Mathematical Geology

, Volume 32, Issue 3, pp 249–270 | Cite as

Variogram Model Selection via Nonparametric Derivative Estimation

  • David J. Gorsich
  • Marc G. Genton


Before optimal linear prediction can be performed on spatial data sets, the variogram is usually estimated at various lags and a parametric model is fitted to those estimates. Apart from possible a priori knowledge about the process and the user's subjectivity, there is no standard methodology for choosing among valid variogram models like the spherical or the exponential ones. This paper discusses the nonparametric estimation of the variogram and its derivative, based on the spectral representation of positive definite functions. The use of the estimated derivative to help choose among valid parametric variogram models is presented. Once a model is selected, its parameters can be estimated—for example, by generalized least squares. A small simulation study is performed that demonstrates the usefulness of estimating the derivative to help model selection and illustrates the issue of aliasing. MATLAB software for nonparametric variogram derivative estimation is available at An application to the Walker Lake data set is also presented.

nonparametric variogram fitting derivative estimation generalized least squares model selection aliasing 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Arfken, G., 1985, Mathematical methods for physicists: Academic Press, New York, 985 p.Google Scholar
  2. Barry, R. P., and Ver Hoef, J. M., 1996, Blackbox kriging: spatial prediction without specifying variogram models: Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics, v. 1, no. 3, p. 297–322.Google Scholar
  3. Bochner, S., 1955, Harmonic analysis and the theory of probability: University of California Press, Berkley and Los Angeles, 176 p.Google Scholar
  4. Cherry, S., 1997, Non-parametric estimation of the sill in geostatistics: Environmetrics, v. 8, p. 13–27.Google Scholar
  5. Cherry, S., Banfield, J., and Quimby, W. F., 1996, An evaluation of a non-parametric method of estimating semi-variograms of isotropic spatial processes: Journal of Applied Statistics, v. 23, no. 4, p. 435–449.Google Scholar
  6. Clark, I., 1979, Practical geostatistics: Applied Science Publishers, Essex, England, 129 p.Google Scholar
  7. Cressie, N., 1985, Fitting variogram models by weighted least squares: Math. Geology, v. 17, p. 563–586.Google Scholar
  8. Cressie, N., 1993, Statistics for spatial data: John Wiley & Sons, New York, 900 p.Google Scholar
  9. Ecker, M. D., and Gelfand, A. E., 1997, Bayesian variogram modeling for an isotropic spatial process: Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics, v. 2, no. 4, p. 347–369.Google Scholar
  10. Genton, M. G., 1998a, Highly robust variogram estimation: Math. Geology, v. 30, no. 2, p. 213–221.Google Scholar
  11. Genton, M. G., 1998b, Variogram fitting by generalized least squares using an explicit formula for the covariance structure: Math. Geology, v. 30, no. 4, p. 323–345.Google Scholar
  12. Härdle, W., 1989, Applied nonparametric regression: Cambridge University Press, 333 p.Google Scholar
  13. Isaaks, E. H., and Srivastava, R. M., 1989, An introduction to applied geostatistics: Oxford University Press, 561 p.Google Scholar
  14. Journel, A. G., and Huijbregts, Ch. J., 1978, Mining geostatistics: Academic Press, London, 600 p.Google Scholar
  15. Matheron, G., 1962, Traité de géostatistique appliquée, Tome I: Mémoires du Bureau de Recherches Géologiques et Minières, no. 14, Editions Technip, Paris, 333 p.Google Scholar
  16. Oppenheim, A. V., and Schafer, R. W., 1989. Discrete-time signal processing: Prentice-Hall Signal Processing Series, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, 879 p.Google Scholar
  17. Schoenberg, I. J., 1938, Metric spaces and completely monotone functions: Annals of Mathematics, v. 39, no. 4, p. 811–841.Google Scholar
  18. Shapiro, A., and Botha, J. D., 1991. Variogram fitting with a general class of conditionally nonnegative definite functions: Computational Statistics and Data Analysis, v. 11, p. 87–96.Google Scholar
  19. Stein, M., 1988, Asymptotically efficient prediction of a random field with a misspecified covariance function: Annals of Statistics, v. 16, no. 1, p. 55–63.Google Scholar
  20. Stein, M., 1990, Uniform asymptotic optimality of linear predictions of a random field using an incorrect second-order structure: Annals of Statistics, v. 18, no. 2, p. 850–872.Google Scholar
  21. Wand, M. P., and Jones, M. C., 1995, Kernel smoothing: Chapman & Hall, 212 p.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© International Association for Mathematical Geology 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • David J. Gorsich
    • 1
  • Marc G. Genton
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of MathematicsMassachusetts Institute of TechnologyCambridge
  2. 2.Department of MathematicsMassachusetts Institute of TechnologyCambridge

Personalised recommendations