistical inference from band recovery data - a handbook. U.S. Fish and Wildl. Serv. Resour. Publ. No. 131. 212 pp.Google Scholar
  15. Bruce, B.D. 1992. Preliminary observations on the biology of the white shark, Carcharodon carcharias, in South Australian waters. Aust. J. Mar. Freshwater Res. 43: 1–11.Google Scholar
  16. Burnett, C.D., J.S. Beckett, C.A. Dickson, P.C.F. Hurley & T.D. Iles. 1987. A summary of releases and recaptures in the Canadian large pelagic fish tagging program 1961- 1986. Can. Data Rep. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 673: 1–99.Google Scholar
  17. Cailliet, G.M. 1990. Elasmobranch age determination and veri-fication: an updated review. pp. 157–165. In: H.L. Pratt, Jr., S.H. Gruber & T. Taniuchi (ed.) Elasmobranchs as Living Resources: Advances in the Biology, Ecology, Systematics, and the Status of the Fisheries, NOAA Tech. Rep. NMFS 90.Google Scholar
  18. Cailliet, G.M. 1992. Demography of the central California population of the leopard shark (Triakis semifasciata). Aust. J. Mar. Freshwater Res. 43: 183–193.Google Scholar
  19. Cailliet, G.M., H.F. Mollet, G.C. Pittenger, D. Bedford & L.J. Natanson. 1992. Growth and demography of the Pacific angel shark (Squatina californica), based upon tag returns off California. Aust. J. Mar. Freshwater Res. 43: 1313–1330.Google Scholar
  20. Carrier, J.C. 1985. Nurse sharks of Big Pine Key: comparative success of three types of external tags. Florida Sci. 48: 146–154.Google Scholar
  21. Casey, J.G. 1985. Transatlantic migrations of the blue shark: a case history of cooperative shark tagging. pp. 253–68. In: R.H. Stroud (ed.) World Angling Resources and Challenges: Proceedings of the First World Angling Conference, Cap d'Agde, France, September 12- 18, 1984, International Game Fish Association, Ft. Lauderdale.Google Scholar
  22. Casey, J.G. & N.E. Kohler. 1992. Tagging studies on the shortfin mako shark (Isurus oxyrinchus) in theWestern North Atlantic. Aust. J. Mar. Freshwater Res. 43: 45–60.Google Scholar
  23. Casey, J.G. & L.J. Natanson. 1992. Revised estimates of age and growth of the sandbar shark (Carcharhinus plumbeus) from the western North Atlantic. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 49: 1474–1477.Google Scholar
  24. Clarke, T.A. 1971. The ecology of the scalloped hammerhead shark, Sphyrna lewini, in Hawaii. Pac. Sci. 25: 133–144.Google Scholar
  25. Cliff, G., R.P. van der Elst, A. Govender, T.K. Witthuhn & E.M. Bullen. 1996. First estimates of mortality and population size of white sharks on the South African coast. pp. 393–400. In: A.P. Klimley & D.G. Ainley (ed.) Great White Sharks: the Biology of Carcharodon carcharias, Academic Press, San Diego.Google Scholar
  26. Coutin, P. 1992. Sharks... and more sharks. Australian Fisheries 51: 41–42.Google Scholar
  27. Davenport, S. & J.D. Stevens. 1988. Age and growth of two commercially important sharks (Carcharhinus tilstoni and C. sorrah) from Northern Australia. Aust. J. Mar. Freshwater Res. 39: 417–433.Google Scholar
  28. Davies, D.H. & L.S. Joubert. 1967. Tag evaluation and shark tagging in South African waters, 1964- 65. pp. 111–140. In: P.W. Gilbert, R. F. Mathewson & D.P. Rall (ed.) Sharks, Skates, and Rays, Johns Hopkins Press, Baltimore.Google Scholar
  29. Ebert, D.A. 1996. Biology of the sevengill shark, Notorynchus cepedianus (Peron, 1807) in the temperate coastal waters of southern Africa. S. Afr. J. Mar. Sci. 17: 93–103.Google Scholar
  30. Eckert, S.A. & B.S. Stewart. 2001. Telemetry and satellite tracking of whale sharks, Rhincodon typus, in the Sea of Cortez, Mexico, and the north Pacific Ocean. Env. Biol. Fish. 60: 299–308 (this volume).Google Scholar
  31. Eisner, R.A. & J.A. Ritter. 1979. The Canadian Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) smolt tag and its recovery system: a review. ICES, C.M. 1979/M: 24. 12 pp.Google Scholar
  32. Everhart, W.H. & W.D. Youngs. 1981. Principles of fishery science. Cornell University Press, Ithaca. 349 pp.Google Scholar
  33. Fabens, A.J. 1965. Properties and fitting of the von Bertalanffy growth curve. Growth 29: 265–289.Google Scholar
  34. Ferreira, C.A. & T.P. Ferreira. 1996. Population dynamics of white sharks in South Africa. pp. 381–391. In: A.P. Klimley & D.G. Ainley (ed.) Great White Sharks: the Biology of Carcharodon carcharias, Academic Press, San Diego.Google Scholar
  35. Fitzmaurice, P. 1994. Tagging studies of blue sharks and tope off the Irish coast. p. 17. In: S.L. Fowler & R.C. Earll (ed.) Proceedings of the Second European Shark and RayWorkshop, 15- 16 February 1994, Tag and Release Schemes and Shark and Ray Management Plans.Google Scholar
  36. Francis, M.P. 1988a. Movement patterns of rig (Mustelus lenticulatus) tagged in southern New Zealand. N.Z. J. Mar. Freshwater Res. 22: 259–272.Google Scholar
  37. Francis, M.P. 1989. Exploitation rates of rig (Mustelus lenticulatus) around the South Island of New Zealand. N.Z. J. Mar. Freshwater Res. 23: 239–245.Google Scholar
  38. Francis, M.P. & R.I.C.C. Francis. 1992. Growth rate estimates for New Zealand rig (Mustelus lenticulatus). Aust. J. Mar. Freshwater Res. 43: 1157–1176.Google Scholar
  39. Francis, M.P. & K.P. Mulligan. 1998. Age and growth of New Zealand school shark, Galeorhinus galeus. N.Z. J. Mar. Freshwater Res. 32: 427–440.Google Scholar
  40. Francis, R.I.C.C. 1988b. Are growth parameters estimated from tagging and age-length data comparable? Can. J. Fish. Aquatic Sci. 45: 936–942.Google Scholar
  41. Francis, R.I.C.C. 1988c. Maximum likelihood estimation of growth and growth variability from tagging data. N.Z. J. Mar. Freshwater Res. 22: 42–51.Google Scholar
  42. Gordon, W.G. 1990. Fish marking and the Magnuson Act. Amer. Fish. Soc. Symp. 7: 1–4.Google Scholar
  43. Grant, C.J., R.L. Sandland & A.M. Olsen. 1979. Estimation of growth, mortality, and yield per recruit of the Australian school shark, Galeorhinus australis (Macleay), from tag recoveries. Aust. J. Mar. Freshwater Res. 30: 625–637.Google Scholar
  44. Gruber, S.H. 1982. Role of the lemon shark, Negaprion brevirostris as a predator in the tropical marine environment: a multidisciplinary study.Florida Sci. 45: 46–75.Google Scholar
  45. Gruber, S.H., D.R. Nelson & J.F. Morrissey. 1988. Patterns of activity and space utilization of lemon sharks, Negaprion brevirostris, in a shallow Bahamian lagoon. Bull. Mar. Sci. 43: 61–76.Google Scholar
  46. Gruber, S.H. & R.G. Stout. 1983. Biological materials for the study of age and growth in a tropical marine elasmobranch, the lemon shark, Negaprion brevirostris (Poey). pp. 193–205. In: E.D. Prince & L.M. Pulos (ed.) Proceedings of the International Workshop on Age Determination of Oceanic Pelagic Fishes: Tunas, Billfishes, and Sharks, NOAA Tech. Rep. NMFS 8.Google Scholar
  47. Gubanov, Y.P. 1976. The first catch of a tagged thresher shark (Alopias vulpinus). J. Ichthyol. 16: 497–498.Google Scholar
  48. Gulland, J.A. 1983. Fish stock assessment. FAO/Wiley Series on Food and Agriculture, New York. 223 pp.Google Scholar
  49. Gulland, J.A. & S.J. Holt. 1959. Estimation of growth parameters for data at unequal time intervals. J. Con. Explor. Mer 25: 47–49.Google Scholar
  50. Hansen, P.M. 1963. Tagging experiments with the Greenland shark (Somniosus microcephalus (Bloch and Schneider)) in subarea 1. pp. 172–175. In: International Commission of Northwest Atlantic Fisheries Special Publication 4, North Atlantic Fish Marking Symposium.Google Scholar
  51. Harden Jones, F.R. 1968. Fish migration. Edward Arnold, London. 325 pp.Google Scholar
  52. Haw, F., P.K. Bergman, R.D., Fralick, R.M. Buckley & H.L. Blankenship. 1990. Visible implanted fish tag. Amer. Fish. Soc. Symp. 7: 311–315.Google Scholar
  53. Herald, E.S. & W.E. Ripley. 1951. The relative abundance of sharks and bat stingrays in San Francisco Bay. Calif. Fish Game 37: 315–329.Google Scholar
  54. Heupel, M.R. & M.B. Bennett. 1997. Histology of dart tag insertion sites in the epaulette shark. J. Fish Biol. 50: 1034–1041.Google Scholar
  55. Heupel, M.R., C.A. Simpfendorfer & M.B. Bennett. 1998. Analysis of tissue responses to fin tagging in Australian carcharhinids. J. Fish Biol. 52: 610–620.Google Scholar
  56. Hilborn, R. 1988. Determination of tag return from recaptured fish by sequential examination for tags. Trans. Amer. Fish. Soc. 117: 510–514.Google Scholar
  57. Hilborn, R., C.J. Walters & D.B. Jester, Jr. 1990. Value of fish marking in fisheries management. Amer. Fish. Soc. Symp. 7: 5–8.Google Scholar
  58. Hoenig, J.M., N.J. Barrowman, W.S. Hearn & K.H. Pollock. 1998a. Multiyear tagging studies incorporating fishing effort data. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 55: 1466–1476.Google Scholar
  59. Hoenig, J.M., N.J. Barrowman, K.H. Pollock, E.N. Brooks, W.S. Hearn & T. Polachek. 1998b. Models for tagging data that allow for incomplete mixing of newly tagged animals. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 55: 1477–1483.Google Scholar
  60. Hoey, J.J. 1983. Analysis of longline fishing effort for apex predators (swordfish, shark, and tuna) in the western North Atlantic and Gulf of Mexico. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Rhode Island, Kingston, 288 pp.Google Scholar
  61. Holden, M.J. 1962. English spurdogfish tagging. Annales Biologiques 18: 107–108.Google Scholar
  62. Holden, M.J. 1965. The stocks of spurdogs (Squalus acanthias L.) in British waters, and their migrations. Fish. Invest. Minist. Agric. Fish. Food G.B. Ser. II Salmon Freshwater Fish. 244: 1–20.Google Scholar
  63. Holden, M.J. 1967. Transatlantic movement of a tagged spurdog-fish. Nature 214: 1140–1141.Google Scholar
  64. Holden, M.J. & R.G. Horrod. 1979. The migrations of tope, Galeorhinus galeus (L), in the eastern North Atlantic as determined by tagging. J. Cons. Int. Explor. Mer 38: 314–317.Google Scholar
  65. Holland, G.A. 1957. Migration and growth of the dogfish shark, Squalus acanthias (Linnaeus), of the eastern North Pacific. Wash. Dept. Fish. Fish. Res. Pap. 2: 43–59.Google Scholar
  66. Hurst, R.J., N.W. Bagley, G.E. McGregor & M.P. Francis. 1999. Movements of the New Zealand school shark, Galeorhinus galeus, from tag returns. N. Z. J. Mar. Freshwater Res. 33: 29–48.Google Scholar
  67. Jackobsson, J. 1970. On fish tags and tagging. Oceanogr. Mar. Biol. Ann. Rev. 8: 457–499.Google Scholar
  68. Jensen, A.L. 1981. Sample sizes for single mark and single recapture experiments. Trans. Amer. Fish. Soc. 110: 455–458.Google Scholar
  69. Jensen, A.C., R.L. Edwards & G.C. Matthiessen. 1961. The spiny dogfish - a review. Woods Hole Lab Report No. 61- 7: 1–42.Google Scholar
  70. Jolly, G.M. 1965. Explicit estimates from capture- recapture data with both death and immigration-stochastic model. Biometrika 52: 225–247.Google Scholar
  71. Jones, R. 1976. The use of marking data in fish population analysis. FAO Fish. Tech. Pap. 153: 1–42.Google Scholar
  72. Kato, S. & A.H. Carvallo. 1967. Shark tagging in the eastern Pacific Ocean, 1962- 65. pp. 93–109. In: P.W. Gilbert, R.F. Mathewson & D.P. Rall (ed.) Sharks, Skates, and Rays, Johns Hopkins Press, Baltimore.Google Scholar
  73. Ketchen, K.S. 1975. Age and growth of dogfish Squalus acanthias in British Columbiawaters. J. Fish. Res. Board Can. 32: 43–59.Google Scholar
  74. Ketchen, K.S. 1986. The spiny dogfish (Squalus acanthias) in the northeast Pacific and a history of its utilization. Canadian Special Publication of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 88: 1–78.Google Scholar
  75. Klimley, P.A. & D.R. Nelson. 1984. Diel movement patterns of the scalloped hammerhead shark (Sphyrna lewini) in relation to El Bajo Espiritu Santo: a refuging central-position social system. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 15: 45–54.Google Scholar
  76. Kohler, N.E., J.G. Casey & P.A. Turner. 1998. NMFS cooperative shark tagging program, 1962- 1993: an atlas of shark tag and recapture data. Mar. Fish. Rev. 60: 1–87.Google Scholar
  77. Kusher, D.I., S.E. Smith & G.M. Cailliet. 1992. Validated age and growth of the leopard shark, Triakis semifasciata, with comments on reproduction. Env. Biol. Fish. 35: 187–203.Google Scholar
  78. Lenarz, W.H., F.J. Mather, III, J.S. Beckett, A.C. Jones & J.M. Mason, Jr. 1973. Estimation of rates of tag shedding by northwest Atlantic bluefin tuna. U.S. Fish. Bull. 71: 1103–1105.Google Scholar
  79. Manire, C.A. & S.H. Gruber. 1991. Effect of M-type dart tags on field growth of juvenile lemon sharks. Trans. Amer. Fish. Soc. 120: 776–780.Google Scholar
  80. Mather, F.J., III, D.C. Tabb, J.M. Mason, Jr. & H.L. Clark. 1974. Results of sailfish tagging in the western North Atlantic Ocean. pp. 194–210. In: R.S. Shomura & F. Williams (ed.) Proceedings of the International Billfish Symposium, Kailua-Kona, Hawaii, 9- 12 August 1972, Part 2, Review and Contributed Papers, U.S. Dep. Comm. NOAA Tech. Rep. NMFS SSRF-675.Google Scholar
  81. McFarlane, G.A. & R.J. Beamish. 1987. Validation of the dorsal spine method of age determination for spiny dogfish. pp. 287- 300. In: R.C. Summerfelt & G.E. Hall (ed.) Age and Growth of Fish, Iowa State University Press, Ames.Google Scholar
  82. McFarlane, G.A., R.S. Wydoski & E.D. Prince. 1990. Historical review of the development of external tags and marks. Amer. Fish. Soc. Symp. 7: 9–29.Google Scholar
  83. McLaughlin, R.H. & A.K. O'Gower. 1970. Underwater tagging of the Port-Jackson shark Heterodontus portusjacksoni. Bull. Inst. Oceanogr. (Monaco) 69: 3–10.Google Scholar
  84. McLaughlin, R.H. & A.K. O'Gower. 1971. Life history and underwater studies of a heterodont shark. Ecol. Monogr. 41: 271–289.Google Scholar
  85. Merson, R.R. 1998. Nursery grounds and maturation in the sandbar shark in theWestern North Atlantic. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Rhode Island, Kingston, 150 pp.Google Scholar
  86. Monan, G.E. 1982. Advances in tagging and tracking hatchery salmonids: coded wire tags, multiple-coded and miniature radio tags, and the passive integrated transponder tag. pp. 33–37. In: C.J. Sindermann (ed.) Proceedings of the Eleventh U.S.- Japan Meeting on Aquaculture, Salmon Enhancement, Tokyo, Japan, October 19- 20, 1982, NOAA Tech. Rep. NMFS 27.Google Scholar
  87. Morrissey, J.F. & S.H. Gruber. 1993. Home range of juvenile lemon sharks, Negaprion brevirostris. Copeia 1993: 425–434.Google Scholar
  88. Moulton, P.L., T.I. Walker & S. Saddlier.1992. Age and growth studies of gummy shark, Mustelus antarcticus Gunther, and school shark, Galeorhinus galeus (Linnaeus), from southern Australian waters. Aust. J. Mar. Freshwater Res. 43: 1241–1267.Google Scholar
  89. Murray, T. 1990. Fish-marking techniques in NewZealand. Amer. Fish. Soc. Symp. 7: 737–745.Google Scholar
  90. Myers, R.A., M.O. Hammill & G.B. Stenson. 1997. Using mark-recapture to estimate the numbers of a migrating stagestructured population. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 54: 2097–2104.Google Scholar
  91. Natanson, L.J. & G.M. Cailliet. 1990. Vertebral growth zone deposition in Pacific angel sharks. Copeia 1990: 1133–1145.Google Scholar
  92. Natanson, L.J., J.G. Casey, N.E. Kohler & T. Colket, IV. 1999 Growth of the tiger shark (Galeocerdo cuvier) in the western North Atlantic, based on tag returns and length-frequencies; and a note on the effects of tagging. U.S. Fish. Bull. 97: 944–953.Google Scholar
  93. Nelson, D.R. 1990. Telemetry studies in sharks: a review, with applications in resource management. pp. 239–256. In: H.L. Pratt, Jr., S.H. Gruber & T. Taniuchi (ed.) Elasmobranchs as Living Resources: Advances in the Biology, Ecology, Systematics, and the Status of the Fisheries, NOAA Tech. Rep. NMFS 90.Google Scholar
  94. O'Gower, A.K. & A.R. Nash. 1978. Dispersion of the Port Jackson shark in Australian waters. pp. 529–544. In: E.S. Hodgson & R.F. Mathewson (ed.) Sensory Biology of Sharks, Skates, and Rays, Office of Naval Research, Department of the Navy, Arlington.Google Scholar
  95. Olsen, A.M. 1953.Tagging of school shark, Galeorhinus australis (Macleay) (Carcharhanidae) in south-eastern Australian waters. Aust. J. Mar. Freshwater Res. 4: 95–104.Google Scholar
  96. Olsen, A.M. 1954. The biology, migration, and growth rate of the school shark, Galeorhinus australis (Macleay) (Carcharhanidae) in south-eastern Australian waters. Aust. J. Mar. Freshwater Res. 5: 353–410.Google Scholar
  97. Olsen, A.M. 1984. Synopsis of biological data on the school shark Galeorhinus australis (Macleay 1881). FAO Fisheries Synopsis No. 139, FIR/S139. 42 pp.Google Scholar
  98. Parsons, G.R. 1987. Life history and bioenergetics of the bonnethead shark, Sphyrna tiburo (Linnaeus): a comparison of two populations. Ph.D., University of South Florida, Tampa. 51 pp.Google Scholar
  99. Pepper, V.A. & M.F. O'Connell. 1983. Coded wire microtag applications in Newfoundland, the first three years. ICES C.M. 1983/M 15: 1–14.Google Scholar
  100. Pepperell, J.G. 1990. Australian cooperative game-fish tagging program, 1973- 1987: status and evaluation of tags. Amer. Fish. Soc. Symp. 7: 765–774.Google Scholar
  101. Pittenger, G.G. 1984. Movements, distribution, feeding and growth of the Pacific angel shark, Squatina californica, at Catalina Island, California. M.S. Thesis, California State University, Long Beach. 83 pp.Google Scholar
  102. Pollock, K.H., J.M. Hoenig & C.M. Jones. 1991. Estimation of fishing and natural mortality when a tagging study is combined with a creel survey or port sampling. Amer. Fish. Soc. Symp. 12: 423–434.Google Scholar
  103. Porter, T.R. 1979. A review of factors affecting the rate of return of tagged Atlantic salmon and effects of tagging. ICES C.M. 1979/M 15: 1–17.Google Scholar
  104. Pratt, H.L., Jr. & J.C. Carrier. 2001. A review of elasmobranch reproductive behavior with a case study on the nurse shark, Ginglymostoma cirratum. Env. Biol. Fish. 60: 157–188 (this volume).Google Scholar
  105. Pratt, H.L., Jr. & J.G. Casey. 1983. Age and growth of the shortfin mako, Isurus oxyrinchus, using four methods. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 40: 1944–1957.Google Scholar
  106. Prentice, E.F., T.A. Flagg, C.S. McCutcheon, D.F. Brastow & D.C. Cross. 1990. Equipment, methods, and an automated data-entry station for PIT tagging. Amer. Fish. Soc. Symp. 7: 335–340.Google Scholar
  107. Pyle, P., S.D. Anderson, A.P. Klimley & R.P. Henderson. 1996. Environmental factors affecting the occurrence and behavior of white sharks at the Farallon Islands, California. pp. 281–291. In: A.P. Klimley & D.G. Ainley (ed.) Great White Sharks: the Biology of Carcharodon carcharias, Academic Press, San Diego.Google Scholar
  108. Randall, J. E. 1977. Contribution to the biology of the whitetip reef shark (Triaenodon obesus). Pacific Sci. 31: 143–164.Google Scholar
  109. Raymond, H.L. 1974. Marking fishes and invertebrates. I. State of the art of fish branding. Mar. Fish. Rev. 36: 1–6.Google Scholar
  110. Ricker, W.E. 1975. Computation and interpretation of biological statistics of fish populations. Bull. Fish. Res. Board Can. 191. 382 pp.Google Scholar
  111. Rounsefell, G.A. & W.H. Everhart. 1953. Fishery science - its methods and applications. John Wiley & Sons, New York. 444 pp.Google Scholar
  112. Schwarz, C.J. & A.N. Arnason. 1990. Use of tag-recovery information in migration and movement studies.Amer. Fish. Soc. Symp. 7: 588–603.Google Scholar
  113. Sciarrotta, T.C. & D.R. Nelson. 1977. Diel behavior of the blue shark, Prionace glauca, near Santa Catalina Island, California. U.S. Fish Bull. 75: 519–528.Google Scholar
  114. Scott, E.L, E.D. Prince & C.D. Goodyear. 1990. History of the cooperative game fish tagging program in the Atlantic Ocean, Gulf of Mexico, and Caribbean Sea, 1954- 1987. Amer. Fish. Soc. Symp. 7: 841–853.Google Scholar
  115. Shafer, T.C. 1970. Migration and distribution of the spiny dog-fish (Squalus acanthias L.) in the western North Atlantic. M.S. Thesis, University of Rhode Island, Kingston, 45 pp.Google Scholar
  116. Skomal, G.B. 1990. Age and growth of the blue shark, Prionace glauca, in the North Atlantic. M.S. Thesis, University of Rhode Island, Kingston, 103 pp.Google Scholar
  117. Sluczanowski, P.W.R. 1988. The development of fish tagging projects. pp. 134–140. In: D.A. Hancock (ed.) Australian Society for Fish Biology Tagging Workshop, Sydney, 21- 22 July 1988, Bureau of Rural Resources Proceedings No. 5.Google Scholar
  118. Smith, S.E. 1984. Timing of vertebral-band deposition in tetracycline-injected leopard sharks. Trans. Amer. Fish. Soc. 113: 308–313.Google Scholar
  119. Smith, S.E. & N.J. Abramson. 1990. Leopard shark Triakis semifasciata distribution, mortality rate, yield, and stock replenishment estimates based on a tagging study in San Francisco Bay. U.S. Fish. Bull. 88: 371–381.Google Scholar
  120. Springer, S. 1960. Natural history of the sandbar shark Eulamia milberti. U.S. Fish. Bull. 61: 1–38.Google Scholar
  121. Stevens, J.D. 1976. First results of shark tagging in the north-east Atlantic, 1972-1975. J. Mar. Biol. Ass. U.K. 56: 929–937.Google Scholar
  122. Stevens, J.D. 1984. Life-history and ecology of sharks at Aldabra atoll, Indian Ocean. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B222: 79–106.Google Scholar
  123. Stevens, J.D. 1990. Further results from a tagging study of pelagic sharks in the north-east Atlantic. J. Mar. Biol. Ass. U.K. 70: 707–720.Google Scholar
  124. Stevens, J.D., G.J. West & K.J. McLoughlin. 2000. Movements, recapture patterns, and factors affecting the return rate of carcharhinid and other sharks tagged off northern Australia. Mar. Freshwater Res. 51: 127–141.Google Scholar
  125. Strasburg, D.W. 1958.Distribution, abundance, and habits of pelagic sharks in the central Pacific Ocean. 1958. U.S. Fish. Bull. 58: 335–361.Google Scholar
  126. Strong, W.R., Jr., R.C. Murphy, B.D. Bruce & D.R. Nelson. 1992. Movements and associated observations of bait-attracted white sharks, Carcharodon carcharias: a preliminary report. Aust. J. Mar. Freshwater Res. 43: 13–20.Google Scholar
  127. Strong, W.R., Jr., B.D. Bruce, D.R. Nelson & R.D. Murphy. 1996. Population dynamics of white sharks in Spencer Gulf, South Australia. pp. 401–414. In: A.P. Klimley & D.G. Ainley (ed.) Great White Sharks: the Biology of Carcharodon carcharias, Academic Press, San Diego.Google Scholar
  128. Talent, L.G. 1985. The occurrence, seasonal distribution, and reproductive condition of elasmobranch fishes in Elkhorn Slough, California.Calif. Fish Game 71: 210–219.Google Scholar
  129. Templeman, W. 1944. The life-history of the spiny dogfish (Squalus acanthias) and the vitamin A values of dogfish liver oil. Newfoundl. Dept. Nat. Res. Bull. (Fish.) 15: 1–102.Google Scholar
  130. Templeman, W. 1954. Migrations of spiny dogfish tagged in Newfoundland waters. J. Fish. Res. Board. Can. 11: 351–354.Google Scholar
  131. Templeman, W. 1976. Transatlantic migrations of spiny dogfish (Squalus acanthias). J. Fish. Res. Board Can. 33: 2605–2609.Google Scholar
  132. Templeman, W. 1984. Migrations of spiny dogfish, Squalus acanthias, and recapture success from tagging in the Newfoundland area, 1963- 65. J. Northw. Atl. Fish. Sci. 5: 47–53.Google Scholar
  133. Thorson, T.B. 1971. Movement of bull sharks, Carcharhinus leucas, between Caribbean Sea and Lake Nicaragua demonstrated by tagging. Copeia 1971: 336–338.Google Scholar
  134. Thorson, T.B. & E.J. Lacy, Jr. 1982. Age, growth rate and longevity of Carcharhinus leucas estimated from tagging and vertebral rings. Copeia 1982: 110–116.Google Scholar
  135. Tricas, T.C. 1977.Food habits, movements, and seasonal abundance of the blue shark, Prionace glauca (Carcharhinidae), in southern California waters. M.S. Thesis, California State University, Long Beach. 79 pp.Google Scholar
  136. Tucker, R. 1985. Age validation studies on the spines of the spurdog (Squalus acanthias) using tetracycline. J. Mar. Biol. Assoc., U.K. 65: 641–651.Google Scholar
  137. van der Elst, R.P. 1990. Marine fish tagging in South Africa. Amer. Fish. Soc. Symp. 7: 854–862.Google Scholar
  138. Walker, T.I. 1992. Fishery simulation model for sharks applied to the gummy shark, Mustelus antarcticus Gunther, from southern Australian waters. Aust. J. Mar. Freshwater Res. 43: 195–212.Google Scholar
  139. West, G.J. & J.D. Stevens. 2001. Archival tagging of school sharks, Galeorhinus galeus, in Australia: initial results. Env. Biol. Fish. 60: 283–298 (this volume).Google Scholar
  140. Williams, H. & A.H. Schaap. 1992. Preliminary results of a study into the incidental mortality of sharks in gill-nets in two Tasmanian shark nursery areas. Aust. J. Mar. Freshwater Res. 43: 237–250.Google Scholar
  141. Xiao, Y. 1994. Growth models with corrections for the retardative effects of tagging. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 51: 263–267.Google Scholar
  142. Xiao, Y. 1996. A framework for evaluating experimental designs for estimating rates of fish movement from tag recoveries. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 53: 1272–1280.Google Scholar
  143. Xiao, Y., L.P. Brown, T.I. Walker & A.E. Punt. 1999a. Estimation of instantaneous rates of tag shedding for school shark, Galeorhinus galeus, and gummy shark, Mustelus antarcticus, by conditional likelihood. U.S. Fish. Bull. 97: 170–184.Google Scholar
  144. Xiao, Y., J.D. Stevens & G.J. West. 1999b. Estimation of fishing and natural mortalities from tag experiments with exact or grouped times at liberty. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 56: 868–874.Google Scholar
  145. Yamashita, D.T. & K.D. Waldron. 1958. An all-plastic dart-type fish tag. Calif. Fish Game 44: 311–317.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nancy E. Kohler
    • 1
  • Patricia A. Turner
    • 2
  1. 1.Northeast Fisheries Science CenterNOAA/NMFSNarragansettU.S.A.
  2. 2.Northeast Fisheries Science CenterNOAA/NMFSNarragansettU.S.A.

Personalised recommendations