HemoCue®, an Accurate Bedside Method of Hemoglobin Measurement?
Objective. Evaluate the accuracy of this bedside method to determinehemoglobin (Hb) concentration in general surgery over a wide range of Hbvalues and to determine potential sources of error. Methods. Accuracy of Hbmeasurement using HemoCue® (AB Leo Diagnostics, Helsinborg, Sweden) wasassessed in 140 surgical blood samples using 7 HemoCue® devices incomparison with a CO-Oximeter (IL 482, Instrumentation Laboratory,Lexington, MA). To analyze potential sources of error, packed red cells andfresh frozen plasma were reconstituted to randomized Hb levels of 2–18g/dL. Results. In the surgical blood samples, the Hb concentrationdetermined by the CO-Oximeter (HbCOOX) ranged from 5.1 to 16.7 g/dL and theHb concentration measured by HemoCue® (HbHC) from 4.7 to 16.0 g/dL. Bias(HbCOOX – HbHC) between HbCOOX and HbHC was 0.6 ± 0.6 g/dL(mean ± SD) or 5.4 ± 5.0% (p < 0.001). Also in thereconstituted blood, the bias between HbCOOX and HbHC was significant (0.2± 0.3 g/dL or 2.1 ± 3.2%; p < 0.001). Themicrocuvette explained 68% of the variability between HbCOOX andHbHC. HemoCue® thus underestimates the Hb concentration by2–5% and exhibits a 8–10 times higher variability withonly 86.4% of HbHC being within ± 10% of HbCOOX.Conclusion. Although the mean bias between HbCOOX and HbHC was relativelylow, Hb measurement by HemoCue® exhibited a significant variability.Loading multiple microcuvettes and averaging the results may increase theaccuracy of Hb measurement by HemoCue®.
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.Rutherford CJ, Kaplan HS. Autologous blood donations–can we bank on it? N Engl J Med 1995; 332: 740–742Google Scholar
- 2.Spahn DR, Leone BJ, Reves JG, Pasch T. Cardiovascular and coronary physiology of acute isovolemic hemodilution: a review of nonoxygen-carrying and oxygen-carrying solutions. Anesth Analg 1994; 78: 1000–1021Google Scholar
- 3.McNulty SE, Torjman M, Grodecki W, Marr A, Schieren H. A comparison of four bedside methods of hemoglobin assessment during cardiac surgery. Anesth Analg 1995; 81: 1197–1202Google Scholar
- 4.Be WK, Kerkkamp HE, Booij LH. Hemocue–a new haemoglobinometer in the clinic. Eur J Anaesthesiol 1991; 8: 55–58Google Scholar
- 5.Laifer SA, Kuller JA, Hill LM. Rapid assessment of fetal hemoglobin concentration with the HemoCue system. Obstet Gynecol 1990; 76: 723–724Google Scholar
- 6.Berry SM, Dombrowski MP, Blessed WB, Bichalski JA, Jones TB, Cotton DB. Fetal hemoglobin quantitations using the Hemocue system are rapid and accurate. Obstet Gynecol 1993; 81: 417–420Google Scholar
- 7.Cohen AR, Seidl-Friedman J. HemoCue system for hemoglobin measurement. Evaluation in anemic and nonanemic children. Am J Clin Pathol 1988; 90: 302–305Google Scholar
- 8.Chen PP, Short TG, Leung DH, Oh TE. A clinical evaluation of the Hemocue haemoglobinometer using capillary, venous and arterial samples. Anaesth Intensive Care 1992; 20: 497–500Google Scholar
- 9.Neville RG. Evaluation of portable haemoglobinometer in general practice. Br Med J Clin Res Ed 1987; 294: 1263–1265Google Scholar
- 10.Von Schenck H, Falkensson M, Lundberg B. Evaluation of “HemoCue,” a new device for determining hemoglobin. Clin Chem 1986; 32: 526–529Google Scholar
- 11.Sedor FA, Holleman CM. Evaluation of the IL 482 CO-Oximeter. Clin Chem 1987; 33: 1942–1943Google Scholar
- 12.Mahoney JJ, Vreman HJ, Stevenson DK, Van Kessel AL. Measurement of carboxyhemoglobin and total hemoglobin by five specialized spectrophotometers (CO-oximeters) in comparison with reference methods. Clin Chem 1993; 39: 1693–1700Google Scholar
- 13.Vreman HJ, Mahoney JJ, Van Kessel AL, Stevenson DK. Carboxyhemoglobin as measured by gas chromatography and with the IL 282 and 482 CO-Oximeters. Clin Chem 1988; 34: 2562–2566Google Scholar
- 14.Henderson MA, Irwin MG. High humidity affects HemoCue microcuvette function (letter). Anaesth Intensive Care 1995; 23: 407.1Google Scholar