Social Indicators Research

, Volume 41, Issue 1–3, pp 51–94

Poverty, Inequality and Deprivation in South Africa: An Analysis of the 1993 SALDRU Survey

  • Stephan Klasen
Article

Abstract

This paper analyses poverty and inequality in South Africa based on data from a comprehensive multi-purpose household survey undertaken in 1993 to provide baseline statistics on poverty and its determinants to the new government. The paper shows that South Africa has among the highest levels of income inequality in the world and compares poorly in most social indicators to countries with similar income levels. Much of the poverty in the country is a direct result of apartheid policies that denied equal access to education, employment, services, and resources to the black population of the country. As a result, poverty has a very strong racial dimension with poverty concentrated among the African population. In addition, poverty is much higher in rural areas, and particularly high in the former homelands. Poverty among female-headed households and among children is also higher than average. Moreover, poverty is closely related to poor education and lack of employment. The poor suffer from lack of access to education, quality health care, basic infrastructure, transport, are heavily indebted, have little access to productive resources, and are heavily dependent on remittances and social transfers, particularly social pensions and disability grants. The paper uses an income-based definition of poverty for most of the analysis. In addition, it develops a broad-based index of deprivation including income, employment, wealth, access to services, health, education, and perceptions of satisfaction as its components. While on average the two indicators correspond fairly closely, the income poverty measure misses a considerable number of people who are severely deprived in many of the non-income measures of well-being. This group of severely deprived not identified by the income poverty measure consists predominantly of Africans living in rural areas, concentrated particularly in the province of KwaZulu/Natal.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. Ardington, E. and F. Lund: 1995, 'Pensions and Development: Social Security as Complementary to Programmes of Reconstruction and Development', Development Southern Africa 12: 557–577.Google Scholar
  2. Central Statistical Services: 1994, 1995 October Household Survey (CSS, Pretoria).Google Scholar
  3. Case, A.C. and A. Deaton: 1996, Large Transfers to the Elderly in South Africa, Mimeographed (Princeton University, Princeton).Google Scholar
  4. Chen, S. Dhatt, and M. Ravallion: 1996, Is Poverty Increasing in the Developing World (The World Bank, Washington, DC).Google Scholar
  5. Collier, P., S. Radwan, S. Wangwe, and A. Wagner: 1986, Labor and Poverty in Rural Tanzania (International Labor Office/Clarendon Press, Oxford).Google Scholar
  6. Development Bank of Southern Africa: 1994, South Africa's Nine Provinces: A Human Development Profile (DBSA, Midrand).Google Scholar
  7. Dreze, J. and A. Sen: 1989, Hunger and Public Action (Clarendon Press, New York).Google Scholar
  8. Fuller, B., P. Pillay, and N. Sirur: 1995, Literacy in South Africa: Expanding Enrollments while Re-Inforcing Inequality? Mimeographed (Harvard University, Cambridge).Google Scholar
  9. Government of South Africa: 1994,White Paper on the Reconstruction and Development Programme (Pretoria, Government Printing Office).Google Scholar
  10. International Labour Office: 1996, South African Labour Market Review (ILO, Geneva).Google Scholar
  11. May, J.: 1996, The South African Participatory Poverty Assessment-Synthesis Report (DRA, Durban).Google Scholar
  12. Lipton, M.: 1977, Why Poor People stay Poor: A Study of Urban Bias in World Development (Temple Smith, London).Google Scholar
  13. Pereira da Silva: 1994, South Africa: Economic Performance and Policies, Informal Discussion Paper No. 7 (The World Bank, Washington, DC).Google Scholar
  14. Ramphele, M. and F. Wilson: 1989, Uprooting Poverty: The South African Challenge (Norton, New York).Google Scholar
  15. Ravallion, M.: 1996, Good and Bad Growth: The 1996 Human Development Report. Mimeographed (The World Bank, Washington, DC).Google Scholar
  16. Ravallion, M. and S. Chen: 1996,What can New Survey Data Tell us About Recent Changes in Living Standards in Developing and Transitional Economies? Policy Research Department mimeographed (The World Bank, Washington, DC).Google Scholar
  17. RDP Office: 1995, Key Indicators of Poverty in South Africa (RDP Office, Pretoria).Google Scholar
  18. Schultz, P. and Mwabu: 1995, Returns to Education in South Africa, mimeographed (Yale University, New Haven).Google Scholar
  19. Sen, A. K.: 1992, Inequality Re-examined (Harvard University Press, Cambridge).Google Scholar
  20. Sen, A.K.: 1995, Commodities and Capabilities (North-Holland, Amsterdam).Google Scholar
  21. Sender, J.: 1996, Rural Poverty and the Labour Market in South Africa, SOAS mimeographed (School of Oriental and African Studies, London).Google Scholar
  22. United Nations Development Program: 1996, Human Development Report (Oxford University Press, New York).Google Scholar
  23. Whiteford, A., D. Posel, and T. Kelatwang: 1995, A Profile of Poverty, Inequality, and Human Development in South Africa (Human Science Research Council, Pretoria).Google Scholar
  24. World Bank: 1995, A Detailed Poverty Profile, Mimeographed (The World Bank, Washington, DC).Google Scholar
  25. World Bank: 1996, 1994, World Development Report (Oxford University Press, New York).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  • Stephan Klasen
    • 1
  1. 1.Centre for History and EconomicsKing's College, University of CambridgeCambridgeUnited Kingdom

Personalised recommendations