New Forests

, Volume 19, Issue 3, pp 279–290 | Cite as

Mulch and hexazinone herbicide shorten the time longleaf pine seedlings are in the grass stage and increase height growth

  • James D. Haywood


Herbaceous plant control with mulchor hexazinone herbicide influenced planted longleafpine (Pinus palustris Mill.) seedling totalheight on a silt loam site in central Louisiana. Thesite had been sheared and windrowed in 1991 and rotarymowed before three treatments were established in arandomized complete block design: (1) Untreatedcheck: no herbaceous plant control after planting;(2) Five mulches: on each plot, five randomlyassigned mulches were placed around seedlings; themulches were either a mat of cotton, hemlock andpolyester, pine straw, woven polypropylene, orperforated polyethylene; and (3) Hexazinone: theherbicide hexazinone at 1.12 kg active ingredient/hawas annually sprayed in the first two growing seasonsover the rows of unshielded seedlings. The longleafseedlings were planted in February 1993.

After three growing seasons, seedlings on the mulchand hexazinone treatments were taller than those onthe check plots. About 59% of the mulched andhexazinone treated seedlings had grown out of thegrass stage (at least 12 cm tall) compared to 17% ofthe check seedlings. After five growing seasons, thepercentage of longleaf pine seedlings out of the grassstage was similar on all treatments and averaged 87%. However, these better growing pines were taller on themulch and hexazinone treatments (a 142-cm average)than on the checks (78 cm). Pine straw was anineffective mulch probably because the straw smotheredthe seedlings. The longleaf saplings were tallestwhen the perforated polyethylene mat was used.

Pinus palustris Mill. loblolly pine P. taeda L. plantation establishment competition control vegetation management 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Barnett, J.P. 1989. Site preparation, containers, and soil types affect field performance of loblolly and longleaf pine seedlings, pp. 155-158. In: Miller, J.H. (Comp) Proc. 5th Bienn. South. Silv. Res. Conf. 1988 November 1-3. USDA Forest Serv., South. Forest Exp. Sta., New Orleans, Louisiana. Gen. Tech. Rep. SO-74.Google Scholar
  2. Barrett, J.W. 1962. Regional Silviculture of the United States. The Ronald Press Co., New York. 609 p.Google Scholar
  3. Boyer, W.D. 1975. Brown-spot infection on released and unreleased Longleaf Pine Seedlings. USDA Forest Serv., South. Forest Exp. Sta., New Orleans, Louisiana. Res. Pap. SO-108. 9 p.Google Scholar
  4. Boyer, W.D. 1989. Response of planted longleaf pine bare-root and container stock to site preparation and release: Fifth-year results, pp. 165-168. In: Miller, J.H. (Comp) Proc. 5th Bienn. South. Silv. Res. Conf. 1988 November 1-3. USDA Forest Serv., South. Forest Exp. Sta., New Orleans, Louisiana. Gen. Tech. Rep. SO-74.Google Scholar
  5. Boyer, W.D. 1993. Long-term development of regeneration under longleaf pine seedtree and shelterwood stands. South. J. Appl. For. 17: 10-15.Google Scholar
  6. Boyer, W.D. and Miller, J.H. 1994. Effect of burning and brush treatments on nutrient and soil physical properties in young longleaf pine stands. For. Ecol. Manage. 70: 311-318.Google Scholar
  7. Croker, T.C., Jr. and Boyer, W.D. 1975. Regenerating longleaf pine naturally. USDA Forest Serv., South. Forest Exp. Sta., New Orleans, Louisiana. Res. Pap. SO-105. 21 p.Google Scholar
  8. Crutchfield, D.A., Wicks, G.A. and Burnside, O.C. 1985. Effect of winter wheat (Triticum aestivum) straw mulch level on weed control. Weed Sci. 33: 110-114.Google Scholar
  9. Gale, W.J., McColl, R.W. and Fang, X. 1993. Sandy fields traditional farming for water conservation in China. J. Soil Water Conserv. 48: 474-477.Google Scholar
  10. Grelen, H.E. 1983. May burning favors survival and early height growth of longleaf pine seedlings. South. J. Appl. For. 7: 16-19.Google Scholar
  11. Gupta, G.N. 1991. Effects of mulching and fertilizer application on initial development of some tree species. For. Ecol. Manage. 44: 211-221.Google Scholar
  12. Harlow, W.M. and Harrar, E.S. 1969. Textbook of dendrology, pp. 81-84. McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York.Google Scholar
  13. Harms, W.R. 1996. An old-growth definition for wet pine forests, woodlands, and savannas. USDA Forest. Serv., South. Res. Sta., Asheville, North Carolina. Gen. Tech. Rep. SRS-2. 7 p.Google Scholar
  14. Haywood, J.D. 1999. Durability of selected mulches, their ability to control weeds, and influence growth of loblolly pine seedlings. New Forests 18: 263-277.Google Scholar
  15. Haywood, J.D. and Youngquist, J.A. 1991. Mulching effects of plant fiber and plant fiberpolyester mats combined with fertilizer on loblolly pine seedlings. Tree Plant. Notes 42(3): 32-35.Google Scholar
  16. Haywood, J.D., Tiarks, A.E. and Sword, M.A. 1997. Fertilization, weed control, and pine litter influence loblolly pine stem productivity and root development. New Forests 14: 233-249.Google Scholar
  17. Kerr, A., Jr., Griffis, B.J., Powell, J.W., Edwards, J.P., Venson, R.L., Long, J.K. and Kilpatrick, W.W. 1980. Soil Survey of Rapides Parish, Louisiana. USDA Soil Conserv. Serv. and Forest Serv. and Louisiana State Univ. Agric. Exp. Sta. 87 p. and 114 maps.Google Scholar
  18. Louisiana Office of State Climatology 1997. Louisiana Monthly Climate Review. Southern Regional Climate Center, Depart. Geography and Anthropology, Louisiana State Univ. Vol 17. 126 p.Google Scholar
  19. Loveless, R.W., Pait, J.A., III and McElwain, T. 1989. Response of longleaf pine to varying intensity of silvicultural treatments, pp. 159-164. In: Miller, J.H. (Comp) Proc. 5th Bienn. South. Silv. Res. Conf. 1988 November 1-3. USDA Forest Serv., South. Forest Exp. Sta., New Orleans, Louisiana. Gen. Tech. Rep. SO-74.Google Scholar
  20. Mahajan, K.K. and Kanwar, B.B. 1993. Effect of pine (Pinus species)-needle mulch on maize (Zea mays)-wheat (Triticum aestivum) cropping system. Indian J. Agron. 38: 515-518.Google Scholar
  21. McDonald, P.M. and Helgerson, O.T. 1990. Mulches Aid in Regenerating California and Oregon Forests: Past, Present, and Future. USDA Forest Serv. Pacific SW Res. Sta., Berkeley, CA. Gen. Tech. Rep. PSW-123. 19 p.Google Scholar
  22. McNab, W.H. and Avers, P.E. (Comp) 1994. Ecological Subregions of the United States: Section Descriptions. USDA Forest Serv. Washington Office, Washington DC. Admin. Pub. WO-WSA-5. 267 p.Google Scholar
  23. Nelson, L.R., Zutter, B.R. and Gjerstad, D.H. 1985. Planted longleaf pine seedlings respond to herbaceous weed control using herbicides. South. J. Appl. For. 9: 236-240.Google Scholar
  24. Neter, J. and Wasserman, W. 1974. Applied Linear Statistical Models Regression, Analysis of Variance, and Experimental Designs. Richard D. Irwin, Inc., Homewood, Illinois. 842 p.Google Scholar
  25. Smith, L.F. 1961. Tree percent on burned and unburned longleaf seedbeds. J. For. 59: 201-203.Google Scholar
  26. Wahlenberg, W.G. 1946. Longleaf Pine Its Use, Ecology, Regeneration, Protection, Growth, and Management. Charles Lathrop Pack Forestry Foundation and USDA Forest Service, Washington, DC. 429 p.Google Scholar
  27. Walker, R.F. and McLaughlin, S.B. 1989. Black polyethylene mulch improves growth of plantation-grown loblolly pine and yellow-poplar. New For. 3: 265-274.Google Scholar
  28. Zuzel, J.F. and Pikul, J.L., Jr. 1993. Effects of straw mulch on runoff and erosion from small agricultural plots in northeastern Oregon. Soil Sci. 156: 111-117.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • James D. Haywood
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Southern Research StationUSDA Forest ServiceAsheville
  2. 2.PinevilleUSA)

Personalised recommendations