Comparative Study of Agar Diffusion Test and the NCCLS Macrobroth Method for In Vitro Susceptibility Testing of Candida spp.
- 105 Downloads
We performed a prospective double-blind study to evaluate the correlation between inhibition zones obtained by a disk-diffusion test, using Neo-sensitabs of fluconazole (Rosco Diagnostica), and the MICs generated by the NCCLS macrobroth dilution assay. Eighty clinical isolates, representing 5 of the clinically relevant species of Candida, were tested simultaneously by both methods. A clear inverse correlation was found between the results obtained by both tests (r = −0.69). In addition, there was high degree of agreement between methods in the identification of susceptible isolates. However, the resistance definition by disk-diffusion test had a positive predictive value of only 17%. Our data support the hypothesis that Rosco Fluconazole Neo-sensitabs have potential as a screening test for the identification of Candida isolates susceptible to fluconazole. Resistant isolates should be further investigated by standardized broth procedures.
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 3.National Committee For Clinical Laboratory Standards. Reference Method for Broth Dilution Antifungal Susceptibility Testing of Yeasts; Approved Standard M27-A. Wayne, Pa, National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. 1997; 17(9): 1–8.Google Scholar
- 4.Pfaller MA, Bale M, Buschelman B, Lancaster M, Espinel-Ingroff A, Rex JH, Rinaldi MG, Cooper CR, McGinnis MR. Quality control guidelines for National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards recommended broth macrodilution testing of amphotericin B, fluconazole, and flucytosine. J Clin Microbiol 1995; 33: 1104–1107.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 5.Rex JH, Pfaller MA, Galgiani JN, Bartlett MS, Espinel-Ingroff A, Ghannoum MA, Lancaster M, Odds FC, Rinaldi MG, Walsh TJ, Barry AL. Development of interpretative breakpoints for antifungal susceptibility testing: conceptual framework and analysis of in vitro-in vivo correlation data for fluconazole, itraconazole, and Candida infections. Clin Infect Dis 1997; 24: 235–247.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 6.Pfaller MA, Barry AL. Evaluation of a novel colorimetric broth microdilution method for antifungal susceptibility testing of yeast isolates. J Clin Microbiol 1994; 1992–1996.Google Scholar
- 8.Colombo AL, Barchiesi F, McGough DA, Fothergill AW, Rinaldi MG. Evaluation of the Etest system versus a microtitre broth method for antifungal susceptibility testing of yeasts against fluconazole and itraconazole. J Antimicrob Chemother 995; 36: 93–100.Google Scholar
- 10.National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. Performance standards for antimicrobial disk susceptibility tests-fifth edition; Approved standard.-A5. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards, Viii anova, Pa, 993.Google Scholar
- 11.Casals JB, Pringler N. Antibacterial/antifungal sensitivity testing using Neo-Sensitabs, Rosco Diagnostica, Taastrup, Denmark, 1991, 55–58.Google Scholar