Advertisement

Evolutionary Ecology

, 12:377 | Cite as

Optimal avian migration: A dynamic model of fuel stores and site use

  • Thomas P. Weber
  • Bruno J. Ens
  • Alasdair I. Houston
Article

Abstract

Birds migrating between widely separated wintering and breeding grounds may choose among a number of potential stopover sites by using different itineraries. Our aim is to predict the optimal migration schedule in terms of (1) rates of fuel deposition, (2) departure fuel loads and (3) stopover site use, when only a handful of such sites are available. We assume that reproductive success depends on the date and fuel load at arrival on the breeding grounds. On migration, the birds face a trade-off between gaining fuel and avoiding predation. To allow the optimal decision at any given moment to depend on the fuel load and the location of the bird, as well as on unpredictability in conditions, we employed stochastic dynamic programming. This technique assumes that the birds know the probability distribution of conditions in all sites, but not the particular realization they will encounter. We examined the consequences of varying aspects of the model, like (1) the shape of the relationship between arrival date and fitness, (2) the presence of stochasticity in fuel deposition rates and wind conditions, and (3) the nature of predation (i.e. whether predation risk depends on the fuel load of the birds or their feeding intensity).

Optimal fuel deposition rates are predicted to be constant if there are either only predation risks of maintaining stores or only risks of acquiring fuel stores. If only fuel acquisition is risky, fuel deposition rates can be below maximum, especially if there also is an intermediate best arrival time at the breeding ground. The fuel deposition rate at a site then depends not just on the site's quality but on the qualities of all visited sites. In contrast, rates of fuel deposition are not constant if both the acquisition and the maintenance of fuel stores carry risk. Optimal departure fuel loads are just enough to reach the next site if the environment is deterministic and are simply set by the energetic cost of covering the distance. As with time-minimizing models, more fuel than necessary to reach a site is only deposited under very restricted circumstances. Such overloads are more likely to be deposited if either fuel gains or expenditure are stochastic. The size of overloads is then determined by the variance in fuel gain at the target site and the worst possible conditions during flight. Site use is modified by differences in predation risk between sites and differences in fuel deposition rates. An expression derived to predict site use under time minimization provides a good approximation in state-dependent models. In some cases, the possibility of starvation may influence optimal decisions, even when the probability of starvation under the optimal policy is low. This effect of starvation has also been found in other contexts.

avian migration departure fuel loads fuel deposition rates stochastic dynamic programming stopover site use 

References

  1. Alerstam, T. and Lindström, Å. (1990) Optimal bird migration: The relative importance of time, energy, and safety. In Bird Migration: The Physiology and Ecophysiology (E. Gwinner, ed.), pp. 331–351. Springer, Berlin.Google Scholar
  2. Bijlsma, G.R. (1990) Predation by large falcon species on wintering waders on the Banc d'Arguin, Mauritania. Ardea 78, 75–82.Google Scholar
  3. Creswell, W. (1993) Escape responses by redshanks, Tringa totanus, on attack by avian predators. Anim. Behav. 46, 609–611.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Creswell, W. (1994) Flocking is an effective anti-predation strategy in redshank, Tringa totanus. Anim. Behav. 47, 433–442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Daan, S., Dijkstra, C. and Tinbergen, J.M. (1990) Family planning in the kestrel (Falco tinnunculus): The ultimate control of covariation of laying date and clutch size. Behaviour 114, 83–116.Google Scholar
  6. Davidson, N.C. and Evans, P.R. (1988) Prebreeding accumulation of fat and muscle protein by Arctic-breeding shorebirds. Acta XIX Congr. Internat. Ornithol. (Ottawa), 342–352.Google Scholar
  7. Drent, R.H. and Daan, S. (1980) The prudent parent: Energetic adjustments in avian breeding. Ardea 68, 225–252.Google Scholar
  8. Ens, B.J., Piersma, T. and Tinbergen, J.M. (1994) Towards predictive models of bird migration schedules: Theoretical and empirical bottlenecks. NIOZ-report 1994–95.Google Scholar
  9. Evans, P.R. (1991) Seasonal and annual patterns of mortality in migratory shorebirds: Some conservation implications. In Bird Population Studies (C.M. Perrins, J.-D. Lebreton and G.J.M. Hirons, eds), pp. 346–359. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  10. Fransson, T. and Weber, T.P. (1997) Migratory fuelling of blackcaps Sylvia atricapilla under the perceived risk of predation. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 41, 75–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Goss-Custard, J.D. (1984) Intake rates and food supply in migrating and wintering shorebirds. Behav. Mar. Anim. 6, 233–270.Google Scholar
  12. Green, G.H., Greenwood, J.J.D. and Lloyd, C.S. (1977) The influence of snow condition on the date of breeding of wading birds in north-east Greenland. J. Zool. (Lond) 183, 311–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gudmundsson, G.A., Lindström, Å. and Alerstam, T. (1991) Optimal fat loads and long distance flights by migrating Knots, Sanderlings and Turnstones. Ibis 133, 140–152.Google Scholar
  14. Hedenström, A. (1992) Flight performance in relation to fuel loads in birds. J. Theor. Biol. 158, 535–537.Google Scholar
  15. Houston, A.I. and McNamara, J.M. (1993) A theoretical investigation of the fat reserves and mortality levels of small birds in winter. Ornis Scand. 24, 205–219Google Scholar
  16. Houston, A.I., McNamara, J.M. and Hutchinson, J.M.C. (1993) General results concerning the trade-off between gaining energy and avoiding predation. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 341, 375–397.Google Scholar
  17. Kersten, M. and Visser, W. (1996) The rate of food processing in the Oystercatcher: Food intake and energy expenditure are constrained by a digestive bottleneck. Funct. Ecol. 10, 440–448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Liechti, F., Hedenström, A. and Alerstam, T. (1994) Effect of sidewinds on optimal flying speeds of birds J. Theor. Biol. 170, 219–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lindström, Å. and Piersma, T. (1993) Mass changes in migrating birds: The evidence for fat and protein storage re-examined. Ibis 135, 70–78.Google Scholar
  20. Lindström, Å., Hasselquist, D., Bensch, S. and Grahn, M. (1990) Asymmetric contests over resources for survival and migration: A field experiment with bluethroats. Anim. Behav. 40, 453–461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Mangel, M. and Clark, C.W. (1986) Towards a unified foraging theory. Ecology 67, 1127–1138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Mangel, M. and Clark, C.W. (1988) Dynamic Modeling in Behavioral Ecology. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar
  23. McNamara, J.M. and Houston, A.I. (1986) The common currency for behavioural decisions. Am. Nat. 127, 358–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. McNamara, J.M., Mace, R.H. and Houston, A.I. (1987) Optimal daily routines of singing and foraging. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 20, 399–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. McNamara, J.M., Houston, A.I. and Lima, S.L. (1994) Foraging routines of small birds in winter: A theoretical investigation. J. Avian Biol. 25, 287–302.Google Scholar
  26. Metcalfe, N.B. and Furness, R.W. (1984) Changing priorities: The effect of premigratory fattening on the trade-off between foraging and vigilance. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 15, 203–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Møller, A.P. (1994) Phenotype-dependent arrival time and its consequences in a migratory bird. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 35, 115–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Moore, F.R. and Simm, P.A. (1986) Risk-sensitive foraging by a migratory bird (Dendroica coronata). Experientia 42, 1054–1056.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Mouritsen, K.N. (1992) Predator avoidance by night-feeding dunlins (Calidris alpina): A matter of concealment. Ornis Scand. 23, 195–198.Google Scholar
  30. Page, G. and Whitacre, D.F. (1975) Raptor predation on wintering shorebirds. Condor 77, 73–83.Google Scholar
  31. Pennycuick, C.J. (1975) Mechanics of flight. In Avian Biology, Vol. V (D.S. Farner and J.R. King, eds), pp. 1–75. Academic Press, London.Google Scholar
  32. Piersma, T. (1987) Hop, skip or jump? Constraints on migration of Arctic waders by feeding, fattening and flight speed. Limosa 60, 185–194 (in Dutch with English summary).Google Scholar
  33. Piersma, T. (1994) Close to the edge: Energetic bottlenecks and the evolution of migratory pathways in Knots. PhD thesis, University of Groningen, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
  34. Piersma, T. and van de Sant, S. (1992) Pattern and predictability of potential wind assistance for waders and geese migrating from West Africa and the Wadden Sea to Siberia. Ornis Svevica 2, 55–66.Google Scholar
  35. Piersma, P., Verkuil, Y. and Tulp, I. (1994) Resources for long-distance migration of knots Calidris canutus islandica and C. c. canutus: How broad is the temporal exploitation window of benthic prey in the western and eastern Wadden Sea? Oikos 71, 393–407.Google Scholar
  36. Rayner, J.M.V. (1990) The mechanics of flight and bird migration performance. In Bird Migration: The Physiology and Ecophysiology (E. Gwinner, ed.), pp. 283–299. Springer, Berlin.Google Scholar
  37. Rowe, L., Ludwig, D. and Schluter, D. (1994) Time, condition and the seasonal decline of avian clutch size. Am. Nat. 143, 698–722.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Tucker, V.A. (1974) Energetics of natural avian flight. In Avian Energetics (R.A. Paynter, ed.), pp. 298–328. Publication No. 15 of the Nuttall Ornithological Club, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  39. van der Meer, J. and Piersma, T. (1994) Physiologically inspired regression models for estimating and predicting nutrient stores and their composition in birds. Physiol. Zool. 67, 305–329.Google Scholar
  40. Weber, T.P. and Houston, A.I. (1997) Flight costs, flight range and the stopover ecology of migrating birds. J. Anim. Ecol. 66, 297–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Weber, T.P., Houston, A.I. and Ens, B.J. (1994) Optimal departure fat loads and site use in avian migration: An analytical model. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 258, 29–34.Google Scholar
  42. Whitfield, D.P. (1985) Raptor predation on wintering waders in south-east Scotland. Ibis 127, 554–558.Google Scholar
  43. Whitfield, D.P., Evans, A.D. and Whitfield, P.A. (1986) The impact of raptor predation on wintering waders. Acta XIX Congr. Internat. Ornithol. ( Ottawa ), 674–687.Google Scholar
  44. Wiersma, P. and Piersma, T. (1994) Effects of microhabitat, flocking, climate and migratory goal on energy expenditure in the annual cycle of knots. Condor 96, 257–279.Google Scholar
  45. Wilson, J.R. (1981) The migration of High Arctic shorebirds through Iceland. Bird Study 28, 21–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Wilson, J.R. (1988) The migratory system of Knots in Iceland. Wader Study Group Bull. 54, 8–9.Google Scholar
  47. Witter, M.S. and Cuthill, I.S. (1993) The ecological costs of avian fat storage. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 340, 73–92.Google Scholar
  48. Witter, M.S., Cuthill, I.S. and Bonser, R.H.C. (1994) Experimental investigations of mass-dependent predation risk in the European starling, Sturnus vulgaris. Anim. Behav. 48, 201–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Zwarts, L., Blomert, A.-M. and Hoepkes, R. (1990a) Increase of feeding time in waders preparing for spring migration from the Banc d'Arguin, Mauritania. Ardea 78, 237–256.Google Scholar
  50. Zwarts, L., Ens, B.J., Kersten, M. and Piersma, T. (1990b) Moult, mass and flight range of waders ready to take off for long distance migrations. Ardea 78, 339–364.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Chapman and Hall 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • Thomas P. Weber
    • 1
  • Bruno J. Ens
    • 2
  • Alasdair I. Houston
    • 3
  1. 1.BBSRC/NERC Ecology and Behaviour Group, Department of ZoologyUniversity of OxfordOxfordUK
  2. 2.Institute for Forestry and Nature Research (IBN-DLO)TexelThe Netherlands
  3. 3.School of Biological SciencesUniversity of BristolBristolUK

Personalised recommendations