Advertisement

Transport in Porous Media

, Volume 32, Issue 1, pp 117–137 | Cite as

Gas Flow in Porous Media With Klinkenberg Effects

  • Yu-Shu Wu
  • Karsten Pruess
  • peter Persoff
Article

Abstract

Gas flow in porous media differs from liquid flow because of the large gas compressibility and pressure-dependent effective permeability. The latter effect, named after Klinkenberg, may have significant impact on gas flow behavior, especially in low permeability media, but it has been ignored in most of the previous studies because of the mathematical difficulty in handling the additional nonlinear term in the gas flow governing equation. This paper presents a set of new analytical solutions developed for analyzing steady-state and transient gas flow through porous media including Klinkenberg effects. The analytical solutions are obtained using a new form of gas flow governing equation that incorporates the Klinkenberg effect. Additional analytical solutions for one-, two- and three-dimensional gas flow in porous media could be readily derived by the following solution procedures in this paper. Furthermore, the validity of the conventional assumption used for linearizing the gas flow equation has been examined. A generally applicable procedure has been developed for accurate evaluation of the analytical solutions which use a linearized diffusivity for transient gas flow. As application examples, the new analytical solutions have been used to verify numerical solutions, and to design new laboratory and field testing techniques to determine the Klinkenberg parameters. The proposed laboratory analysis method is also used to analyze data from steady-state flow tests of three core plugs from The Geysers geothermal field. We show that this new approach and the traditional method of Klinkenberg yield similar results of Klinkenberg constants for the laboratory tests; however, the new method allows one to analyze data from both transient and steady-state tests in various flow geometries.

gas flow Klinkenberg effect Klinkenberg constant pneumatic analysis unsaturated-zone flow air venting air permeability tests 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ahlers, C. F., Finsterle, S., Wu, Y. S. and Bodvarsson, G. S.: 1995, Determination of pneumatic permeability of a multi-layered system by inversion of pneumatic pressure data, Proc. of the 1995 AGU Fall Meeting, San Francisco, California.Google Scholar
  2. Al-Hussainy, R. J. Ramey, and Crawford, P. B.: 1966, The flow of real gases through porous media, J. Petrol. Technol. pp. 624–636.Google Scholar
  3. Baehr, A. L. and Joss, C. J.: 1995, An updated model of induced airflow in the unsaturated zone, Water Resour. Res. 27(10), 417–421.Google Scholar
  4. Baehr, A. L., Hoag, G. E. and Marley, M. C.: 1989, Removing volatile contaminants from the unsaturated zone by inducing advective air-phase transport, J. Contam. Hydrol. 4, 1–26.Google Scholar
  5. Baehr, A. L. and Hult, M. F.: 1991, Evaluation of unsaturated zone air permeability through pneumatic tests, Water Resour. Res. 27(10), 2605–2617.Google Scholar
  6. Carslaw, H. S. and Jaeger, J. C.: 1959, Conduction of Heat in Solids, Clarendon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  7. Collins, R. E. and Crawford, P. B.: 1953, Calculations of unsteady-state gas flow through porous media, corrected for Klinkenberg effects, AIME Trans. 198, 339–340.Google Scholar
  8. Dranchuk, P. M. and Chwyl, E.: 1969, Transient gas flow through finite porous media, J. Cana. Petrol. Technol. 8, 57–65.Google Scholar
  9. Dranchuk, P. M. and Kolada, L. J.: 1968, Interpretaion of steady linear visco-inertial gas flow data, J. Canadian Petroleum Technology 7, 36–40.Google Scholar
  10. Dake, L. P.: 1978, Fundamentals of Reservoir Engineering, Development in Petroleum Science, 8, Elsevier, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  11. Falta, R. W., Pruess, K., Javandel, I. and Witherspoon, P. A.: 1992, Numerical modeling of steam injection for the removal of nonaqueous phase liquids from the subsurface, 1. Numerical simulation, Water Resour. Res. 28(2), 433–449.Google Scholar
  12. Huyakorn, P. S., Panday, S. and Wu, Y. S.: 1994, A three-dimensional multiphase flow model for assessing NAPL contamination in porous media and fractured media, I. formulation, J. Contam. Hydrol. 16, 109–130.Google Scholar
  13. Ikoku, C. I.: 1984, Natural Gas Reservoir Engineering, Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
  14. Johnson, P. C., Kemblowski, M. W. and Colthart, D. J.: 1990, Quantitative analysis for the cleanup of hydrocarbon-contaminated soils by in-situ soil venting, Ground water 28(3), 413–429.Google Scholar
  15. Jones, S. C.: 1972, A rapid accurate unsteady-state Klinkenberg parameter, SPE Journal 383–397.Google Scholar
  16. Katz, D. L. and Lee, R. L.: 1990, Natural Gas Engineering, Production and Storage, Chemical Engineering Series, McGraw-Hill, New York.Google Scholar
  17. Katz, D. L. et al.: 1959, Handbook of Natural Gas Engineering, McGraw-Hill, New York.Google Scholar
  18. Kidder, R. F.: 1957, Unsteady flow of gas through a semi-infinite porous medium, J. Appl. Mech. 329–332.Google Scholar
  19. Klinkenberg, L. J.: 1941, The permeability of porous media to liquids and gases, Drilling and Production Practice, American Petroleum Inst., pp. 200–213.Google Scholar
  20. Lee, R. L., Logan, R. W. and Tek, M. R.: 1987, Effetcs of Turbulence on Transient Flow of Real Gas through Porous Media, SPE Formation Evaluation, pp. 108–120.Google Scholar
  21. McWhorter, D. B.: 1990, Unsteady radial flow of gas in the vadose zone, J. Contam. Hydrol. 5, 297–314.Google Scholar
  22. Mendoza, C. A. and Frind, E. O.: 1990, Advective-dispersive transport of dense organic vapors in the unsaturated zone, 1. model development, Water Resour. Res. 26(3), 379–387.Google Scholar
  23. Muskat, M.: 1946, The Flow of Homogeneous Fluids through Porous Media, J. W. Edwards, Inc. Ann Arbor, Michigan.Google Scholar
  24. Panday S., Forsyth, P. A., Falta, R. W., Wu, Y. S. and Huyakorn, P. S.: 1995, Considerations for robust compositional simulations of subsurface NAPL contamination and remediation, Water Resour. Res. 31(5), 1273–1289.Google Scholar
  25. Persoff, P. and Hulen, J. B.: 1996, Hydrologic characterization of four cores from the Geysers coring project, Proc. Twenty-First Workshop on Geothermal Engineering, Stanford University, CA, January 22–24.Google Scholar
  26. Persoff, P. and Thomas, J.F.: 1988, Estimating Michaelis-Menten or Langmuir isotherm constants by weighted nonlinear least squares, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 52(3) 886–889.Google Scholar
  27. Pruess, K., Simmons, A., Wu, Y. S. and Moridis, G.: 1996, TOUGH2 Software Qualification, Report LBL-38383, UC-814, Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory, Berkeley, California.Google Scholar
  28. Pruess, K.: 1991, TOUGH2 — A general-purpose numerical simulator for multiphase fluid and heat flow, Report LBL-29400, Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory, Berkeley, California.Google Scholar
  29. Reda D. C.: 1987, Slip-flow experiments in welded tuff: The Knudson diffusion problem, In: Chin-Fu Tsang (ed.), Coupled Processes Associated with Nuclear Waste Repositories, 485–493.Google Scholar
  30. Russell, D. G., Goodrich, J. H. and Perry, J. F.: 1966, Methods for predicting gas well performance, J. Petrol. Technol. pp. 99–108.Google Scholar
  31. Scheidegger, A. E.: 1974, The Physics of Flow Through Porous Media, (3rd ed.), University of Toronto Press, Toronto, p. 102.Google Scholar
  32. Shan, C.: 1995, Analytical solutions for determining vertical air permeability in unsaturated soils, Water Resour. Res. 31(9), 2193–2200.Google Scholar
  33. Shan, C., Falta, R. W. and Javandel, I.: 1992, Analytical solutions for steady state gas flow to a soil vapor extraction well, Water Resour. Res. 28(4), 1105–1120.Google Scholar
  34. Tek, M. R., Coats, K. H. and Katz, D. L.: 1962, The effects of turbulence on flow of natural gas through porous reservoirs, J. Petrol. Technol. AIME Trans. 222, 799–806.Google Scholar
  35. Theis, C. V.: 1935, The relation between the lowering of the piezometric surface and the rate and duration of discharge of a well using Ground-water storage, Trans. AGU, pp. 519–524.Google Scholar
  36. Weeks, E. P.: 1978, Field determination of vertical permeability to air in the unsaturated zone, US Geological Survey Professional Paper 1051.Google Scholar
  37. Wilson, D. E., Montgomery, R. E. and Sheller, M. R.: 1987, A mathematical model for removing volatile subsurface hydrocarbons miscible displacement, Water Air Soil Pollut. 33, 231–255.Google Scholar
  38. Wu, Y. S., Pruess, K. and Persoff, P.: 1996, Steady and transient analytical solutions for gas flow in porous media with Klinkenberg effects, Research Report LBNL-39499, UC-1240, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yu-Shu Wu
    • 1
  • Karsten Pruess
    • 1
  • peter Persoff
    • 1
  1. 1.Earth Sciences Division, Lawrence Berkeley National LaboratoryBerkeleyU.S.A.

Personalised recommendations