Advertisement

Human Ecology

, Volume 28, Issue 2, pp 171–218 | Cite as

Food Transfers Among Hiwi Foragers of Venezuela: Tests of Reciprocity

  • Michael Gurven
  • Kim Hill
  • Hillard Kaplan
  • Ana Hurtado
  • Richard Lyles
Article

Abstract

Although food sharing has been observed in many traditional societies, we still do not have a deep understanding of how various ecological conditions produce variation in who gives and who receives specific resources. To understand better the behavioral ecology of food sharing, we present data collected with the Hiwi of Venezuela and focus on two questions: (a) How do characteristics of food resources and acquirers determine how much is transfered to others? (b) How do characteristics of nuclear families A and B influence how much is transferred between A and B? We use path modeling in an attempt to tease apart the relative contribution of biological kinship, geographical proximity between households, family size, and quantities family B gave to family A on the expected quantities that family A gives to family B. Reciprocal altruism is shown to be an important link in the chain of factors, but not in the tit-for-tat form common in theoretical treatments of reciprocity.

food sharing hunter-gatherers reciprocal altruism evolutionary ecology bargaining theory Venezuela 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. Arcand, B. (1976). Cuiva food production. Canadian Review of Sociology and Anthropology 13: 387–396.Google Scholar
  2. Axelrod, R. (1984). The Evolution of Cooperation, Basic Books, New York.Google Scholar
  3. Axelrod, R., and Dion, D. (1988). The further evolution of cooperation. Science 242: 1385–1389.Google Scholar
  4. Axelrod, R., and Hamilton, W. D. (1981). The evolution of cooperation. Science 211: 1390–1396.Google Scholar
  5. Bentler, P. M. (1989). EQS Structural Equations Program Manual, BMDP Statistical Software, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
  6. Bentler, P. M., and Bonett, D. G. (1980). Significance tests and goodness-of-fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin 88: 588–606.Google Scholar
  7. Binmore, K. (1994). Game Theory and the Social Contract, Vol 1. Playing Fair, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  8. Bleige-Bird, R. L., and Bird, D. W. (1997). Delayed reciprocity and tolerated theft: The behavioral ecology of food-sharing strategies. Current Anthropology 38: 49–78.Google Scholar
  9. Blurton Jones, N. (1987). Tolerated theft, suggestions about the ecology and evolution of sharing, hoarding, and scrounging. Social Science Information 26: 31–54.Google Scholar
  10. Boyd, R. (1992). The evolution of reciprocity when conditions vary. In Harcourt, A. H., and de Waal, F. B. M. (eds.), Coalitions and Alliances in Humans and Other Animals, Oxford University Press, New York, pp. 473–489.Google Scholar
  11. Coppens, W. (1975). Los Cuiva de San Esteban de Capanaparo: Ensavo de antropologia aplicada, Monograph 19, Fundació n La Salle de Ciencias Naturales, Instituto Caribe de Antropologia y Sociologia, Editorial Sucre, Caracas.Google Scholar
  12. Cosmides, L. (1989). The logic of social exchange: Has natural selection shaped how humans reason? Studies with the Wason selection task. Cognition 31: 187–226.Google Scholar
  13. de Waal, F. B. M. (1997a). Food transfers through mesh in brown capuchins. Journal of Comparative Psychology 111: 370–378.Google Scholar
  14. de Waal, F. B. M. (1997b). The chimpanzee's service economy: food for grooming. Evolution and Human Behavior 18: 375–386.Google Scholar
  15. Dugatkin, L. A., and Mesterton-Gibbons, M. (1995). Cooperation among unrelated individuals: Reciprocal altruism, byproduct mutualism, and group selection in fishes. Biosystems 37: 19–30.Google Scholar
  16. Fonval, F. (1976). Les Cuiva du Venezuela, Ph.D. dissertation, École des Hautes Études en Sciences Sociales, Paris.Google Scholar
  17. Frean, M. (1996). The evolution of degrees of cooperation. Journal of Theoretical Biology182: 549–559.Google Scholar
  18. Gurven, M. (2000). Reciprocal altruism and food sharing decisions among hunter-gatherers (in preparation).Google Scholar
  19. Hames, R. (1987). Garden labor exchange among the Ye'kwana. Ethology and Sociobiology 8: 354–392.Google Scholar
  20. Hames, R. (1998). Reciprocal altruism in Yanomamo food exchange. In Chagnon, N., Cronk, L., and Irons, W. (eds.), HumanBehavior and Adaptation: An Anthropological Perspective, Aldine de Gruyter, New York.Google Scholar
  21. Hatcher, L. (1994). A Step-by-Step Approach to Using the SAS System for Factor Analysis and Structural Equation Modeling, SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC.Google Scholar
  22. Hawkes, K. (1991). Showing off: Tests of an hypothesis about men's foraging goals. Ethology and Sociobiology 12: 29–54.Google Scholar
  23. Hawkes, K. (1992). Sharing and collective action. In Smith, E. A., and Winter halder, B. (eds.), Evolutionary Ecology and Human Behavior, Aldine de Gruyter, New York, pp. 269–300.Google Scholar
  24. Hawkes, K. (1993). Why hunter-gatherers work: An ancient version of the problem of public goods. Current Anthropology 34: 341–361.Google Scholar
  25. Hawkes, K., O'Connell, J., and Blurton Jones, N. (1989). Hardworking Hadza grandmothers. In Foley, B. and Standen, V. (eds.), Comparative Socioecology of Mammals and Man, Basil Blackwell, London, pp. 341–366.Google Scholar
  26. Hill, K., and Kaplan, H. (1989). Population description and dry season subsistence patterns among the newly contacted Yora (Yaminahua) of Manu National Park, Peru. National Geographic Research 3: 317–324.Google Scholar
  27. Hill, K., and Kaplan, H. (1993). On whymale foragers hunt and share food. Current Anthropology 34: 701–710.Google Scholar
  28. Hurtado, A. M., and Hill, K. (1986). The Cuiva: Hunter-gatherers of western Venezuela. Anthroquest: News of Human Origins, Behavior, and Survival 36: 14–22.Google Scholar
  29. Hurtado, A. M., and Hill, K. (1987). Early dry season subsistence ecology of Cuiva (Hiwi) foragers of Venezuela. Human Ecology 15: 163–187.Google Scholar
  30. Hurtado, A. M., and Hill, K. (1990). Seasonality in a foraging society: variation in diet, work effort, fertility, and sexual division of labor among the Hiwi of Venezuela. Journal of Anthropological Research 46: 293–345.Google Scholar
  31. Hurtado, A. M., and Hill, K. (1991). Paternal effect on offspring survivorship among Ache and Hiwi hunter-gatherers: Implications for modeling pair-bond stability. In Hewlett, B. (ed). Father-Child Relations: Cultural and Biosocial Contexts, Aldine de Gruyter, New York, pp. 31–55.Google Scholar
  32. Hurtado, A. M., Hill, K., Kaplan, H., and Hurtado, I. (1992). Trade-offs between female food acquisition and child care among Hiwi and Ache foragers. Human Nature 3: 185–216.Google Scholar
  33. Isaac, G. (1978). The food-sharing behavior of protohuman hominids. Scientific American 238: 90–108.Google Scholar
  34. Kacelnik, A. (1997). Normative and descriptive models of decision making: time discounting and risk sensitivity. In Bock, G., and Cardew, G. (eds.), Characterizing Human Psychological Adaptations, Ciba Foundation Symposium 208, Wiley, Chichester, UK.Google Scholar
  35. Kaplan, H. (1983). The Evolution of Food Sharing Among Adult Conspecifics: Research with Ache Hunter-Gatherers of Eastern Paraguay, Ph.D. thesis, University of Utah, Salt Lake City.Google Scholar
  36. Kaplan, H., and Hill, K. (1985). Food sharing among Ache foragers: tests of explanatory hypotheses. Current Anthropology 26: 223–245.Google Scholar
  37. Kaplan, H., Hill, K., Hawkes, K., and Hurtado, A. (1984). Food sharing among the Ache hunter-gatherers of eastern Paraguay. Current Anthropology 25: 113–115.Google Scholar
  38. Kirby, K. N., and Herrnstein, R. J. (1995). Preference reversals due to myopic discounting of delayed reward. Psychological Science 6: 83–89.Google Scholar
  39. Kurland, J. A. (1991). The good, the bad, and the ugly: Moral lessons from social anthropology and evolutionary biology. Reviews in Anthropology 20: 125–137.Google Scholar
  40. Kurland, J. A., and Beckerman, S. (1985). Optimal foraging and hominid evolution: Labor and reciprocity. American Anthropologist 87: 73–93.Google Scholar
  41. Lévi-Strauss, C. (1969). The Elementary Structures of Kinship, Beacon Press, Boston.Google Scholar
  42. Loehlin, J. C. (1987). Latent Variable Models: An Introduction to Factor, Path, and Structural Analysis, L. Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ.Google Scholar
  43. Mauss, M. (1967). The Gift, Norton, New York.Google Scholar
  44. Mesterton-Gibbons, M., and Dugatkin, L. A. (1992). Cooperation among unrelated individuals: Evolutionary factors. Quarterly Review of Biology 67: 267–281.Google Scholar
  45. Milinski, M. (1987). Tit-for-tat in sticklebacks and the evolution of cooperation. Nature 325: 434–435.Google Scholar
  46. Nöe, R. (1990). A veto game played by baboons: a challenge to the use of the prisoner's dilemma as paradigm for reciprocity and cooperation. Animal Behavior 39: 78–90.Google Scholar
  47. Nöe, R., van Schaik, C., and van Hooff, J. (1991). The market effect: An explanation for payoff asymmetries among collaborating animals. Ethology 87: 97–118.Google Scholar
  48. Nowak, M., and Sigmund, K. (1992). Tit-for-tat in heterogeneous populations. Nature 355: 250–253.Google Scholar
  49. Nowak, M., and Sigmund, K. (1993). A strategy of win-stay, lose-shift that outperforms titfortat in the prisoner's dilemma game. Nature 364: 56–58.Google Scholar
  50. Ridley, M. (1997). Origins of Virtue: Human Instincts and the Evolution of Cooperation, Viking, New York.Google Scholar
  51. Rogers, A. R. (1993) Why menopause? Evolutionary Ecology 7: 406–420.Google Scholar
  52. Sahlins, M. (1972). Stone Age Economics, Aldine, Chicago.Google Scholar
  53. Service, E. R. (1966). The Hunters, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.Google Scholar
  54. Sosis, R., Feldstein, S., and Hill, K. (1998). Bargaining theory and cooperative fishing participation on Ifaluk Atoll. Human Nature 9(2): 163–203.Google Scholar
  55. Stanford, C. B. (1995). Chimpanzee hunting behavior and human evolution. American Scientist 83: 256–261.Google Scholar
  56. Trivers, R. L. (1971). The evolution of reciprocal altruism. Quarterly Review of Biology 46: 35–57.Google Scholar
  57. Vickery, W. L., Giraldeau, L., Templeton, J. J., Kramer, D. L., and Chapman, C. A. (1991). Producers, scroungers, and group foraging. American Naturalist 137: 847–863.Google Scholar
  58. Wilkinson, G. S. (1988). Reciprocal altruism in bats and other mammals. Ethology and Sociobiology 9: 85–100.Google Scholar
  59. Winterhalder, B. (1986). Diet choice, risk, and food sharing in a stochastic environment. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 5: 369–392.Google Scholar
  60. Winterhalder, B. (1996). A marginal model of tolerated theft. Ethology and Sociobiology 17: 37–53.Google Scholar
  61. Winterhalder, B. (1997). Social foraging and the behavioral ecology of intragroup resource transfer. Evolutionary Anthropology 5: 46–57.Google Scholar
  62. Zahavi, A., and Zahavi, A. (1997). The Handicap Principle: A Missing Piece of Darwin's Puzzle, Oxford University Press, New York.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michael Gurven
    • 1
  • Kim Hill
    • 1
  • Hillard Kaplan
    • 1
  • Ana Hurtado
    • 1
  • Richard Lyles
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of AnthropologyUniversity of New MexicoAlbuquerque

Personalised recommendations