Biology and Philosophy

, Volume 12, Issue 4, pp 493–519 | Cite as

The Evolution of the Linnaean Hierarchy

  • Marc Ereshefsky


The Linnaean system of classification is a threefold system of theoretical assumptions, sorting rules, and rules of nomenclature. Over time, that system has lost its theoretical assumptions as well as its sorting rules. Cladistic revisions have left it less and less Linnaean. And what remains of the system is flawed on pragmatic grounds. Taking all of this into account, it is time to consider alternative systems of classification.

cladism classification Linnaean hierarchy Linnaeus nomenclature species 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Atran, S.: 1990, Cognitive Foundations of Natural History: Towards an Anthropology of Science, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  2. Brothers, D.: 1986, ‘Nomenclature at the Ordinal and Higher Levels’, Systematic Zoology 32, 34–42.Google Scholar
  3. Cain, A.: 1958, ‘Logic and Memory in Linnaeus's System of Taxonomy’, Proceedings of the Linnaean Society of London 169, 144–163.Google Scholar
  4. Darwin, C.: 1859 [1964], On the Origin of Species: A Facsimile of the First Edition, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
  5. de Queiroz, K. and Gauthier, J.: 1992, ‘Phylogenetic Taxonomy’, Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 23, 499–480.Google Scholar
  6. de Queiroz, K. and Gauthier, J.: 1994, ‘Toward a Phylogenetic System of Biological Nomenclature’, Trends in Ecology and Evolution 9, 27–31.Google Scholar
  7. Donoghue, M.: 1985, ‘A Critique of the Biological Species Concept and Recommendations for a Phylogenetic Alternative’, Bryologist 88, 172–181.Google Scholar
  8. Eldredge, N. and Cracraft, J.: 1980, Phylogenetic Patterns and the Evolutionary Process, Columbia University Press, New York.Google Scholar
  9. Ereshefsky, M.: 1991, ‘Species, Higher Taxa, and the Units of Evolution’, Philosophy of Science 58, 84–101.Google Scholar
  10. Ereshefsky, M.: 1994, ‘Some Problems with the Linnaean Hierarchy’, Philosophy of Science 61, 186–205.Google Scholar
  11. Gauthier, J. et al.: 1988, ‘A Phylogenetic Analysis of Lepidosauromorpha’, in R. Estes and G. Pregill (eds.), Phylogentic Relationships of Lizard Families, Stanford University Press, Palo Alto, California, pp. 15–98.Google Scholar
  12. Graybeal, A.: 1995, ‘Naming Species’, Systematic Zoology 44, 237–250.Google Scholar
  13. Griffiths, G.: 1973, ‘Some Fundamental Problems in Biological Classification’, Systematic Zoology 22, 338–343.Google Scholar
  14. Griffiths, G.: 1974, ‘On the Foundations of Biological Systematics’, Acta Biotheoretica 3–4, 85–131.Google Scholar
  15. Griffiths, G.: 1976, ‘The Future of Linnaean Nomenclature’, Systematic Zoology 25, 168–173.Google Scholar
  16. Hennig, W.: 1965 [1994], ‘Phylogenetic Systematics’, Annual Review of Entomology 10, 97–116. Reprinted in E. Sober (ed.), Conceptual Issues in Evolutionary Biology, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, pp. 257–276.Google Scholar
  17. Hennig, W.: 1966, Phylogenetic Systematics, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
  18. Hennig, W.: 1969 [1981], Insect Phylogeny. Translated by A. C. Pont, John Wiley Press, New York. Originally published as Die Stammesgeschichte der Insekten, Waldemar Kramer, Frankfurt.Google Scholar
  19. Heywood, V.: 1985, ‘Linnaeus — the Conflict Between Science and Scholasticism’, in J. Weinstock (ed.), Contemporary Perspectives on Linnaeus. University Press of America, Lanham, Maryland, pp. 1–16.Google Scholar
  20. Hull, D.: 1964 [1989], ‘Consistency and Monophyly’, Systematic Zoology 13, 1–11. Reprinted in D. Hull, The Metaphysics of Evolution, SUNY Press, New York, pp. 129–143.Google Scholar
  21. Hull, D.: 1966, ‘Phylogenetic Numericlature’, Systematic Zoology 15, 14–17.Google Scholar
  22. Hull, D.: 1978, ‘A Matter of Individuality’, Philosophy of Science 45, 335–360.Google Scholar
  23. Hull, D.: 1985, ‘Linné as an Aristotelian’, in J. Weinstock (ed.), Contemporary Perspectives on Linnaeus. University Press of America, Lanham, Maryland, pp. 37–54.Google Scholar
  24. Larson, J.: 1971, Reason and Experience: The Representation of Natural Order in the Work of Carl von Linné, University of California Press, Berkeley.Google Scholar
  25. Linnaeus, C.: 1737 [1938], The Critica Botanica. Translated by A. Hort, The Ray Society, London.Google Scholar
  26. Mayr, E.: 1969, Principles of Systematic Zoology, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
  27. Mayr, E.: 1970, Populations, Species, and Evolution, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
  28. Mayr, E.: 1982, The Growth of Biological Thought, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
  29. Michener, C.: 1963, ‘Some Future Developments in Taxonomy’, Systematic Zoology 12, 151–172.Google Scholar
  30. Michener, C.: 1964, ‘The Possible Use of Uninominal Nomenclature to Increase the Stability of Names in Biology’, Systematic Zoology 13, 182–190.Google Scholar
  31. Mishler, B. and Donoghue, M.: 1982, ‘Species Concepts: A Case for Pluralism’, Systematic Zoology 31, 491–503.Google Scholar
  32. Nelson, G.: 1972, ‘Phylogenetic Relationship and Classification’, Systematic Zoology 21, 227–231.Google Scholar
  33. Patterson, C. and Rosen, D.: 1977, ‘Review of Ichthyodectiform and other Mesozoic Teleost Fishes and the Theory and Practice of Classifying Fossils’, Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History 158, 81–172.Google Scholar
  34. Pennisi, E.: 1996, ‘Meeting Briefs: Evolutionary and Systematic Biologists Converge’, Science 273, 181–182.Google Scholar
  35. Rosen, D.: 1979, ‘Vicariant Patterns Historical Explanation in Biogeography’, Systematic Zoology 27, 159–188.Google Scholar
  36. Simpson, G.: 1961, The Principles of Animal Taxonomy, Columbia University Press, New York.Google Scholar
  37. Simpson, G.: 1963, ‘The Meaning of Taxonomic Statements’, in S. Washburn (ed.), Classification and Human Evolution, Aldine Press, New York, pp. 1–31.Google Scholar
  38. Wiley, E.: 1979, ‘The Annotated Linnaean hierarchy, with comments on Natural Taxa and Competing Systems’, Systematic Zoology 28, 308–337.Google Scholar
  39. Wiley, E.: 1981, Phylogenetics: The Theory and Practice of Phylogenetic Systematics, Wiley and Sons, New York.Google Scholar
  40. Winsor, M.: 1985, ‘The Impact of Darwinism upon the Linnaean Enterprise, with special Reference to the Work of T. H. Huxley’, in J. Weinstock (ed.), Contemporary Perspectives on Linnaeus. University Press of America, Lanham, Maryland, pp. 55–84.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  • Marc Ereshefsky
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PhilosophyUniversity of CalgaryCalgaryCanada

Personalised recommendations