Advertisement

30 Years Later – a New Approach to Sol Spiegelman's and Leslie Orgel's in vitro EVOLUTIONARY STUDIES Dedicated to Leslie Orgel on the occasion of his 70th birthday

  • Frank Oehlenschläger
  • Manfred Eigen
Article

Abstract

The conditions necessary for evolution are amplification, mutagenesis and selection. Here we describe the evolutionary response of an in vitro replicating system to the selection pressure for fast growth and show what happens to the amplified molecules within this replication system. Our emphasis is on methodology, on the monitoring and the automation of experiments in molecular evolution. In order to perform in vitro studies on the evolution of RNA molecules, a modified self-sustained sequence replication (3SR) method was used. In the first step of the 3SR reaction, the RNA template is reversely transcribed by HIV-1 reverse transcriptase, followed by a second strand synthesis and the transcription of the resulting dsDNA by T7 RNA polymerase. The selection pressure (fast growth) was achieved by applying the principle of serial transfer pioneered in the laboratories of Sol Spiegelman and Leslie Orgel. At the end of the exponential growth phase of the 3SR reaction, an aliquot of the reaction mixture is transfered into a new sample containing only buffer, nucleotides and enzymes while RNA template molecules are provided by the transfer. The conditions in the exponential growth phase allow the RNA molecules to be amplified in a constant environment; all enzymes (HIV-1 reverse transcriptase and T7 RNA polymerase) and nucleotides are present in large excess. Therefore, transfering reproducibly within the exponential growth phase is equivalent to selecting for fast growth; those molecules which can replicate faster will displace others after several transfers. The experiments were performed using a serial transfer apparatus (STA) which allows the nucleic acid concentration to be monitored on-line by measuring the laser-induced fluorescence caused by intercalation of thiazole orange monomers into the RNA/DNA amplification products. The serial transfer experiments were carried out with an RNA template (220b RNA) that represents a 220-base segment of the HIV-1 genome and comprises the in vivo primer binding site (PBS) for the HIV-1 reverse transcriptase. It could be shown that after only two serial transfers two RNA species (EP1 and EP2) emerged that were much shorter. EP1 (48b) and EP2 (54b) were formed by deletion mutations within the original 220b RNA template in the very beginning of the serial transfer experiment; due to their higher replication rate (calculated from the growth curves derived on-line) these two deletion mutants displaced the original 220b RNA template in the course of the following thirty transfers. We assume that these two RNA species evolved independently of each other. Their formation was probably induced by a strand-transfer reaction of HIV-1 reverse transcriptase. Sequence analyses of these two evolution products seem to confirm such a presented pathway. 30 years after Spiegelman's experiment, the study described here is another answer to the question he posed: ‘How do molecules evolve if the only demand is the biblical injunction: multiply?’. The answer, derived from a modified 3SR amplification system (mimicking a part of the HIV-1 replication cycle in vitro), is the same as thirty years ago: The RNA molecules adapt to the new conditions by throwing away any ballast not needed for fast replication. Clearly, this is only one aspect of molecular evolution; however, it shows that we should be careful in designating unidentified genetic material as ‘junk DNA’.

Keywords

Thiazole Exponential Growth Phase Primer Binding Site Serial Transfer Sequence Replication 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Gilbert, W.: 1985, ‘Genes-in-pieces revisited’, Science 228, 823–824.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Cochet, M., Gannon, F., Hen, R., Maroteaux, L., Perrin, F. and Chambon, P.: 1976, ‘Organisation and sequence studies of the 17-piece chicken conalbumin gene’, Nature 282, 567–574.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Craik, C. S., Rutter, W. J. and Fletterick, R.: 1983, ‘Splice junctions: association with variation in protein structure’, Science 220, 1125–1129.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Padgett, R. A., Grabowski, P. J., Konarska, M. M. Seiler, S. and Sharp, P. A.: 1986, ‘Splicing of messenger RNA precursors’, Ann. Rev. Biochem. 55, 1119.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Lazzarini, R. A., Keene, J. D. and Schubert, M.: 1981, ‘The origin of defective interfering particles of the negative-strand RNA viruses’, Cell 26, 145–154.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Huang, A. S. and Baltimore, D.: 1970, ‘Defective viral particles and viral disease processes’, Nature 226, 325.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Sharp, P. A.: 1985, ‘On the origin of RNA splicing and introns’, Cell 42, 397–400.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Nayak, D. P.: 1980, ‘Defective interfering influenza viruses’, Ann. Rev. Microbiol. 34, 619–644.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kirkwood, T. B. and Bangham, C. R. M.: 1994, ‘Cycles, chaos and evolution in virus cultures: A model of defective interfering particles’, Proc. Nac. Acad. Sci. USA 91, 8685–8689.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Mills, D. R., Peterson, R. L. and Spiegelman, S.: 1967, ‘An extracellular darwinian experiment with a self-duplicating nucleic acid molecule’, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 54, 919–927.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Walter, N. G. and Strunk, G.: 1994, ‘Strand displacement amplification as an in vitro model for rolling-circle replication: Deletion formation and evolution during serial transfer’, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 91, 7937–7941.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Breaker, R. R. and Joyce, G.: 1994, ‘Emergence of a replicating species from an in vitro RNA evolution reaction’, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 91, 6093–6097.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Gebinoga, M. and Oehlenschläger, F.: 1995, ‘Comparison of self-sustained sequence replication reaction systems’, Eur. J. Biochem. 235, 256–261.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Fahy, E., Kwoh, D. Y. and Gingeras, T. R.: 1991, ‘Self-sustained sequence replication (3SR): An isothermal transcription-based amplification system alternative to PCR’, PCRMethods Appl. 1, 25–33.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Eigen, M.: 1986, ‘The physics of evolution’, Chem. Scr. 26, 13–26.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Strunk, G.: 1993, ‘Automatisierte Evolutionsexperimente in vitro und natürliche Evolution unter kontrollierten Bedingungen mit Hilfe der Serial-Transfer-Technik’, Verlag Shaker, Aachen, Germany.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Otten, H.: 1988, ‘Ein Beitrag zur Durchf¨uhrung von kontrollierten Evolutionsexperimenten mit biologischen Makromolekülen’, Dissertation, Techn. Univ. Braunschweig, Germany.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Barnett, R. W. and Erfle, H.: 1990, ‘Rapid generation of DNA fragment by PCR amplification of crude, synthetic oligonucleotides’, Nucl. Acid Res. 18, 3094.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Sandhu, G. S., Aleff, R. A. and Kline, B. C.: 1992, ‘Dual asymetric PCR: One-step construction of synthetic genes’, Biothechniques 12, 14–16.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Bauer, J.: 1990, RNA sequencing using fluorescent-labelled dideoxynucleotides and automated fluorescence detection, Nucl. Acid Res. 18, 879–884.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Hofacker, I. L., Fontana, W., Stadler, P. F., Bonhoeffer, L. S., Tacker, L. and Schuster, P.: 1994,’ Fast folding and comparison of RNA secondary structures’, Chem. Mon. 125, 167–188.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Wu, W., Blumberg, B. M., Fay, P. J. and Bambara, R. A.: 1995, ‘Strand transfer mediated by human immunodeficiency virus reverse transcriptase in vitro is promoted by pausing and results in misincorporation’, J. Biol. Chem. 270, 325–332.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Peliska, J. A. and Benkovic, S. J.: 1992, ‘Mechanism of DNA strand-transfer reactions catalysed by HIV-1 reverse transcriptase’, Science 258, 1112–1118.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Kohlstaedt, L. A. and Steitz, T. A.: 1992, ‘Reverse transcriptase of human immunodefficiency virus can use either human tRNALys or E. coli tRNAGln as a primer in an in vitro primer-utilization assay’, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 89, 9652–9656.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Nelson, G. W. and Perelson, A. S.: 1995, ‘Modeling defective interfering virus therapy for AIDS: conditions for DIV survival’, Math. Biosci. 125, 127–53.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Saffhill, R., Schneider-Bernloehr, H., Orgel, L.E. and Spiegelman, S.: 1970 ‘In vitro selection of Qß ribonucleic acid variants resistant to ethidium bromide’, J. Mol. Biol. 51, 531–539.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Orgel, L.E.: 1979, ‘Selection in vitro’, Proc. Royal Society, London 205, 435–442.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  • Frank Oehlenschläger
    • 1
  • Manfred Eigen
    • 2
  1. 1.Max-Planck-Institut für Biophysikalische ChemieGöttingen
  2. 2.Max-Planck-Institut für Biophysikalische ChemieGöttingen

Personalised recommendations