Environmentalist

, Volume 18, Issue 4, pp 231–237 | Cite as

Birds and air traffic safety on Zagreb airport (Croatia)

  • SnjeŽAna KuŽIr
  • Jasmina MuŽIniĆ
Article

Abstract

One of the objectives of the new State of Croatia, as a Mediterranean country oriented towards tourism, is safety of its air traffic. The frequency of use of Zagreb airport is currently 688 flights, or about 20000 passengers a week. In 1996, research was carried out at the airport concerning air traffic safety with respect to the presence of birds on the airfield. Biological methods, in which birds were chased away by means of trained birds of prey, were used. For the Zagreb airport experiment nine birds involving three different species: Falco peregrinus, Accipiter gentilis and Falco cherrug were utilised. The results showed that the air traffic safety on Zagreb airport with regard to possible bird-plane strikes improved.

Other bird clearing methods, applied over the 1987–1996 period also reduced bird-plane interferences but were noted to be less effective. With the biological, bird of prey method, 100% temporary clearance was achieved. Habitat modification, which involved removal from the airport vicinity of all factors attractive to the birds, only removed 20–30% of the birds, but this was of a more permanent nature. Use of fire-arms achieved a 80–90% temporary bird clearance. A combination of all three methods would appear to be most effective and measures for further monitoring for safe air traffic movement at Zagreb airport are proposed.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Adams, F.R. (1949) Experiments in clearing birds from airfields, Ministry of Civil aviation ORS/MCA report n° 7. Appendix B, report of an inquiry into birds on airfields. Appendix C, The use of falcons in accident prevention.Google Scholar
  2. Anon. (1995) Štete nastale na zrakoplovima Croatia Airlines-a, Croatia Airlines.Google Scholar
  3. Brown, E.M. (1963) A review of bird strikes on aircraft of the Royal Navy and Royal Air Force. In: Busnel, R.-G. and Giban, J. (eds) El probleme des oiseaux sur les aerodromes. Institut National de la recherche agronomique, Paris, pp. 23-61.Google Scholar
  4. Glosier, P. (1978) Falconry and Hawking, B.T. Batsford Limited, London.Google Scholar
  5. Greisser, M. (1997) Die Wiesen im Flughafen Kloten. Ornis 2, 12-13.Google Scholar
  6. Linnell, M.A., Conover, M.R., Ohashi T.J. (1996) Analysis of bird strikes at a tropical airport, Journal of Wildlife Management 60(4), 935-945.Google Scholar
  7. Longhurst, J., Gibbs, C.D., Raper, D.W., Conlan. D.E. (1996) Towards sustainable airport development. The Environmentalist, 16, 197-202.Google Scholar
  8. Mataić, M. (1980) Privremeno “Uputstvo o zaštiti od ptica na aerodromu Zagreb”, pp.1-128.Google Scholar
  9. Mužinić, J. (1984) Ptice na aerodromu Pleso, Bilten Društva ekologa BiH, Sarajevo, 409-413.Google Scholar
  10. Individual Bird Species Conservation Regulations (Aves) (1995). State Agency for the Conservation of Cultural and Natural Heritage. Narodne novine, 43, 1291-1292Google Scholar
  11. The Nature Conservation Law (1994) Zastupniěki dom Sabora Republike Hrvatske. Narodne novine, 30, 1025- 1030.Google Scholar
  12. The Hunting Law (1994) Zastupniěki dom Sabora Republike Hrvatske. Narodne novine, 10, 211-224.Google Scholar
  13. Wright, E.N. (1963) A review of bird scaring methods used on British airfields. In: Busnel, R.-G. and Giban, J. (eds.). Le probleme des oiseaux sur les aerodromes. Institut National de la recherche agronomique, Paris, 113-121.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • SnjeŽAna KuŽIr
    • 1
  • Jasmina MuŽIniĆ
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute for OrnithologyZagrebCroatia

Personalised recommendations