Journal of Cultural Economics

, Volume 24, Issue 3, pp 205–224 | Cite as

Why Do Companies Sponsor Arts Events? Some Evidence and a Proposed Classification

  • John O'Hagan
  • Denice Harvey
Article

Abstract

Corporate philanthropy towards the arts isof long standing in the United States. There is nosuch tradition in Europe, but corporate sponsorship ofthe arts has been in place since the 1960s (seeFrémion, 1994). This paper will discuss thedifferences and similarities between these two formsof business support to the arts and then concentrateprimarily on corporate sponsorship. The motivationsfor companies to sponsor arts events are examined inthe context both of the literature relating to themotivations for corporate philanthropy and corporatepromotional/marketing expenditure. Results from asurvey of 69 companies that had sponsored 129 artsevents in Ireland are presented and compared to thelimited results from similar surveys elsewhere. Itis suggested that the motivations for such sponsorshipcan usefully be reduced to four: promotion ofimage/name, supply-chain cohesion, rent-seeking andnon-monetary benefit to managers/owners. The evidence for this from the survey, either directly available orimplicit in the responses to some other questions, issignificant.

arts sponsorship and promotion rent-seeking supply-chain cohesion corporate philanthropy special events 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abratt, R., Clayton, B., and Pitt, L. (1987) “Corporate Objectives in Sports Sponsorship”. International Journal of Advertising 6: 299-311.Google Scholar
  2. Burlingame, D. and Frishkoff, P. (1996) “How Does Firm Size Affect Corporate Philanthropy?”, in Burglingame and Young (eds.), pp. 86-104.Google Scholar
  3. Burlingame, D. and Young, D. (eds.) (1996) Corporate Philanthropy at the Crossroads. Indiana University Press, Bloomington and Indianapolis.Google Scholar
  4. Colbert, F., Nantel, J., and Poole, W. (1994) Marketing Culture and the Arts. Morin, Montreal.Google Scholar
  5. Frémion, Y. (1994) Report on Patronage and Sponsorship in Culture and Sport. Committee on Culture, Youth, Education and the Media, European Parliament, Strasbourg.Google Scholar
  6. Harvey D. (1999) “Corporate Sponsorship of the Arts in Ireland”. Unpublished Masters thesis, Trinity College, Dublin.Google Scholar
  7. Hitters, E. (1996) “Art Support as Corporate Responsibility in the Postindustrial City of Rotterdam, The Netherlands”, in Martorella (ed.), pp. 195-166.Google Scholar
  8. Hoek, J., Gendall, P., and West, R. (1990) “The Role of Sponsorship in Marketing Planning: Selected New Zealand Companies”. New Zealand Journal of Business 12: 87-95.Google Scholar
  9. Kirchberg, V. (1996) “Emerging Corporate Arts Support: Potsdam, Eastern Germany”, in Martorella (ed.), Art and Business: An International Perspective on Sponsorship, pp. 119-130.Google Scholar
  10. Kotler, P. and Scheff, J. (1997) Standing Room Only: Strategies for Marketing the Performing Arts. Harvard Business School Press, Boston.Google Scholar
  11. Kushner, R. (1996) “Positive Rationales for Corporate Arts Support”, in Martorella (ed.), Art and Business: An International Perspective on Sponsorship, pp. 235-246.Google Scholar
  12. Martorella, R. (ed.) (1996) Art and Business: An International Perspective on Sponsorship. Praeger, Westport Connecticut.Google Scholar
  13. Meenaghan, J. and Flood, P. (1983) Commercial Sponsorship: The Misunderstood Corporate Art. Corporate Image, Dublin.Google Scholar
  14. Mescon, T. and Tilson, D. (1987) “Corporate Philanthropy: A Strategic Approach to the Bottom-Line”. California Management Review XXIX (winter): 49-61.Google Scholar
  15. O'Hagan, J. (1998) The State and the Arts: An Analysis of Key Economic Policy Issues in Europe and the United States. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham.Google Scholar
  16. Schuster, M. (1997) “Review” (of Martorella, 1996). Journal of Cultural Economics 21: 153-156.Google Scholar
  17. Tate, N. (1987) Sponsorship. Longman Intelligence Reports, London.Google Scholar
  18. Turgeon, N. and Colbert, F. (1992) “The Decision Process Involved in Corporate Sponsorship for the Arts”. Journal of Cultural Economics 16: 41-51.Google Scholar
  19. Useem, M. (1987). “Corporate Philanthropy”, in W. Powell (ed.), The Nonprofit Sector: A Research Handbook, Yale University Press, New Haven, pp. 340-359.Google Scholar
  20. Useem, M. and Kutner, S. (1986) “Corporate Contributions to Culture and the Arts: The Organization of Giving and the Influence of the Chief Executive Officer and of Other Firms on Company Contributions in Massachusetts”, in P. Di Maggio (ed.), Nonprofit Enterprise in the Arts: Studies in Mission and Constraint, Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 93-112.Google Scholar
  21. Waters, I. (1989) Entertainment, Arts and Cultural Services. Longman, London.Google Scholar
  22. Young, D. and Burlingame, D. (1996) “Paradigm Lost: Research toward a New Understanding of Corporate Philanthropy”, in Burlingame and Young (eds.), Corporate Philanthropy at the Crossroads, pp. 158-176.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • John O'Hagan
    • 1
  • Denice Harvey
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of EconomicsTrinity College DublinIreland

Personalised recommendations