Molecular and Cellular Biochemistry

, Volume 194, Issue 1–2, pp 71–77 | Cite as

Three different forms of hexokinase are identified during Tuber Borchii mycelium growth

  • Paola Ceccaroli
  • Roberta Saltarelli
  • Michele Buffalini
  • Giovanni Piccoli
  • Vilberto Stocchi

Abstract

Truffles are ectomycorrhizal fungi which have a great dependence on carbohydrates supplied by their host plants. The catabolism of hexoses in the mycobiont is important for the production of energy, and the first enzyme in the hexose assimilation pathways is hexokinase. This study reports differences in the expression of this enzyme during the growth of Tuber borchii Vittad. mycelium (strain ATCC 96540). Three hexokinase activities (HKM1, HKM2 and HKM3) were isolated by anion-exchange chromatography and partially purified. HKM1 and HKM2 were present in the linear phase at 15-50 days of growth. Two remarkable differences were found in the sugar-phosphorylating activity and stability of HKM1 and HKM2. HKM2 did not phosphorylate the fructose and it was present in the chromatographic profile only when substrates such as glucose, glucosamine or mannose were added to the extraction buffer. On the contrary, HKM1 utilized also fructose and was detected under all the experimental conditions used. HKM3 was the only molecular form observed after 70 days, when the fungus growth had reached a plateau. To our knowledge these results represent the first evidence for the presence in T. borchii mycelium of three distinct enzymatic forms of hexokinase which are differently expressed during growth of the fungus.

hexokinase Tuber borchii mycelium sugars 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Trappe JM: The orders, families and genera of hypogeus ascomycotina (truffles and their relatives). Mycotaxon 9: 297–340, 1979Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Talou T, Kulifaj M: Les secrèts de la truffe. La recherche 239: 31–39, 1992Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Smith SE, Read DJ: Growth and carbon economy in ectomycorrhizal plants. In: Mycorrhizal Symbiosis. Academic Press, London, 1997, pp 233–254Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hampp R, Schaeffer C: Mycorrhiza-Carbohydrate and energy metabolism. In: A. Varma, B. Hock (eds). Mycorrhiza. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1995, pp 267–296Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Martin F, Canet D, Marchall JP: 13C nuclear magnetic resonance study of mannitol cycle and trehalose synthesis during glucose utilization by the ectomycorrhizal ascomycete Cenococcum graniforme. Plant Physiol 77: 439–502, 1985Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Martin F, Ramstedt M, Söderhäll K, Canet D: Carbohydrate and aminoacid metabolism in the ectomycorrhizal ascomycete Spherosporella brunnea during glucose metabolism. Plant Physiol 86: 935–940, 1988Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Colowick SP: The hexokinases. In: P.D. Boyer (ed). The Enzyme. Academic Press, New York, 1973 Vol. IX, pp 1–48Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Cox EL, Dickinson DB: Hexokinase from maize endosperm and scutellum. Plant Physiol 51: 960–966, 1973Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Copeland L, Turner JG: In: D.D. Davies (ed). The biochemistry of plants. Academic Press, New York, 1987, Vol. 11, pp 107–127Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Wilson JE: Regulation of mammalian hexokinase activity. In: R. Beitner (ed). Regulation of carbohydrate metabolism. CRC Press, London Boca Raton, FL, 1985, Vol. 1, pp 45–85Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lagos R, Ureta T: The hexokinases from wild type and morphological mutant strains of Neurospora crassa. Eur J Biochem 104: 357–365, 1980PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Purich DL, Fromm HJ, Rudolph FB: The hexokinases: kinetic, physical and regulatory properties. In: A. Meister (ed.). Advances in Enzymology. Wiley, New York, 1973, Vol. 39, pp 249–326Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Barnard EA: Hexokinases from yeast. In: W.A. Wood (ed). Methods in Enzymology. Academic Press, New York, 1975, Vol. XLII, pp 6–20Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Maitra PK: Glucokinase from yeast. In: WA Wood (ed). Methods in Enzymology. Academic Press, New York, 1975, Vol. XLII, pp 25–30Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Marx DH: The influence of ectotropic mycorrhizal fungi on the resistance of pine roots to pathogenic infections. I. Antagonism of mycorrhizal fungi to root pathogenic fungi and soil bacteria. Phytopathology 59: 153–163, 1969Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Stocchi V, Masat L, Biagiarelli B, Accorsi A, Piccoli G, Palma F, Cucchiarini L, Dachà M: High resolution of multiple forms of red blood cell enzymes using a Toyopearl DEAE 650S. Prep Biochem 22: 11–40, 1992PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Sapico V, Anderson RL: An adenosine 5′-triphosphate: hexose 6-phosphotransferase specific for D-mannose and D-fructose from Leuconostoc mesenteroides. Purification, properties, and evidence for a single enzyme. J Biol Chem 242: 5086–5092, 1967PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Laemmli UK: Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature 227: 680–684, 1970PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Blum H, Beier H, Gross HJ: Improved silver staining of plant proteins, RNA and DNA in polyacrylamide gels. Electrophoresis 8: 93–99, 1987Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Saltarelli R, Ceccaroli P, Vallorani L, Zambonelli A, Citterio B, Malatesta M, Stocchi V: Biochemical and morphological modifications during the growth of Tuber borchii mycelium. Mycol Res 102: 403–409, 1998Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Blasquez MA, Lagunas R, Gancedo C, Gancedo JM: Trehalose-6-phosphate, a new regulator of yeast glycolysis that inhibits hexokinases. FEBS Letters 329: 51–54, 1993PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Ortner S, Plaimauer B, Binder M, Scheiner O, Wiedermann G, Duchene M: Molecular analysis of two hexokinase isoenzymes from Entamoeba histolytica. Mol Biochem Parasitol 73: 189–198, 1995PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Entian K-D, Barnett JA: Regulation of sugar utilization by Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Trends Biol Sci 17: 506–510, 1992Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Rose M, Albig W, Entian K-D: Glucose repression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae is directly associated with hexose phosphorylation by hexokinases PI and PII. Eur J Biochem 199: 511–518, 1991PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Jang JC, Leon P, Zliou L, Sheen J: Hexokinase as a sugar sensor in higher plants. Plant Cell 9: 5–19, 1997CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Grupe A, Hultgren B, Ryan A, Ma YH, Bauer M, Stewart TA: Transgenic knockouts reveal a critical requirement for pancreatic β-cell glucokinase in maintaining glucose homeostasis. Cell 83: 69–78, 1995PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Jang JC, Sheen J: Sugar sensing in higher plants. Plant Cell 6: 1665–1679, 1994CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Sturgeon RJ: Chemical and biochemical aspects of fungal cell walls. In: J.B. Pridham (ed). Plant Carbohydrate Biochemistry. Academic Press, London and New York, 1974, pp 218–233Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Bevege DT, Bowen GD, Skinner MR: Comparative carbohydrate physiology of ecto-and endomycorrhizas. In: F.E. Sanders, B. Mosse, P.B. Tinker (eds). Endomycorrhizas. Academic Press, New York, 1975, pp 149–174Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • Paola Ceccaroli
    • 1
  • Roberta Saltarelli
    • 1
  • Michele Buffalini
    • 1
  • Giovanni Piccoli
    • 1
  • Vilberto Stocchi
    • 1
  1. 1.Istituto di Chimica Biologica ‘Giorgio Fornaini’Università degli Studi di UrbinoUrbinoItaly

Personalised recommendations