Experienced chicks show biased avoidance of stronger signals: an experiment with natural colour variation in live aposematic prey
- 236 Downloads
An important factor for understanding the evolution of warning coloration in unprofitable prey is the synergistic effect produced by predator generalisation behaviour. Warning coloration can arise and become stabilised in a population of solitary prey if more conspicuous prey benefit from a predator's previous interaction with less conspicuous prey. This study investigates whether domestic chicks (Gallus gallus domesticus) show a biased generalisation among live aposematic prey by using larvae of three species of seed bugs (Heteroptera: Lygaeidae) that are of similar shape but vary in the amount of red in the coloration. After positive experience of edible brownish prey, chicks in two reciprocal experiments received negative experience of either a slightly red or a more red distasteful larva. Attacking birds were then divided into two treatment groups, – one presented with the same prey again, and one presented with either a less red or a more red larva. Birds with only experience of edible prey showed no difference in attack probability of the two aposematic prey types. Birds with experience of the less red prey biased their avoidance so that prey with a more red coloration was avoided to a higher degree, whereas birds with experience of the more red prey avoided prey with the same, but not less red coloration. Thus, we conclude that bird predators may indeed show a biased generalisation behaviour that could select for and stabilise an aposematic strategy in solitary prey.
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Arak, A. and Enquist, M. (1995) Conflict, receiver bias and the evolution of signal form. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 349, 337–344.Google Scholar
- Cott, H.B. (1940) Adaptive coloration in animals. Methuen, London.Google Scholar
- Edmunds, M. (1974) Defence in animals: a survey of anti-predator defences. Longman, Harlow.Google Scholar
- Gamberale, G. and Tullberg, B.S. (1996) Evidence for a peak-shift in predator generalization among aposematic prey. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 263, 1329–1334.Google Scholar
- Guilford, T. (1985) Is kin selection involved in the evolution of warning coloration? Oikos 45, 31–36.Google Scholar
- Guilford, T. (1990) The evolution of aposematism. In D.L. Evans and J.O. Schmidt (eds) Insect defenses adaptive mechanisms and strategies of prey and predators. State University of New York Press, Albany, pp. 23–61.Google Scholar
- Poulton, E.B. (1898) Natural Selection: the cause of mimetic resemblance and common warning colours. J. Linn. Soc. Zool. 26, 558–612.Google Scholar
- Rogers, L.J. (1995) The development of brain and behaviour in the chicken. CAB International, Oxon.Google Scholar
- Roper, T.J. and Cook, S.E. (1989) Responses of chicks to brightly coloured insect prey. Behaviour 110, 276–293.Google Scholar
- Turner, J.R.G. (1984) Darwin's coffin and doctor Pangloss — do adaptionist models explain mimicry? In B. Shorrocks (ed.) Evolutionary ecology: Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford, pp. 313–361.Google Scholar