Environmental Biology of Fishes

, Volume 50, Issue 1, pp 85–103 | Cite as

Distribution and microhabitat use by flatfishes in a Louisiana estuary

  • Robert L. Allen
  • Donald M. Baltz
Article

Abstract

We used a 1 m beam trawl to characterize microhabitat use of flatfishes in monthly samples collected in Barataria Bay, Louisiana. Six strata were established along a salinity gradient from the nearshore zone along the Gulf of Mexico to approximately 30 km inland. Randomized sampling within strata characterized flatfish distributions and environmental conditions throughout the bay. Microhabitats were characterized by salinity, temperature, dissolved oxygen, depth, distance from shore, and substrate type. In 594 short-duration, beam-trawl samples collected from October 1992 through September 1994, we identified seven flatfish species from 7046 specimens, most of which were juveniles. Four species accounted for 98.3% of all flatfishes. The two most abundant, offshore tonguefish and bay whiff, were euryhaline and widely distributed over the salinity gradient; however, offshore tonguefish were concentrated in the lowermost stratum where bay whiff were uncommon. The third species, fringed flounder, was more abundant in middle and lower bay strata at higher salinities. The fourth species, blackcheek tonguefish, was most common in middle and upper bay strata and declined in abundance in coastal strata. A rotated factor analysis resolved six environmental variables into three major axes that explained 69 percent of the variance and were characterized as seasonal, depth-distance, and substrate-salinity axes. Separation of species and life history intervals in three-dimensional factor space reflected temporal and spatial segregation. Within the four common flatfishes, 14 of 24 variable comparisons showed clear ontogenetic trends in which at least two size-class means differed significantly. Among the common species, temporal differences were reflected by mean temperatures and dissolved oxygen concentrations and spatial differences were reflected by other environmental variables, including depth, distance, substrate, and salinity.

juvenile flatfish nursery habitat ecological segregation Achirus lineatus Citharichthys spilopterus Etropus crossotus Paralichthys lethostigma Symphurus plagiusa Symphurus civitatium Trinectes maculatus 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References cited

  1. Baltz, D.M. 1990. Autecology. pp. 583–605. In: C.B. Schreck & P.B. Moyle (ed.) Methods for Fish Biology, American Fisheries Society, Bethesda.Google Scholar
  2. Baltz, D.M., C. Rakocinski & J.W. Fleeger. 1993. Microhabitat use by marsh-edge fishes in Louisiana estuary. Env. Biol. Fish. 36: 109–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Beck, M.W. 1995. Size-specific shelter limitation in stone crabs: a test of the demographic bottleneck hypothesis. Ecology 76: 968–980.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Boesch, D.F. & R.E. Turner. 1984. Dependence of fishery species on salt marshes: the role of food and refuge. Estuaries 7: 460–468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Briggs, J.C. 1958. A list of Florida fishes and their distribution. Bulletin of the Florida State Museum, Biological Science 2: 223–318.Google Scholar
  6. Burke, J.S., J.M. Miller & D.E. Hoss. 1991. Immigration and settlement pattern of Paralichthys dentatus and P. lethostigma in an estuarine nursery ground, North Carolina, U.S.A. Neth. J. Sea Res. 27: 393–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Childers, D.L., J.W. Day, Jr. & R.A. Muller. 1990. Relating climatological forcing to coastal water levels in Louisiana estuaries and the potential importance of El Niño-Southern Oscillation events. Clim. Res. 1: 31–42.Google Scholar
  8. Christmas, J.Y. & R.S. Waller. 1973. Estuarine vertebrates, Mississippi, pp. 320–406. In: J.Y. Christmas (ed.) Cooperative Gulf of Mexico Estuarine Inventory and Study, Mississippi Marine Conservation Commission, Mississippi.Google Scholar
  9. Dahlberg, M.D. 1972. An ecological study of Georgia Coastal fishes. U.S. Fish. Bull. 70: 323–353.Google Scholar
  10. Day, J.W., Jr., C.A.S. Hall, W.M. Kemp & A. Yanez-Arancibia. 1989. Estuarine ecology. John Wiley, New York, 558 pp.Google Scholar
  11. Dovel, W.L. 1967. Fish eggs and larvae of the Magothy River, Maryland. Chesapeake Sci. 8: 125–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dovel, W.L., J.A. Mihursky & A.J. McErlean. 1969. Life history aspects of the hogchoker, Trinectes maculatus, in the Patuxent River estuary, Maryland. Chesapeake Sci. 10: 104–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fahay, M.P. 1983. Guide to the early stages of marine fishes occuring in the western North Atlantic Ocean, Cape Hatteras to the Southern Scotian Shelf. J. N.W. Atl. Fish. Sci. Vol. 4, Northwest Atlantic Fisheries Organization, Dartmouth. 423 pp.Google Scholar
  14. Ginsburg, I. 1951. Western Atlantic tonguefishes with descriptions of six new species. Zoologica 36: 185–201.Google Scholar
  15. Gunter, G. 1938. Seasonal variations in abundance of certain estuarine and marine fishes in Louisiana with particular reference to life histories. Ecol. Monogr. 8: 314–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gunter, G. 1945. Studies on marine fishes of Texas. Publ. Inst. Mar. Sci. Univ. Texas 1: 1–190.Google Scholar
  17. Gunter, G. & G.E. Hall. 1963. Biological investigations of the St. Lucie estuary (Florida) in connection with Lake Okeechokee discharges through the St. Lucie canal. Gulf Res. Rep. 1: 189–307.Google Scholar
  18. Hildebrand, S.F. & W.C. Schroeder. 1928. Fishes of Chesapeake Bay. Bulletin U.S. Bureau of Fisheries 43: 1–366.Google Scholar
  19. Hoese, H.D. & R.H. Moore. 1977. Fishes of the Gulf of Mexico. Texas, Louisiana and adjacent waters. Texas A & M University Press, College Station. 327 pp.Google Scholar
  20. Houde, E.D. 1987. Fish early life dynamics and recruitment variability. Amer. Fish. Soc. Symp. 2: 17–29.Google Scholar
  21. Houde, E.D. & E.S. Rutherford. 1993. Recent trends in estuarine fisheries: predictions of fish production and yield. Estuaries 16: 161–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hurlbert, S.H. 1981. A gentile depilation of the niche: Dicean resource sets in resource hyperspace. Evol. Theory 5: 177–184.Google Scholar
  23. Kramer, S.H. 1991. The shallow-water flatfishes of San Diego County. Rep. CalCOFI 32: 128–142.Google Scholar
  24. Kuipers, B. 1975. On the efficiency of a two-meter beam trawl for juvenile plaice (Pleurinectes platessa). Neth. J. Sea Res. 9: 69–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Leslie, A.J., Jr. & D.J. Stewart. 1986. Systematics and distributional ecology of Etropus (Pisces, Bothidae) on the Atlantic coast of the United States with description of a new species. Copeia 1986: 140–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Livingston, R.J. 1988. Inadequacy of species-level designations for ecological studies of coastal migratory fishes. Env. Biol. Fish. 22: 225–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Magnuson, J.J. 1991. Fish and fisheries ecology. Ecological Applications 1: 13–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Martin, F. & G.E. Drewry. 1978. Development of fishes of the mid-Atlantic bight. An atlas of eggs, larval, and juvenile stages. Vol. VI. Stromateidae through Ogcocephalidae. U.S. Dept. of Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service, Biological Services Program FWS/OBS-78/12. 416 pp.Google Scholar
  29. Miller, J.M. 1965. A trawl survey of the shallow Gulf fishes near Port Aransas, Texas. Publ. Inst. Mar. Sci. Univ. Texas 10: 80–107.Google Scholar
  30. Miller, J.M. 1994. An overview of the second flatfish symposium: recruitment in flatfish. Neth. J. Sea. Res. 32: 103–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Miller, J.M., J.S. Burke & G.R. Fitzhugh. 1991. Early life history patterns of Atlantic North American flatfish: likely (and unlikely) factors controlling recruitment. Neth. J. Sea Res. 27: 261–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Miller, P.J. 1979. A concept of fish phenology. Symp. Zool. Soc. London 44: 1–28.Google Scholar
  33. Miller, T.J., L.B. Crowder, J.A. Rice & E.A. Marschall. 1988. Larval size and recruitment mechanisms in fishes: towards a conceptual framework. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 45: 1657–1670.Google Scholar
  34. Minello, T.J., R.J. Zimmerman & E.X. Martinez. 1987. Fish predation on juvenile brown shrimp, Penaeus aztecus Ives: effects of turbidity and substratum on predation rates. U.S. Fish. Bull. 85: 59–70.Google Scholar
  35. Minello, T.J., R.J. Zimmerman & E.X. Martinez. 1989. Mortality of young brown shrimp Penaeus aztecus in estuarine nurseries. Trans. Amer. Fish. Soc. 118: 693–708.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Moe, M.A., Jr. & G.T. Martin. 1965. Fishes taken in monthly trawl samples offshore of Pinellas County, Florida, with new additions to the fish fauna of the Tampa Bay area. Tulane Studies in Zoology 12: 129–151.Google Scholar
  37. Munroe, T.A. 1991. Western Atlantic tonguefishes of the Symphurus plagusia complex (Cynoglossidae: Pleuronectiformes), with descriptions of two new species. U.S. Fish. Bull. 89: 247–287.Google Scholar
  38. Olney, J.E. & G.C. Grant. 1976. Early planktonic larvae of the blackcheek tonguefish, Symphurus plagiusa (Pisces: Cynoglossidae), in the lower Chesapeake Bay, Chesapeake Sci. 17: 229–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Perret, W.S., W.R. Latapie, J.F. Pollard, W.R. Mock, G.B. Adkins, W.J. Gaidry & C.J. White. 1971. Fishes and invertebrates collected in trawl and seine samples in Louisiana estuaries. pp. 31–175. In: W.S. Perret, B.B. Barrett, W.R. Latapie, J.F. Pollard, W.R. Mock, G.B. Adkins, W.J. Gaidry & C.J. White (ed.) Cooperative Gulf of Mexico Estuarine Inventory and Study, Louisiana, Phase IV, Biology, Louisiana Wild Life and Fisheries Commission, New Orleans.Google Scholar
  40. Prentice, J.A. 1989. Low-temperature tolerance of southern flounder in Texas. Trans. Amer. Fish. Soc. 118: 30–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Powell, A.B. & F.J. Schwartz. 1977. Distribution of paralichthid flounders (Bothidae: Paralichthys) in North Carolina estuaries. Chesapeake Sci. 18: 334–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Powell, A.B. & F.J. Schwartz. 1979. Food of Paralichthys dentatus and P. lethostigma (Pisces: Bothidae) in North Carolina estuaries. Estuaries 2: 276–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Power, J.H. 1989. Sink or swim: growth dynamics and zooplankton hydromechanics. Amer. Nat. 133: 706–721.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Reichert, M.J.M. & H.W. van der Veer. 1991. Settlement, abundance, growth and mortality of juvenile flatfish in a subtropical tidal estuary (Georgia, U.S.A.). Neth. J. Sea Res. 27: 375–391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Reid, G.K. 1954. An ecological study of the Gulf of Mexico fishes in the vicinity of Cedar Key, Florida. Bulletin of Science Gulf and Caribbean 4: 1–94.Google Scholar
  46. Renfro, W.C. 1959. Checklist of the fishes and commercial shrimp of Area M-2 (Galveston and Trinity Bays, Texas). Texas Game Fish Commission, Marine Fisheries Division, Project Report 1958–1959, Project No. M-2-R-1, Job No. A-2 30 pp.Google Scholar
  47. Rice, J.A., L.B. Crowder & K.A. Rose. 1993. Interactions between size-structured predator and prey populations: experimental test and model comparison. Trans. Amer. Fish. Soc. 122: 481–491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Rogers, B.D. & W.H. Herke. 1985. Temporal patterns and size characteristics of migrating juvenile fishes and crustaceans in a Louisiana marsh. Louisiana Agricultural Experiment Station, Res. Rep. 5. 81 pp.Google Scholar
  49. Rogers, S.G., T.E. Targett & S.B. Van Sant. 1984. Fish-nursery use in Georgia salt-marsh estuaries: the influence of spring-time freshwater conditions. Trans. Amer. Fish. Soc. 113: 595–606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Ross, S.T. 1986. Resource partitioning in fish assemblages: a review of field studies. Copeia 1986: 352–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Schoener, T.W. 1970. Non-synchronous spatial overlap in lizards in patchy habitats. Ecology 51: 408–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Sissenwine, M.P. 1984. Why do fish populations vary? pp. 59–94. In: R.M. May (ed.) Exploitation of Marine Communities, Springer-Verlag, Berlin.Google Scholar
  53. Springer, V.G. & K.D. Woodburn. 1960. An ecological study of the fishes of the Tampa Bay area. Florida State Board of Conservation Marine Laboratory, Professional Paper Series 1: 1–104.Google Scholar
  54. Stokes, G.M. 1977. Life history studies of southern flounder (Paralichthys lethostigma) and gulf flounder (P. albigutta) in the Aransas Bay area of Texas. Texas Parks and Wildlife Department, Technical Science 25: 1–37.Google Scholar
  55. Stoner, A.W. 1986. Community structure of the demersal fish species of Laguna Joyuda, Puerto Rico. Estuaries 9: 142–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Tagatz, M.E. 1967. Fishes of the St. Johns River, Florida. Quaterly Journal of the Florida Academy of Sciences 30: 25–50.Google Scholar
  57. Tarbox, K.E. 1974. Seasonal occurrence, distribution, and relative abundance of juvenile fishes at Marsh Island, Louisiana. Masters Thesis, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge. 122 pp.Google Scholar
  58. Vernstein, R.W. 1977. The importance of predation by crabs and fishes on benthic infauna in Chesapeake Bay. Ecology 58: 1199–1217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Walters, C.J. & J.S. Collie. 1988. Is research on environmental factors useful to fisheries management? Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 45: 1848–1854.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Wiens, J.A. 1977. On competition and variable environments. Amer. Scientist 65: 590–597.Google Scholar
  61. Wiseman, W.J., Jr., J.M. Bane, S.P. Murray & M.W. Tubman. 1976. Small-scale temperature and salinity structure over the inner shelf west of the Mississippi River delta. Memoires Societe Royale des Sciences de Liege, 6e *serie, 10: 277–285.Google Scholar
  62. Wright, R.A., L.B. Crowder & T.H. Martin. 1993. The effects of predation on the survival and size-distribution of estuarine fishes: an experimental approach. Env. Biol. Fish. 36: 291–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  • Robert L. Allen
    • 1
  • Donald M. Baltz
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Coastal Fisheries InstituteUSA
  2. 2.Department of Oceanography and Coastal SciencesLouisiana State UniversityBaton RougeU.S.A

Personalised recommendations