Journal of Quantitative Criminology

, Volume 17, Issue 1, pp 89–110 | Cite as

A Move Toward Specificity: Examining Urban Disadvantage and Race-and Relationship-Specific Homicide Rates

  • Karen F. Parker


The purpose of this research is to estimate the differential impact of structural conditions on race- and relationship-specific homicide rates for U.S. cities in 1990. The structural conditions commonly employed in race-specific homicide research are examined, such as job accessibility, economic deprivation, racial segregation, and racial inequality. Furthermore, four relationship categories of homicide—acquaintance, family, stranger, and intimate—are disaggregated by racial group. The detailed relationship-specific homicide rates are compared to a baseline homicide rate to determine whether structural factors associated with urban disadvantage similarly influence homicide rates across relationship types. The results indicate that differences emerge in the impact of structural conditions on homicides disaggregated by race- and relationship-specific categories. Theoretical explanations consistent with criminology and race-relations literature are discussed, as well as the potential benefits and implications for studies that pursue more meaningful and detailed classifications in homicide offending.

types of homicide race-specific homicide concentrated disadvantage 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Allen, T., and Buckner, G. (1997). A graphical approach to analyzing relationships between offenders and victims using supplementary homicide reports. Homicide Stud. Interdisciplin. Int. J. 1(2): 129–140.Google Scholar
  2. Avakame, E. F. (1998). How different is violence in the home? An examination of some correlates of stranger and intimate homicide. Criminology 36(3): 601–632.Google Scholar
  3. Balkwell, G. (1990). Ethnic inequality and the rate of homicide. Soc. Forces 69: 53–70.Google Scholar
  4. Blauner, R. (1982). Racial Oppression in America, Harper & Row: New York.Google Scholar
  5. Block, C. R., and Block, R. L. (1991). Beginning with Wolfgang: An agenda for homicide research. J. Crime Just. 14: 31–70.Google Scholar
  6. Braithwaite, J. (1979). Inequality, Crime and Public Policy, Routledge & Kegan Paul, London.Google Scholar
  7. Browne, A., and R. Williams, K. R. (1993). Gender, intimacy, and lethal violence: Trends from 1976 through 1987. Gender Soc. 7(1): 78–98.Google Scholar
  8. Bursik, R. J. (1988). Social disorganization and theories of crime and delinquency: problems and prospect. Criminology 26: 519–551.Google Scholar
  9. Corzine, J., and Huff-Corzine, L. (1992). Racial inequality and black homicide: An analysis of felony, nonfelony, and total rates. J. Contemp. Crim. Just. 8: 150–165.Google Scholar
  10. Curtis, L. A. (1974). Criminal Violence, Lexington Books, Lexington, MA.Google Scholar
  11. Daly, M., and Wilson, M. (1988). Homicide, Aldine de Gruyter, Hawthorne, NY.Google Scholar
  12. Decker, S. H. (1993). Exploring victim-offender relationships in homicide: The role of individual and event characteristics. Just. Q. 10: 585–612.Google Scholar
  13. Decker, S. H. (1996). Deviant homicide: A new look at the role of motives and victim-offender relationships. J. Res. Crime Delinq. 33: 427–449.Google Scholar
  14. Flewelling, R. L., and Williams, K. R. (1999). Categorizing homicides: The use of disaggregated data in homicide research. In Smith, M. D., and Zahn, M. A. (eds.), Homicide: A Sourcebook of Social Research, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA, pp. 96–106.Google Scholar
  15. Harer, M. D., and Steffensmeier, D. (1992). The differing effects of economic inequality on black and white rates of violence. Soc. Forces 70: 1035–1054.Google Scholar
  16. Huff-Corzine, L., Corzine, J., and Moore, D. C. (1991). Deadly connections: culture, poverty, and the direction of lethal violence. Soc. Forces 69: 715–732.Google Scholar
  17. Jacobs, D., and Wood, K. (1999). Interracial conflict and interracial homicide: Do political and economic rivalries explain white killings of blacks or black killings of whites? Am. J. Sociol. 105(1): 157–190.Google Scholar
  18. Kasarda, J. D. (1989). Urban industrial transition and the underclass. Ann. Am. Acad. Polit. Soc. Sci. 501: 26–47.Google Scholar
  19. Krivo, L., and Peterson, R. D. (1996). Extremely disadvantaged neighborhoods and urban crime. Soc. Forces 75: 619–648.Google Scholar
  20. Krivo, L. J., Peterson R. D., Rizzo, H., and Reynolds, J. R. (1998). Race, segregation, and the concentration of disadvantages: 1980–1990. Soc. Problems 45: 61–79.Google Scholar
  21. Land, K. C., McCall, P. L., and Cohen, L. E. (1990). Structural covariates of homicide rates: Are there any invariances across time and social space? Am. J. Sociol. 95: 922–963.Google Scholar
  22. Lieberson, S. (1980). A Piece of the Pie: Blacks and White Immigrants, 1880–1930, University of California Press, Berkeley and Los Angeles.Google Scholar
  23. Loftin, C., and Parker, R. N. (1985). An errors-in-variable model of the effect of poverty on urban homicide rates. Criminology 23: 269–285.Google Scholar
  24. Maltz, M. D. (1994). Deviating from the mean: The declining significance of significance.J. Res. Crime Delinq. 31(4): 434–463.Google Scholar
  25. Maltz, M. D. (1998). Which homicides decreased? Why? J. Crim. Law Criminol. 88(4): 1489–1496.Google Scholar
  26. Massey, D., and Denton, N. (1993). American Apartheid: Segregation and the Making of the Underclass, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  27. Massey, D., and Eggers, M. L. (1990). The ecology of inequality: Minorities and the concentration of poverty, 1970–1980. Am. J. Sociol. 95(5): 1153–1188.Google Scholar
  28. Massey, D., Gross, A. B., and Eggers, M. L. (1991). Segregation, the concentration of poverty, and the life chances of individuals. Soc. Sci. Res. 20: 397–420.Google Scholar
  29. Massey, D., Gross, A. B., and Shibuya, K. (1994). Migration, segregation, and the concentration of poverty. Am. Sociol. Rev. 59: 425–445.Google Scholar
  30. Merton, R. K. (1938). Social structure and anomie. Am. Sociol. Rev. 3: 672–682.Google Scholar
  31. Messner, S. F. (1983). Regional and racial effects on the urban homicide rate: The subculture of violence revisited. Am. J. Soc. 88: 997–1007.Google Scholar
  32. Messner, S. F., and Golden, R. M. (1992). Racial inequality and racially disaggregated homicide rates: An assessment of alternative theoretical explanations. Criminology 30(3): 421–447.Google Scholar
  33. Messner, S. F., and South, S. (1986). Economic deprivation, opportunity structure, and robbery victimization. Soc. Forces 64(4): 975–991.Google Scholar
  34. Nelsen, C., Corzine, J., and Huff-Corzine, L. (1994). The violent West re-examined: A research note on regional homicide rates. Criminology 32: 149–161.Google Scholar
  35. Nisbett, R. E., and Cohen, D. (1996). Culture of Honor: The Psychology of Violence in the South, Westview Press, Boulder, CO.Google Scholar
  36. Olzak, S. (1990). The political context of competition: Lynching and urban racial violence. Soc. Forces 69: 395–421.Google Scholar
  37. Parker, K. F., and McCall, P. (1997). Adding another piece to the inequality-homicide puzzle: The impact of structural inequality on racially disaggregated homicide rates. Homicide Stud. Interdisciplin. Int. J. 1: 35–60.Google Scholar
  38. Parker, K. F., and McCall, P. L. (1999). Structural conditions and racial homicide patterns: A look at the multiple disadvantages in urban areas. Criminology 37(3): 447–478.Google Scholar
  39. Parker, K. F., McCall, P. L., and Land, K. C. (1999). Determining social structural predictors of homicide: Unit of analysis and other methodological concerns. In Smith, M. D., and Zahn, M. A. (eds.), Homicide: A Sourcebook of Social Research, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA, pp. 107–124.Google Scholar
  40. Parker, R. N. (1989). Poverty, subculture of violence and type of homicide. Soc. Forces 67: 953–1007.Google Scholar
  41. Parker, R. N., and Smith, M. D. (1979). Deterrence, poverty, and type of homicide. Am. J. Sociol. 85: 614–624.Google Scholar
  42. Parker, R. N., and Toth, A. T. (1990). Family, intimacy, and homicide: A macro-social approach.Violence Victims 5: 195–210.Google Scholar
  43. Peterson, R. D., and Krivo, L. J. (1993). Racial segregation and black urban homicide.Soc. Forces 71: 1001–1026.Google Scholar
  44. Riedel, M. (1999). Sources of homicide data: A review and comparison. In Smith, M. D., and Zahn, M. A. (eds.), Homicide: A Sourcebook of Social Research, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA, pp. 75–95.Google Scholar
  45. Riedel, M., and Best, J. (1998). Patterns in intimate partner homicide: California, 1987–1996. Homicide Stud.: Interdisciplin.Int.J. 2(3): 305–320.Google Scholar
  46. Riedel, M. and Zahn, M. A. (1985). The Nature and Patterns of American Homicide, U.S. Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  47. Rojek, D. G., and Williams, J. L. (1993). Interracial versus intraracial offenses in terms of victim/offender relationships. In Wilson, A. V. (ed.), Homicide: The Victim/Offender Connection, Anderson, Cincinnati, OH, pp. 249–266.Google Scholar
  48. Rosenfeld, R. (1997). Changing relationships between men and women: A note on the decline in intimate partner homicide. Homicide Stud.: Interdisciplin.Int.J. 1(1): 72–83.Google Scholar
  49. Sampson, R. J. (1985). Race and criminal violence: demographically disaggregated analysis of urban homicide. Crime Delinq. 31: 47–82.Google Scholar
  50. Sampson, R. J. (1987). Urban black violence: The effect of male joblessness and family disruption. Am. J. Sociol. 93: 348–382.Google Scholar
  51. Sampson, R. J. (1991). Linking the micro-and macro-level dimensions of community social organization. Soc. Forces 70(1): 43–64.Google Scholar
  52. Sampson, R. J., and Groves, W. B. (1989). Community structure and crime: Testing social disorganization theory. Am. J. Sociol. 94: 774–802.Google Scholar
  53. Sampson, R. J., and Wilson, W. J. (1995). Race, crime, and urban inequality. In Hagen, J., and Peterson, R. D. (eds.), Crime and Inequality, Stanford University Press, Palo Alto, CA, pp. 37–54.Google Scholar
  54. Silverman, K. (1987). Relational distance and homicide: The role of the stranger. J. Crim. Law Criminol. 78: 272–308.Google Scholar
  55. Shihadeh, E. S., and Flynn, N. (1996). Segregation and crime: The effects of black social isolation on the rates of black urban violence. Soc. Forces 74: 1325–1352.Google Scholar
  56. Shihadeh, E. S., and Maume, M. O. (1997). Segregation and crime: The relationship between black centralization and urban black homicide. Homicide Stud.: Interdisciplin.Int.J. 1: 254–280.Google Scholar
  57. Shihadeh, E. S., and Steffensmeier, D. (1994). Economic inequality, family disruption, and urban black violence: Cities as unites of stratification and social control. Soc. Forces 73: 729–751.Google Scholar
  58. Smith, M. D. (1992). Variations in correlates of race-specific urban homicide rates. J. Contemp. Crim. Just. 8: 137–149.Google Scholar
  59. Smith, M. D., and Parker, R. N. (1980). Type of homicide and variation in regional rates. Soc. Forces 59: 136–147.Google Scholar
  60. Tolnay, S. E., Beck, E. M., and Massey, J. L. (1992). Black competition and white vengeance: Legal execution of blacks as social control in the cotton South, 1890–1929. Soc. Forces 73: 627–644.Google Scholar
  61. Wilbanks, W. (1984). Murder in Miami: An Analysis of Homicide Patterns and Trends in Dade County, Florida, 1917–1983, University Press of America, Lanham, MD.Google Scholar
  62. Williams, K., and Flewelling, R. L. (1987). Family, acquaintance, and stranger homicide: Alternative procedures for rates calculations. Criminology 25: 543–560.Google Scholar
  63. Williams, K., and Flewelling, R. L. (1988). The social production of homicide: A comparative study of disaggregated rates in American cities. Am. Sociol. Rev. 53: 421–431.Google Scholar
  64. Wilson, M. L., and Daly, M. (1992). Who kills whom in spousal killings? On the exceptional sex ration of spousal homicides in the United States. Criminology 30: 189–215.Google Scholar
  65. Wilson, W. J. (1987). The Truly Disadvantaged: The Inner City, The Underclass, and Public Policy. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
  66. Wolfgang, M. E. (1958). Patterns in Criminal Homicide. Patterson Smith, Monclair, NJ.Google Scholar
  67. Zahn, M. A., and Sagi, P. C. (1987). Stranger homicide in nine American cities. J. Crim. Law Criminol. 78: 377–397.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Karen F. Parker
    • 1
  1. 1.Center for Studies in Criminology and LawUniversity of FloridaGainesville

Personalised recommendations