Journal of Quantitative Criminology

, Volume 15, Issue 2, pp 163–180

Applying NIBRS Data to the Study of Intimate Partner Violence: Massachusetts as a Case Study

  • Martie P. Thompson
  • Linda E. Saltzman
  • Daniel Bibel
Article

Abstract

Using data from Massachusetts, we illustrate three ways in which National Incident-BasedReporting System (NIBRS) data can improve the collection of importantinformation on intimate partner violence. First, because NIBRS usesincident-based reporting, data are collected on all crimes associated witheach incident. In our sample of women victimized by an intimate partner, 10%had experienced more than one crime during the incident. Second, NIBRSinvolves expanded data collection on the offender–victim relationship, aswell as reporting about additional offenses. For female victims, partnerswere more likely than nonpartners to commit the crimes of simple assault,intimidation, and aggravated assault. For crimes involving male victims, anaquaintance was most likely to be the offender. Third, NIBRS data allow usto connect information about the incident, the offender(s), and thevictim(s). Our data indicted that several victim- offender-, and incident-relatedvariables were risk factors for injury, including victim’s ethnicity,offender’s relationship to the victim, offender's use of a weapon, whether or not thecase was cleared, type of crime committed, and whether or not drugs and/or alcoholwere involved in the incident. Although there are several limitations to NIBRSdata, its potential usefulness to the study of intimate partner violence deserves furtherattention.

NIBRS intimate partner violence offender–victim relationship women violence incident-based reporting 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. Bachman, R., and Saltzman, L. (1995). Violence Against Women: Estimates from the Redesigned Survey, Bureau of Justice Statistics special report, U.S. Department of Justice, Publication NCJ-154348, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  2. Bureau of Justice Statistics (1981). Dictionary of Criminal Justice Data Terminology, U.S. Department of Justice, Publication NCJ-76939, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  3. Bureau of Justice Statistics (1997a). Criminal Victimization in the United States, 1994, U.S. Department of Justice, publication NCJ-162126, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  4. Bureau of Justice Statistics (1997b). Implementing the National Incident-Based Reporting System: A Project Status Report, U. S. Department of Justice, publication NCJ-165581, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  5. Ellis, D., and DeKeseredy, W. (1997). Rethinking estrangement, interventions, and intimate femicide. Violence Against Women 3: 590–609.Google Scholar
  6. Greenfeld, L. A., Rand, M. R., Craven, D., Klaus, P. A., Perkins, C. A., Ringel, C., Warchol, G., Maston, C., and Fox, J. A. (1998). Violence by Intimates. Bureau of Justice Statistics Factbook, U.S. Department of Justice, publication NCJ-167237, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  7. Langford, L., Isaac, N., and Kabat, S. (1998). Homicides related to intimate partner violence in Massachusetts: Examining case ascertainment and validity of the SHR. Homicide Stud. 2: 353–377.Google Scholar
  8. Maxfield, M. (1989). Circumstances in supplementary homicide reports: Variety and validity. Criminology 27: 671–695.Google Scholar
  9. Rosenberg, M. L., and Mercy, J. A. (1991). Assaultive violence. In Rosenberg, M. L., and Fenley, M. A. (eds.), Violence in America, Oxford University Press, New York, pp. 14–50.Google Scholar
  10. Saltzman, L. E., Mercy, J. A., and Rhodes, P.H. (1992). Identification of nonfatal family and intimate assault incidents in police data. Am. J. Public Health 82: 1018–1020.Google Scholar
  11. U.S. Department of Justice (1984). Uniform Crime Reporting Handbook, U.S Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  12. U.S. Department of Justice (1998). Crime in the United States, 1997. Uniform Crime Reports, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  13. Wilson, M. I., and Daly, M. (1993). Spousal homicide risk and estrangement. Violence and Victims 8: 3–16.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • Martie P. Thompson
    • 1
  • Linda E. Saltzman
    • 2
  • Daniel Bibel
    • 3
  1. 1.Epidemic Intelligence Service, Epidemiology Program Office and Division of Violence PreventionNational Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and PreventionAtlanta
  2. 2.Divison of Violence PreventionNational Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and PreventionAtlanta
  3. 3.Divison of Investigations and IntelligenceMassachusetts State PoliceFramingham

Personalised recommendations