Environmental Biology of Fishes

, Volume 59, Issue 1, pp 69–77 | Cite as

Daily Cleaning Activity and Diversity of Clients of the Barber Goby, Elacatinus figaro, on Rocky Reefs in Southeastern Brazil

  • Ivan Sazima
  • Cristina Sazima
  • Ronaldo B. Francini-Filho
  • Rodrigo L. Moura

Abstract

Gobies of the genus Elacatinus are regarded as the most specialised cleaner fishes in the western tropical Atlantic, yet there are no studies on these cleaners in the southern portion of West Atlantic. We studied the diversity of clients and the daily cleaning activity of the barber goby, Elacatinus figaro, on rocky reefs in southeastern Brazil (23–24°S). A total of 34 fish client species in 16 families were recorded over 484 cleaning events. The most frequent clients were damselfishes, Pomacentridae (37.9% of cleaning events) and grunts, Haemulidae (16.9%). Planktivores were the most frequently attended trophic category, and two species in that category accounted for about a half (44%) of the total cleaning events. Size of clients ranged 4.5–55 cm and most individuals were medium-sized (12–30 cm); as the barber goby ranged 2–4.5 cm, clients were 1.5 to 15 times larger than the cleaner was. Cleaning activity started at dawn and ended shortly before nightfall, the highest frequency of interactions occurring at early morning (nocturnal clients) and mid-afternoon (diurnal clients). By midday the frequency of cleaning events decreased and their duration increased. A total of 109±3 cleaning events and 30±1 min of cleaning activity were estimated per cleaning station per day, both figures low when compared to those recorded for cleaner fishes in tropical areas of the western Atlantic and Indo-Pacific.

Gobiidae cleaning symbiosis cleaning stations fish clients feeding habits planktivores western South Atlantic 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References cited

  1. Altmann, J. 1974. Observational study of behavior: sampling methods. Behavior 49: 227–265.Google Scholar
  2. Arnal, C. & I.M. Côté. 1998. Interactions between cleaning gobies and territorial damselfish on coral reefs. Anim. Behav. 55: 1429–1442.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Collette, B.B. & F.H. Talbot. 1972. Activity patterns of coral reef fishes with emphasis on nocturnal-diurnal changeover. Bull. Nat. Hist. Mus. Los Angeles Co. 14: 98–124.Google Scholar
  4. Colin, P. 1975. The neon gobies. T.F.H. Publications, Neptune City. 304 pp.Google Scholar
  5. Corredor, L. 1978. Notes on the behavior and ecology of the new fish cleaner shrimp Brachycarpus biunguiculatus (Lucas) (Decapoda Natantia, Palaemonidae). Crustaceana 35: 35–40.Google Scholar
  6. Côté, I.M., C. Arnal & J.D. Reynolds. 1998. Variation in posing behaviour among fish species visiting cleaning stations. J. Fish Biol. 53 Supplement A: 256–266.Google Scholar
  7. Darcy, G.H., E. Maisel & T.C. Ogden. 1974. Cleaning preferences of the gobies Gobiosoma evelynae and G. prochilos and the juvenile wrasse Thalassoma bifasciatum. Copeia 1974: 375–379.Google Scholar
  8. Feder, H.M. 1966. Cleaning symbiosis in the marine environment. pp. 327–380. In: S.M. Henry (ed.) Symbiosis, Volume 1, Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  9. Francini-Filho, R.B., R.L. Moura & I. Sazima. 2000. Cleaning by the wrasse Thalassoma noronhanum, with two records of predation by its grouper client Cephalopholis fulva. J. Fish Biol. 56: 802–809.Google Scholar
  10. Gorlick, D.L. 1984. Preference for ectoparasite-infected host fishes by the Hawaiian cleaning wrasse, Labroides phthirophagus (Labridae). Copeia 1984: 758–762.Google Scholar
  11. Grutter, A.S. 1995. Relationship between cleaning rates and ectoparasite loads in coral reef fishes. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 118: 51–58.Google Scholar
  12. Grutter, A.S. 1996. Parasite removal rate by the cleaner wrasse Labroides dimidiatus. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 130: 61–70.Google Scholar
  13. Grutter, A.S. & R. Poulin. 1998. Cleaning on coral reefs by the wrasse Labroides dimidiatus: influence of client body size and phylogeny. Copeia 1998: 120–127.Google Scholar
  14. Hiatt, R.W. & D.W. Strasburg. 1960. Ecological relationships of the fish fauna on coral reefs of the Marshall Islands. Ecol. Monogr. 30: 65–127.Google Scholar
  15. Hobson, E.S. 1974. Feeding relationships of teleostean fishes on coral reefs in Kona, Hawaii. U.S. Fish. Bull. 72: 915–1031.Google Scholar
  16. Humann, P. 1994. Reef fish identification: Florida, Caribbean, Bahamas, 2nd ed. Vaughan Press, Orlando. 396 pp.Google Scholar
  17. Johnson, W.S. & P. Ruben. 1988. Cleaning behavior of Bodianus rufus, Thalassoma bifasciatum, Gobiosoma evelynae, and Periclimenes pedersoni along a depth gradient at Salt River Submarine Canyon, St. Croix. Env. Biol. Fish. 23: 225–232.Google Scholar
  18. Lehner, P.N. 1979. Handbook of ethological methods. Garland STPM Press, New York. 403 pp.Google Scholar
  19. Limbaugh, C. 1961. Cleaning symbiosis. Sci. Amer. 205: 42–49.Google Scholar
  20. Losey, G.S. 1971. Communication between fishes in cleaning symbiosis. pp. 45–76. In: T.C. Cheng (ed.) Aspects of the Biology of Symbiosis, University Park Press, Baltimore.Google Scholar
  21. Losey, G.S. 1974. Cleaning symbiosis in Puerto Rico with comparison to the tropical Pacific. Copeia 1974: 960–970.Google Scholar
  22. Losey, G.S. 1979. Fish cleaning symbiosis: proximate causes of host behaviour. Anim. Behav. 27: 669–685.Google Scholar
  23. Losey, G.S. 1987. Cleaning symbiosis. Symbiosis 4: 229–258.Google Scholar
  24. Losey, G.S. 1993. Knowledge of proximate causes aids our understanding of function and evolutionary history. Mar. Behav. Physiol. 23: 175–186.Google Scholar
  25. Nelson, J.S. 1994. Fishes of the world, 3rd ed. John Wiley & Sons, New York. 600 pp.Google Scholar
  26. Potts, G.W. 1973. The ethology of Labroides dimidiatus (Cuv. & Val.) (Labridae) on Aldabra. Anim. Behav. 21: 250–291.Google Scholar
  27. Randall, J.E. 1967. Food habits of reef fishes of the West Indies. Stud. Trop. Oceanogr. 5: 665–847.Google Scholar
  28. Randall. J.E. 1983. Caribbean reef fishes, 2nd ed. T.F.H. Publications, Neptune City. 350 pp.Google Scholar
  29. Sale, P.F. (ed.) 1991. The ecology of fishes on coral reefs. Academic Press, San Diego. 754 pp.Google Scholar
  30. Sazima, I. & R.L. Moura. 2000. Shark, Carcharhinus perezi, cleaned by the goby, Elacatinus randalli, at Fernando de Noronha Archipelago, western South Atlantic. Copeia 2000: 297–299.Google Scholar
  31. Sazima, I., R.L. Moura & R.S. Rosa. 1997. Elacatinus figaro sp. n. (Perciformes: Gobiidae), a new cleaner goby from the coast of Brazil. Aqua J. Ichthyol. Aq. Biol. 2: 33–38.Google Scholar
  32. Sazima, I., R.L Moura & J.L Gasparini. 1998. The wrasse Halichoeres cyanocephalus (Labridae) as a specialized cleaner. Bull. Mar. Sci. 63: 605–610.Google Scholar
  33. Sazima, I., R.L. Moura & C. Sazima. 1999. Cleaning activity of juvenile angelfish, Pomacanthus paru, on the reefs of the Abrolhos Archipelago, western South Atlantic. Env. Biol. Fish. 56: 399–407.Google Scholar
  34. Van Tassel, J.L., A. Brito & S.A. Bortone. 1994. Cleaning behavior among marine fishes and invertebrates in the Canary Islands. Cybium 18: 117–127.Google Scholar
  35. Wicksten, M.K. 1995. Associations of fishes and their cleaners on coral reefs of Bonaire, Netherlands Antilles. Copeia 1995: 477–481.Google Scholar
  36. Wicksten, M.K. 1998. Behaviour of cleaners and their client fishes at Bonaire, Netherlands Antilles. J. Nat. Hist. 32: 13–30.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ivan Sazima
    • 1
  • Cristina Sazima
    • 2
    • 3
  • Ronaldo B. Francini-Filho
    • 2
    • 4
  • Rodrigo L. Moura
    • 2
  1. 1.Departamento de Zoologia and Museu de História NaturalUniversidade Estadual de CampinasCampinas, São PauloBrasil
  2. 2.Departamento de Zoologia and Museu de História Natural, Caixa Postal 6109Universidade Estadual de CampinasCampinas, São PauloBrasil
  3. 3.Departamento de ZoologiaUniversidade Estadual PaulistaRio Claro, São PauloBrasil
  4. 4.Seção de Peixes, Museu de Zoologia da Universidade de São PauloSão Paulo, São PauloBrasil

Personalised recommendations