Advertisement

Journal of Clinical Monitoring

, Volume 13, Issue 6, pp 363–371 | Cite as

A New Technique to Measure and Track Blood Resistivity in Intracardiac Impedance Volumetry

  • Bala Gopakumaran
  • Peter Osborn
  • John H. Petre
  • Paul A. Murray
Article

Abstract

Objective. To propose and verify a technique by which blood resistivitycan be measured continuously and instantaneously with a conductance catheterused to measure ventricular volume by intracardiac impedance volumetry.Methods. Intracardiac impedance volumetry involves the measurement ofventricular blood volume using a multi-electrode conductance catheter.Ventricular volume measurement with the conductance catheter requires thevalue of blood resistivity. Previously, blood resistivity has beendetermined by drawing a sample of blood and measuring resistivity in aseparate measuring cell. A new technique is proposed that allows theresistivity of blood to be measured with the conductance catheter itself.Two adjacent electrodes of the catheter are chosen to establish a localizedelectric field. With a localized field, the resistance measured between theadjacent electrodes bears a constant ratio (resistivity ratio) to theresistivity of blood. Finite element cylindrical models with excitingelectrodes were created to determine the resistivity ratio. Bloodresistivity was determined by dividing the resistance found due to thelocalized electric field by the resistivity ratio. The proposed scheme wasverified in cylindrical physical models and in in vivo canine hearts.Results. Finite element simulations showed the resistivity ratio to be 1.30and 1.43 for two custom-made catheters (Ohmeda Inc. and Biosensors Inc.,respectively). The resistivity ratio remained constant as long as thecylindrical volume of blood around the adjacent electrodes had a radiuslarger than the electrode spacing. In addition, this ratio was found to be afunction of electrode width. The new technique allowed us to measure salineresistivity with an error, −0.99 ± 0.25% in a physicalmodel, and blood resistivity with an error, −0.625 ±2.75% in an in vivo canine model. Conclusion. The new in vivotechnique can be used to measure and track blood resistivity instantaneouslyand continuously without drawing blood samples.

Blood resistivity impedance volumetry conductance catheter ventricular volume cardiac output 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.
    Woodard JC, Bertram CD, Gow BS. Detecting right ventricular volume changes using the conductance catheter. PACE 1992; 15: 2283–2294Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Woodard JC, Bertram CD, Gow BS. Right ventricular volumetry by catheter measurement of conductance. PACE 1987; 10: 862–870Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Baan J, Jong TTA, Kerkhof PLM et al. Continuous stroke volume and cardiac output from intra-ventricular dimensions obtained with impedance catheter. Cardiovasc Res 1981; 15: 328–334Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kass DA, Midei M, Graves W, Brinker JA, Maughan WL. Use of a conductance (volume) catheter and transient inferior vena caval occlusion for rapid determination of pressure-volume relationships in man. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 1988; 15: 192–202Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Van der Velde ET, Van Dijk AD, Steendijk P et al. Left ventricular segemental volume by conductance catheter and cine-CT. Eur Heart J 1992; 13 (Suppl. E): 15–21Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    McKay RG, Spears JR, Aroesty JM et al. Instantaneous measurement of left and right ventricular stroke volume and pressure-volume relationships with an impedance catheter. Circulation 1984; 69(4): 703–710Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Baan J, Van der Velde ET, De Bruin HG et al. Continuous measurement of left ventricular volume in animals and humans by conductance catheter. Circulation 1984; 70(5): 812–823Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Applegate RJ, Cheng CP, Little WC. Simultaneous conductance catheter and dimension assessment of left ventricle volume in the intact animal. Circulation 1990; 81: 638–648Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Schreuder JJ, Van der Veen FH, Van der Velde ET et al. Beat-to-beat analysis of left ventricular pressure-volume relation and stroke volume by conductance catheter and aortic modelflow in cardiomyoplasty patients. Circulation 1995; 91: 2010–2017Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Odake M, Takeuchi M, Takaoka H et al. Determination of left ventricular volume using a conductance catheter in the diseased human heart. Eur Heart J 1992; 13 (Suppl. E): 22–27Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Burkhoff D, Van der Velde E, Kass DA et al. Accuracy of volume measurement by conductance catheter in isolated, ejecting canine hearts. Circulation 1985; 72(2): 440–447Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kass DA, Yamazaki T, Burkhoff D, Maughan WL, Sagawa K. Determination of left ventricular end-systolic pressure-volume relationships by the conductance (volume) catheter technique. Circulation 1986; 73(3): 586–595Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Gopakumaran B, Petre JH, Krucinski S, Murray PA. Real-time continuous measurement of right ventricular volume using a conductance catheter. Biomed Instrum Technol 1996; 30: 427–438Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Tjon-A-Meeuw L, Hess OM, Nonogi H et al. Left ventricular volume determination in dogs: a comparison between conductance technique and angiocardiography. Eur Heart J 1988; 9: 1018–1026Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Salo RW, Pederson BD, Olive AL, Lincoln WC, Wallner TG. Continuous ventricular volume assessment for diagnosis and pacemaker control. PACE 1984; 7(2): 1267–1272Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Krupa J, Terlecki J. A nondestructive method for measuring electrical conductivity of intracellular matter of tissue in situ. Radiat Environ Biophys 1976; 13: 79–88Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Geddes LA, Sadler C. The specific resistance of blood at body temperature. Med Biol Eng 1973; 11(3): 336–339Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Geddes LA, da Costa CP. The specific resistance of canine blood at body temperature. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 1973; 20 (Communication): 51–53Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Geddes LA, Baker LE. The specific resistance of biological material-A compendium of data for the biomedical engineer and physiologist. Med Biol Eng 1967; 5: 271–293Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Salo RW. The theoretical basis of a computational model for the determination of volume by impedance. Automedica 1989; 11: 299–310Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Salo RW. Improvement in intracardiac impedance volumes by field extrapolation. Eur Heart J 1992; 13 (Suppl. E): 35–39Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Hettrick DA, Warltier DC. Finite element model of the impedance catheter technique for ventricular volume measurement. Finite Elements in Analysis and Design 1993; 14: 361–372Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Panescu D, Webster JG, Stratbucker RA. Measurement of ventricular volume from blood conductance using two-dimensional finite element analysis. Physiol Meas 1994; 15: 49–56Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Frewer RA. The electrical conductivity of flowing blood. Bio-Med Eng 1974; 9(12): 552–554Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Dellimore JW, Gosling RG. Change in blood conductivity with flow rate. Med Biol Eng 1975; 13(6): 904–913Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  • Bala Gopakumaran
    • 1
    • 2
  • Peter Osborn
    • 3
  • John H. Petre
    • 4
  • Paul A. Murray
    • 4
  1. 1.Biomedical Engineering CenterThe Ohio State UniversityColumbusU.S.A
  2. 2.Center for Anesthesiology ResearchThe Cleveland Clinic FoundationClevelandU.S.A.
  3. 3.Marquette Electronics Inc.MilwaukeeU.S.A
  4. 4.Center for Anesthesiology ResearchThe Cleveland Clinic FoundationClevelandU.S.A

Personalised recommendations