Biology and Philosophy

, Volume 13, Issue 2, pp 233–244 | Cite as

Taxonomy and Philosophy of Names

Abstract

Although naming biological clades is a major activity in taxonomy, little attention has been paid to what these names actually refer to. In philosophy, definite descriptions have long been considered equivalent to the meaning of names and biological taxonomy is a scientific application of these ideas. One problem with definite descriptions as the meanings of names is that the name will refer to whatever fits the description rather than the intended individual (clade). Recent proposals for explicit phylogenetic definitions of clade names suffer from similar problems and we argue that clade names cannot be defined since they lack intension. Furthermore we stress the importance of “tree-thinking” for phylogenetic reference to work properly.

reference meaning individual class definition clade evolution phylogeny phylogenetic taxonomy systematics tree-thinking cladistics intention extension 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bryant, H.N.: 1994, 'Comments on the phylogenetic definition of taxon names and conventions regarding the naming of crown clades', Systematic Biology 43, 124–130.Google Scholar
  2. Bryant, H.N.: 1996, 'Explicitness, stability, and universality in the phylogenetic definition and usage of taxon names: a case study of the phylogenetic taxonomy of the Carnivora (Mammalia)', Systematic Biology 45, 174–189.Google Scholar
  3. De Queiroz, K.: 1992, 'Phylogenetic definitions and taxonomic philosophy', Biology and Philosophy 7, 295–313.Google Scholar
  4. De Queiroz, K.: 1994, 'Replacement of an essentialistic perspective on taxonomic definitions as exemplified by the definition of “Mammalia”', Systematic Biology 43, 497–510.Google Scholar
  5. De Queiroz, K.: 1995, 'The definitions of species and clade names: a reply to Ghiselin', Biology and Philosophy 10, 223–228.Google Scholar
  6. De Queiroz, K. and Gauthier, J.: 1990, 'Phylogeny as a central principle in taxonomy: phylogenetic definitions of taxon names', Systematic Zoology 39, 307–322.Google Scholar
  7. De Queiroz, K. and Gauthier, J.: 1992, 'Phylogenetic taxonomy', Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 23, 449–480.Google Scholar
  8. De Queiroz, K. and Gauthier, J.: 1994, 'Toward a phylogenetic system of biological nomenclature', Trends in Ecology and Evolution 9, 27–31.Google Scholar
  9. Donnellan, K.S.: 1966, 'Reference and definite descriptions', Philosophical Review 75, 281–304.Google Scholar
  10. Donnellan, K.S.: 1972, 'Proper names and identifying descriptions', in Harman and Davidson (ed.), Semantics and natural language, Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht-Holland, pp. 356–379.Google Scholar
  11. Ghiselin, M.T.: 1966, 'On psychologism in the logic of taxonomic controversies', Systematic Zoology 15, 207–215.Google Scholar
  12. Ghiselin, M.T.: 1969, The triumph of the Darwinian method, University of California Press.Google Scholar
  13. Ghiselin, M.T.: 1974, 'A radical solution to the species problem', Systematic Zoology 23, 536–544.Google Scholar
  14. Ghiselin, M.T.: 1981, 'Categories, life, and thinking', The Behavioural and Brain Sciences 4, 269–313.Google Scholar
  15. Ghiselin, M.T.: 1987, 'Species concepts, individuality, and objectivity', Biology and Philosophy 2, 127–143.Google Scholar
  16. Ghiselin, M.T.: 1995, 'Ostensive definitions of the names of species and clades', Biology and Philosophy 10, 219–222.Google Scholar
  17. Gibson, R.: 1983, 'Nemerteans of the Great Barrier Reef 6. Enopla Hoplonemertea (Polystilifera: Reptantia)', Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 78, 73–104.Google Scholar
  18. Hennig, W.: 1966, Phylogenetic systematics, University of Illinois Press, Urbana.Google Scholar
  19. Hull, D.L.: 1989, The metaphysics of evolution, SUNY Press.Google Scholar
  20. Härlin, M.: 1997, 'Tree-thinking and nemertean systematics, with a systematization of the Eureptantia', Hydrobiologia (in Press).Google Scholar
  21. Kripke, S.: 1980, Naming and necessity, Blackwell, Oxford.Google Scholar
  22. Mill, J.S.: 1875, A System of Logic, Ratiocinative and Inductive, Being a Connected View of the Principles of Evidence and the Methods of Scientific Investigation, 9th ed., Longmans,Green, Reader and Dyer, London.Google Scholar
  23. Nelson, R.J.: 1992, Naming and reference. The link of word to object, Routledge.Google Scholar
  24. Putnam, H.: 1975, Mind, language, and reality. Philosophical papers, volume 2, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Russell, B.: 1956, 'Lectures on Logical Atomism', in R. C. Marsh (ed), Logic and Knowledge, George Allen & Unwin Ltd., London.Google Scholar
  26. Schander, C. and Thollesson, M.: 1995, 'Phylogenetic taxonomy – some comments', Zoologica Scripta 24, 263–268.Google Scholar
  27. Searle, J.: 1958, 'Proper names', Mind 67: 166–173.Google Scholar
  28. Sundberg, P. and Pleijel, F.: 1994, 'Phylogenetic classification and the definition of taxon names', Zoologica Scripta 23, 19–25.Google Scholar
  29. Wittgenstein, L.: 1953, Philosophical investigations, Macmillan, Chicago.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of ZoologyGöteborg UniversityGöteborgSweden
  2. 2.Center for the History and Philosophy of ScienceCalifornia Academy of SciencesSan FranciscoUSA

Personalised recommendations