Environmental Biology of Fishes

, Volume 60, Issue 1–3, pp 117–130 | Cite as

Surfactants as Chemical Shark Repellents: Past, Present, and Future

  • Joseph A. Sisneros
  • Donald R. Nelson


The development of Shark Chaser by the U.S. Navy during World War II was the first serious effort to develop a chemical shark repellent. In the decade following the war reports of Shark Chaser ineffectiveness led the Office of Naval Research to search for a more efficacious shark repellent. After years without success, ONR eventually canceled the use of Shark Chaser and abandoned the search for a chemical shark repellent. In the early 1970s, interest in chemical shark repellents was renewed by the discovery of pardaxin, a natural shark repellent secreted by the Red Sea Moses sole, Pardachirus marmoratus. The surfactant-like nature of pardaxin led investigators to test the potential of various surfactants as repellents. Subsequent studies indicated that the shark repellent efficacy of the effective alkyl sulfate surfactants was due to their hydrophobic nature. Here we report tests conducted on juvenile swell sharks, Cephaloscyllium ventriosum, to determine if the noxious quality of alkyl sulfates is affected by surfactant hydrophobicity [carbon chain length and ethylene oxide (EO) groups] and counterions. Our results indicate that the aversive response of sharks to alkyl sulfate surfactants increases with carbon chain length from octyl to dodecyl, decreases with the addition of EO groups and is not affected by counterions. This study confirms that dodecyl sulfate is the most effective surfactant shark repellent, but it does not meet the Navy's potency requirement for a nondirectional surrounding-cloud type repellent of 100 parts per billion (0.1 ug ml−1). Thus, dodecyl sulfate is only practical as a directional repellent such as in a squirt application. Future research should test the action of alkyl sulfates on cell membranes, the potential of other biotoxic agents, and semiochemicals in the search for an effective chemical shark repellent.

SDS Cephaloscyllium ventriosum shark chaser pardaxin dodecyl sulfate 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Baldridge, Jr., H.D. 1990. Shark repellent: not yet, maybe never. Milit. Med. 155: 358–361.Google Scholar
  2. Bakus, G.J. 1983. Toxicity in shallow marine waters: potential for developing shark repellents. pp. 185–199. In: B.J. Zahurance (ed.) Shark Repellents from the Sea: New Perspectives, Westview Press, Boulder.Google Scholar
  3. Bartnik, F. & K. Kunstler. 1987. Biological effects, toxicology, and human safety. pp. 475–503. In: J. Falbe (ed.) Surfactants in Consumer Products: Theory, Technology, and Application, Springer-Verlag, New York.Google Scholar
  4. Brown, C. 1980. Survivors of USS Indianapolis still relive their ordeal. Los Angeles Times, 27 Aug.:9(1A).Google Scholar
  5. Choman, B. 1963. Determination of the response of skin to chemical agents by an in vitro procedure. J. Invest. Dermatol. 40: 177–182.Google Scholar
  6. Clark, E. 1974. The Red Sea's sharkproof fish. Nat. Geogr. Mag. 145: 718–727.Google Scholar
  7. Clark, E. 1983. Shark repellent effect of the Red Sea Moses sole. pp. 135–150. In: B.J. Zahurance (ed.) Shark Repellents from the Sea: New Perspectives, Westview Press, Boulder.Google Scholar
  8. Clark, E. & S. Chao. 1973. A toxic secretion from the Red Sea flatfish, Pardachirus marmoratus (Lacepede). Bull. Sea Fish. Res. St. (Haifa) 60: 53–56.Google Scholar
  9. Clark, E. & A. George. 1979. Toxic soles, Pardachirus marmoratus from the Red Sea and P. pavoninus from Japan, with notes on other species. Env. Biol. Fish. 4: 103–123.Google Scholar
  10. Doak, W. 1974. Revolutionary weapon - anti-shark wet suit. Skin Diver Mag. (June): 86–89.Google Scholar
  11. Gargiulo, D., T.A. Blizzard & K. Nakanishi. 1989. Synthesis of mosesin-4, a naturally occurring steroid saponin with shark repellent activity, and its analog 7-β-galactosyl ethyl cholate. Tetrahedron 45: 5423–5432.Google Scholar
  12. Gilbert, P.W. & C. Gilbert. 1973. Sharks and shark deterrents. Underwater Journal 5: 69–79.Google Scholar
  13. Gilbert, P.W. & S. Springer. 1963. Testing shark repellents. pp. 477–494. In: P.W. Gilbert (ed.) Sharks and Survival, D.C. Heath and Company, Boston.Google Scholar
  14. Gruber, S.H. & E. Zlotkin. 1982. Bioassay of surfactants as shark repellents. Nav. Res. Rev. 34: 18–27.Google Scholar
  15. Gruber, S.H., E. Zlotkin & D.R. Nelson. 1984. Shark repellents. pp. 26–42. In: L. Bolis, J. Zadunaisky & R. Gilles (ed.) Toxins, Drugs, and Pollutants in Marine Animals, Springer-Verlag, New York.Google Scholar
  16. Herbert, D.W.M., G.H. Elkins, H.T. Mann & J. Hemens. 1957. Toxicity of synthetic detergents to rainbow trout. Wat. Wast. Treat. J. 6: 394–397.Google Scholar
  17. Hodgson, E.S. & R.F. Mathewson. 1978. Electrophysiological studies of chemoreception in elasmobranchs. pp. 227–267. In: E.S. Hodgson & R.F. Mathewson (ed.) Sensory Biology of Sharks, Skates, and Rays, Office of Naval Research, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  18. Hubert, J.J. 1980. Bioassay. Kendall/Hunt Publishing Co., Dubuque. 164 pp.Google Scholar
  19. Imokawa, G., K. Sumura & M. Katsumi. 1975. Study on skin roughness caused by surfactants: II. Correlation between protein denaturation and skin roughness. J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 52: 484–488.Google Scholar
  20. Kastner, W. 1980. Anionic surfactants. pp. 139–150. In: C. Gloxhuber (ed.) Anionic Surfactants, Biochemistry, Toxicology, Dermatology, Surfactant Sci. Ser. Vol. 10, Marcel Dekker, New York.Google Scholar
  21. Klimley, A.P. & A.A. Myrberg, Jr. 1979. Acoustic stimuli underlying withdrawal from a sound source by adult lemon sharks, Negaprion brevirostris (Poey). Bull. Mar. Sci. 29: 447–458.Google Scholar
  22. Mann, H. 1955. The action of surface active washing agents on fish and animals forming fish food. Arch. Fischwiss. 6: 131–137.Google Scholar
  23. Myrberg, A.A., Jr., C.R. Gordon & A.P. Klimley. 1978. Rapid withdrawal from a sound source by open-ocean sharks. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 64: 1289–1297.Google Scholar
  24. Nelson, D.R. 1983. Shark attack and repellency research: an overview. pp. 11–74. In: B.J. Zahuranec (ed.) Shark Repellents from the Sea: New Perspectives, Westview Press, Boulder.Google Scholar
  25. Nelson, D.R. 1991. Shark repellents: how effective, how needed? pp. 106–108. In: S.H. Gruber (ed.) Discovering Sharks, American Littoral Society, Highlands.Google Scholar
  26. Nelson, D.R. & W.R. Strong. 1996. Chemical repellent tests on white sharks, with comments on repellent delivery methods. pp. 471–475. In: A.P. Klimley & D.G. Ainley (ed.) Great White Sharks: The Biology of Carcharodon carcharias, Academic Press, San Diego.Google Scholar
  27. Opdyke, D.L. & C.M. Burnett. 1965. Effect of ethoxylation on the skin irritating properties of alkyl ether sulfates. Proc. Sci. Sect. Toilet Goods Assoc. 44: 3–8.Google Scholar
  28. Parker, D.O. 1971. Effect of molecular structure on the toxicity of some nonionic surfactants to the goldfish, Carassius auratus (Cypriniformes: Cyprinidae). Masters Thesis, California State Univ, Long Beach. 92 pp.Google Scholar
  29. Parness, J. 1975. A study on the action and composition of toxic secretion of the flatfish Pardachirus marmoratus (Soleidae). Master Thesis, Hebrew University, Tel Aviv. 90 pp.Google Scholar
  30. Pickering, Q.H. 1970. The chronic toxicity of linear alkylate sulfate (LAS) to Pimaphales promelas Rafinesque. J.Wat. Pollut. Contr. Fed. 42: 243–254.Google Scholar
  31. Primor, N., J. Parness & E. Zlotkin. 1978. Pardaxin: the toxic factor from the skin secretion of the flatfish Pardachirus marmoratus (Soleidae). pp. 539-547. In: P. Rosenberg (ed.) Toxins: Animal, Plant, and Microbial, Pergamon Press, New York.Google Scholar
  32. Primor, N., I. Sabnay, V. Lavie & E. Zlotkin. 1980. Toxicity to fish, effect on gillATPase and gill ultrastructural changes induced by Pardachirus secretion and its derived toxin, Pardaxin. J. Exp. Zool. 211: 33–43.Google Scholar
  33. Primor, N., E. Bonaventura & J. Bonaventura. 1983a. Effect of Pardachirus marmoratus secretion and its active factor, pardaxin, on elasmobranchs. pp. 151–156. In: B.J. Zahuranec (ed.) Shark Repellents from the Sea: New Perspectives, Westview Press, Boulder.Google Scholar
  34. Primor, N., J.A. Zadunaisky & A.T. Tu. 1983b. Pardaxin, its mode of action, toxicity and structure. pp. 173–184. In: B.J. Zahuranec (ed.) Shark Repellents from the Sea: New Perspectives, Westview Press, Boulder.Google Scholar
  35. Primor, N., J. Zadunaisky, V. Murdaugh, Jr., J. Boyer & J. Forrest, Jr. 1984. Pardaxin increases solute permeability of gills and rectal gland in the dogfish shark, Squalus acanthias. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. 78C: 483–490.Google Scholar
  36. Rasmussen, L.E.L. & M.J. Schmidt. 1992. Are sharks chemically aware of crocodiles? pp. 335–342. In: R.L. Doty & D. Müller-Schwarze (ed.) Chemical Signals in Vertebrates IV, Plenum Press, New York.Google Scholar
  37. Satchell, G.H. & D.J. Maddalena. 1972. The cough or expulsion reflex in the Port Jackson shark, Heterodontus portusjacksoni. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. 41A: 49–62.Google Scholar
  38. Satkowski, W.B., S.K. Huang & R.L. Liss. 1967. Polyoxyethylene esters of fatty acids. pp. 142-174. In: M.J. Schick (ed.) Nonionic Surfactants, Marcel Dekker, New York.Google Scholar
  39. Schott, H. 1973. Effect of chain length in homologous series of anionic surfactants on irritant action and toxicity. J. Pharmacol. Sci. 62: 341–343.Google Scholar
  40. Server, L. 1989. Sharks. Crescent Books, New York. 128 pp.Google Scholar
  41. Sisneros, J.A. 1993. Effect of molecular structure on the shark repellent potency of anionic surfactants. Masters Thesis, California State Univ., Long Beach. 77 pp.Google Scholar
  42. Smith, L.J., Jr. 1986. Effectiveness of sodium lauryl sulfate and other chemicals as shark repellents in a laboratory swimthrough test situation. Masters Thesis, California State Univ., Long Beach. 67 pp.Google Scholar
  43. Smith, L.J., Jr. 1991. The effectiveness of sodium lauryl sulphate as a shark repellent in a laboratory test situation. J. Fish Biol. 38: 105–113.Google Scholar
  44. Sobotka, H. 1965. Comparative biochemistry of marine animals. Bioscience 1965: 583–584Google Scholar
  45. Sokal, R.R. & F.J. Rohlf. 1981. Biometry. W.H. Freeman and Company, New York. 859 pp.Google Scholar
  46. Spira, M.E., M. Klein, B. Hochner, Y. Yarom & M. Castel. 1976. Ultrastructural changes accompanying the disturbances of neuromuscular transmission caused by Pardachirus toxin. Neuroscience 1: 117–124.Google Scholar
  47. Springer, S. 1954. Laboratory experiments with shark repellents. Proc. Gulf and Caribbean Fisheries Inst. 7th Ann. Sess.: 159–163.Google Scholar
  48. Tachibana, K. & S.H. Gruber. 1988. Shark repellent lipophilic constituents in the defense secretion of the Moses sole (Pardachirus marmoratus). Toxicon 26: 839–853.Google Scholar
  49. Tachibana, K., M. Sakaitanai & K. Nakanishi. 1984. Pavoninins: shark-repelling ichthyotoxins from the defense secretion of the Pacific sole. Science 226: 703–705.Google Scholar
  50. Tester, A.L. 1963. Olfaction, gustation, and the common chemical sense in sharks. pp. 255-282. In: P.W. Gilbert (ed.) Sharks and Survival, D.C. Heath and Co., Boston.Google Scholar
  51. Thompson, S.A., K. Tachibana, K. Nakanishi & I. Kubota. 1986. Melittin-like peptides from the shark-repelling defense secretion of the sole Pardachirus pavoninus. Science 233: 341–343.Google Scholar
  52. Tuve, R.L. 1963. Development of the U.S. Navy 'shark Chaser’ chemical shark repellent. pp. 455–464. In: P.W. Gilbert (ed.) Sharks and Survival, D.C. Heath and Company, Boston.Google Scholar
  53. Zahuranec, B.J. & H.D. Baldridge, Jr. 1983. Shark research and the United States Navy. pp. 1–10. In: B.J. Zahuranec (ed.) Shark Repellents from the Sea: New Perspectives, Westview Press, Boulder.Google Scholar
  54. Zlotkin, E. & Y. Barenholz. 1983. On the membranal action of pardaxin. pp. 157–171. In: B.J. Zahuranec (ed.) Shark Repellents from the Sea: New Perspectives, Westview Press, Boulder.Google Scholar
  55. Zlotkin, E. & S.H. Gruber. 1984. Synthetic surfactants: a new approach to the development of shark repellents. Arch. Toxicol. 56: 55–58.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Joseph A. Sisneros
    • 1
  • Donald R. Nelson
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Biological SciencesFlorida Institute of TechnologyMelbourneU.S.A.
  2. 2.Department of Neurobiology and BehaviorCornell UniversityIthacaU.S.A.

Personalised recommendations