Journal of Quantitative Criminology

, Volume 16, Issue 1, pp 1–19 | Cite as

Measuring Civilian Defensive Firearm Use: A Methodological Experiment

  • David McDowall
  • Colin Loftin
  • Stanley Presser
Article

Abstract

Estimates of the incidence of victim gun use from the National CrimeVictimization Survey (NCVS) are consistently lower than are those fromother studies. To examine the divergence, we conducted a survey that gaugedthe impact of methodological differences between the NCVS and the otherstudies. For half of the sample, we asked questions from the NCVS, followedby questions from the other surveys. For the other half of the sample, wepresented the questions in the reverse order. We examined two hypotheses:(1) survey methods account for the divergent results, and (2) the questionscover unrelated activities. The results provided some support for the firsthypothesis, but respondents also reported many more defenses to thequestions from the other surveys than to the NCVS questions. Consistent withthe second hypothesis, this suggests that the NCVS and the other surveysmeasure responses to largely different provocations.

defensive gun use firearms survey research experimental designs crossover designs 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. Bachman, R., and Taylor, B. (1994). The measurement of family violence and rape by the redesigned National Crime Victimization Survey. Just. Q. 11: 499–512.Google Scholar
  2. Cook, P. J., and Ludwig, J. (1996). Guns In America: Results of a Comprehensive National Survey on Firearms Ownership and Use, Police Foundation, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  3. Cook, P. J., and Ludwig, J. (1998). Defensive gun uses: New evidence from a national survey. J. Quant. Criminol. 14: 111–131.Google Scholar
  4. Cook, P. J., Ludwig, J., and Hemenway, D. (1997). The gun debate's new mythical number: How many defensive uses per year? J. Policy Anal. Manage. 16: 463–469.Google Scholar
  5. Cox, D. R., and Snell, E. J. (1989). Analysis of Binary Data, 2nd ed., Chapman and Hall, New York.Google Scholar
  6. Diggle, P. J., Liang, K. Y., and Zeger, S. L. (1994). Analysis of Longitudinal Data, Oxford University Press, New York.Google Scholar
  7. Hemenway, D. (1997a). The myth of millions of annual self-defense gun uses: A case study of survey overestimates of rare events. Chance 10(3): 6–10.Google Scholar
  8. Hemenway, D. (1997b). Survey research and self-defense gun use: An explanation of extreme overestimates. J. Crim. Law Criminol. 87: 1430–1445.Google Scholar
  9. Heston, C. (1999). The president's column. Am. Rifle. 147(6): 12.Google Scholar
  10. Ikeda, R. M., Dahlberg, L. L., Sacks, J. J., Mercey, J. A., and Powell, K. E. (1997). Estimating intruder-related firearm retrievals in U.S. households, 1994. Violence Vict. 12: 363–372.Google Scholar
  11. Jones, B., and Kenward, M. G. (1989). Design and Analysis of Cross-Over Trials, Chapman and Hall, New York.Google Scholar
  12. Kleck, G. (1988). Crime control through the private use of armed force. Soc. Problems 35: 1–21.Google Scholar
  13. Kleck, G., and Gertz, M. (1995). Armed resistance to crime: The prevalence and nature of self-defense with a gun. J. Crim. Law Criminol. 86: 150–186.Google Scholar
  14. Kleck, G., and Gertz, M. (1997). The illegitimacy of one-sided speculation: Getting the defensive gun use estimate down. J. Crim. Law Criminol. 87: 1446–1461.Google Scholar
  15. Koss, M. P. (1992). The underdetection of rape: Methodological choices influence incidence estimates. J. Soc. Issues 48: 61–75.Google Scholar
  16. Liang, K. Y., and Zeger, S. L. (1986). Longitudinal data analysis using generalized linear models. Biometrika 73: 13–22.Google Scholar
  17. Lynch, J. P. (1996). Clarifying divergent estimates of rape from two national surveys. Public Opin. Q. 60: 410–430.Google Scholar
  18. McDowall, D., and Wiersema, B. (1994). The incidence of defensive firearm use by U.S. crime victims, 1987 through 1990. Am. J. Public Health 84: 1982–1984.Google Scholar
  19. McDowall, D., Loftin, C., and Wiersema, B. (1998). Estimates of the frequency of firearm selfdefense from the National Crime Victimization Survey. Violence Research Group Discussion Paper 20, School of Criminal Justice, State University of New York-Albany.Google Scholar
  20. Rand, M. R. (1994). Guns and Crime (NCJ-147003), U.S. Bureau of Justice Statistics, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  21. Rand, M. R., Lynch, J. P., and Cantor, D. (1997). Criminal Victimization, 1973-95 (NCJ-163069), U.S. Bureau of Justice Statistics, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  22. Smith, T. W. (1997). A call for a truce in the DGU war. J. Crim. Law Criminol. 87: 1462–1469.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • David McDowall
    • 1
  • Colin Loftin
    • 1
  • Stanley Presser
    • 2
  1. 1.Violence Research Group, School of Criminal JusticeUniversity at Albany, State University of New YorkAlbany
  2. 2.Department of SociologyUniversity of MarylandCollege Park

Personalised recommendations