Advertisement

Sex Roles

, Volume 43, Issue 3–4, pp 181–199 | Cite as

A Status Account of Gender Stereotypes: Beyond Communality and Agency

  • Michael Conway
  • Lenny R. Vartanian
Article

Abstract

Women's lower status relative to men can account for people's differential attribution to women and men, of the constructs of the Extended Personal Attributes Questionnaire (EPAQ; Spence, Helmreich, & Holahan, 1979). Ratings in all three studies were made on the EPAQ scales. In Study 1a, participants rated their perceptions of the stereotypes of women and of men. In Study 1b, participants reported their own perceptions of women and men. In Study 2, participants were presented a minimal status manipulation (Conway, Pizzamiglio, & Mount, 1996) for which status is unconfounded with gender; participants then reported their perceptions of low- and high-status individuals. The men in Studies 1a and 1b were perceived as were high-status individuals in Study 2. Except for (i.e., verbal passive-aggression nagging, whining), women in Studies 1a and 1b were perceived as were low-status individuals in Study 2. Results are discussed in terms of status accounts of gender stereotypes and gender differences in social behavior.

Keywords

Gender Difference Social Psychology Social Behavior Lower Status Minimal Status 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. Argyle, M. (1994). The psychology of social class. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  2. Baken, D. (1966). The duality of human existence. Chicago: Rand McNally.Google Scholar
  3. Bem, S. L. (1974). The measurement of psychological androgyny. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 42, 155–162.Google Scholar
  4. Bem, S. L. (1981). Bem Sex-Role Inventory: Professional manual. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.Google Scholar
  5. Berger, J., Rosenholtz, S. J., & Zelditch, M. (1980). Status-organizing processes. Annual Review of Sociology, 6, 479–508.Google Scholar
  6. Berger, J., Wagner, D. G., & Zelditch, M. (1985). Introduction. Expectation states theory: Review and assessment. In J. Berger & M. Zelditch (Eds.), Status rewards, and influence: How expectations organize behavior (pp. 1–72). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  7. Best, D. L., & Williams, J. E. (1993). A cross-cultural viewpoint. In A. E. Beall & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), The psychology of gender (pp. 215–248). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  8. Biernat, M., & Kobrynowicz, D. (1997). Gender-and race-based standards of competence: Lower minimum standards but higher ability standards for devalued groups Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 544–557.Google Scholar
  9. Brody, L. E., & Hall, J. A. (1993). Gender and emotion. In M. Lewis & J. Haviland (Eds.), Handbook of emotions (pp. 447–460). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  10. Broverman, I. K., Vogel S. R., Broverman, D. M., Clarkson, F. E., & Rosenkrantz, P. S. (1972). Sex-role stereotypes: A current appraisal. Journal of Social Issues, 28, 217–230.Google Scholar
  11. Bugental, D. B. (2000). Acquisition of the algorithms of social life: A domain-based approach. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 187–219.Google Scholar
  12. Conway, M. (2000). Ratings of low-and high-status in terms of potency, evaluation, and activity scales derived from the Adjective Check List. Unpublished raw data.Google Scholar
  13. Conway, M., Di Fazio, R., & Mayman, S. (1999). Judging other's emotions as a function of the other's status. Social Psychology Quarterly, 62, 291–305.Google Scholar
  14. Conway, M., Pizzamiglio, M. T., & Mount, L. (1996). Status, communality and agency: Implications for the stereotypes of gender and other groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 25–38.Google Scholar
  15. Deaux, K., & Lewis, L. L. (1984). Structure of gender stereotypes: Interrelationships among components and gender label. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 991–1004.Google Scholar
  16. Deaux, K., Winton, W., Crowley, M., & Lewis, L. (1985). Level of categorization and content of gender stereotypes. Social Cognition, 31, 145–167.Google Scholar
  17. Devine, G. P. (1989). Stereotypes and prejudice: Their automatic and controlled components. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 5–18.Google Scholar
  18. Dion, K. L., & Cota, A. A. (1991). The Ms. stereotypes: Its domain and the role of explicitness in title preference. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 15, 403–410.Google Scholar
  19. Dittmar, H., Mannetti, L., & Semin, G. R. (1989). Fine feathers make fine birds:Acomparative study of the impact of material wealth on perceived identities in England and Italy. Social Behaviour, 4, 195–200.Google Scholar
  20. Dovidio, J. F., Ellyson, S. L., Keating, C. F., Heltman, K., & Brown, C. E. (1988). The relationship of social power to visual displays of dominance between men and women. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 233–242.Google Scholar
  21. Eagly, A. H., Wood, W., & Diekman, A. (2000). Social role theory of sex differences and similarities: A current appraisal. In T. Eckes & H. M. Trautner (Eds.), The developmental social psychology of gender. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  22. Fiske, A. P. (1992). The four elementary forms of sociality: Framework for a unified theory of social relations. Psychological Review, 99, 689–723.Google Scholar
  23. Fiske, S. T. (1993). Controlling other people: The impact of power on stereotyping. American Psychologist, 48, 621–628.Google Scholar
  24. Geis, F. L., Brown, V., Jennings, J., & Corrado-Taylor, D. (1984). Sex vs. status in sex-associated stereotypes. Sex Roles, 11, 771–785.Google Scholar
  25. Geis, F. L. (1993). Self-fulfilling prophecies: A social psychological view of gender. In A. E. Beall & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), The psychology of gender (pp. 9–54). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  26. Gerber, G. L. (1996). Status in same-gender and mixed gender police dyads: Effects of personality attributions. Social Psychological Quarterly, 59, 350–363.Google Scholar
  27. Gilbert, D. T., & Malone, P. S. (1995). The correspondence bias. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 21–38.Google Scholar
  28. Helgeson, V. S., & Fritz, H. L. (1999). Unmitigated agency and unmitigated communion: Distinctions from agency and communion. Journal of Personality Research, 33, 131–158.Google Scholar
  29. Johnson, P. (1976). Women and power: Towards a theory of effectiveness. Journal of Social Issues, 3, 99–110.Google Scholar
  30. Kessler, S. J., & McKenna, W. (1978). Gender: An ethnomethodological approach. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  31. Kiesler, D. J. (1983). The 1982 interpersonal circle: A taxonomy for complementarity in human transactions. Psychological Review, 90, 185–214.Google Scholar
  32. Lenski, G. E. (1966). Power and prestige: A theory of social stratification. New York: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
  33. Lips, H. M. (1991). Women, men, and power. Mountain View, CA: Mayfield.Google Scholar
  34. Lonner, W. J. (1980). The search for psychological universals. In H. C. Triandis & W. W. Lambert (Eds.), Handbook of cross-cultural psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 143–204). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
  35. Mayer, K. B., & Buckley, W. (1970). Class and society, 3rd ed. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  36. Murdock, G. P. (1934). Our primitive contemporaries. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  37. Ng, S. K. (1980). The social psychology of power. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  38. Osgood, C. E., May, W. H., & Miron, M. S. (1975). Cross-cultural universals of affective meaning. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
  39. Ridgeway, C. (1991). The social construction of status value: Gender and other nominal characteristics. Social Forces, 70, 367–386.Google Scholar
  40. Rhoodie, E. M. (1989). Discrimination against women: A global survey. Jefferson, NJ: McFarland.Google Scholar
  41. Rosenkrantz, P., Vogel, S., Bee, H., Broverman, I., & Broverman, D. M. (1968). Sex-role stereotypes and self-concepts in college students. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 32, 287–295.Google Scholar
  42. Sagrestano, L. M. (1992). The use of power and influence in gendered world. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 16, 439–447.Google Scholar
  43. Spence, J. T. (1984). Masculinity, femininity, and gender-related traits: A conceptual analysis and critique of current research. In B. A. Maher & W. B. Maher (Eds.), Progress in experimental personality research (pp. 1–97). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  44. Spence, J. T., & Helmreich, R. L. (1978). Masculinity and femininity: Their psychological dimensions, correlates, and antecedents. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
  45. Spence, J. T., Helmreich, R. L., & Holahan, C. K. (1979). Negative and positive components of psychological masculinity and femininity and their relationships to self-reports of neurotic acting-out behaviors. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 1673–1682.Google Scholar
  46. Spence, J. T., Helmreich, R. L., & Stapp, J. (1974). The Personal Attributes Questionnaire: A measure of sex role stereotypes and masculinity and femininity. JSAS: Catalog of selected documents in psychology, 4, 43–44.Google Scholar
  47. Swim, J. K., Aikin, K. J., Hall, W. S., & Hunter, B. A. (1995). Sexism and racism: Oldfashioned and modern prejudices. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 199–214.Google Scholar
  48. Tracey, T. T. (1994). An examination of the complementarity of interpersonal behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 864–878.Google Scholar
  49. Twenge, J. M. (1997). Changes in masculine and feminine traits over time: A meta-analysis. Sex Roles, 36, 305–325.Google Scholar
  50. Wiggins, J. S. (1979). A psychological taxonomy of trait-descriptive terms: The interpersonal domain. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 395–412.Google Scholar
  51. Wiggins, J. S. (1982). Circumplex models of interpersonal behavior in clinical psychology. In P. C. Kendall & J. N. Butcher (Eds.), Handbook of research methods in clinical psychology (pp. 183–221). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  52. Williams, J. E., & Best, D. L. (1990). Measuring sex stereotypes: A multination study. Newbury Park, CA. Sage.Google Scholar
  53. Wood, W., & Karten, S. J. (1986). Sex differences in interaction style as a product of perceived sex differences in competence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 341–347.Google Scholar
  54. Zelditch, M. (1992). Interpersonal power. In E. Borgatta & M. Borgatta (Eds.), Encyclopedia of sociology, (Vol. 2, pp. 994–1001). New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michael Conway
    • 1
  • Lenny R. Vartanian
    • 2
  1. 1.Concordia UniversityUSA
  2. 2.Department of PsychologyUniversity of TorontoCanada

Personalised recommendations