Why do plants abort so many developing seeds: bad offspring or bad maternal genotypes?
- 422 Downloads
It has been suggested that abortion of ovules in perennials is caused partly by early acting genetic load (abortions due to ‘bad offspring’). However, it is still unclear what proportion of abortions of naturally pollinated seeds are due to early genetic load. Here we suggest that variation between maternal genotypes (abortions due to ‘bad maternal genotypes’) may be an even more important factor causing genetic abortions than early load, based on results from Scots pine. The early load is severe in Scots pine: in experimental self-pollinations on average 76% of the seeds were aborted. Comparison of naturally pollinated and experimentally cross-pollinated seeds showed that the abortion rate of naturally pollinated seeds was only slightly, and not statistically significantly, higher than that of experimentally cross-pollinated seeds (30% vs. 26.5%, respectively). Thus, although early load can be high under self-pollination in Scots pine, it does not account for a high share of abortions of naturally pollinated seeds. Instead, maternal genotype determined the seed abortion rate: in a separate experiment using an experimental population (clonal stand), 29% of the total variance in seed abortion was due to variation between maternal genotypes. We studied further whether ‘bad maternal genotypes’ could be explained by trade-offs between seed abortion and other fitness functions. Only one statistically significant genetic correlation was found, a positive association between cone production and successful seed development. Thus ‘bad maternal genotypes’ aborted a higher proportion of their seed and produced less cones than the ‘good maternal genotypes’.
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Andersson, S. (1993) The potential for selective seed maturation in Achillea ptarmica (Asteraceae). Oikos 66, 36–42.Google Scholar
- Bishir, J. and Namkoong, G. (1987) Unsound seeds in conifers: estimation of numbers of lethal alleles and of magnitudes of effects associated with the maternal parent. Silvae Genetica 36, 180–185.Google Scholar
- Burbidge, A.H. and James, S.H. (1991) Postzygotic seed abortion in the genetic system of Stylidium (Angiospermae: Stylidaceae). J. Heredity 82, 319–328.Google Scholar
- Falconer, D.S. (1989) Introduction to Quantitative Genetics. Longman, Essex, UK.Google Scholar
- Griffin, A.R. and Lindgren, D. (1985) Effect of inbreeding on production of filled seed in Pinus radiata — experimental results and a model of gene action. Theor. Appl. Genet. 71, 334–343.Google Scholar
- Johnsson, H. (1976) Contributions to the genetics of empty grains in the seed of Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris). Silvae Genet. 25, 10–15.Google Scholar
- Kärkkäinen, K. and Savolainen, O. (1993) The degree of early inbreeding depression determines the selfing rate at the seed stage: model and results from Pinus sylvestris (Scots pine). Heredity 71, 160–166.Google Scholar
- Kempthorne, O. (1957) An Introduction to Genetic Statistics. The Iowa State University Press, Ames, IA.Google Scholar
- Klekowski, E.J. Jr. (1988a) Genetic load and its causes in long-lived plants. Trees 1988, 195–203.Google Scholar
- Klekowski, E.J. Jr. (1988b) Progressive cross-and self-sterility associated with aging in fern clones and perhaps other plants. Heredity 61, 247–253.Google Scholar
- Koski, V. (1970) A study of pollen dispersal as a mechanism of gene flow in conifers. Commun. Inst. For. Fenn. 70.4, 1–78.Google Scholar
- Koski, V. (1971) Embryonic lethals of Picea abies and Pinus sylvestris. Commun. Inst. For. Fenn. 75.3, 1–30.Google Scholar
- Koski, V. and Muona, O. (1986) Probability of inbreeding in relation to clonal differences in male flowering and embryonic lethals. Proceedings of IUFRO conference on breeding theory, progeny testing and seed orchards, Williamsburgh, Virginia, 13–17 October, 1986, pp. 391–300.Google Scholar
- Muona, O. and Harju, A. (1989) Effective population sizes, genetic variability, and mating system in natural stands and seed orchards of Pinus sylvestris. Silvae Genet. 38, 221–228.Google Scholar
- Plym Forshell, C. (1974) Seed development after self-pollination and cross-pollination of Scots pine, Pinus sylvestris L. Studia Forestalia Suecica 118, 1–37.Google Scholar
- Sarvas, R. (1962) Investigation on the flowering and seed crop of Pinus sylvestris. Commun. Inst. For. Fenn. 53.4, 1–198.Google Scholar
- SAS Institute (1985) Users's Guide: Statistics. 1985 Edition. SAS Institute, Inc., Gary, NC.Google Scholar
- Savolainen, O. (1994) Genetic variation and fitness: conservation lessons from pines. In V. Loeschcke, J. Tomiuk and S.K. Jain (eds) Conservation Genetics, pp. 27–36. Birkhäuser, Basel.Google Scholar
- Savolainen, O. Kärkkäinen, K. and Kuittinen, H. (1992) Estimating numbers of embryonic lethals in conifers. Heredity 69, 308–314.Google Scholar
- Stern, K. (1972) Über die Ergebnisse einiger Versuche zur räumlichen und zeitlichen Verteilung des Pollens einzelner Kiefern. Z. Pflanzenzuchtung 67, 313–326.Google Scholar