Environmental Biology of Fishes

, Volume 53, Issue 2, pp 183–191 | Cite as

Sound production and reproductive behaviour of the armoured catfish Corydoras paleatus (Callichthyidae)

  • Inge Pruzsinszky
  • Friedrich Ladich


Sound production during reproductive behaviour, dyadic encounters and distress situations was investigated in the callichthyid catfish Corydoras paleatus. Sounds were broad-band, pulsed, acoustic signals produced during abduction of the pectoral spines. Only males emitted trains of sounds during courting and trains of sounds of shorter duration during dyadic encounters. Several males, which are usually smaller than females, courted one gravid female without obvious cooperation or competition between them. During mating, one previously vocalizing male clasped the female's barbels with one pectoral spine and inseminated the eggs. The number of successful spawnings, days until spawning, and number of eggs laid was not related to the number of males (one, two or three) combined with one female. Males did not behave aggressively towards each other during courting or in dyadic encounters. In distress situations, when fish were hand held, both sexes and juveniles produced single sounds. The dominant frequency was negatively correlated with body size and the sound duration was positively correlated with relative length of pectoral spines (standardized to body length). This acoustical behaviour in C. paleatus differs considerably from Hoplosternum thoracatum, a representative of the callichthyine subfamily, in which vocalization was observed during territorial behaviour in males and aggressive behaviour in both sexes. This is the first report of a major difference in vocalizing behaviour within one teleost family.

courtship calls distress calls sex-specific vocalization intrafamilial diversity aquarium observations 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Abu-Gideiri, Y.B. & D.H. Nasr. 1973. Sound production bySynodontis schall (Bloch-Schneider). Hydrobiologia 43: 415–428.Google Scholar
  2. Bischof, C. 1996. Diversity of agonistic behaviour of croaking gourami (Trichopsis vittata, T. schalleri andT. pumila: Ana bantoidei) and the paradise fish (Macropodus opercularis: Anabantoidei). Aggr. Behav. 22: 447–455.Google Scholar
  3. Brantley, R.K. & A.H. Bass. 1994. Alternative spawning tactics and acoustic signals in the plainfin midshipman fishPorichthys notatus Girard (Teleostei, Batrachoididae). Ethology 96: 213–232.Google Scholar
  4. Burgess, W.E. 1989. An atlas of freshwater and marine catfishes. T.F.H. Publications, Neptune City. 784 pp.Google Scholar
  5. Fine, M.L. 1978. Seasonal and geographical variation of the mating call of the oyster toadfish,Opsanu tau L. Oecologia 36: 45–57.Google Scholar
  6. Fine, M.L., D. McElroy, J. Rafi, C.B. King, K.E. Loesser & S. Newton. 1996. Lateralization of pectoral stridulation sound production in the channel catfish. Physiol. Behav. 60: 753–757.Google Scholar
  7. Fine, M.L., H.E. Winn & B.L. Olla. 1977. Communication in fishes. pp. 472–518.In: T.A. Sebeok (ed.) How Animals Communicate, Indiana University Press, Bloomington.Google Scholar
  8. Gainer, H. 1967. Neuromuscular mechanisms of sound production and pectoral spine locking in the banjo catfish,Bunocephalus sp. Physiol. Zool. 40: 269–306.Google Scholar
  9. Gerald, J.W. 1971. Sound discrimination by males of two cyprinid fishes. Texas J. Sci. 112: 48–54.Google Scholar
  10. Gray, G.A. & H.E. Winn. 1961. Reproductive ecology and sound production of the toadfish,Opsanus tau. Ecology 42: 274–282.Google Scholar
  11. Hawkins, A.D. & A.A. Myrberg. 1983. Hearing and sound communication underwater. pp. 347–405.In: B. Lewis (ed.) Bioacoustics, A Comparative Approach, Academic Press, London.Google Scholar
  12. Hawkins, A.D. & K.J. Rasmussen. 1978. The calls of gadoid fish. J. Mar. Biol. Ass. U.K. 58: 891–911.Google Scholar
  13. Ibara, R.M., L.T. Penny, A.W. Ebeling, G. Dykhuizen & G. Cailliet. 1983. The mating call of the plainfin midshipman fish,Porichthys notatus, pp. 205–212.In: D.L.G. Noakes et al. (ed.) Predators and Prey in Fisher, Dr W. Junk Publishers, The Hague.Google Scholar
  14. Jenkins, R.E. & D.J. Jenkins. 1980. Reproductive behavior of the greater redhorse,Moxostoma valenciennesi, in the thousand islands region. Can. Field Nat. 94: 426–443.Google Scholar
  15. Katano, O., K. Saitoh & A. Koizumi. 1988. Scatter — spawning of the catfish,Silurus asotus. Japan J. Ichthyol. 35: 203–211.Google Scholar
  16. Kohda, M., M. Tanimura, M. Kikue-Nakamura & S. Yamagishi. 1995. Sperm drinking by female catfishes: a novel mode of insemination. Env. Biol. Fish. 42: 1–6.Google Scholar
  17. Kratochvil, H. 1985. Beitrage zur Lautbiologie der Anabantoidei — Bau, Funktion und Entwicklung von lauterzeugenden Systemen. Zool. Jahrb. Physiol. 89: 203–255.Google Scholar
  18. Ladich, F. 1990. Vocalization during agonistic behaviour inCottus gobio (Cottidae): an acoustic threat display. Ethology 84: 193–201.Google Scholar
  19. Ladich, F. 1997a. Agonistic behaviour and significance of sounds in vocalizing fish. Mar. Fresh. Behav. Physiol. 29: 87–108.Google Scholar
  20. Ladich, F. 1997b. Comparative analysis of swimbladder (drumming) and pectoral (stridulation) sounds in three families of catfishes. Bioacoustics 8: 85–208.Google Scholar
  21. Ladich, F., W. Brittinger & H. Kratochvil. 1992. Significance of agonistic vocalization in the croaking gourami (Trichopsis vittatus, Teleostei). Ethology 90: 307–314.Google Scholar
  22. Ladich, F. & H. Kratochvil. 1989. Sound production by the marmoreal goby,Protherorhinus marmoratus (Pallas) (Gobiidae, Teleostei). Zool. Jahrb. Physiol 93: 501–504.Google Scholar
  23. Lugli, M., P. Torricelli, G. Pavan & P.J. Miller. 1996. Breeding sounds of malePadogobius nigricans with suggestions for further evolutionary study of vocal behaviour in gobioid fishes. J. Fish Biol. 49: 648–657.Google Scholar
  24. Mayr, M. 1987. Verhaltensbeobachtungen anHoplosternum thoracatum, Cuvier & Valenciennes (1840), mit besonderer Berücksichtigung des Lautverhaltens. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Vienna, Vienna. 103 pp.Google Scholar
  25. Myrberg, A.A. Jr. 1972. Ethology of the bicolor damselfish,Eupomacentrus partitus (Pisces: Pomacentridae): a comparative analysis of laboratory and field behaviour. Anim. Behav. Monogr. 5: 199–283.Google Scholar
  26. Myrberg, A.A. Jr. 1981. Sound communication and interception in fishes. pp. 395–426.In: W.N. Tavolga, A.N. Popper & R.R. Fay (ed.) Hearing and Sound Communication in Fishes, Springer Verlag, Berlin.Google Scholar
  27. Myrberg, A.A. Jr., M. Mohler & J.D. Catala. 1986. Sound production by males of a coral reef fish (Pomacentrus partitus): its significance to females. Anim. Behav. 34: 913–923.Google Scholar
  28. Myrberg, A.A. Jr., E. Spanier & S.J. Ha 1978. Temporal patterning in acoustical communication. pp. 137–179.In: E.S. Reese & F.J. Lighter (ed.) Contrasts in Behaviour, John Wiley & Sons, New York.Google Scholar
  29. Nelson, J.S. 1994. Fishes of the world. John Wiley & Sons, New York, 600 pp.Google Scholar
  30. Noll, A.M. 1967. Cepstrum pitch detection. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 41: 293–309.Google Scholar
  31. Page, L.M. & C.E. Johnston. 1990. Spawning in the creek chubsucker.Erimyzon oblongus, with a review of spawning behavior in suckers (Castostomidae). Env. Biol. Fish. 27: 265–272.Google Scholar
  32. Pfeiffer, W. & J.F. Eisenberg. 1965. Die Lauterzeugung der Dornwelse (Doradidae) und der Fiederbartwelse (Mochokidae). Z. Morph. Ökol. Tiere 54: 669–679.Google Scholar
  33. Riglcy, L. & J. Muir. 1979. The role of sound production by the brown bullheadIctalurus nebulosus. Proc. Pennsylvania Acad. Sci. 53: 132–134.Google Scholar
  34. Royce, W.F. 1951. Breeding habits of lake trout in New York. U.S. Fish. Bull. 59: 59–76.Google Scholar
  35. Schachner, G. & F. Schaller. 1981. Schallerzeugung und Schallreaktion beim Antennenwels (Mandim)Rhamdia sebae sebae Val. Zool. Beitr. 27: 375–391.Google Scholar
  36. Schneider, H. 1964. Bioakustische Untersuchungen an Anemonenfischen der GattungAmphiprion (Pisces). Z. Morph. Ökol. Tiere 53: 453–474.Google Scholar
  37. Stout, J.F. 1963. The significance of sound production during the reproductive behaviour ofNotropis analostanus (family Cyprinidae). Anim. Behav. 11: 83–92.Google Scholar
  38. Taborsky, M. 1994. Sneakers, satellites, and helpers: parasitic and cooperative behavior in fish reproduction. pp. 1–100.In: P.J.B. Slater, J.S. Rosenblatt, C.T. Snowdon & M. Milinsky (ed.) Advances in the Study of Behavior 23, Academic Press, San Diego.Google Scholar
  39. Wallin, J.E. 1989. Bluehead chub (Nocomis leptocephalus) nests used by yellow shiners (Notropis lutipinnis). Copeia 1989: 1077–1080.Google Scholar
  40. Winn, H.E. 1967. Vocal facilitation and the biological significance of toadfish sounds. pp. 283–304.In: W.N. Tavolga (ed.) Marine Bioacoustics, Pergamon Press, New York.Google Scholar
  41. Winn, H.E. 1972. Acoustic discrimination by the toadfish with comments on signal system. pp. 361–385.In: H.E. Winn & B.L. Olla (ed.) Behaviour of Marine Animals, vol. 2, Vertebrates, Plenum Press, New York.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • Inge Pruzsinszky
    • 1
  • Friedrich Ladich
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of ZoologyUniversity of ViennaViennaAustria

Personalised recommendations