Plant Molecular Biology Reporter

, Volume 16, Issue 2, pp 157–157 | Cite as

Transcript Imaging with cDNA-AFLP: A Step-by-Step Protocol

  • Christian W.B. Bachem
  • Ronald J.F.J. Oomen
  • Richard G.F. Visser


The method of cDNA-AFLP allows detection of differentially expressed transcripts using PCR. This report provides a detailed and updated protocol for the cDNA-AFLP procedure and an analysis of interactions between its various parameters. We studied the effects of PCR cycle number and template dilution level on the number of transcript derived fragments (TDFs). We also examined the use of magnetic beads to synthesise cDNA and the effect of MgCl2 concentration during amplification. Finally, we determined the detection level of the cDNA-AFLP method using TDFs of various sizes and composition. We could detect TDFs corresponding to a single copy per cell of a specific transcript in a cDNA-AFLP pattern, indicating high sensitivity of the method. Also, there was no correlation between concentration of detectable TDF and the fragment size, stressing the high stringency of the amplification reactions. Theoretical considerations and specific applications of the method are discussed.

cDNA-AFLP plant development RNA-fingerprinting 


  1. Altschul SF, Gish W, Miller W, Myers EW and Lipman DJ (1990) Basic local alignment search tool. J Mol Biol 215: 403–410.Google Scholar
  2. Bachem CWB, van der Hoeven RS, de Bruijn SM, Vreugdenhil D, Zabeau M and Visser RGF (1996) Visualization of differential gene expression using a novel method of RNA fingerprinting based on AFLP: analysis of gene expression during potato tuber development. The Plant J 9: 745–753.Google Scholar
  3. Bauer D, Warthoe P, Rohde M, and Struss M (1994) PCR methods and applications manual supplement, pp S805-809. Cold Spring Harbor University Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY.Google Scholar
  4. Diachenko LB, Ledesma J, Chenchik AA and Siebert PD (1996) Combining the technique of RNA fingerprinting and differential display to obtain differentially expressed mRNA. Biochem Biophys Res Com 219: 824–828.Google Scholar
  5. Du-Toit R, Victor TC, and Van-Helden PD (1993) Empirical evaluation of conditions influencing the polymerase chain reaction: enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli as a test case. Euro J Clin Chem Clin Biochem 31: 225–231.Google Scholar
  6. Habu Y, Fukadatanaka S, Hisatomi Y and Iida S (1997) Amplified restriction fragment length polymorphism-based mRNA fingerprinting using a single restriction enzyme that recognizes a 4-bp sequence. Biochem Biophys Res Comm 234: 516–521.Google Scholar
  7. Ivanova NB and Belyavsky AV (1995) Identification of differentially expressed genes by restriction endonuclease-based gene expression fingerprinting. Nucl Acids Res 23: 2954–2958.Google Scholar
  8. Kato K (1996) RNA fingerprinting by molecular indexing. Nucl Acids Res 24: 394–395.Google Scholar
  9. Liang P, Bauer D, Averboukh L, Warthoe P, Rohrwild M, Muller H, Strauss M and Pardee AB (1995) Analysis of altered gene expression by differential display. Meth Enzymol 254: 304–321.Google Scholar
  10. Liang P and Pardee AB (1992) Differential display of eukaryotic messenger RNA by means of the polymerase chain reaction. Science 257: 967–971.Google Scholar
  11. Mathieu-Daudé F, Cheng C, Welsh J and McClelland M (1996) DNA rehybridization during PCR: the ‘C-ot effect’ and its consequences. Nucl Acids Res 24: 1504–1507.Google Scholar
  12. Money T, Reader S, Qu IJ, Dunford RP and Moore G (1996) AFLP-based mRNA fingerprinting. Nucl Acids Res 24: 2616–2617.Google Scholar
  13. Sambrook J, Fritsch EF and Maniatis T (1989) Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual. Cold Spring Harbor University Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY.Google Scholar
  14. Vos P, Hogers R, Bleeker M, Reijans M, van de Lee T, Hornes M, Frijters A, Pot J, Pelman J, Kuiper M and Zabeau M (1995) AFLP: a new technique for DNA fingerprinting. Nucl Acids Res 23: 4407–4414.Google Scholar
  15. Welsh J, Chada K, Dalal SS, Ralph D, Cheng R and McClelland M (1992) Arbitrarily primed PCR fingerprinting of RNA. Nucl Acids Res 20: 4965–4970.Google Scholar
  16. Zhao S, Ooi SL and Pardee AB (1995) New primer strategy improves precision of differential display. BioTechniques 18: 842–850.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • Christian W.B. Bachem
    • 1
  • Ronald J.F.J. Oomen
    • 1
  • Richard G.F. Visser
    • 1
  1. 1.Laboratory of Plant Breeding, Graduate School of Experimental Plant SciencesWageningen Agricultural UniversityWageningenThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations