Environmental Biology of Fishes

, Volume 59, Issue 2, pp 199–209

Effects of Group Membership and Size Distribution within a Group on Growth Rates of Juvenile Sablefish Anoplopoma fimbria

  • Susan M. Sogard
  • Bori L. Olla


Group membership can confer both advantages and disadvantages to growth in juvenile fishes. The balance between costs and benefits of social interactions can shift depending on such factors as the composition of the group (density and size disparity) and the availability of food. We examined the effect of these factors on absolute growth and growth depensation in juvenile sablefish, Anoplopoma fimbria. Increasing density and increasing size disparity had little influence on absolute growth rates of juvenile sablefish and the effects of these social factors were not modified by ration level. In experiments testing density effects, absolute growth did not differ among groups of 1, 3, or 10 fish held at high rations, but at low rations single fish exhibited a different pattern of size-dependent growth compared to fish in groups. In experiments testing disparity effects, absolute growth did not differ between groups with an even size distribution and groups with a mixed size distribution. The relative size of an individual within a group, i.e., small, medium, or large, also did not modify growth, despite evidence of higher chasing behavior in mixed size distributions. Although the growth of small fish was not diminished in the presence of large fish, negative impacts of size disparity were expressed in high levels of cannibalism, which occurred in 42% of groups with a mixed size distribution. Significant growth depensation over time occurred in the density experiment, but not in the size disparity experiment, possibly due to the shorter duration of the latter experiment. We suggest that growth depensation was generated by individual variability in growth capacity rather than social effects on growth rates. Schooling behavior, measured by group cohesion indices, increased with fish size and was higher in groups with an even vs. a mixed size distribution. These results for sablefish are consistent with other schooling species in which growth variability is determined by exploitative competition and/or genetic variability in growth capacity rather than interference competition.

fish behavior schooling size disparity density growth food availability 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References cited

  1. Boehlert, G.W. & M.M. Yoklavich. 1985. Larval and juvenile growth of sablefish, Anoplopoma fimbria, as determined from otolith increments. U.S. Fish. Bull. 83: 475-481.Google Scholar
  2. Boujard, T., M. Jourdan, M. Kentouri & P. Divanach. 1996. Diel feeding activity and the effect of time-restricted self-feeding on growth and feed conversion in European sea bass. Aquaculture 139: 117-127.Google Scholar
  3. Carter, C.G., C.J. Purser, D.F. Houlihan & P. Thomas. 1996. The effect of decreased ration on feeding hierarchies in groups of greenback flounder (Rhombosolea tapirina: Teleostei). J. Mar. Biol. Ass. U.K. 76: 505-516.Google Scholar
  4. Clark, C.W. & M. Mangel. 1986. The evolutionary advantages of group foraging. Theor. Pop. Biol. 30: 45-75.Google Scholar
  5. Clark, P.J. & F.C. Evans. 1954. Distance to nearest neighbor as a measure of spatial relationships in populations. Ecology 35: 445-453.Google Scholar
  6. Cui, Y. & R.J. Wootton. 1989. Grouping fails to affect the growth and energy budget of a cyprinid, Phoxinus phoxinus(L.). J. Fish Biol. 35: 795-798.Google Scholar
  7. Davis, M.W. & B.L. Olla. 1987. Aggression and variation in growth of chum salmon (Oncorhynchus keta) juveniles in seawater: effects of limited rations. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 44: 192-197.Google Scholar
  8. Delco, E.A. & R.J. Byers. 1963. Reduced metabolic rates of two cyprinid fishes. Copeia 1963: 176-178.Google Scholar
  9. Dong, Q. & D.L. DeAngelis. 1998. Consequences of cannibalism and competition for food in a smallmouth bass population: an individual-based modeling study. Trans. Amer. Fish. Soc. 127: 174-191.Google Scholar
  10. Eggers, D.M. 1976. Theoretical effect of schooling by planktivorous fish predators on rate of prey consumption. J. Fish. Res. Board Can. 33: 1964-1971.Google Scholar
  11. Eklöv, P. 1992. Group foraging versus solitary foraging efficiency in piscivorous predators: the perch, Perca fluviatilis, and pike, Esox lucius, patterns. Anim. Behav. 44: 313-326.Google Scholar
  12. Folkvord, A. & H. Otterå. 1993. Effects of initial size distribution, day length, and feeding frequency on growth, survival, and cannibalism in juvenile Atlantic cod (Gadus morhuaL.). Aquaculture 114: 243-260.Google Scholar
  13. Grover, J.J. & B.L. Olla. 1987. Effects of an El Niño event on the food habits of larval sablefish, Anoplopoma fimbria, off Oregon and Washington. U.S. Fish. Bull. 85: 71-79.Google Scholar
  14. Houde, E.D. 1975. Effects of stocking density and food density on survival, growth and yield of laboratory-reared larvae of sea bream Archosargus rhomboidalis(L.) (Sparidae). J. Fish Biol. 7: 115-127.Google Scholar
  15. Imsland, A.K., T. Nilsen & A. Folkvord. 1998. Stochastic simulation of size variation in turbot: possible causes analysed with an individual-based model. J. Fish Biol. 53: 237-258.Google Scholar
  16. Jobling, M. 1985. Physiological and social constraints on growth of fish with special reference to Arctic charr, Salvelinus alpinusL. Aquaculture 44: 83-90.Google Scholar
  17. Jobling, M. & B.M. Baardvik. 1994. The influence of environmental manipulations on inter-and intra-individual variation in food acquisition and growth performance of Arctic charr, Salvelinus alpinus. J. Fish Biol. 44: 1069-1087.Google Scholar
  18. Jobling, M., J. Koskela & S. Winberg. 1999. Feeding and growth of whitefish fed restricted and abundant rations: influences on growth heterogeneity and brain serotonergic activity. J. Fish Biol. 54: 437-449.Google Scholar
  19. Jobling, M. & T.-G. Reinsnes. 1986. Physiological and social constraints on growth of Arctic charr, Salvelinus alpinusL.: an investigation of factors leading to stunting. J. Fish Biol. 28: 379-384.Google Scholar
  20. Kanda, T. & Y. Itazawa. 1978. Group effects on physiological and ecological phenomena in fish-II. Group effect on the growth of the medaka. Bull. Japan. Soc. Sci. Fish. 44: 1197-1200.Google Scholar
  21. Kawanabe, H. 1969. The significance of social structure in production of the 'ayu', Plecoglossus altivelis. pp. 243-251. In: T.G. Northcote (ed.) Symposium on Salmon and Trout in Streams, H.R. MacMillan Lectures in Fisheries, University of British Columbia Institute of Fisheries, Vancouver.Google Scholar
  22. Koebele, B.P. 1985. Growth and the size hierarchy effect: an experimental assessment of three proposed mechanisms; activity differences, disproportional food acquisition, physiological stress. Env. Biol. Fish. 12: 181-188.Google Scholar
  23. Laidig, T.E., P.B. Adams & W.M. Samiere. 1997. Feeding habits of sablefish, Anoplopoma fimbria, off the coast of Oregon and California. NOAA Tech. Rep. NMFS 130: 65-79.Google Scholar
  24. Li, H.W. & R.W. Brocksen. 1977. Approaches to the analysis of energetic costs of intraspecific competition for space by rainbow trout (Salmo gairdneri). J. Fish Biol. 11: 329-341.Google Scholar
  25. Magnuson, J.J. 1962. An analysis of aggressive behavior, growth, and competition for food and space in medaka (Oryzias latipes(Pisces, Cyprinodontidae)). Can. J. Zool. 40: 313-363.Google Scholar
  26. Magurran, A.E. & T.J. Pitcher. 1983. Foraging, timidity and shoal size in minnows and goldfish. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 12: 147-152.Google Scholar
  27. McCarthy, I.D., C.G. Carter & D.F. Houlihan. 1992. The effect of feeding hierarchy on individual variability in daily feeding of rainbow trout, Oncorhynchus mykiss(Walbaum). J. Fish Biol. 41: 257-263.Google Scholar
  28. Metcalfe, N.B., F.A. Huntingford, W.D. Graham & J.E. Thorpe. 1989. Early social status and the development of life-history strategies in Atlantic salmon. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 236: 7-19.Google Scholar
  29. Nijaguna, G.M., S.R. Reddy & K. Shakuntala. 1986. Combined effects of feeding frequency and population density on the food utilization of Poecilia reticulata(Peters). Pol. Arch. Hydrobiol. 33: 221-228.Google Scholar
  30. Olla, B.L., M.W. Davis & C.H. Ryer. 1998. Understanding how the hatchery environment represses or promotes the development of behavioral survival skills. Bull. Mar. Sci. 62: 531-550.Google Scholar
  31. Olla, B.L. & C. Samet. 1974. Fish-to-fish attraction and the facilitation of feeding behavior as mediated by visual stimuli in striped mullet, Mugil cephalus. J. Fish. Res. Board Can. 31: 1621-1630.Google Scholar
  32. Parker, F.R., Jr. 1973. Reduced metabolic rates in fishes as a result of induced schooling. Trans. Amer. Fish. Soc. 102: 125-131.Google Scholar
  33. Peuhkuri, N., E. Ranta, S.-K. Juvonen & K. Lindstrom. 1995. Schooling affects growth in the three-spined stickleback, Gasterosteus aculeatus. J. Fish Biol. 46: 221-226.Google Scholar
  34. Peuhkuri, N., E. Ranta & P. Seppa. 1997. Size-assortative schooling in free-ranging sticklebacks. Ethology 103: 318-324.Google Scholar
  35. Pitcher, T.J. & J.K. Parrish. 1993. Functions of shoaling behaviour in teleosts. pp. 363-439. In: T.J. Pitcher (ed.) Behaviour of Teleost Fishes, Chapman & Hall, London.Google Scholar
  36. Pitcher, T.J., A.E. Magurran & I.J. Winfield. 1982. Fish in larger shoals find food faster. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 10: 149-151.Google Scholar
  37. Post, J.R., M.R.S. Johannes & D.J. McQueen. 1997. Evidence of density-dependent cohort splitting in age-0 yellowperch (Perca flavescens): potential behavioural mechanisms and population-level consequences. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 54: 867-875.Google Scholar
  38. Purdom, C.E., A. Jones & R.F. Lincoln. 1972. Cultivation trials with turbot (Scophthalmus maximus). Aquaculture 1: 213-230.Google Scholar
  39. Ranta, E. & V. Kaitala. 1991. School size affects individual feeding success in three-spined sticklebacks (Gasterosteus aculeatusL.). J. Fish Biol. 39: 733-737.Google Scholar
  40. Rubenstein, D.I. 1981. Individual variation and competition in the Everglades pygmy sunfish. J. Anim. Ecol. 50: 337-350.Google Scholar
  41. Ryer, C.H. & B.L. Olla. 1995. The influence of food distribution upon the development of aggressive and competitive behaviour in juvenile chum salmon, Oncorhynchus keta. J. Fish Biol. 46: 264-272.Google Scholar
  42. Ryer, C.H. & B.L. Olla. 1996. Growth depensation and aggression in laboratory reared coho salmon: the effect of food distribution and ration size. J. Fish Biol. 48: 686-694.Google Scholar
  43. Ryer, C.H. & B.L. Olla. 1997. Altered search speed and growth: social versus independent foraging in two pelagic juvenile fishes. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 153: 273-281.Google Scholar
  44. Sampath, K. & T.J. Pandian. 1985. Effects of size hierarchy on surface behaviour and conversion rate in an air-breathing fish Channa striatus. Physiol. Behav. 34: 51-55.Google Scholar
  45. Shenker, J.M. 1988. Oceanographic associations of neustonic larval and juvenile fishes and dungeness crab megalopae off Oregon. U.S. Fish. Bull. 86: 299-317.Google Scholar
  46. Shenker, J.M. & B.L. Olla. 1986. Laboratory feeding and growth of juvenile sablefish, Anoplopoma fimbria. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 43: 930-937.Google Scholar
  47. Smith, H.T., C.B. Schreck & D.E. Maughan. 1978. Effect of population density and feeding rate on the fathead minnow (Pimephales promelas). J. Fish Biol. 12: 449-455.Google Scholar
  48. Sogard, S.M. & B.L. Olla. 1994. The potential for intracohort cannibalism in age-0 walleye pollock, Theragra chalcogramma, as determined under laboratory conditions. Env. Biol. Fish. 39: 183-190.Google Scholar
  49. Sogard, S.M. & B.L. Olla. 1998. Behavior of juvenile sablefish, Anoplopoma fimbria(Pallas), in a thermal gradient: balancing food and temperature requirements. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 222: 43-58.Google Scholar
  50. Sokal, R.R. & F.J. Rohlf. 1981. Biometry, 2nd edition. W.H. Freeman Co., New York. 859 pp.Google Scholar
  51. Stirling, H.P. 1977. Growth, food utilization and effect of social interaction in the European bass Dicentrarchus labrax. Mar. Biol. 40: 173-184.Google Scholar
  52. Valerio, M. & G.W. Barlow. 1986. Ontogeny of young Midas cichlids: a study of feeding, filial cannibalism and agonism in relation to differences in size. Biol. Behav. 11: 16-35.Google Scholar
  53. Wankowski, J.W.J. & J.E. Thorpe. 1979. Spatial distribution and feeding in Atlantic salmon, Salmo salarL., juveniles. J. Fish Biol. 14: 239-247.Google Scholar
  54. Yamagishi, H. 1969. Postembryonal growth and its variability of the three marine fishes with special reference to the mechanism of growth variation in fishes. Res. Popul. Ecol. (Kyoto) 11: 14-33.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • Susan M. Sogard
    • 1
  • Bori L. Olla
    • 2
  1. 1.Alaska Fisheries Science Center, National Marine Fisheries ServiceHatfield Marine Science CenterNewportU.S.A.
  2. 2.Alaska Fisheries Science CenterNational Marine Fisheries Service, Hatfield Marine Science CenterNewportU.S.A.

Personalised recommendations