Advertisement

Aerobiologia

, Volume 15, Issue 4, pp 281–291 | Cite as

Measurement of biological aerosol with a fluorescent aerodynamic particle sizer (FLAPS): correlation of optical data with biological data

  • Jim HoEmail author
  • Melvin Spence
  • Peter Hairston
Article

Abstract

Biological aerosol measurement in real time is anurgent military requirement that also has manypotential non-military applications. Such detectioncapabilities will be useful in environmentalmonitoring, for example, in gathering information inperceived hazardous areas like housing developmentsdownwind of sewage treatment plants.

Experience gained from measuring fluorescence signalsof single bacterial spores under flow cytometry usingUV excitation at 340--360 nm, was applied to concepttesting of a prototype instrument, built to do thesame for aerosols. This machine was capable ofresolving particle size as well as fluorescenceintensity of each particle under laboratory and fieldconditions; it was called the fluorescent aerodynamicparticle sizer (FLAPS). A second generation FLAPS(FLAPS2) was designed to be smaller, power efficientand field portable. FLAPS2 was challenged underrefereed conditions in blind trials to determine if itcould detect biological aerosols in natural fieldenvironment. This paper describes practical aspects ofmeasuring biological aerosols when the results must becompared to reference samplers that provide culturableor ``live'' data. Treatment of particle size andfluorescence information is discussed with respect toFLAPS and reference data fidelity. Finally, anobjective method is introduced to evaluate FLAPS datacorrelation to reference data. The measurementssuggest that there is positive correlation betweenFLAPS measurements and live biological aerosolparticles.

biological aerosol measurement biological aerosol particles FLAPS 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Andersen D.O. and Mohr A.J.: 1996, Abbreviated test plan for outdoor field trial (JFT III) of prototype biological detection components and systems. DPG document No. DPG-TP-96–041, JPO for Biological Defense, 5201 Leesburg pike, Skyline #3, Suite 1200, Falls Church, VA 22041–3203.Google Scholar
  2. Boulet C.A., Ho J., Stadnyk L., Thompson H.G., Spence M.R., Luoma G.A., Elaine R.E. and Lee W.E.: 1996, Report on the Canadian Integrated Biological Detection System Trial Results of the Combined Joint Field Trials II, for Biological Detection. Defence Research Establishment Suffield SR 652 (Unclassified). Canadian defense documents are available from: Information Holdings-Operations Department of National Defence Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0K2, Canada.Google Scholar
  3. Boyle E. and Steen H.: 1993, The physical and biological basis for flow Cytometry of Escherichia coli. In: D. Lloyd (ed), Flow Cytometry in Microbiology. Springer-Verlag, New York.Google Scholar
  4. Brenner K.P., Scarpino P.V. and Clark C.S.: 1988, Animal viruses, coliphages, and bacteria in aerosols and wastewater at a spray irrigation site. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 54, 409–415.Google Scholar
  5. Bronk B.V. and Reinisch L.: 1993, Variability of steady-state bacterial fluorescence with respect to growth conditions. Appl. Spectr. 47, 436–440.Google Scholar
  6. Chatigny M.A., Macher J.M., Burge H.A. and Solomon W.R.: 1998, Sampling airborne microorganisms and aeroallergens. In: S.V. Hering (ed), Air Sampling Instruments for Evaluation of Atmospheric Contaminants, 7th. Publ. American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists, Inc, pp. 199–220.Google Scholar
  7. Chen G., Nachman P., Pinnick R.G., Hill S.C. and Chang R.K.: 1996, Conditional firing aerosol fluorescence spectrum analyzer for individual airborne particles with pulsed 266 nm laser excitation. Opt. Lett. 21, 1307–1309.Google Scholar
  8. Cleveland W.S.: 1993, Visualizing Data. Publ. Hobart Press, Simmit, NJ. ISBN: 0963488406.Google Scholar
  9. Davey H.M. and Kell D.B.: 1996, Flow cytometry and cell sorting of heterogeneous microbial populations: the importance of single-cell analysis. Microbial. Rev. 60, 641–696.Google Scholar
  10. Davis J.M. and Main C.E.: 1984, A regional analysis of the meteorological aspects of the spreading and development of the blue mold on tobacco. Boundary-Layer Meteorol. 28, 271–304.Google Scholar
  11. Day R.L. and Lee L.C.: 1983, Optical emission from photoexcitation of aerosol particles produced by reaction of ozone with 1,3–butadiene. Applied Optics 22, 2546–2550.Google Scholar
  12. EPA: 1998, Building Assessment Survey and Evaluation (BASE) Study and the Temporal Indoor Monitoring and Evaluation (TIME) Study. www.epa.gov/iaq/base/baseenvi.htmlGoogle Scholar
  13. Grant R.H., Scheidt A.B. and Rueff L.R.: 1994, Aerosol transmission of a viable virus affecting swine: explanation of an epizootic of pseudorabies. Int. J. Biometeorol. 38:1, 33–39.Google Scholar
  14. Groves W.E., Davies F.C. and Sells B.H.: 1968, Spectrophotometric determination of microgram quantities of protein without nucleic acid interference. Anal. Biochem 22, 195–210.Google Scholar
  15. Hairston P., Ho J., Quant F.R.: 1997, Design of an instrument for real-time detection of bioaerosols using simultaneous measurement of particle aerodynamic size and intrinsic fluorescence. J. Aerosol Sc. 28, 471–482.Google Scholar
  16. Harrison D.E.F. and Chance B.: 1970, Fluorimetric technique for monitoring changes in the level of reduced nicotinamide nucleotides in continuous cultures of microorganisms. Appl. Microbiol. 19, 446–450.Google Scholar
  17. Ho J. and Fisher G.: 1993, Detection of BW agents: flow cytometry measurment of Bacillus subtilis (BG) spore fluorescence. Defense Research Establishment Suffield memorandum 1421.Google Scholar
  18. Ho J.: 1994, Detection of biological warfare agents. In: C. Boulet (ed), Today Science Tomorrow Defence. Government of Canada Cat No. D4–1/175E, ISBN 0–662–21570–2, (Unclassified), pp. 11–18.Google Scholar
  19. Ho J., Spence M. and Fisher G.R.: 1995, Detection of BW agents: Dugway trinational BW field trial 20–30 October 1993, Dugway, Utah; Mobile aerosol sampling unit data analysis (U). Defense Research Establishment Suffield report 619.Google Scholar
  20. Ho J. and Spence M.: 1998, Background aerosol characteristics measured with a fluorescence aerodynamic particle sizer: Sensitivity of FLAPS performance. Suffield Memorandum 1504, (Unclassified).Google Scholar
  21. Ichinose N.: 1991, Fluorometric analysis in biomedical chemistry: trends and techniques including HPLC applications in chemical analysis 109: 5–44, ed. N. Ichinose, G. Schwedt, F.M. Schnepel and K. Adachi.Google Scholar
  22. Jeys T., DiCecca S., Daneu V., Rowe G., Newbury N., Sanchez A., Primmerman C. and Reyes F.: 1997, Bioaerosol fluorescence sensor. Scientific conference on Obscuration and Aerosol Research, 23–27 June, ERDEC, APG, MD. Available from NTIS, 5285 Port Royal Road, Springfield, VA 22161.Google Scholar
  23. Kang Y.J. and Frank J.F.: 1990, Characteristics of biological aerosols in dairy processing plants. J. Dairy Sci. 73, 621–626.Google Scholar
  24. Kaprelyants A.S. and Kell D.B.: 1992, Rapid assessment of bacterial viability and vitality using rhodamine 123 and flow cytometry. J. Appl. Bacteriol. 72, 410–422.Google Scholar
  25. Kell D.B., Ryder H.M., Kaprelyants A.S. and Westerhoff H.V.: 1991, Quantifying heterogeniety: Flow cytometry of bacteria cultures. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 60, 145–158.Google Scholar
  26. Kell D.B., Kaprelyants A.S., Weichart D.H., Harwood C.R. and Barer M.R.: 1998, Viability and activity in readily culturable bacteria: a review and discussion of the practical issues. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 73, 169–187.Google Scholar
  27. Lis D.O., Pastuszka J.S. and Górny R.L.: 1997, The prevalence of bacterial and fungal aerosol in homes, offices and ambient air of Upper Silesia. Preliminary results. Rocz Panstw Zakl Hig. 48, 59–68.Google Scholar
  28. Pinnick R.G., Hill S.C., Nachman P., Videen G., Chen G. and Chang R.: 1998, Aerosol fluorescence spectrum analyzer for rapid measurement of single micrometer-sized airborne biological particles. Aerosol science and Technology 28, 95–104.Google Scholar
  29. Sawyer B., Elenbogen G., Rao K.C., O'Brien P., Zenz D.R. and Lue-Hing C.: 1993, Bacterial aerosol emission rates from municipal wastewater aeration tanks. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 59, 3183–3186.Google Scholar
  30. Sokal R.R. and Rohlf F.J.: 1981, Biometry: The Principles and Practice of Statistics in Biological Research, 2nd ed. Freeman and Co., New York, 607 pp.Google Scholar
  31. Steen H.B.: 1983, A microscope-based flow cytometer. Histochem. J. 15, 147–160.Google Scholar
  32. Tillett H.E. and Carpenter R.G.: 1991, Statistical methods applied in microbiology and epidemiology. Epidemiol. Infect. 107, 467–478.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Defence Research Establishemnt SuffieldMedicine HatCanada
  2. 2.TSI IncorporatedSt. PaulUSA

Personalised recommendations