European Journal of Epidemiology

, Volume 15, Issue 3, pp 293–299 | Cite as

Non-responders to a postal questionnaire on respiratory symptoms and diseases

  • Eva Rönmark
  • Ann Lundqvist
  • Bo Lundbäck
  • Lennarth Nyström
Article

Abstract

Only few data have been published about non-responders in epidemiological studies on respiratory diseases. The aim of this study was to examine the characteristics of the non-responders and the reasons for non-response in a survey of respiratory health. All 9132 subjects, born 1925–1926, 1940–1941, 1955–1956 and 1970–1971 and living in eight representative areas in Norrbotten, Sweden, were invited to a prevalence study on asthma, chronic bronchitis and respiratory symptoms. The response rate was 85%. A sample of the non-responders from the cross-sectional postal questionnaire study was contacted by telephone and interviewed using the same questionnaire as had been used in the postal survey. Of the 1397 non-responders a stratified sample of 182 subjects were selected for this study and 144 agreed to participate. The response rate was increasing by increasing age. The main reason for non-response was that the subjects had forgotten to mail the questionnaire, lack of interest or lack of time. There were significantly higher proportions of current smokers and manual workers among the non-responders. The prevalence rates of wheezing, long-standing cough, sputum production, attacks of breathlessness, asthma and use of asthma medicines were significantly higher among the non-responders compared with the responders according both univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses, in which the influences of age, sex, smoking habits, socio-economic group and area of domicile were taken into account. The prevalence of respiratory symptoms and diseases was slightly underestimated in the postal survey.

Asthma Non-responders Prevalence Questionnaire Respiratory symptoms 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Locker D, Wiggins D, Sittampalam Y, Patrick DL. Estimating the prevalence of disability in the community: The influence of sample design and response bias. J Epidemiol Community Health 1981; 35: 208–212.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Olsson A. To answer or not answer — that is the question. Empiric studies of non-responses and quality of the answers in postal questionnaire studies (in Swedish). University of Gothenburg, Department of Statistical Sciences, Unit For Communication. Report no. 12, Gothenburg, Sweden, 1986.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bakke P, Gulsvik A, Lilleng P, Overå O, Hanoa R, Eide GE. Postal survey on airborne occupational exposure and respiratory disorders in Norway: Causes and consequences of non-response. J Epidemiol Community Health 1990; 44: 316–320.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Tibblin G. A population study of 50-year-old men. An analysis of the non-participation group. Acta Med Scand 1965; 178: 453–459.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bergstrand R, Vedin A, Wilhelmsson C, Wilhelmsen L. Bias due to non-participation and heterogenous subgroups in population surveys. J Chron Dis 1983; 36: 725–728.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Wilhelmsen L, Ljungberg S, Wedel H, Werkö L. A comparison between participants and non-participants in a primary preventive trial. J Chron Dis 1976; 29: 331–339.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Criqui MH, Barret-Connor E, Austin M. Differences between respondents and non-respondents in a population-based cardiovascular disease study. Am J Epidemiol 1978; 108: 367–372.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Jacobsen BK, Thelle DS. The Tromsö Heart Study: Responders and non-responders to a health questionnaire, do they differ? Scand J Soc Med 1988; 16: 101–104.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Macera CA, Jackson KL, Davies DR, Kronenfeld JJ, Blair SN. Patterns of nonresponse to a mail survey. J Clin Epidemiol 1990; 43: 1427–1430.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    De Marco R, Verlato G, Zanolin E, Bugiani M, Drane JW. Nonresponse bias in EC Respiratory Health Survey in Italy. Eur Respir J 1994; 7: 2139–2145.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lundbäck B, Nyström L, Rosenhall L, Stjernberg N. Obstructive lung disease in Northern Sweden. Respiratory symptoms assessed in a postal survey. Eur Respir J 1991; 4: 257–266.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lundbäck B, Stjernberg N, Nyström L, Lundbäck K, Lindström M, Rosenhall L. An interview study to estimate prevalence of asthma and chronic bronchitis. The obstructive lung disease in Northern Sweden study. Eur J Epidemiol, 1993; 3: 123–133.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lundbäck B, Stjernberg N, Nyström L, Forsberg B, Lindström M, Lundbäck K, Jönsson E, Rosenhall L. Epidemiology of respiratory symptoms, lung function and important determinants. Report from the obstructive lung disease in northern Sweden project. Tubercle & Lung Dis, 1994; 75: 116–126.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lundbäck B, Stjernberg N, Rosenhall L, Lindström M, Jönsson E, Andersson S. Methacholine reactivity and asthma. Report from the northern Sweden obstructive lung disease project. Allergy, 1993; 48: 117–124.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Lundbäck B. Asthma, chronic bronchitis and respiratory symptoms: prevalence and important determinants. The obstructive lung disease in northern Sweden study I. Umeå University, Medical Dissertations, Umeå, Sweden, 1993.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Statistics Sweden. The socio-economic classification of occupations. Stockholm, Sweden. 1982.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Stjernberg N. Chronic bronchitis and bronchial asthma in an industrial community in northern Sweden. Relation to environmental and occupational exposure to sulphur dioxide. Umeå University, Medical Dissertations, Umeå, Sweden, 1985.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Asch DA, Jedrziewski MK, Christakis NA. Response rates to mailed surveys published in medical journals. J Clin Epidemiol 1997; 50: 1129–1136.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    European Community Respiratory Health Survey. Variations in the prevalence of respiratory symptoms, self-reported asthma attacks, and use of asthma medication in the European Community Respiratory Health Survey (ECRHS). Eur Respir J 1996; 9: 687–695.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Westin O. Who do not reply questions on living habits. An analysis of willingness to answer and of non-participation (in Swedish). Dept of Community Medicine, Local Health Authoroties, Gävleborg County, Gävle, Sweden, 1991; 4.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Janzon L, Hansson BS, Isacsson S-O, Lindell S-E, Steen B. Factors influencing participation in health surveys. J Epidemiol Community Health 1986; 40: 174–177.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Carlstedt G. Womens health — a question about power (in Swedish). Tiden/Folksam: Scand Book AB, Falun, Sweden, 1992.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Higgins MW, Keller JB, Metzner HL. Smoking, socioeconomic status and chronic respiratory disease. Am Rev Respir Dis 1977; 116: 408–410.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • Eva Rönmark
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
  • Ann Lundqvist
    • 1
  • Bo Lundbäck
    • 1
    • 2
  • Lennarth Nyström
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of Medicine, Central Hospital of NorrbottenTHE OLIN-study groupLuleå-BodenSweden
  2. 2.Respiratory Epidemiology Unit, Department of Occupational HealthNational Institute for Working LifeUmeåSweden
  3. 3.Luleå Health Care CentreLuleåSweden
  4. 4.Department of Epidemiology and Public HealthUmeå UniversitySweden

Personalised recommendations