Journal of Quantitative Criminology

, Volume 15, Issue 4, pp 379–406 | Cite as

Examining Space–Time Interaction in City-Level Homicide Data: Crack Markets and the Diffusion of Guns Among Youth

  • Daniel Cork

Abstract

This paper examines the linkage between crack market activity and gunhomicide suggested by Blumstein (1995), who argues that the arrival ofcrack stimulated an increased availability of guns among juveniles. Thisgreater availability of guns, the argument continues, is responsible for thesharp upswing in juvenile homicide experienced in the United States in themid-1980s. Using city-level data on crack arrests and gun-related juvenilehomicide, we fit a change-point version of the Bass (1969) model ofinnovation diffusion. We find that, in most large American cities, thediffusion process for crack cocaine experienced an onset of dramatic growththat was followed by a similar, slightly slower growth in gun homicidescommitted by juveniles. We further use cluster analysis to find that thespatial patterning of the two processes is similar, starting on the East andWest Coasts and working their way toward other regions of the nation. Gunuse in homicide among slightly older offenders (ages 18–24) alsoexperienced a change at roughly the same time as the juveniles, but the rateof diffusion was considerably milder than for the younger group; offendersages 25 or older generally show no growth in gun-related homicide whatsoever. In addition, there is no detectable surge in juvenile nongun homicide activity. Based on these findings, we conclude that the crack cocaine markets–gun availability linkage is highly plausible, and we suggest directions for future research in clarifying the dynamics of the late-1980s surge in juvenile homicide.

space– time interaction homicide city-level data crack markets guns youth 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. Bass, F. M. (1969). A new product growth model for consumer durables. Manage. Sci. 15(5): 215–227.Google Scholar
  2. Baumer, E., Lauritsen, J. L., Rosenfeld, R., and Wright, R. (1998). The influence of crack cocaine on robbery, burglary, and homicide rates: A cross-city, longitudinal analysis. J. Res. Crime Delinq. 35(3): 316–340.Google Scholar
  3. Blumstein, A. (1995). Youth violence, guns, and the illicit-drug industry. J. Crim. Law Criminol. 86: 10–36.Google Scholar
  4. Blumstein, A., and Cork, D. (1996). Linking gun availability to youth gun violence. Law Contemp. Problems 59(1): 5–24.Google Scholar
  5. Boyum, D., and Kleiman, M. A. R. (1995). Alcohol & other drugs. In Wilson, J. Q., and Petersilia, J. (eds.), Crime, Institute for Contemporary Studies Press, San Francisco, Chap. 13.Google Scholar
  6. Cork, D. (1996). Juvenile homicide and the availability of firearms. First research (working) paper, H. John Heinz III School of Public Policy and Management, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh.Google Scholar
  7. Cornell, D. G. (1993). Juvenile homicide: A growing national problem. Behav. Sci. Law 11: 389–396.Google Scholar
  8. Decker, S. H., Pennell, S., and Caldwell, A. (1997). Illegal firearms: Access and use by arrestees. Research in Brief, National Institute of Justice, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  9. Fourt, L. A., and Woodlock, J. W. (1960). Early prediction of market success for grocery products. J. Market. 25: 31–38.Google Scholar
  10. Hamid, A. (1992). The development cycle of a drug epidemic: The cocaine smoking epidemic of 1981–1991. J. Psychoact. Drugs 24: 337–348.Google Scholar
  11. Inciardi, J. A., and Pottieger, A. E. (1991). Kids, crack, and crime. J. Drug Issues 21(2): 257–270.Google Scholar
  12. Johnson, B. D., Williams, T., Dei, K. A., and Sanabria, H. (1990). Drug abuse in the inner city: Impact on hard-drug users and the community. In Crime and Justice: An Annual Review (Drugs and Crime), Vol. 13, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp. 9–67.Google Scholar
  13. Johnson, B. D., Natarajan, M., Dunlap, E., and Elmoghazy, E. (1994). Crack abusers and noncrack abusers: Profiles of drug use, drug sales and nondrug criminality. J. Drug Issues 24(1): 117–141.Google Scholar
  14. Kass, R. E., and Raftery, A. E. (1995). Bayes factors. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 90(430): 773–795.Google Scholar
  15. Mahajan, V., Mason, C. H., and Srinivasan, V. (1986). An evaluation of estimation procedures for new product diffusion models. In Mahajan, V., and Wind, Y. (eds.), Innovation Diffusion Models of New Product Acceptance, Ballinger, Cambridge, MA, pp. 203–232.Google Scholar
  16. Mahajan, V., Muller, E., and Bass, F. M. (1993). New-product diffusion models. In Eliashberg, J., and Lilien, G. (eds.), Handbooks in Operations Research and Management Science, Vol. 5, Elsevier, New York, Chap. 8.Google Scholar
  17. Mansfield, E. (1961). Technical change and the rate of imitation. Econometrica 29: 741–766.Google Scholar
  18. Prothrow-Stith, D., and Weissman, M. (1991). Deadly Consequences: How Violence is Destroying our Teenage Population and a Plan to Begin Solving the Problem, Harper Collins, New York.Google Scholar
  19. Schmittlein, D. C., and Mahajan, V. (1982). Maximum likelihood estimation for an innovation diffusion model of new product acceptance. Market. Sci. 1(1): 57–78.Google Scholar
  20. Schwarz, G. (1978). Estimating the dimension of a model. Ann. Stat. 6(2): 461–464.Google Scholar
  21. Sheley, J. F., and Wright, J. D. (1995). In the Line of Fire: Youth, Guns, and Violence in Urban America, Aldine de Gruyter, New York.Google Scholar
  22. Sultan, F., Farley, J. U., and Lehmann, D. R. (1990). A meta-analysis of applications of diffusion models. J. Market. Res. 27: 70–77.Google Scholar
  23. United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics (1992). Drugs, Crime, and the Justice System: A National Report from the Bureau of Justice Statistics, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  24. United States Sentencing Commission (1995). Special Report to the Congress: Cocaine and Federal Sentencing Policy. World Wide Web address: http:yywww.ussc.gov.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • Daniel Cork
    • 1
  1. 1.Carnegie Mellon UniversityPittsburgh

Personalised recommendations