Advertisement

Journal of Primary Prevention

, Volume 21, Issue 2, pp 267–284 | Cite as

Research on Family Engagement in Preventive Interventions: Toward Improved Use of Scientific Findings in Primary Prevention Practice

  • Richard Spoth
  • Cleve Redmond
Article

Abstract

Effective strategies for family engagement are essential in the implementation of models directed toward the application of research findings to primary prevention practice. Although there has been limited investigation of family engagement in preventive interventions for general populations, the research has yielded several preliminary findings that warrant further study. Notably, families in eligible general populations can differ to a significant degree in intervention preferences and beliefs that influence their motivation to engage in interventions or in intervention evaluations. Also, a number of stable family member characteristics, such as internalizing/externalizing problems, have not been predictive of family engagement. Educational attainment has been predictive, but the differences between participants and nonparticipations have tended to be small. In addition, there are several common barriers to engagement, including family scheduling conflicts, that place practical limits on participation levels and need to be carefully addressed through engagement techniques. Collectively, findings from the literature suggest directions for the development of effective engagement strategies; also, they underscore the value of family engagement research in science-based prevention practices.

family engagement participation preventive interventions dissemination 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  2. Albee, G.W., & Gullotta, T. P. (1997). Primary prevention's evolution. In G.W. Albee & T. P. Gullotta (Eds.) Primary prevention works (pp. 3–22). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  3. Albin, J. B., Lee, B., Dumas, J., Slater, J., & Witmer, J. (1985). Parent training with Canadian families. Canada's Mental Health, December, 20–24.Google Scholar
  4. Altman, D. G. (1995). Sustaining interventions in community systems: On the relationship between researchers and communities. Health Psychology, 14(6), 526–536.Google Scholar
  5. Biglan, A. (1995). Changing cultural practices: A contextual framework for intervention research. Reno, NV: Context Press.Google Scholar
  6. Biglan, A. (1998, October). Research-based programs that could help to prevent youth problem behavior. Paper presented at Center for Substance Abuse Prevention Science Symposium family focused preventive interventions, Bethesda, MD.Google Scholar
  7. Biglan, A., & Metzler, C. (1999). A public health perspective for research on family-focused interventions. In R. Ashery, E. Robertson, & K. Kumpfer (Eds.), Drug abuse prevention through family interventions (National Institute on Drug Abuse Research Monograph on family-focused prevention research). Rockville, MD: National Institute on Drug Abuse.Google Scholar
  8. Capaldi, D. M., Chamberlain, P., Fetrow, R. A., & Wilson, J. E. (1997). Conducting ecologically valid prevention research: Recruiting and retaining a “whole village” in multimethod, multiagent studies. American Journal of Community Psychology, 25, 471–492.Google Scholar
  9. Capaldi, D. M., & Patterson, G. R. (1987). An approach to the problem of recruitment and retention rates for longitudinal research. Behavioral Assessment, 9, 169–177.Google Scholar
  10. Carnegie Council on Adolescent Development. (1995). Great transitions: Preparing adolescents for a new century. New York: Carnegie Council of New York.Google Scholar
  11. Center for Substance Abuse Prevention. (1998). Family-Centered Approaches to Prevent Alcohol, Tobacco, and Other Drug Use Among Children and Adolescents. DHHS Publication No. (SMA) 3223-FY98.Google Scholar
  12. Cialdini, R. (1999, December). A theory of examined participation. Unpublished manuscript presented at workshop on participation in preventive intervention programs: theory and practice, Arizona State University, Tempe Arizona.Google Scholar
  13. Cohen, D. A., & Linton, K. L. P. (1995). Parent participation in adolescent drug abuse prevention program. Journal of Drug Education, 25, 159–169.Google Scholar
  14. Cohen, D. A., & Rice, J. C. (1995). A parent-targeted intervention for adolescent substance use prevention: Lessons learned. Evaluation Review, 19(2), 159–180.Google Scholar
  15. Coie, J., Watt, N., Hawkins, S., Ramey, S., Markman, H., Long, B., & West, S. (1991, June). Prevention research: Conceptual model of strategies and procedures. Paper presented at the National Prevention Conference sponsored by NIMH, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  16. Dishion, T. J., Patterson, G. R., Stoolmiller, M., & Skinner, M. L. (1991). Family, school, and behavioral antecedents to early adolescent involvement with antisocial peers. Developmental Psychology, 27(1), 172–180.Google Scholar
  17. Dryfoos, J. G. (1997). The prevalence of problem behaviors: Implications for programs. In R. P. Weissberg, T. P. Gullotta, R. L. Hampton, B. A. Ryan, & G.R. Adams (Eds.), Enhancing Children's Wellness (pp. 17–46). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  18. Elias, M. J. (1992). Using action research as a framework for program development. In C. E. Maher & J. E. Zins (Eds.), Psychoeducational interventions: Guidebooks for school practitioners. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers.Google Scholar
  19. Elias, M. J. & Clabby, J. F. (Eds.). (1992). Building social problem solving skills: Guidelines from a school-based program. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers.Google Scholar
  20. Fein, E. (1972). Motivating attendance in parent education groups. Social Work, 17(4), 105–107.Google Scholar
  21. Fontana, C. A., Fleischman, A. R., McCarton, C., Meltzer, A., & Ruff, H. (1988). A neonatal preventive intervention study: Issues of recruitment and retention. Journal of Primary Prevention, 9, 164–176.Google Scholar
  22. Frankel, F., & Simmons, J. Q., III. (1992). Parent behavioral training: Why and when some parents drop out? Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 21, 322–330.Google Scholar
  23. Gordon, R. (1983). An operational classification of disease prevention. Public Health Reports, 98, 107–109.Google Scholar
  24. Greenwald, P., & Cullen, J.W. (1985). The scientific approach to cancer control. Ca: A Cancer Journal for Physicians, 34, 328–332.Google Scholar
  25. Hawkins, J. D. (1998, June). Moving to Phase Five in the Prevention cycle: Collaborating with communities to make prevention science prevention practice. Paper presented at the 6th Annual Meeting of the Society for Prevention Research,Park City, UT.Google Scholar
  26. Hawkins, J. D., Catalano, R. F., & Miller, J. Y. (1992). Risk and protective factors for alcohol and other drug problems in adolescence and early adulthood: Implications for substance abuse prevention. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 64–105.Google Scholar
  27. Herzog, E. P., Cherniss, D. S., & Menzel, B. J. (1986). Issues in engaging high-risk mothers in supportive work. Infant Mental Health Journal, 7, 59–68.Google Scholar
  28. Holden, G. W., Lavigne, V. V., & Cameron, A. M. (1990). Probing the continuum of effectiveness in parent training: Characteristics of parents and preschoolers. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 19, 2–8.Google Scholar
  29. Holden, G., Rosenberg, G., Barker, K., Tuhrim, S., & Brenner, B. (1993). The recruitment of research participants: A review. Social Work in Health Care, 19(2), 1–44.Google Scholar
  30. Hops, H., & Seeley, J. R. (1992). Parent participation in studies of family interaction: Methodological and substantive considerations, 229–243.Google Scholar
  31. Irvine, A. B., Biglan, A., Smolkowski, K., Metzler, C. W., & Ary, D. V. (1999). The effectiveness of a parenting skills program for parents of middle school students in small communities. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 67(6), 811–825.Google Scholar
  32. Johnson, R. M. (1974). Trade-off analysis of consumer values. Journal of Marketing Research, 11, 121–127.Google Scholar
  33. Johnson, R. M. (1987). Adaptive conjoint analysis. In R. M. Johnson & I. D. Ketchum (Eds.), Proceedings of the Sawtooth Software Conference on perceptual mapping, conjoint analysis, and computer interviewing (pp. 253–266). Sun Valley, ID: Sawtooth Software.Google Scholar
  34. Kosterman, R., Hawkins, J. D., Spoth, R., Haggerty, K. P., & Zhu, K. (1997). Effects of a preventive parent-training intervention on observed family interactions: Proximal outcomes from Preparing for the Drug Free Years. Journal of Community Psychology, 25, 337–352.Google Scholar
  35. Kumpfer, K. (1997). Third National Training Conference on Strengthening America's Families: Showcase of Model Family Programs for Delinquency Programs. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Juvenile and Delinquency Prevention.Google Scholar
  36. Kviz, F. J., Crittenden, K. S., & Warnecke, R. B. (1992). Factors associated with nonparticipation among registrants for a self-help, community-based smoking cessation intervention. Addictive Behaviors, 17, 533–542.Google Scholar
  37. Lengua, L. J., Roosa, M. W., Schupak-Neuberg, E., Michaels, M. L., Berg, C. N., & Weschler, L. F. (1992). Using focus groups to guide the development of a parenting program for difficult-to-reach, high-risk families. Family Relations, 41, 163–168.Google Scholar
  38. Lerner, R. M., & Simon, L. A. K. (1998). Directions for the American Outreach University in the Twenty-First Century. In R. M. Lerner & L. A. K. Simon (Eds.), University-community collaborations for the Twenty-First Century (pp. 463–480). New York: Garland.Google Scholar
  39. Levant, R. F. (1987). The use of marketing techniques to facilitate acceptance of parent education programs: A case example. Family Relations, 36, 246–251.Google Scholar
  40. Morrisey, E., Wandersman, A., Seybolt, D., Nation, M., Crusto, C., & Davino, K. (1997). Toward a framework for bridging the gap between science and practice in prevention: A focus on evaluator and practitioner perspectives. Evaluation and Program Planning, 20, 367–377.Google Scholar
  41. Moskowitz, J. M. (1989). The primary prevention of alcohol problems: A critical review of the research literature. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 50, 54–88.Google Scholar
  42. Mrazek, P. & Haggerty, R. (Eds.). (1994). Reducing risks for mental disorders: Frontiers for preventive intervention research. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  43. Myers, H. F., Alvy, K. T., Richardson, M., Arrington, A., Marigna, M., Huff, R., Main, M., & Newcomb, M. (1990). The effective black parenting program: A controlled research study with inner-city black families. Studio City, CA: Center for the Improvement of Child Caring.Google Scholar
  44. National Institute on Drug Abuse. (1997). Preventing Drug Use Among Children and Adolescents: A Research-Based Guide. (NIH Publication No. 97–4212). Rockville, MD: Author.Google Scholar
  45. Powell, D. R. (1984). Social network and demographic predictors of length of participation in a parent education program. Journal of Community Psychology, 12, 13–20.Google Scholar
  46. Price, R. H., & Smith, S. S. (1985). A guide to evaluating prevention programs in mental health. DHHS Publication No. (ADM) 85–1365.Google Scholar
  47. Prinz, R. J., & Miller, G. E. (1994). Family-based treatment for childhood antisocial behavior: Experimental influences on dropout and engagement. Journal of Clinical and Child Psychology, 62, 645–650.Google Scholar
  48. Redmond, C., & Spoth, R. (1994, June). Sociodemographic factors and health beliefs: A covariance structure model of parents' perceptions of the usefulness of interventions designed to prevent adolescent substance abuse. Paper presented at the Society for Prevention Research Second Annual Meeting, West Palm Beach.Google Scholar
  49. Redmond, C., Spoth, R., Shin, C., & Lepper, H. (in press). Modeling long-term parent outcomes of two universal family-focused preventive interventions: One year follow-up results. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology.Google Scholar
  50. Resnick, M. D., Bearman, P. S., Blum, R. W., Bauman, K. E., Harris, K. M., Jones, J., Tabor, J., Beuhring, T., Sieving, R. E., Shew, M., Ireland, M., Bearinger, L. H., Udry, J. R. (1997). Protecting adolescents from harm: Findings from the national longitudinal study on adolescent health. Journal of the American Medical Association, 278, 823–832.Google Scholar
  51. Rogers, E. M. (1983). Diffusion of innovation (3rd ed.). New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  52. Rohrbach, L. A., Hodgson, C. S., Broder, B. I., Montgomery, S. B., Flay, B. R., Hansen, W. B., & Pentz, M. A. (1994). Parental participation in drug abuse prevention: Results from the Midwestern Prevention Project. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 4, 295–317.Google Scholar
  53. Rosenstock, I. M. (1966). Why people use health services. Milbank Memorial Fund Quarterly Bulletin, 44, 94–127.Google Scholar
  54. Rosenstock, I. M. (1990). The Health Belief Model: Explaining health behavior through expectancies. In K. Glanz, F. M. Lewis, & B. K. Rimer (Eds.), Health behavior and health education: Theory, research and practice (pp. 39–62). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  55. Saylor, C. F., Elksnin, N., Farah, B. A., & Pope, J. A. (1990). Depends on who you ask: What maximizes participation of families in early intervention programs. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 15, 557–569.Google Scholar
  56. Shedler, J., & Block, J. (1990). Adolescent drug use and psychological health: A longitudinal inquiry. American Psychologist, 45, 612–630.Google Scholar
  57. Spanier, G. B. (in press). Enhancing the Quality of Life: A model for the 21st Century Land-Grant University. Applied Developmental Science.Google Scholar
  58. Spoth, R. (1997). Challenges in defining and developing the field of rural mental disorder preventive intervention research. American Journal of Community Psychology, 25(4), 425–448.Google Scholar
  59. Spoth, R. (1999). Family-focused preventive intervention research: A pragmatic perspective on issues and future directions. In R. Ashery, E. Robertson, & K. Kumpfer (Eds.), NIDA Research Monograph on drug abuse prevention through family interventions (pp. 459–510). Rockville, MD: National Institute on Drug Abuse.Google Scholar
  60. Spoth, R., Ball, A. B., Klose, A., & Redmond, C. (1996). Illustration of a market segmentation technique using family-focused prevention program preference data. Health Education Research, 11(2), 259–267.Google Scholar
  61. Spoth, R., & Conroy, S. (1993). Survey of prevention-relevant beliefs and efforts to enhance parenting skills among rural parents. The Journal of Rural Health, 9(3), 227–239.Google Scholar
  62. Spoth, R., Goldberg, C., & Redmond, C. (1999). Engaging families in longitudinal preventive intervention research: Discrete-time survival analysis of socioeconomic and social-emotional risk factors. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 67(1), 157–163.Google Scholar
  63. Spoth, R., & Molgaard, V. (1993). Consumer-focused data collection in prevention program evaluation: Rationale and illustrations. Evaluation and the Health Professions, 16(3), 278–294.Google Scholar
  64. Spoth, R., & Molgaard, V. (1999). Project Family: A partnership integrating research with the practice of promoting family and youth competencies. In T. R. Chibucos & R. Lerner (Eds.), Serving children and families through community-university partnerships: Success stories (pp. 127–137). Boston: Kluwer Academic.Google Scholar
  65. Spoth, R., & Redmond, C. (1993a). Identifying program preferences through conjoint analysis: Illustrative results from a parent sample. American Journal of Health Promotion, 8(2), 124–133.Google Scholar
  66. Spoth, R., & Redmond, C. (1993b). Study of participation barriers in family-focused prevention: Research issues and preliminary results. International Quarterly of Community Health Education, 13(4), 365–388.Google Scholar
  67. Spoth, R., & Redmond, C. (1994). Effective recruitment of parents into family-focused prevention research: A comparison of two strategies. Psychology and Health: An International Journal, 9, 353–370.Google Scholar
  68. Spoth, R., & Redmond, C. (1995). Parent motivation to enroll in parenting skills programs: A model of family context and health belief predictors. Journal of Family Psychology, 9(3), 294–310.Google Scholar
  69. Spoth, R., Redmond, C., Haggerty, K., & Ward, T. (1995). A controlled parenting skills outcome study examining individual difference and attendance effects. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 57, 449–464.Google Scholar
  70. Spoth, R., Redmond, C., Hockaday, C., & Shin, C. (1996). Barriers to participation in family skills preventive interventions and their evaluations: A replication and extension. Family Relations, 45, 247–254.Google Scholar
  71. Spoth, R., Redmond, C., Kahn, J., & Shin, C. (1997). A prospective validation study of inclination, belief, and context predictors of family-focused prevention involvement. Family Process, 36, 403–429.Google Scholar
  72. Spoth, R., Redmond, C., & Lepper, H. (1999). Alcohol initiation outcomes of universal family-focused preventive interventions: One-and two-year follow-ups of a controlled study. Journal of Studies on Alcohol [Invited article for special issue on alcohol and the family], (Suppl. 13), 103–111.Google Scholar
  73. Spoth, R., Redmond, C., & Shin, C. (1998). Direct and indirect latent-variable parenting outcomes of two universal family-focused preventive interventions: Extending a public health-oriented research base. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 66(2), 385–399.Google Scholar
  74. Spoth, R., Redmond, C., Shin, C., & Lepper, H. (1999). Modeling parental inclination to enroll in skills-training interventions: A replication study. Manuscript in review process.Google Scholar
  75. Spoth, R., Redmond, C., Yoo, S., & Dodge, K. (1993). Sociodemographic factors and parent beliefs relevant to the prevention of adolescent behavior problems. Family Perspective, 27(3), 285–303.Google Scholar
  76. Spoth, R., Reyes, M. L., Redmond, C., & Shin, C. (1999). Assessing a public health approach to delay onset and progression of adolescent substance use: Latent transition and loglinear analyses of longitudinal family preventive intervention outcomes. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 67(5), 619–630.Google Scholar
  77. Stein, R. E. K., Bauman, L. J., & Ireys, H. T. (1991). Who enrolls in prevention trials? Discordance in perception of risk by professionals and participants. American Journal of Community Psychology, 19, 603–617.Google Scholar
  78. Toomey, T. L., Williams, C. L., Perry, C. L., Murray, D. M., Dudoritz, B., & Veblen-Mortenson, S. (1996). An alcohol primary prevention program for parents of 7th graders: The amazing alternatives! Home Program. Journal of Child and Adolescent Substance Abuse, 5, 35–53.Google Scholar
  79. Wandersman, A., Morrissey, E., Davino, K., Seybolt, D., Crusto, C., Nation, M., Goodman, R., & Imm, P. (1998). Comprehensive quality programming and accountability: Eight essential strategies for implementing successful prevention programs. The Journal of Primary Prevention, 19, 3–30.Google Scholar
  80. Weinberger, D. A., Tublin, S. K., Ford, M. E., & Feldman, S. S. (1990). Preadolescents' social-emotional adjustment and selective attrition in family research. Child Development, 61, 1374–1386.Google Scholar
  81. Weissberg, R. P., & Elias, M. J. (1993). Enhancing young people's social competence and health behavior: An important challenge for educators, scientists, policymakers, and funders. Applied & Preventive Psychology, 2, 179–190.Google Scholar
  82. Williams, C. L., Perry, C. L., Dudovitz, B., Veblen-Mortenson, S., Anstine, P. S., Komro, K. A., & Toomey, T. L. (1995). A home-based prevention program for sixth-grade alcohol use: Results from Project Northland. Journal of Primary Prevention, 16, 125–147.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Human Sciences Press, Inc. 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • Richard Spoth
    • 1
  • Cleve Redmond
    • 2
  1. 1.Institute for Social and Behavioral Research ISU Research ParkIowa State UniversityAmes
  2. 2.Institute for Social and Behavioral ResearchIowa State UniversityUSA

Personalised recommendations