Environmental Biology of Fishes

, Volume 50, Issue 3, pp 331–341 | Cite as

Age and growth of the bonnethead shark, Sphyrna tiburo, from northwest Florida, with comments on clinal variation

  • John K. Carlson
  • Glenn R. Parsons

Abstract

Age and growth rates of the bonnethead shark, Sphyrna tiburo, from northwest Florida were estimated from vertebrae collected between October 1992 and October 1995. The von Bertalanffy growth equation was fit to male and female vertebral age data. Initial growth was rapid (≈ 200 mm TL) for both sexes from age 0–1. At age 2 growth slowed for males but continued for females. Similar to many species of sharks, females grew slower than males (K = 0.28 and K = 0.69, respectively) but attained a larger maximum size (L=1226 and L=897). Maximum age was estimated in males and females to be 8+ and 12+ years, respectively. Growth of young-of-year sharks was 21 to 30 mm TL per month determined by three different methods. A comparison of age and growth estimates from populations at more southerly latitudes suggest that clinal variation in total length may be evident among bonnethead sharks in the Gulf of Mexico with females reaching larger sizes in northern areas as compared to south Florida.

life history elasmobranchs ageing cline early growth 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References cited

  1. Baughman, J.L. & S. Springer. 1950. Biological and economic notes on the sharks of the Gulf of Mexico, with special reference to those of Texas, and with a key for their identification. Amer. Mid. Nat. 44: 96–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bernard, D.R. 1981. Multivariate analysis as a means of comparing growth in fish. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 38: 233–236.Google Scholar
  3. Branstetter, S. 1987. Age and growth validation of newborn sharks held in laboratory aquaria, with comments on the life history of the Atlantic sharpnose shark, Rhizoprinodon terraenovae. Copeia 1987: 291–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Branstetter, S., J.A. Musick & J.A. Colvocoresses. 1987. A comparison of the age and growth of the tiger shark, Galeocerdo cuvieri, from off Virginia and from the northwestern Gulf of Mexico. U.S. Fish. Bull. 85: 269–279.Google Scholar
  5. Calliet, G.M. 1990. Elasmobranch age determination and verification: an updated review. pp. 157–165. In: H.L. Pratt Jr., S.H. Gruber & T. Taniuchi (ed.) Elasmobranchs as Living Resources: Advances in Biology, Ecology, Systematics and the Status of the Fisheries, NOAA Tech. Rep. NMFS 90.Google Scholar
  6. Casey, J.G., H.L. Pratt & C.E. Stillwell. 1985. Age and growth of the sandbar shark (Carcharhinus plumbeus) from the western North Atlantic. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 42: 963–975.Google Scholar
  7. Compagno, L.J.V. 1984. FAO species catalogue, Vol. 4. Sharks of the world, Part 2: Carcharhiniformes. FAO Fish. Synop. 125: 550–551.Google Scholar
  8. Galtsoff, P.S. 1954. Gulf of Mexico, its origin, waters, and marine life. U.S. Fish. Bull. 55. 604 pp.Google Scholar
  9. Killam, K.A. & G.R. Parsons. 1989. Age and growth of the blacktip shark, Carcharhinus limbatus, near Tampa Bay, Florida. U.S. Fish. Bull. 87: 845–857.Google Scholar
  10. Kusher, D.I., S.E. Smith & G.M. Cailliet. 1992. Validated age and growth of the leopard shark, Triakis semifasciata, with comments on reproduction. Env. Biol. Fish. 35: 197–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Macdonald, P.D.M. 1987. Analysis of length-frequency distributions. pp. 371–384. In: R.C. Summerfelt & G.E. Hall (ed.) The Age and Growth of Fish. The Iowa State University Press. Ames.Google Scholar
  12. Natanson, L.J., J.G. Casey & N.E. Kohler. 1995. Age and growth estimates for the dusky shark, Carcharhinus obscurus, in the western North Atlantic Ocean. U.S. Fish. Bull. 93: 116–126.Google Scholar
  13. Parsons, G.R. 1983. An examination of the vertebral rings of the Atlantic sharpnose shark, Rhizoprinodon terraenovae. Northeast Gulf Sci. 6: 63–66.Google Scholar
  14. Parsons, G.R. 1985. Growth and age estimation of the Atlantic sharpnose shark, Rhizoprinodon terraenovae: a comparison of techniques. Copeia 1985: 80–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Parsons, G.R. 1993a. Age determination and growth of the bonnethead shark, Sphyrna tiburo: a comparison of two populations. Mar. Biol. 117: 23–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Parsons, G.R. 1993b. Geographic variation in reproduction between two populations of the bonnethead shark, Sphyrna tiburo. Env. Biol. Fish. 38: 25–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Pratt, H.L. & J.G. Casey. 1983. Age and growth of the shortfin mako, Isurus oxyrinchus, using four methods. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 40: 1944–1957.Google Scholar
  18. Simpfendorfer, C.A. 1993. Age and growth of the Australian sharpnose shark, Rhizoprionodon taylori, from north Queensland, Australia. Env. Biol. Fish. 36: 233–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Thorson, T.B. & E.J. Lacy. 1982. Age, growth rates and longevity of Carcharhinus leucas estimated from tagging and vertebral rings. Copeia 1982: 110–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. von Bertalanffy, L. 1938. A quantitative theory of organic growth. Hum. Biol. 10: 181–213Google Scholar
  21. Zar, J.H. 1984. Biostatistical analysis. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs. 718 pp.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  • John K. Carlson
    • 1
    • 2
  • Glenn R. Parsons
    • 2
  1. 1.Southeast Fisheries Science CenterNational Marine Fisheries Service, NOAAPanama CityU.S.A
  2. 2.Biology DepartmentUniversity of Mississippi, UniversityU.S.A

Personalised recommendations