Evolutionary Ecology

, Volume 12, Issue 7, pp 839–853 | Cite as

Seasonal shifts in sex ratios of fledgling American kestrels (Falco sparverius paulus): The Early Bird Hypothesis

  • Peter D. Smallwood
  • John a. Smallwood


We document a seasonal shift in the sex ratios of broods produced by resident southeastern American kestrels (Falco sparverius paulus) breeding in nest boxes in Florida. Early in the breeding season, most biased broods were biased towards males, whereas later in the season, most biased broods were biased towards females. Computer-simulated broods subjected to sex-biased egg and/or nestling mortality demonstrate that it is possible that differential mortality produced the pattern of bias that we observed. However, these simulations do not exclude the possibility that female kestrels were manipulating the primary sex ratio of the broods. We present evidence that this sex ratio shift is adaptive: for males we detected breeding as yearlings, all had fledged early the previous season. No such relationship between season and the probability of breeding as a yearling was found for females. We propose the Early Bird Hypothesis as the ecological basis for the advantage of fledg ing early in males. We hypothesize that pre-emptive competition among post-fledging, dispersing males for breeding sites confers an advantage to males fledged early in the season. This hypothesis may explain why a non-migratory population of the Eurasian kestrel (F. tinnunculus) and non-migratory American kestrels breeding in Florida (F. s. paulus) exhibit this seasonal shift in sex ratios, whereas migratory American kestrels (F. s. sparverius) breeding in Saskatchewan, Canada, do not. We discuss the relevance of the Early Bird Hypothesis for other animal species.

Early Bird Hypothesis Falco sparverius paulus intrasexual competition sex allocation sex-biased mortality sex ratio 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Anderson, D.J., Budde, C., Apanius, V., Martinez Gomez, J.E., Bird, D.M. and Weathers, W.W. (1993a) Prey size influences female competitive dominance in nestling American kestrels (Falco sparverius). Ecology 74, 367–376.Google Scholar
  2. Anderson, D.J., Reeve, J., Martinez Gomez, J.E., Weathers, W.W., Hutson, S., Cunningham, H.V. and Bird, D.M. (1993b) Sexual size dimorphism and food requirements of nestling birds. Can. J. Zool. 71, 2541–2545.Google Scholar
  3. Balgooyen, T.G. (1976) Behavior and ecology of the American kestrel (Falco sparverius L.) in the Sierra Nevadas of California. Univ. Calif. Pub. Zool. 103, 1–83.Google Scholar
  4. Bednarz, J.C. and Hayden, T.J. (1991) Skewed brood sex ratio and sex-biased hatching sequence in Harris hawks. Am. Nat. 137, 116–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bildstein, K.L. (1992) Causes and consequences of reversed sexual dimorphism in raptors: The Head Start Hypothesis. J. Raptor Res. 26, 115–123.Google Scholar
  6. Bird, D.M. and Palmer, R.S. (1988) American kestrel. In Handbook of North American Birds, Vol. 5: Diurnal Raptors, Part 2 (R.S. Palmer, ed.), pp. 253–290. Yale University Press, New Haven, CT.Google Scholar
  7. Blank, J.L. and Nolan, V. (1983) Offspring sex ratio in red-winged blackbirds is dependent on maternal age. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. 80, 6141–6145.Google Scholar
  8. Bortolotti, G.R. and Iko, W.M. (1992) Non-random pairing in American kestrels: Mate choice versus intra-sexual competition. Anim. Behav. 44, 811–821.Google Scholar
  9. Bulmer, M.G. (1983) The significance of protandry in social hymenoptera. Am. Nat. 121, 540–551.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Burley, N. (1986) Sex-ratio manipulations in color-banded zebra finches. Evolution 40, 1191–1206.Google Scholar
  11. Butler, M.G. (1984) Life Histories of Aquatic Insects. Praeger Scientific, Westport, CT.Google Scholar
  12. Charnov, E. (1979) The general patterns of sexuality: Darwinian fitness. Am. Nat. 113, 465–480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Charnov, E. (1982) The Theory of Sex Allocation. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar
  14. Clark, A.B. (1978) Sex ratio and local resource competition in a prosimian primate. Science 201, 163–165.Google Scholar
  15. Clutton-Brock, T.H. (1986) Sex ratio variation in birds. Ibis 128, 317–329.Google Scholar
  16. Clutton-Brock, T.H., Albon, S.D. and Guinness, F.E. (1985) Parental investment and sex differences in juvenile mortality in birds and mammals. Nature 313, 131–133.Google Scholar
  17. Cooch, E., Lank, D., Robertson, R. and Cooke, F. (1997) Effects of parental age and environmental change on o.spring sex ratio in a precocial bird. J. Anim. Ecol. 66, 189–202.Google Scholar
  18. Cronk, L. (1993) Parental favoritism towards daughters. Am. Sci. 81, 272–279.Google Scholar
  19. Daan, S., Dijkstra, C. and Weissing, F.J. (1996) An evolutionary explanation for seasonal trends in avian sex ratios. Behav. Ecol. 7, 426–430.Google Scholar
  20. Darwin, C. (1874) The Descent of Man and Selection in Relation to Sex, 2nd edn. D. Appleton and Co., London.Google Scholar
  21. Dijkstra, C., Daan, S., Meijer, T., Cave, A.J. and Foppen, R.P.B. (1988) Daily and seasonal variations in body mass of the kestrel in relation to food availability and reproduction. Ardea 76, 127–140.Google Scholar
  22. Dijkstra, C., Daan, S. and Buker, J.B. (1990) Adaptive seasonal variation in the sex ratio of kestrel broods. Funct. Ecol. 4, 143–147.Google Scholar
  23. Ellegren, H., Gustafsson, L. and Sheldon, B.C. (1996) Sex ratio adjustment in relation to paternal attrac-tiveness in a wild bird population. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 93, 11723–11728.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Emlen, S.T., Emlen, J.M. and Levin, S.A. (1986) Sex ratio selection in species with helpers at the nest. Am. Nat. 127, 1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Fisher, R.A. (1930) The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  26. Godfray, H.C.J. and Werren, J.H. (1996) Recent developments in sex ratio studies. Trends Ecol. Evol. 11, 59–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Gosling, L.M. (1986) Selective abortion of entire litters in the Coypu: Adaptive control of offspring pro-duction in relation to quality and sex. Am. Nat. 127, 772–795.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Gowaty, P.A. (1993) Differential dispersal, local resource competition, and sex ratio variation in birds. Am. Nat. 141, 263–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Griffiths, R. (1992) Sex-biased mortality in the lesser black-backed gull Larus fuscus during the nestling stage. Ibis 134, 237–244.Google Scholar
  30. Hamilton, W.D. (1967) Extraordinary sex ratios. Science 156, 477–488.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Hoffman, M.L. and Collopy, M.W. (1988) Historical status of the American kestrel (Falco sparverius paulus) in Florida. Wilson Bull. 100, 91–107.Google Scholar
  32. Hogg, J.T., Hass, C.C. and Jenni, D.A. (1992) Sex-biased maternal expenditure in Rocky Mountain bighorn sheep. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 31, 243–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Howe, H.F. (1977) Sex-ratio adjustment in the common grackle. Science 198, 744–746.Google Scholar
  34. Kale, H.W. III (1978) Rare and Endangered Biota of Florida, Vol. II: Birds. University Presses of Florida, Gainesville, FL.Google Scholar
  35. Koenig, W.D. and Dickinson, J.L. (1996) Nestling sex-ratio variation in Western blue birds. Auk 113, 902–910.Google Scholar
  36. Komduer, J. (1996) Facultative sex ratio bias in the offspring of the Seychelles warblers. Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. Ser. B 263, 661–666.Google Scholar
  37. Krebs, J.R. and Davies, N.B. (1993) An Introduction to Behavioural Ecology, 3rd edn. Blackwell Scientific, London.Google Scholar
  38. Kugera, T.E. (1991) Adaptive variation in sex ratios of offspring in nutritionally stressed mule deer. J. Mammalogy 72, 745–749.Google Scholar
  39. Leroux, A. and Bretagnolle, V. (1996) Sex ratio variations in broods of Montagus harriers, Circus pygargus. J. Avian Biol. 27, 63–69.Google Scholar
  40. Lessells, C.M., Mateman, A.C. and Visser, J. (1996) Great tit hatchling sex ratios. J. Avian Biol. 27, 135–142.Google Scholar
  41. Meijer, T., Daan, S. and Dijkstra, C. (1988) Female condition and reproduction: Effects of food manipulation in free-living and captive kestrels. Ardea 76, 141–154.Google Scholar
  42. Miller, K.E. and Smallwood, J.A. (1997) Natal dispersal and philopatry of the southeastern American kestrel in Florida. Wilson Bull. 109, 226–232.Google Scholar
  43. Olsen, P.D. and Cockburn, A. (1991) Female-biased sex allocation in peregrine falcons and other raptors. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 28, 417–423.Google Scholar
  44. Rijnsdorp, A., Daan, S. and Dijkstra, C. (1981) Hunting in the kestrel, Falco tinnunculus, and the adaptive significance of daily habits. Oecologia 50, 391–406.Google Scholar
  45. Roest, A.I. (1957) Notes on the American sparrow hawk. Auk 74, 1–19.Google Scholar
  46. Ryder, J.P. (1983) Sex ratio and egg sequence in ring-billed gulls. Auk 100, 726–728.Google Scholar
  47. Schultz, E.T. (1990) Why do small dwarf perch breed late? The causes and consequences of breeding schedule variation in female Micrometrus minimus. PhD dissertation, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA.Google Scholar
  48. Schultz, E.T. (1993) The effect of birth date on fitness of female dwarf perch, Micrometrus minimus (Per-ciformes: Embiotocidae). Evolution 47, 520–539.Google Scholar
  49. Smallwood, J.A. (1987) Sexual segregation by habitat in American kestrels wintering in southcentral Florida: Vegetative structure and responses to differential prey availability. Condor 89, 842–849.Google Scholar
  50. Smallwood, J.A. (1988) A mechanism of sexual segregation by habitat in American kestrels wintering in southcentral Florida. Auk 105, 36–46.Google Scholar
  51. Smallwood, J.A. and Collopy, M.W. (1993) Management of the threatened southeastern American kestrel in Florida: Population responses to a regional nest-box program (abstract). J. Raptor Res. 27, 81.Google Scholar
  52. Svensson, E. and Nilsson, A. (1996) Mate quality affects offspring sex ratio in blue tits. Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. Ser. B 263, 357–361.Google Scholar
  53. Thornhill, R. and Alcock, J. (1983) The Evolution of Insect Mating Systems. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  54. Trivers, R.L. and Willard, D.E. (1973) Natural selection of parental ability to vary the sex ratio of offspring. Science 179, 90–92.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Varland, D.E., Klaas, E.E. and Loughin, T.M. (1991) Development of foraging behavior in the American kestrel. J. Raptor Res. 25, 9–17.Google Scholar
  56. Weatherhead, P.J. (1985) Sex ratios of red-winged blackbirds by egg size and laying sequence. Auk 102, 298–304.Google Scholar
  57. Weatherhead, P.J. and Montgomerie, R. (1995) Local resource competition and sex ratio in birds. J. Avian Biol. 26, 168–171.Google Scholar
  58. Wiebe, K.L. and Bortolotti, G.R. (1992) Facultative sex ratio manipulation in American kestrels. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 30, 379–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Wright, D.D., Ryser, J.T. and Kiltie, R.A. (1995) First-Cohort Advantage Hypothesis: A new twist on facultative sex ratio adjustment. Am. Nat. 145, 133–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Zijlstra, M., Daan, S. and Bruinenberg-Rinsma, J. (1992) Seasonal variation in the sex ratio of marsh harrier broods (Circus aeruginosus) broods. Funct. Ecol. 6, 553–559.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • Peter D. Smallwood
    • 1
  • John a. Smallwood
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of BiologyBryn Mawr CollegeBryn Mawr
  2. 2.Department of BiologyMontclair State UniversityUpper MontclairUSA

Personalised recommendations