Natural family planning with and without barrier method use in the fertile phase: efficacy in relation to sexual behavior: a German prospective long-term study
- 76 Downloads
A large prospective long-term study with users of natural family planning (NFP) methods has been conducted to analyze the relation between unintended pregnancy rates and sexual behavior with special reference to barrier method use in the fertile phase. Seven hundred and fifty eight NFP beginners, 19-45 years of age, 14 870 cycles, 28 unintended pregnancies were studied.
Of the couples, 54.2% use NFP only or predominantly and 45.9% use mixed methods (additional barrier method use in the fertile phase in 55.7% of the cycles). The overall pregnancy rate after 12 cycles of exposure is 2.2% according to the actuarial method. There is no significant difference between NFP users and mixed methods users and also no significant effect of duration of use in the first 5 years of exposure. During "perfect use" the pregnancy rate at 12 months is 0.63%. When only protected intercourse takes place in the fertile phase the pregnancy rate is 0.45%. The symptothermal method of NFP is most unforgiving for imperfect use (unprotected intercourse in the fertile phase). However, it is extremely effective when either abstinence or protected intercourse is used in the fertile phase.
KeywordsPublic Health Sexual Behavior Family Planning Special Reference Pregnancy Rate
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.Raith E, Frank P, Freundl G. Naturliche Familienplanung heute. F r ë rzte, Berater und interessierte Anwender. Heidelberg, Berlin, New York: Springer, 1994.Google Scholar
- 2.Gnoth CH, Frank-Herrmann P, Freundl G, Kunert J, Godehardt E. Sexual behavior of natural family planning users in Germany and its changes over time. Adv Contracept. 1995; 11: 173–85.Google Scholar
- 3.Frank-Herrmann P, Freundl G, Baur S et al. E¡ectiveness and acceptability of the symptothermal method of natural family planning in Germany. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1991; 165: 2052–4.Google Scholar
- 4.Arbeitsgruppe Naturliche Familienplanung. Naturlich und sicher naturliche Familienplanung-ein Leitfaden. 8th rev ed. M nchen: Ehrenwirth, 1993.Google Scholar
- 5.Freundl G. The European Natural Family Planning Study Groups. Prospective European multi-center study of natural family planning (1989–1992): interim results. Adv Contracept. 1993; 9: 269-83.Google Scholar
- 6.Trussel J, Grummar-Strawn L. Contraceptive failure of the ovulation method of periodic abstinence. Fam Plann Perspect. 1990; 22: 65–75.Google Scholar
- 7.Barbato M, Bertoloti G. Natural methods for fertility control: a prospective study. Int J Fertil. 1988; Suppl.: 48–51.Google Scholar
- 8.Kambic R, Kambic M, Brixius AM, Miller S. A thirty month clinical experience in natural family planning. Am J Public Health. 1981; 71: 1255–8.Google Scholar
- 9.Rice FJ, Lanctot CA, Garcia-Devessa C. E¡ectiveness of the symptothermal method of natural family planning: an international study. Int J Fertil. 1981; 26: 222–30.Google Scholar
- 10.Johnston JA. An analysis of continuity-discontinuity in natural family planning. An Australian factor analysis. Int J Fertil. 1981; 26: 231–8.Google Scholar
- 11.Lamprecht VM, Grummer-Strawn L. Development of new formulas to identify the fertile time of the menstrual cycle. Contraception. 1996; 54: 339–43.Google Scholar