Advertisement

Journal of Quantitative Criminology

, Volume 16, Issue 1, pp 87–110 | Cite as

Comparing Self-Reports and Official Records of Arrests

  • Michael G. Maxfield
  • Barbara Luntz Weiler
  • Cathy Spatz Widom
Article

Abstract

We compared measures of self-reported arrests and official arrests for 676young adults with a history of child abuse and/or neglect and 520 nonabusedand nonneglected controls matched on age, sex, race, and approximate familysocial class. Findings reveal considerable concurrent validity between thetwo sources overall. But there is also evidence of differences by gender,race/ethnicity, age at time of arrest, conviction status, and type ofoffense. Abused and neglected subjects did not appear to differ from thecontrol group in the extent of underreporting of known offenses, however,the groups did differ in the degree of “positive bias”—offensesnot found in arrest records. Abused/neglected subjects self-reportedproportionately more offenses not known to police compared to controls. Thisresult suggests that findings from previous studies on the relationshipbetween childhood victimization and later criminality, as measured byarrests, may have underestimated the magnitude of this relationship.

self-reports official reports validity child abuse child neglect 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Blumstein, A., Cohen, J., Roth, J. A., and Visher, C. A. (eds.) (1986). “Career Criminals,” National Academy Press, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  2. Bowling, B. (1990). Conceptual and methodological problems in measuring “race” differences in delinquency: A reply to Marianne Junger. Br. J. Criminol. 30(4): 483–492.Google Scholar
  3. Chaiken, J. M., and Chaiken, M. R. (1982). Varieties of Criminal Behavior, Rand, Santa Monica, CA.Google Scholar
  4. Elliott D. S. (1994). Serious violent offenders: Onset, developmental course, and termination. Criminology 32: 1–21.Google Scholar
  5. Elliott, D. S., and Voss, H. L. (1974). Delinquency and Dropout, D. C. Heath, Lexington, MA.Google Scholar
  6. Farrington, D. P., Loeber, R., Stouthamer-Loeber, M., Van Kammen, W. B., and Schmidt, L. (1996). Self-reported delinquency and a combined delinquency seriousness scale based on boys, mothers, and teachers: Concurrent and predictive validity for African-Americans and caucasians. Criminology 34: 493–518.Google Scholar
  7. Geerken, M. R. (1994). Rap sheets in criminological research: Considerations and caveats. J. Quant. Criminol. 10: 3–21.Google Scholar
  8. Hindelang, M. J., Hirschi, T., and Weis, J. G. (1979). Correlates of delinquency: The illusion of discrepancy between self-report and official measures. Am. Sociol. Rev. 44: 999–1014.Google Scholar
  9. Hindelang, M. J., Hirschi, T., and Weis, J. G. (1981). Measuring Delinquency, Sage, Beverly Hills, CA.Google Scholar
  10. Hirschi, T. (1969). Causes of Delinquency, University of California Press, Berkeley.Google Scholar
  11. Hollingshead, A. B. (1975). Four Factor Index of Social Status, New Haven, CT (Yale University Working Paper).Google Scholar
  12. Huizinga, D. (1991). Assessing violent behavior with self-reports. In Milner, J. S. (ed.), Neuropsychology of Aggression, Kluwer, Boston.Google Scholar
  13. Huizinga, D., and Elliott, D. S. (1986). Reassessing the reliability and validity of self-report delinquency measures. J. Quant. Criminol. 24: 293–327.Google Scholar
  14. Junger, M. (1989). Discrepancies between police and self-report data for Dutch racial minorities. Br. J. Criminol. 29: 273–284.Google Scholar
  15. Lab, S. P., and Allen, R. B. (1984). Self-report and official measures: A further examination of the validity issue. J. Crim. Just. 12: 445–455.Google Scholar
  16. Leventhal, J. M. (1982). Research strategies and methodologic standards in studies of risk factors for child abuse. Child Abuse Neglect 6: 113–123.Google Scholar
  17. Marquis, K. H. (1981). Quality of Prisoner Self-Reports: Arrest and Conviction Response Errors, Rand, Santa Monica, CA.Google Scholar
  18. Maltz, M. D. (1994). Deviating from the mean: The declining significance of significance. J. Res. Crime Delinq. 31: 434–463.Google Scholar
  19. Maxfield, M. G., and Babbie, E. (1998). Research Methods for Criminal Justice and Criminology, 2nd ed., Wadsworth, Belmont, CA.Google Scholar
  20. Maxfield, M. G., and Widom, C. S. (1996). The cycle of violence: Revisited six years later. Arch. Pediatr. Adolesc. Med. 150: 390–395.Google Scholar
  21. Robins, L. N. (1978). Sturdy childhood predictors of adult antisocial behavior: Replications from longitudinal studies. Psychol. Med. 8: 611–622.Google Scholar
  22. Robins, L. N., Helzer, J. E., Cottler, L., and Goldring, E. (1989). National Institute of Mental Health Diagnostic Interview Schedule, Version III Revised (DIS-III-R), Washington University, St. Louis, MO.Google Scholar
  23. Sampson, R. J. (1985). Sex differences in self-reported delinquency and official records: A multiple-group structural modeling approach. J. Quant. Criminol. 1: 345–367.Google Scholar
  24. Schulsinger, F., Mednick, S. A., and Knop, J. (1981). Longitudinal Research: Methods and Uses in Behavioral Sciences, Martinus Nijhoff, Boston.Google Scholar
  25. Tracy, P. E. (1987). Race and class differences in official and self-reported delinquency. In Wolfgang, M. E., Thornberry, T. P., and Figlio, R. M. (eds.), From Boy to Man, From Delinquency to Crime, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.Google Scholar
  26. Weis, J. G. (1986). Issues in the measurement of criminal careers. In Blumstein, A., Cohen, J., Roth, J. A., and Visher, C. A. (eds.), Criminal Careers and “Career Criminals,” National Academy Press, Washington, DC, Vol. 2, pp. 1–51.Google Scholar
  27. West, D. J., and Farrington, D. P. (1977). The Delinquent Way of Life, Heinemann, London.Google Scholar
  28. Widom, C. S. (1984). Sex roles, criminality, and psychopathology. In Widom, C. S. (ed.), Sex Roles and Psychopathology, Plenum, New York, pp. 187–213.Google Scholar
  29. Widom, C. S. (1989a). Child abuse, neglect and adult behavior: Research design and findings on criminality, violence, and child abuse. Am. J. Orthopsychiatry 59: 355–367.Google Scholar
  30. Widom, C. S. (1989b). Child abuse, neglect, and violent criminal behavior. Criminology 27: 251–271.Google Scholar
  31. Widom, C. S. (1989c). The cycle of violence. Science 244: 160–166.Google Scholar
  32. Widom, C. S., and Morris, S. (1997). Accuracy of adult recollections of childhood victimization Part II: Childhood sexual abuse. Psychol. Assess. 9(1): 34–46.Google Scholar
  33. Wolfgang, M. E., and Weiner, N. (1989). University of Pennsylvania Greater Philadelphia Area Study, Unpublished interview protocol.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michael G. Maxfield
    • 1
  • Barbara Luntz Weiler
    • 2
  • Cathy Spatz Widom
    • 2
  1. 1.School of Criminal JusticeRutgers UniversityNewark
  2. 2.School of Criminal JusticeUniversity at AlbanyAlbany

Personalised recommendations