Advertisement

Environmental Biology of Fishes

, Volume 54, Issue 2, pp 119–133 | Cite as

Behavioral specialization in developing sciaenids and its relationship to morphology and habitat

  • Kirsten R. Poling
  • Lee A. Fuiman
Article

Abstract

Behavioral development of three species of marine sciaenid fish larvae was examined and related to their sensory morphology and habitat. Anti-predator behavior of the larvae was examined under different experimental conditions to isolate the roles of vision and mechanoreception. Spotted seatrout larvae maintained high levels of responsiveness even without visual cues but performed very poorly without mechanoreception. Loss of visual cues had no impact on the distance at which seatrout responded to the stimulus. Atlantic croaker generally performed best when vision was available. This species had low responsiveness without visual stimuli, and had smaller reactive distances when unable to use vision. Red drum were the most flexible in their use of sensory systems. For almost the entire larva period, responsiveness of red drum was equally high regardless of which sensory system was not available. In addition, reactive distances were unaffected when either visual or mechanoreceptive stimuli were eliminated. Thus, seatrout and croaker are sensory specialists, and red drum are sensory generalists. This is corroborated by previous studies on the sensory morphology of these species which showed that seatrout had more mechanosensory specialization, croaker had more visual specialization, and red drum were intermediate, with some enhancement of both systems. Behavioral data are interpreted in terms of habitat usage of the three species. Seatrout have the most restricted distribution over seagrass beds, croaker have a somewhat more flexible distribution, encompassing more open water habitats, and red drum have the most flexible range of habitats, using both vegetated and unvegetated portions of the estuary. These results indicate that even closely related species can exhibit different behaviors in order to better exploit the habitats in which they occur.

vision mechanoreception anti-predator behavior Micropogonias undulatus Cynoscion nebulosus Sciaenops ocellatus 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References cited

  1. Arnold, C.R. 1988. Controlled year-round spawning of the red drum (Sciaenops ocellatus) in captivity. Contr. Mar. Sci. 30 (Suppl): 65–70.Google Scholar
  2. Batty, R.S. 1983. Observation of fish larvae in the dark with television and infra-red illumination. Mar. Biol. 76: 105–107.Google Scholar
  3. Blaxter, J.H.S. & L.A. Fuiman. 1989. Function of the free neuromasts of marine teleost larvae. pp. 481–499. In: S. Coombs, P. G\:orner & H. M\:unz (ed.) The Mechanosensory Lateral Line: Neurobiology and Evolution, Springer-Verlag, New York.Google Scholar
  4. Blaxter, J.H.S. & L.A. Fuiman. 1990. The role of sensory systems of herring larvae in evading predatory fishes. J. Mar. Biol. Assoc. UK 70: 413–427.Google Scholar
  5. Boehlert, G.W. 1979. Retinal development in postlarval through juvenile Sebastes diploproa: adaptations to a changing photic environment. Rev. Can. Biol. 38: 265–280.Google Scholar
  6. Browman, H.I., W.C. Gordon, B.I. Evans & W.J. O'Brien. 1990. Correlation between histological and behavioral measures of visual acuity in a zooplanktivorous fish, the white crappie (Pomoxis annularis). Brain Behav. Evol. 35: 85–97.Google Scholar
  7. Folkvord, A. & J.R. Hunter. 1986. Size-specific vulnerability of northern anchovy, Engraulis mordax, larvae to predation by fishes. U.S. Fish. Bull. 84: 859–869.Google Scholar
  8. Fuiman, L.A. 1993. Development of predator evasion in Atlantic herring, Clupea harengus L. Anim. Behav. 45: 1101–1116.Google Scholar
  9. Fuiman, L.A. 1994. The interplay of ontogeny and scaling in the interactions of fish larvae and their predators. J. Fish Biol. 45(Suppl. A): 55–79.Google Scholar
  10. Fuiman, L.A. & D.R. Ottey. 1993. Temperature effects on spontaneous behavior of larval and juvenile red drum Sciaenops ocellatus, and implications for foraging. U.S. Fish. Bull. 91: 23–35.Google Scholar
  11. Higgs, D.M. 1996. Interrelations between sensory development and ecology in clupeoid larvae. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Texas, Austin, 151 pp.Google Scholar
  12. Higgs, D.M. & L.A. Fuiman. 1996. Ontogeny of visual and mechanosensory structure and function in Atlantic menhaden, Brevoortia tyrannus. J. Exp. Biol. 199: 2619–2629.Google Scholar
  13. Holt, G.J. 1993. Feeding larval red drum on microparticulate diets in a closed recirculating water system. J. World Aqua. Soc. 24: 225–230.Google Scholar
  14. Holt, S.A., C.L. Kitting & C.R. Arnold. 1983. Distribution of young red drums among different seagrass meadows. Trans. Amer. Fish. Soc. 112: 267–271.Google Scholar
  15. Holt, S.A., G.J. Holt & C.R. Arnold. 1989. Tidal stream transport of larval fishes into non-stratified estuaries. Rapports et Proc\`es-Verbaux des R\'eunions Conseil International pour L' Exploration de la Mer 191: 100–104.Google Scholar
  16. Jones, W.R. & J. Janssen. 1992. Lateral line development and feeding behavior in the mottled sculpin, Cottus bairdi (Scorpacniformes: Cottidae). Copeia 1992: 485–492.Google Scholar
  17. Kawamura, G. & K. Ishida. 1985. Changes in sense organ morphology and behavior with growth in the flounder Paralichthys olivaceous. Bull. Japan. Soc. Sci. Fish. 51: 155–165.Google Scholar
  18. Kawamura, G., R. Tsuda, H. Kumai & S. Ohashi. 1984. The visual cell morphology of Pagrus major and its adaptive changes with shift from pelagic to benthic habitats. Bull. Japan. Soc. Sci. Fish. 50: 1975–1980.Google Scholar
  19. Kotrschal, K. & M. Palzenberger. 1992. Neuroecology of cyprinids: comparative, quantitative histology reveals diverse brain patterns. Env. Biol. Fish. 33: 135–152.Google Scholar
  20. Kroese, A.B.A. & N.A.M. Schellart. 1992. Velocity-and acceleration-sensitive units in the trunk lateral line of the trout. J. Neurophys. 68: 2212–2221.Google Scholar
  21. Margulies, D. 1989. Size-specific vulnerability to predation and sensory system development of white seabass, Atractoscion nobilis, larvae. U.S. Fish. Bull. 87: 537–552.Google Scholar
  22. Matsuura, S., K. Ikeda & T. Furukawa. 1971. Effects of streptomycin, kanamycin, quinine, and other drugs on the microphonic potentials of goldfish sacculus. Japan. J. Phys. 21: 579–590.Google Scholar
  23. Miller, J.M., L.B. Crowder & M.L. Moser. 1985. Migration and utilization of estuarine nurseries by juvenile fishes: an evolutionary perspective. pp. 338–352. In: M.A. Rankin (ed.) Migration; Mechanisms and Adaptive Significance, University of Texas Marine Science Institute, Port Aransas.Google Scholar
  24. Miller, T.J., L.B. Crowder & J.A. Rice. 1993. Ontogenetic changes in behavioral and histological measures of visual acuity in three species of fish. Env. Biol. Fish. 37: 1–8.Google Scholar
  25. Motta, P.J., K.B. Clifton, P. Hernandez & B.T. Eggold. 1995. Ecomorphological correlates in ten species of subtropical seagrass fishes: diet and microhabitat utilization. Env. Biol. Fish. 44: 37–60.Google Scholar
  26. Noakes, D.L.G. & J.-G.J. Godin. 1988. Ontogeny of behavior and concurrent developmental changes in sensory systems in teleost fish. pp. 345–395. In: W.S. Hoar & D.J. Randall (ed.) Fish Physiology Volume 11, The Physiology of Developing Fish, Part B, Viviparity and Posthatching Juveniles, Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  27. Pierce, J.W., D.L. Corell, B. Goldberg, M.A. Faust & W.H. Klein. 1986. Response of underwater light transmittance in the Rhode River estuary to changes in water-quality parameters. Estuaries 9:169–178.Google Scholar
  28. Poling, K.R. 1997. Sensory and behavioral ontogeny of three species of sciaenids and the importance of habitat. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Texas, Austin. 151 pp.Google Scholar
  29. Poling, K.R. & L.A. Fuiman. 1997. Sensory development and concurrent behavioural changes in Atlantic croaker larvae. J. Fish Biol. 51: 402–421.Google Scholar
  30. Poling, K.R. & L.A. Fuiman. 1998. Sensory development and its relation to habitat in three species of scioenids. Brain Behav. Evol. (in press).Google Scholar
  31. Rutherford, E.S., T.W. Schmidt & J.T. Tilmani. 1989. Early life history of spotted seatrout (Cynoscion nebulosus) and gray snapper (Lutjanus griseus) in Florida Bay, Everglades National Park, Florida. Bull. Mar. Sci. 44: 49–64.Google Scholar
  32. Savino, J.F. & R.A. Stein. 1982. Predator-prey interaction between largemouth bass and bluegills as influenced by simulated, submersed vegetation. Trans. Amer. Fish. Soc. 111: 255–266.Google Scholar
  33. Shand, J. 1994. Changes in retinal structure during development and settlement of the goatfish Upeneus tragula. Brain Behav. Evol. 43: 51–60.Google Scholar
  34. Thomas, P. & N. Boyd. 1988. Induced spawning of spotted sea-trout, red drum, and orangemouth corvina (family: Sciaenidac) with luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone analog injection. Contr. Mar. Sci. 30(Suppl.): 43–48.Google Scholar
  35. Warlen, S.A. 1981. Age and growth of larvae and spawning time of Atlantic croaker in North Carolina. Proceedings of the Annual Conference of the Southeastern Association of Fish and Wildlife Agriculture 34: 204–214.Google Scholar
  36. Weinstein, M.P., S.L. Weiss, R.G. Hodson & L.R. Gerry. 1980. Retention of three taxa of postlarval fishes in an intensively flushed tidal estuary, Cape Fear River, North Carolina. U.S. Fish. Bull. 78: 419–435.Google Scholar
  37. Wilkinson, L. 1992. SYSTAT: The System for Statistics. Systat, Inc., Evanston. 638 pp.Google Scholar
  38. Zar, J.H. 1996. Biostatistical analysis, 3rd edition. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs. 718 pp.Google Scholar
  39. Zaunreiter, M., H. Junger & K. Kotrschal. 1991. Retinal morphology of cyprinid fishes: a quantitative histological study of ontogenetic changes and interspecific variation. Vision Res. 31: 383–394.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kirsten R. Poling
    • 1
  • Lee A. Fuiman
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUniversity of VirginiaCharlottesvilleU.S.A. (e-mail
  2. 2.University of Texas at Austin, Marine Science InstitutePort AransasU.S.A

Personalised recommendations