European Journal of Epidemiology

, Volume 14, Issue 6, pp 605–610 | Cite as

Risk factors for Toxoplasma infection in a reproductive age female population in the area of Belgrade, Yugoslavia

  • Branko Bobić
  • Ivana Jevremović
  • Jelena Marinković
  • Desanka Šibalić
  • Olgica Djurković-Djaković


The contribution to Toxoplasma infection of known transmission risk factors such as consumption of undercooked meat, contact with soil, and contact with cats, as well as that of age, degree of education, residence in central vs. suburban city communities, and year of entry into the study, has been investigated in a group of 1157 female residents (age range 15 to 45 years) of a defined geographic area (Belgrade) during a 4-years period (1988–1991). The rate of infection increased with age, ranging from 57% to 93%, with an overall mean of 77%. However, it decreased significantly over the study period (p < 0.01). Of the potential risk factors examined, regression analysis showed that the following: age (relative risk (RR): 1.18, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.02–1.37, p=0.022), undercooked meat consumption (RR: 2.22, 95% CI: 1.2–2.86, p=0.001), and the year of entry into the study (RR: 0.69, 95% CI: 0.6–0.8, p=0.000) were significantly associated with infection. However, while the consumption of undercooked meat contributed to the frequency of infection in the whole group, its significance increased with the degree of education but decreased with age, and was greater in women residing in the suburbs. In addition, in women below age 20, exposure to soil (farming, gardening) was significantly associated with infection (RR: 1.38, 95% CI: 1.12–1.97, p=0.037). Since cats are the single source of toxoplasma oocysts, the above finding indicates that cats are an epidemiologically significant source of environmental contamination in Belgrade. However, cat ownership itself as a criterion of contact with cats was not associated with infection (p = 0.326). In the absence of a general screening in pregnancy program in Yugoslavia, these data point out the groups of pregnant women at the highest risk of infection and provide a basis for a region-appropriate educational program to prevent congenital toxoplasmosis.

Prevalence Risk factors Toxoplasmosis Women of reproductive age 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Luft BJ, Remington JS. Toxoplasmic encephalitis in AIDS. Clin Infect Dis 1992; 15: 211–222.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Remington JS, Desmonts G. Toxoplasmosis. In: Remington JS, Klein JO (eds), Infectious diseases of the fetus and newborn infant, 3rd ed. Philadelphia: W B Saunders, 1990: 89–195.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Wilson CB, Remington JS, Stagno S, Reynolds DW. Development of adverse sequelae in children born with subclinical congenital Toxoplasma infection. Pediatrics 1980; 66: 767–774.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    World Health Organization. Report of a European meeting on the prevention of congenital toxoplasmosis. Gratz, 5–6 December 1984.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Fulton W. Congenital toxoplasmosis: Is screening desirable? Scand J Infect Dis Suppl 1992; 84: 11–17.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Jeannel D, Niel G, Costagliola D, Danis M, Traore BM, Gentilini M. Epidemiology of toxoplasmosis among pregnant women in the Paris area. Int J Epidemiol 1988; 17: 595–602.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Koskiniemi M, Lappalainen M, Koskela P, Hedman K, Ammala P, Hillesmaa V, Teramo K, and study group. The program for antenatal screening of toxoplasmosis in Finland: A prospective study. Scand J Infect Dis Suppl 1992; 84: 70–74.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Carme B, Leene E, Tirarad V, Hayette MP, Gondry J. Epidemiological studies on toxoplasmosis in French pregnant women in Picardie (France). Eight INCOPA, Izmir, 10–14 October 1994. Abstract 028.2 (265).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Valcavi PP, Natali A, Soliani L, Montali S, Dettori G, Cheezi C. Prevalence of anti-Toxoplasma gondii antibodies in the population of the area of Parma (Italy). Eur J Epidemiol 1995; 11: 333–337.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Desmonts G. Sur la technique de l'épreuve de lyse des toxoplasmes. Sem Hôp Paris 1955; 31: 193–198.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Šibalić D, Radović M, Šulović V. Infection par Toxoplasma gondii pendant la grossesse et avant elle et les conséquences possibles sur le foetus. In: Petrović Z (ed), Proceedings of Second European Multicolloquy of Parasitology, Trogir 1–6 September 1975. Novi Sad: Prosveta, 1977: 23–28.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Djurković-Djaković O. Toxoplasma infection and pathological outcome of pregnancy. Gynecol Obstet Invest 1995; 41: 36–41.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Bobić B, Jevremović I, Marinković J, Nikolić A, Vuković D, Djurković-Djaković O. Epidemiological indications for toxoplasmosis serology in pregnancy. Jugosl Ginekol Perinatol 1998; 34: 17–21.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Šibalić D. Incidence of Toxoplasma gondii infection in man and in various animals in some areas of Serbia. Acta Parasitol Jug 1977; 8: 13–18.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Stagno S, Thiermann E. Acquisition of toxoplasma infection by children in a developing country. Bull WHO 1973; 49: 627–631.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Olesen Larsen S, Lebech M. Models for prediction of the frequency of toxoplasmosis in pregnancy in situations of changing infection rates. Int J Epidemiol 1994; 23: 1309–1314.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Forsgren M, Gille E, Ljungstrom I, Nokes DJ. Toxoplasma gondii in pregnant women in Stockholm in 1969, 1979 and 1987. Lancet 1991; 337: 1413–1414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Logar J, Novak Antonić Ž, Zore A. Serological screening for toxoplasmosis in pregnancy in Slovenia. Scand J Infect Dis 1995; 27: 163–164.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Aspock H, Pollak A. Prevention of prenatal toxoplasmosis by serological screening of pregnant women in Austria. Scand J Infect Dis Suppl 1992; 84: 32–37.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Lunde A, Ugla A. Survival of Toxoplasma gondii in mutton after microwave cooking and freezing. Bull Int Soc Fr Parasitol 1990; Suppl 2, 8: 95.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Edelhofer R. Evaluation of different transmission routes of Toxoplasma gondii in Central Europe. 3rd Biomed Workshop Toxoplasma gondii Research in Europe, Vienna, 6–7 May 1994, Abstr p: 7.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    French J, Messinger H, Macearthy J. A study of Toxoplasma gondii infection in farm and non farm groups in the same geographic location. Am J Edpidemiol 1970; 185–191.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Singh S, Nautiyal BL. Seroprevalence of toxoplasmosis in Kumaon region of India. Indian J Med Res 1991; 93: 247–249.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Jackson MH, Hutchison WM, Siim JChr. A seroepidemiological survey of toxoplasmosis in Scotland and England. Ann Trop Med Parasitol 1987; 81: 359–365.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    DiGiacomo R, Harris N, Huber N, Cooney M. Animal exposures and antibodies to Toxoplasma gondii in a university population. Am J Epidemiol 1990; 131: 729–733.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Wallace MR, Rossetti RJ, Oslon PE. Cats and toxoplasmosis risk in HIV-infected adults. JAMA 1993; 269: 76–77.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Papoz L, Simondon F, Saurin W. A simple model relevant to toxoplasmosis applied to epidemiologic results in France. Am J Epidemiol 1986; 123: 154–161.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Kapperud G, Jenum PA, Stray Pedersen B, Melby KK, Eskild A, Eng J. Risk factors for Toxoplasma gondii infection in pregnancy. Am J Epidemiol 1996; 144: 405–412.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Ades AE, Parker S, Gilbert R, Tookey PA, Berry T, Hjelm M, Wilcox AH, Cubitt D, Peckham CS. Maternal prevalence of Toxoplasma antibody based on anonymous neonatal serosurvey: A geographical analysis. Epidemiol Infect 1993; 110: 127–133.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • Branko Bobić
    • 1
  • Ivana Jevremović
    • 2
  • Jelena Marinković
    • 3
  • Desanka Šibalić
    • 1
  • Olgica Djurković-Djaković
    • 1
  1. 1.Toxoplasmosis Research LaboratoryInstitute for Medical ResearchBelgrade
  2. 2.Institute for EpidemiologyYugoslavia
  3. 3.Institute for Statistics and Informatics, School of MedicineUniversity of BelgradeBelgradeYugoslavia

Personalised recommendations