Journal of Nonverbal Behavior

, Volume 24, Issue 2, pp 131–150 | Cite as

The Role of Gesture in Children's Comprehension of Spoken Language:Now They Need It, Now They Don't

  • Nicole M. McNeil
  • Martha W. Alibali
  • Julia L. Evans


Two experiments investigated gesture as a form of external support for spoken language comprehension. In both experiments, children selected blocks according to a set of videotaped instructions. Across trials, the instructions were given using no gesture, gestures that reinforced speech, and gestures that conflicted with speech. Experiment 1 used spoken messages that were complex for preschool children but not for kindergarten children. Reinforcing gestures facilitated speech comprehension for preschool children but not for kindergarten children, and conflicting gestures hindered comprehension for kindergarten children but not for preschool children. Experiment 2 tested preschool children with simpler spoken messages. Unlike Experiment 1, preschool children's comprehension was not facilitated by reinforcing gestures. However, children's comprehension also was not hindered by conflicting gestures. Thus, the effects of gesture on speech comprehension depend both on the relation of gesture to speech, and on the complexity of the spoken message.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Alibali, M. W., Sylvan, E. A., Fujimori, Y., & Kawanaka, T. (1997, May). The functions of teachers' gestures: What's the point? Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Midwestern Psychological Association, Chicago, Illinois.Google Scholar
  2. Allen, R., & Shatz, M. (1983). “What says meow?”: The role of context and linguistic experience in very young children's responses to what-questions. Journal of Child Language, 10, 321–335.Google Scholar
  3. Berger, K. W., & Popelka, G. R. (1971). Extra-facial gestures in relation to speechreading. Journal of Communication Disorders, 3, 302–308.Google Scholar
  4. Bisanz, J., Danner, F., & Resnick, L. (1979). Changes with age in measures of processing efficiency. Child Development, 50, 132–141.Google Scholar
  5. Boyatzis, C. J., & Satyaprasad, C. (1994). Children's facial and gestural decoding and encoding: Relations between skills and with popularity. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 18, 37–55.Google Scholar
  6. Case, R., Kurland, D. M., & Goldberg, J. (1982). Operational efficiency and the growth of short-term memory span. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 33, 386–404.Google Scholar
  7. Chapman, R. S. (1978). Comprehension strategies in children. In J. F. Kavanagh & W. Strange (Eds.), Speech and language in laboratory, school, and clinic (pp. 308–327). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  8. Church, R. B., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (1986). The mismatch between gesture and speech as an index of transitional knowledge. Cognition, 23, 43–71.Google Scholar
  9. Clark, R., Hutcheson, S., & Van Buren, P. (1974). Comprehension and production in language acquisition. Journal of Linguistics, 10, 39–54.Google Scholar
  10. Fischer, K. W., & Bidell, T. R. (1998). Dynamic development of psychological structures in action and thought. In W. Damon (Series Ed.) & R. Lerner (Vol. Ed.), Handbook of child psychology, Vol. 1: Theoretical models of human development (pp. 467–561). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  11. Furuyama, N. (in press). Gestural interaction between the instructor and the learner in origami instruction. In D. McNeill (Ed.), Language and gesture: Window into thought and action. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Glenberg, A. M., & Robertson, D. A. (1999). Indexical understanding of instructions. Discourse Processes, 28, 1–26.Google Scholar
  13. Goldin-Meadow, S., Singer, M., & Kim, S. (1999). What the teachers' hands tell the students' minds about math. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 720–730.Google Scholar
  14. Graham, J. A., & Heywood, S. (1976). The effects of elimination of hand gesture and of verbal codability on speech performance. European Journal of Social Psychology, 5, 189–195.Google Scholar
  15. Halford, G. (1993). Children's understanding: The development of mental models. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  16. Hodapp, R. M., Goldfield, E. C., & Boyatzis, C. J. (1984). The use and effectiveness of maternal scaffolding in mother-infant games. Child Development, 55, 772–781.Google Scholar
  17. Hoots, M. A., McAndrew, F. T., & Francois, G. R. (1989). Decoding of gestures by kindergarten, first-and third-grade children. The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 150, 117–118.Google Scholar
  18. Just, M. A., & Carpenter, P. A. (1992). A capacity theory of comprehension: Individual differences in working memory. Psychological Review, 99, 122–149.Google Scholar
  19. Kelly, S. D., & Church, R. B. (1998). A comparison between children's and adults' ability to detect conceptual information conveyed through representational gestures. Child Development, 69, 85–93.Google Scholar
  20. Krauss, R. M., Dushay, R., Chen, Y., & Rauscher, F. (1995). The communicative value of conversational hand gestures. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 31, 533–552.Google Scholar
  21. Krauss, R. M., & Glucksberg, S. (1969). The development of communication competence as a function of age. Child Development, 40, 255–266.Google Scholar
  22. Krauss, R. M., Morrel-Samuels, P., & Colasante, C. (1991). Do conversational hand gestures communicate? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 743–754.Google Scholar
  23. Lickiss, K. P., & Wellens, R. (1978). Effects of visual accessibility and hand restraint on fluency of gesticulator and effectiveness of message. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 46, 925–926.Google Scholar
  24. Macnamara, J. (1977). From sign to language. In J. Macnamara (Ed.), Language learning and thought (pp. 11–35). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  25. McNeill, D. (1992). Hand and mind: What gestures reveal about thought. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  26. Morford, M., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (1992). Comprehension and production of gesture in combination with speech in one-word speakers. Journal of Child Language, 19, 559–580.Google Scholar
  27. Muschisky, M., Gershkoff-Stowe, L., Cole, E., & Thelen, E. (1996). The epigenetic landscape revisited: A dynamic interpretation. In C. Rovee-Collier & L. P. Lipsitt (Eds.), Advances in infancy research (pp. 121–159). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
  28. O'Reilly, A. W. (1995). Using representations: Comprehension and production of actions with imagined objects. Child Development, 66, 999–1010.Google Scholar
  29. Perry, M., Berch, D., & Singleton, J. (1995). Constructing shared understanding: The role of nonverbal input in learning contexts. Journal of Contemporary Legal Issues, 6, 213–235.Google Scholar
  30. Regier, T. (1997). Constraints on the learning of spatial terms: A computational investigation. In D. Medin, P. Schyns, & R. Goldstone (Eds.), Psychology of learning and motivation, Vol. 36: Mechanisms of perceptual learning (pp. 171–217). San Diego: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  31. Riseborough, M. G. (1981). Physiographic gestures as decoding facilitators: Three experiments exploring a neglected facet of communication. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 5, 172–183.Google Scholar
  32. Rogers, W. T. (1978). The contribution of kinesic illustrators toward the comprehension of verbal behavior within utterances. Human Communication Research, 5, 54–62.Google Scholar
  33. Tfouni, L. V., & Klatzky, R. L. (1983). A discourse analysis of deixis: Pragmatic, semantic, and cognitive factors in the comprehension of “this,” “that,” “here” and “there”. Journal of Child Language, 10, 123–133.Google Scholar
  34. Thelen, E. (1989). Self-organization in developmental processes: Can systems approaches work? In M. Gunnar & E. Thelen (Eds.), Minnesota symposium on child psychology: Vol. 22, Systems and development (pp. 77–117). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  35. Thelen, E., & Smith, L. B. (1994). A dynamic systems approach to the development of cognition and action. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  36. Thompson, L. A., & Massaro, D. W. (1986). Evaluation and integration of speech and pointing gestures during referential understanding. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 42, 144–168.Google Scholar
  37. Thompson, L. A., & Massaro, D. W. (1994). Children's integration of speech and pointing gestures in comprehension. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 57, 327–354.Google Scholar
  38. van der Lely, H., & Dewart, H. (1986). Sentence comprehension strategies in specifically language impaired children. British Journal of Disorders of Communication, 21, 291–306.Google Scholar
  39. Volkmar, F. R., & Siegel, A. E. (1982). Responses to consistent and discrepant social communications. In R. S. Feldman (Ed.), Development of nonverbal behavior in children (pp. 231–255). New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
  40. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes (M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, S. Scribner, & E. Souberman, Trans.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  41. Wood, D. J., Bruner, J. S., & Ross, G. (1976). The role of tutoring in problem solving. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 17, 89–100.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Human Sciences Press, Inc. 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nicole M. McNeil
    • 1
  • Martha W. Alibali
    • 2
  • Julia L. Evans
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUniversity of Wisconsin–MadisonMadison
  2. 2.Department of PsychologyUniversity of Wisconsin–MadisonMadison
  3. 3.Department of Communicative DisordersUniversity of Wisconsin–Madison

Personalised recommendations