European Journal of Political Research

, Volume 34, Issue 2, pp 281–300 | Cite as

Electoral participation in the Netherlands: Individual and contextual influences

  • Marcel van Egmond
  • Nan Dirk de Graaf
  • Cees van der Eijk


Research into electoral participation has produced two traditions, one focusing mainly on individual level explanations while the second concentrates primarily on aggregate level explanations. By bringing these two research approaches together, we are not only able to explain individual electoral participation more thoroughly, but we also gain additional insight into the influence of aggregate level characteristics on individual behavior. We combine eight National Election Studies held in the Netherlands between 1971 and 1994 enabling us to study variation on the individual and the contextual (aggregate) level, including interactions between these two levels. Findings show that the addition of contextual characteristics form a significant improvement to an individual level model predicting electoral participation. Findings also confirm our expectation that the influence of individual characteristics such as education or political interest is dependent upon contextual characteristics describing for instance the salience of the election.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Anker, H. & Oppenhuis, E.V. (1995). Dutch parliamentary election study 1994. Amsterdam: Steinmetz Archive/SWIDOC.Google Scholar
  2. Blais, A. & Carty R.K. (1990). Does proportional representation foster turnout?, Journal of Political Research 18: 167–181.Google Scholar
  3. Campbell, A. (1960). Surge and decline: A study of electoral change, Public Opinion Quarterly 24: 397–418.Google Scholar
  4. Campbell, A., Converse, Ph.E., Miller, W.E. & Stokes, D.E. (1960). The American voter. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  5. Carmines, E.G. & Huckfeldt, R. (1996). Political behavior: in R.E. Goodin & H.-D. Klingemann (eds.), A new handbook of political science (pp. 223–254). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Castenmiller, P. & Dekker, P. (1987). Politieke participatie van vrouwen en mannen in Nederland 1973- 1986. Acta Politica 22: 409–448.Google Scholar
  7. Coleman, J. (1990). The foundations of social theory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  8. De Graaf, N.D. (1996). Politieke scheidslijnen: Ontwikkelingen in politieke participatie en politieke voorkeuren, in H.B.G. Ganzeboom & W.C. Ultee (eds.), De Sociale Segmentatie van Nederland in 2015. The Hague: SDU.Google Scholar
  9. van Deth, J. (1989). Interest in politics, in M.K. Jennings & J. van Deth (eds.), Continuities in Political Action. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
  10. Durkheim, E. (1897). Le suicide, etude de sociologie. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
  11. van der Eijk, C. & Oppenhuis, E. (1990). Turnout and second-order effects in the European elections of June 1989: Evidence from the Netherlands, Acta Politica 25: 67–94.Google Scholar
  12. van der Eijk, C., Franklin, M. & Marsh, M. (1996). What voters teach us about Europe-wide elections, what Europe-wide elections teach us about voters, Electoral Studies 15: 149–166.Google Scholar
  13. Franklin, M., Mackie, Th.T. & Valen, H. et al. (1992). Electoral change: Responses to evolving social and attitudinal structures in Western countries. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Franklin, M.N. (1996). Electoral participation, in L. LeDuc, G. Niemi & P. Norris (eds.), Comparing democracies: Elections and voting in global perspective (pp. 216–235). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  15. Franklin, M., van der Eijk, C. & Oppenhuis, E. (1996). The institutional context: Turnout, in C. van der Eijk & M.N. Franklin (eds.), Choosing Europe? Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
  16. Hout, M. & Knoke, D. (1975). Change in voter turnout, 1952- 1972, Public Opinion Quarterly 39: 52–68.Google Scholar
  17. Jaarsma, B., Schram, A., van Winden, F. & Linssen, G. (1986). Kiezersopkomst in Nederland, Acta Politica 21: 39–55.Google Scholar
  18. Katosh, J.P. & Traugott, M.W. (1981). The consequences of validated and self-reported voting measures, Public Opinion Quarterly 45: 519–535.Google Scholar
  19. King, G. (1997). A solution to the ecological inference problem: Reconstructing individual behavior from aggregate data. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Leijenaar, M.H. (1989). De Geschade Heerlijkheid. The Hague: SDU.Google Scholar
  21. Lipset, S.M. (1948). Political Man: The social bases of politics. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Marsh, M. & Franklin, M. (1996). The foundations: Unanswered questions from the study of European Elections, 1979- 1994, in C. van der Eijk & M.N. Franklin (eds.), Choosing Europe? Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
  23. Milbraith, L.W. & Goel, M.L. (1977). Political participation: How and why do people get involved in politics?, 2nd ed. Chicago: Rand McNally.Google Scholar
  24. Oppenhuis, E. (1995). Voting behavior in Europe. Amsterdam: Spinhuis.Google Scholar
  25. Powell, Jr. G.B. (1980). Voting turnout in thirty democracies: Partisan, legal, and socioeconomic influences, in R. Rose (ed.), Electoral participation: A comparative analysis, Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  26. Powell, Jr. G.B. (1986). American voter turnout in comparative perspective, American Political Science Review 80: 17–43.Google Scholar
  27. Przeworski, A. & Tuene, H. (1970). The logic of comparative social inquiry. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  28. Reif K. & Schmitt, H. (1980). Nine second-order national elections: A conceptual framework for the analysis of European elections results, European Journal of Political Research 8: 3–44.Google Scholar
  29. Rose, R. (1974). Electoral behavior: A comparative handbook. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  30. Schmidt, O. (1981). Opkomst, in A.Th.J. Eggen, C. van der Eijk & B. Niemöller (eds.), Kiezen in Nederland: 26 mei 1981: Wat de kiezers deden en waarom. Zoetermeer: Actaboek.Google Scholar
  31. Schmidt, O. (1983). Kiezersopkomst van 1971 tot 1982, in C. van der Eijk & B. Niemöller (eds.), In het Spoor van de Kiezer. Meppel: Boom.Google Scholar
  32. Schram, A.J.H.C. (1989). Voter behavior in economic perspective. Alblasserwaard: Kanters.Google Scholar
  33. Smeenk, W., de Graaf, N.D. & Ultee, W. (1995). Thuisblijven bij verkiezingen, in Nederland en de Verenigde Staten, Mens en Maatschappij 70: 220–242.Google Scholar
  34. Smeets, I. (1995). Facing another gap: An exploration of the discrepancies between voting turnout in survey research and official statistics, Acta Politica 20: 307–334.Google Scholar
  35. Verba, S. & Nie, N. (1972). Participation in America: Political democracy and social equality. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  36. Verba, S., Nie, N.H. & Kim, J. (1978). Participation and political equality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  37. Wolfinger, R.A. & Rosenstone, S.J. (1980). Who votes? New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • Marcel van Egmond
    • 1
  • Nan Dirk de Graaf
    • 2
  • Cees van der Eijk
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of SociologyUniversity of NijmegenThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Department of Political ScienceUniversity of AmsterdamThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations