Journal of Consumer Policy

, Volume 23, Issue 2, pp 153–175 | Cite as

Collective Prototyping: A Consumer Policy Strategy to Encourage Ecological Marketing

  • Michael Neuner


In the present paper, three examples of organized positive consumer action that pursues the aim of supporting ecological marketing practices are presented. It is believed that this form of consumer action is more effective in encouraging ecological marketing than the three classical consumer reaction strategies exit, voice, and loyalty. Positive strategies such as entry, confirmation, and approval allow consumers to articulate needs which are different from those that are already satisfied by products available on the market. The examples chosen describe the process of prototypic development of an environmentally friendly refrigerator, a solar system for the production of energy for private use, and the 3-litre-car, demonstrating how petrol consumption can be decreased by 50%. The goals of the prototyping strategy are, firstly, to demonstrate the feasibility of an ecological product innovation, and, secondly, to assess the market opportunities for such an innovation. The examples show that it is possible and necessary to extend the instruments of consumer policy to collective, partnership-based approaches while still adhering to the paradigm of countervailing consumer power.


Product Innovation Policy Strategy Market Opportunity Consumer Action Marketing Practice 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1977). Attitude-behavior relations. A theoretical analysis and review of empirical research. Psychological Bulletin, 84, 888-918.Google Scholar
  2. Akerlof, G. A. (1980). The market for “lemons.” Qualitative uncertainty and the market mechanism. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 84, 488-500.Google Scholar
  3. Albach, H. (1997). Zum Ausstieg aus Märkten für umweltschädliche Produkte. In: J. Weber (Ed.), Umweltmanagement. Aspekte einer umweltbezogenen Unternehmensführung, pp. 55-74. Stuttgart: Schäffer-Poeschel.Google Scholar
  4. Asher, A. (1998). Going global: A new paradigm for consumer protection. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 32, 183-203.Google Scholar
  5. BMU (Bundesministerium für Umwelt, Naturschutz und Reaktorsicherheit) (1998). Umweltbewußtsein in Deutschland 1998. Ergebnisse einer repräsentativen Bevölkerungsumfrage. Berlin: BMU.Google Scholar
  6. Bonfield, E. (1974). Attitude, social influence, personal norms, and intention interactions as related to brand purchase behaviour. Journal of Marketing Research, 11, 379-389.Google Scholar
  7. Brundtland, G. H. (World Commission on Environment and Development) (Ed.) (1987). Our common future. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Byrnes, J. (1964). Consumer intentions to buy. Journal of Advertising Research, 4(3), 49-51.Google Scholar
  9. Clancy, K. J., & Shulman, R. S. (1991). The marketing revolution: A radical manifesto for dominating the marketplace. New York. Harper Business.Google Scholar
  10. Clawson, J. C. (1971). How useful are 90-day purchase probabilities? Journal of Marketing, 35(4), 43-47.Google Scholar
  11. Conrad, J. (1995). Greenfreeze: Environmental success by accident and strategic action. In: M. Jänicke & H. Weidner (Eds.), Succesful environmental policy. A critical evaluation of 24 cases, pp. 364-378. Berlin: edition sigma.Google Scholar
  12. Darby, M. R., & Karni, E. (1973). Free competition and the optimal amount of fraud. Journal of Law & Economics, 16, 67-88.Google Scholar
  13. Dunlap, R. E., Gallup, G. H., & Gallup, A. M. (1993). Health of the planet. A George H. Gallup memorial survey. Results of a 1992 environmental opinion survey of citizens in 24 nations. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Dunlap, R. E., & Merting, A. G. (1996). Weltweites Umweltbewußtsein. Eine Herausforderung für die sozialwissenschaftliche Theorie. Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie, Sonderheft 36, pp. 193-218.Google Scholar
  15. Elster, J. (1989). The cement of society. A study of social order. Cambridge, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Enquête-Kommission (1991). Schutz der Erde. Eine Bestandsaufnahme mit Vorschlägen zu einer neuen Energiepolitik. Dritter Bericht der Enquête-Kommission “Vorsorge zum Schutz der Erdatmosphäre” des Deutschen Bundestages. Teilband 2. Bonn: Economica.Google Scholar
  17. Ferber, R., & Piskie, R. A. (1965). Subjective probabilities and buying intentions. Review of Economics and Statistics, 47, 322-325.Google Scholar
  18. Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  19. Foxall, G. R. (1984). Consumers' intentions and behaviour. Journal of the Market Research Society, 26, 231-241.Google Scholar
  20. Friedman, M. (1996). A positive approach to organized consumer action: The “buycott” as an alternative to the boycott. Journal of Consumer Policy, 19, 439-451.Google Scholar
  21. Friedman, M. (1997). Boycotts. In: S. Brobeck (Ed.), Encyclopedia of the consumer movement, pp. 68-69. Santa Barbara, CA: ABC-Clio.Google Scholar
  22. Galbraith, J. K. (1956). American capitalism. The concept of countervailing power. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
  23. Garrett, D. E. (1987). The effectiveness of marketing policy boycotts: Environmental opposition to marketing. Journal of Marketing, 51(2), 46-57.Google Scholar
  24. Granbois, D. H., & Summers, J. O. (1975). Primary and secondary validity of consumer purchase probabilities. Journal of Consumer Research, 1, 31-38.Google Scholar
  25. Greenpeace (1996a). Marktanalyse 1996. Der deutsche Solarmarkt nach der Greenpeace-Cyrus-Kampagne. Hamburg: Greenpeace.Google Scholar
  26. Greenpeace (1996b). Cyrus Solarsysteme. Kostengünstige und standardisierte Photovoltaik-Anlagen im Ñberblick. Hamburg: Greenpeace.Google Scholar
  27. Greenpeace (1996c). Greenpeace-Nachrichten, Nr. 5, September-Oktober. Hamburg: Greenpeace.Google Scholar
  28. Härlin, B. (1994). Die Greenfreeze-Erfahrung. In: S. Hellenbrandt & F. Rubik (Eds.), Produkt und Umwelt. Anforderungen, Instrumente und Ziele einer ökologischen Produktpolitik, pp. 221-232. Marburg: Metropolis.Google Scholar
  29. Hirschman, A. O. (1970). Exit, voice, and loyalty. Responses to decline in firms, organizations, and states. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Howard, J. A., & Sheth, J. N. (1969). The theory of buyer behaviour. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  31. imug (Institut für Markt Umwelt Gesellschaft) (1997). Unternehmenstest. Neue Herausforderungen für das Management der sozialen und ökologischen Verantwortung. München: Vahlen.Google Scholar
  32. Infosino, W. (1986). Forecasting new product sales from likelihood of purchase ratings. Marketing Science, 5, 372-384.Google Scholar
  33. Jamieson, L. F., & Bass, F. M. (1989). Adjusting stated purchase intention measures to predict trial purchase of new products: A comparison of models and methods. Journal of Marketing Research, 26, 336-345.Google Scholar
  34. Juster, T. F. (1966). Consumer buying intentions and purchase probability: An experiment in survey design. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 61, 658-696.Google Scholar
  35. Kalwani, M., & Silk, A. J. (1982). On the reliability and predictive validity of purchase intention measures. Marketing Science, 1, 243-286.Google Scholar
  36. Katona, G. (1960). The powerful consumer. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  37. Koopman, J. (1986). New developments in government consumer policy: A challenge for consumer organisations. Journal of Consumer Policy, 9, 269-286.Google Scholar
  38. Kotler, P., & Armstrong, G. (1999). Principles of marketing. Upper Sadle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  39. Kuhlmann, E. (1990). Verbraucherpolitik. Grundzüge ihrer Theorie und Praxis. München: Vahlen.Google Scholar
  40. Ludwig Bölkow System Technik (1995). Solarfabrik '96. München: Ludwig Bölkow System Technik GmbH.Google Scholar
  41. Mayer, R. M. (1988). When businesses oppose businesses in support of consumerist goals. Journal of Consumer Policy, 11, 375-394.Google Scholar
  42. McQuarrie, E. F. (1988). An alternative to purchase intentions: The role of prior behaviour in consumer expenditures on computers. Journal of the Marketing Research Society, 30, 407-437.Google Scholar
  43. MORI (Market and Opinion Research International) (1994). 12 European Union countries' attitudes toward European Union. World Opinion Update, 18, 86-88.Google Scholar
  44. Morwitz, V. G., Johnson, E., & Schmittlein, D. (1993). Does measuring intents change behaviour? Journal of Consumer Research, 20, 46-61.Google Scholar
  45. Morwitz, V. G., & Schmittlein, D. (1992). Using segmentation to improve sales forecasts based on purchase intent: Which “intenders” actually buy? Journal of Marketing Research, 29, 391-405.Google Scholar
  46. Neuner, M. (1998). Ein positiver Ansatz kollektiven Verbraucherverhaltens: Die Prototypingstrategie. In: M. Neuner & L. A. Reisch (Eds.), Konsumperspektiven. Verhaltensaspekte und Infrastruktur, pp. 153-172. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot.Google Scholar
  47. Neuner, M. (forthcoming). Verantwortliches Konsumentenverhalten.Google Scholar
  48. Oliver, P. E., Marwell, G., & Teixeira, R. (1985). A theory of the critical mass (1). Interdependence, group heterogeneity, and the production of collective action. American Journal of Sociology, 91, 522-556.Google Scholar
  49. Pfister, C. (1995). Das “1950er Syndrom”-die umweltgeschichtliche Epochenschwelle zwischen Industriegesellschaft und Konsumgesellschaft. In: C. Pfister (Ed.), Das 1950er Syndrom. Der Weg in die Konsumgesellschaft, pp. 51-95. Bern: Haupt.Google Scholar
  50. Pickering, J. F. (1977). The acquisition of consumer durables: A cross-sectoral investigation. London: Associate Business Programmes.Google Scholar
  51. Pickering, J. F., & Isherwood, B. C. (1974). Purchasing probabilities and consumer buying behaviour. Journal of the Market Research Society, 16, 203-226.Google Scholar
  52. Reibstein, D. (1978). The prediction of individual probabilities of brand choice. Journal of Consumer Research, 5, 163-168.Google Scholar
  53. Rother, F. W. (1995). Drei-Liter-Auto. Wirtschaftswoche (September 7), 124-132.Google Scholar
  54. Scherhorn, G. (1983). Die Funktionsfähigkeit von Konsumgütermärkten. In: M. Irle (Ed.), Marktpsychologie als Sozialwissenschaft. Enzyklopädie der Psychologie, Themenbereich D, Serie III, Band 4, pp. 45-150. Göttingen: Hogrefe.Google Scholar
  55. Smith, N. C. (1990). Morality and the market. Consumer pressure for the corporate accountability. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  56. Specht, G. (1979). Die Macht aktiver Konsumenten. Aktive Einflußnahme von Konsumenten auf das Marketing privater Konsumgüteranbieter unter wirkungsorientiertem Aspekt. Stuttgart: Poeschel.Google Scholar
  57. Stapel, J. (1968). Predictive attitudes. In: L. Adler, & I. Crespi (Eds.), Attitude research on the rocks, pp. 96-115. Chicago: American Marketing Association.Google Scholar
  58. Tauber, E. M. (1975). Predictive validity in consumer research. Journal of Advertising Research, 15(4), 59-64.Google Scholar
  59. Taylor, J. W., Houlahan, J. J., & Gabriel, A. C. (1975). The purchase intention question in new product development: A field test. Journal of Marketing, 39(1), 90-92.Google Scholar
  60. Tobin, J. (1959). On the predictive value of consumer intentions and attitudes. Review of Economics and Statistics, 41, 1-11.Google Scholar
  61. Udéhn, L. (1996). The limits of public choice. A sociological critique of the economic theory of politics. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  62. Urban, G. L., & Hauser, J. R. (1993): Design and marketing of new products. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  63. Warshaw, P. R. (1980). Predicting purchase and other behaviours from general and contextually specific intentions. Journal of Marketing Research, 17, 26-33.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michael Neuner
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute for Social Science (540)University of HohenheimStuttgartGermany

Personalised recommendations