Innovative Higher Education

, Volume 25, Issue 3, pp 165–181 | Cite as

Adult-Centered Practices: Benchmarking Study in Higher Education

  • Susan Mancuso


Adult student enrollment in higher education is approaching 50%, yet most college and university practices have been designed for younger, traditional age students. This study used an innovative benchmarking research methodology, including surveys and site visits, to identify best practices at selected adult-centered institutions. The findings were distilled into one overarching theme and thirteen related themes. The overarching theme, “Adult learner centered institutions have a culture in which flexibility, individuation, and adult-centered learning drive institutional practice” reflects the pervasive student-centeredness of the colleges. The thirteen findings and examples of practices from the colleges that were studied can serve as guideposts to colleges and universities seeking to meet the needs of adult students.

adult education benchmarking student-centeredness 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Alstete, J. W. (1995). Benchmarking in higher education: Adapting best practices to improve quality. (ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report No. 5) Washington, D.C.: George Washington University, Graduate School of Education and Human Development.Google Scholar
  2. Arbuckle, J., & Gale, D. (1996). A comparison of the psychosocial developmental levels of traditional freshman and nontraditional freshman students: Are they really different? NACADA Journal, 16(1), 21–27.Google Scholar
  3. Aslanian, C. B., & Brickell, H. M. (1980). Americans in transition: Life changes as reasons for adult learning. New York: College Entrance Examination Board.Google Scholar
  4. Benchmarking being embraced. (1998, August). Quality, 37, 14.Google Scholar
  5. Benchmarking: Pure and simple. (1997). Houston, American Productivity and Quality Center.Google Scholar
  6. Brookfield, S. D. (1995). Becoming a critically reflective teacher. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  7. Chickering, A. W., & Gamson, Z. F. (1987). Seven principles for good practice in undergraduate education. American Association of Higher Education Bulletin, 39(7), 3–7.Google Scholar
  8. Chickering, A. W., & Reisser, L. (1993). Education and identity. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  9. Commission for a Nation of Lifelong Learners. (1997, November). A nation learning: Vision for the 21st century. Albany, NY: Regents College.Google Scholar
  10. Gardner, H. (1984). Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligences. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  11. Hussar, W. J. (1998). Projections of education statistics to 2008. National Center for Education Statistics Report NCES 98-017. Washington, D.C.: Office of Educational Research and Improvement, U.S. Department of Education.Google Scholar
  12. Jackson, N. (1998). Review of the book Benchmarking in higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 13, 107–109.Google Scholar
  13. Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  14. Lopez, K. (1999). [Transcript of interviews at Empire State College]. Unpublished data. Mancuso, S., Strange, J., & Zakos, P. (1999). Draft report of the ALFI study. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
  15. Merriam, S., & Caffarella, R. (1999). Learning in adulthood. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  16. Naretto, J. A. (1995). Adult student retention: The influence of internal and external communities. NASPA Journal, 32, 90–97.Google Scholar
  17. Polson, C. (1994). O'Banion's advising model and the adult student. 14(2), 96–103.Google Scholar
  18. Principles of good practice for alternative and external degree programs for adults. (1990). Washington, DC: American Council on Education.Google Scholar
  19. Schlossberg, N.K., Lynch, A.Q., & Chickering, A. W. (1989). Improving higher education environments for adults. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  20. Senter, M. S., & Senter, R. Jr. (1998). A comparative study of traditional and nontraditional students' identities and needs. NASPA Journal, 35, 270–280.Google Scholar
  21. Shields, N. (1994). Retention, academic success, and progress among adult, returning students: A comparison of the effects of institutional and external factors. NACADA Journal, 14, 13–24.Google Scholar
  22. Sperling, J., & Tucker, R. (1997). For-profit higher education. Transaction Books. SUNY Empire State College 1998-2000 bulletin (1998). Saratoga Springs, NY.Google Scholar
  23. Tools and techniques of benchmarking (1999). Houston: American Productivity and Quality Center.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Human Sciences Press, Inc. 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Susan Mancuso
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Adult and Higher EducationWestern Washington UniversityUSA

Personalised recommendations