Optical and Quantum Electronics

, Volume 31, Issue 8, pp 625–636 | Cite as

Fiber optic evanescent field absorption sensor: Effect of fiber parameters and geometry of the probe

  • S.K. Khijwania
  • B.D. Gupta


A comparative experimental study of the fiber-optic evanescent field absorption sensor based on straight and U-shaped probes is presented. The effects of numerical aperture and the core radius of the fiber on the sensitivity of the sensor are experimentally investigated. Increase in the numerical aperture of the fiber increases the sensitivity of the sensor in the case of both the probes. The effect of core radius on the sensitivity depends on the bending radius of the probe. In the case of straight probe (i.e. infinite bending radius) the fiber with smaller core radius has high sensitivity while in the case of U-shaped probe with 0.17 cm bending radius, the fiber with larger core radius has high sensitivity. Thus, which fiber (with small or large core radius) has maximum sensitivity depends on the bending radius of the probe. For a given fiber, decrease in the bending radius increases the sensitivity of the U-shaped probe. An inverse power law relationship between the bending radius and the evanescent absorbance and hence the sensitivity is established.

Absorption evanescent field numerical aperture optical fiber sensor 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Paul, P.H and G. Kychakoff, Appl. Phys. Lett. 51 12, 1987.Google Scholar
  2. Villarruel, C.A., D.D. Dominguez and A. Dandridge, Proc. SPIE 798 225, 1987.Google Scholar
  3. Simhony, S., I. Schnitzer, A. Katzir and E.M. Kosower, J. Appl. Phys. 64 3732, 1988.Google Scholar
  4. Schnitzer, I., A. Katzir, U. Schiessl, W.J. Riedel and M. Tacke, J. Appl. Phys. 66 5667, 1989.Google Scholar
  5. Ruddy, V. Fiber Integrated Opt. 9 143, 1990.Google Scholar
  6. Ruddy, V., B.D. MacCraith and J.A. Murphy. J. Appl. Phys. 67 6070, 1990.Google Scholar
  7. Gupta, B.D., A. Sharma and C.D. Singh, Int. J. Optoelectron. 8 30, 1993.Google Scholar
  8. Payne, F.P. and Z.M. Hale, Int. J. Optoelectron. 8 743, 1993.Google Scholar
  9. Gupta, B.D. and C.D. Singh, Appl. Opt. 33 2737, 1994a.Google Scholar
  10. Gupta, B.D., C.D. Singh and A. Sharma, Opt. Eng. 33 1864, 1994.Google Scholar
  11. Gupta, B.D. and C.D. Singh, Fiber Integrated Opt. 13 433, 1994b.Google Scholar
  12. Safaai-Jazi, A. and J.V. Peterson, Opt. Laser Technol. 26 399, 1994.Google Scholar
  13. Gupta, B.D., A.K. Tomar and A. Sharma, Opt. Quant. Electron. 27 747, 1995.Google Scholar
  14. Messica, A., A. Greenstein and A. Katzir, Appl. Opt. 35 2274, 1996.Google Scholar
  15. Gupta, B.D. and H. Dodeja and A.K. Tomar, Opt. Quant. Electron. 28 1629, 1996.Google Scholar
  16. Gupta, B.D., and S.K. Khijwania, Fiber Integrated Opt. 17 63, 1998.Google Scholar
  17. Khijwania, S.K. and B.D. Gupta, Opt. Commun. 152 259, 1998.Google Scholar
  18. Snyder, A.W. and J.D. Love, Optical Waveguide Theory Chapman and Hall, London, 1983.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • S.K. Khijwania
    • 1
  • B.D. Gupta
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PhysicsIndian Institute of TechnologyNew DelhiIndia

Personalised recommendations