Advertisement

The Impact of Labour-Force Participation on Childbearing Behaviour: Pro-Cyclical Fertility in Sweden during the 1980s and the 1990s

  • Gunnar Andersson
Article

Abstract

During the last two decades, Sweden has experienced strong fluctuations both in its economy and in its level of childbearing. A period of high employment and increasing fertility has been followed by a period of lower employment and decreasing fertility since the beginning of the 1990s. In this paper, we use register data for Swedish women in order to examine how various types of attachment to the labour market affect women's propensity to give birth at different parities. Specifically, we show what impact changes in women's employment status have had on recorded fertility trends in Sweden. We find that women who have relatively low levels of income and women who are enrolled as students generally have lower fertility than other women. We also find that a rise in the number of women with such characteristics can explain part of the decrease in fertility during the 1990s. It is evident, however, that other factors, working at the macro level, also have to be considered when one wants to explain the fluctuating fertility of Sweden. Social policy is one such factor. In sum, we find a pattern of pro-cyclical fertility, where levels of female earnings are positively related to levels of childbearing.

childbearing childbearing trends employment female income fertility Sweden 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Adler, M. A., 1997. ‘Social change and declines in marriage and fertility in Eastern Germany’, Journal of Marriage and the Family 59: 37–49.Google Scholar
  2. Andersson, G., 1999a. ‘Childbearing trends in Sweden, 1961-1997’, European Journal of Population 15: 1–24.Google Scholar
  3. Andersson, G., 1999b. ‘Trends in childbearing and nuptiality in Sweden, 1961(71)-1997’, Stockholm Research Reports in Demography No. 133. Stockholm University Demography Unit, Stockholm.Google Scholar
  4. Becker, G. S., 1981. A Treatise on the Family. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Bergmann, B., 1995. ‘Becker's theory of the family: Preposterous conclusions’, Feminist Economics 1: 141–150.Google Scholar
  6. Bergstrom, T., 1996. ‘Economics in a family way’, Journal of Economic Literature 34: 1903–1934.Google Scholar
  7. Berinde, D., 1999. ‘Pathways to a third child in Sweden’, European Journal of Population 15: 349–378.Google Scholar
  8. Bernhardt, E., 1991. ‘Working parents in Sweden: an example for Europe?’, in Human Resources in Europe at the dawn of the 21st Century, Eurostat Conference, 27-29 November 1991, Luxembourg, 231-254.Google Scholar
  9. Bernhardt, E., 1993. ‘Fertility and employment’, European Sociological Review 9: 25–42.Google Scholar
  10. Blossfeld, H.-P., 1995. ‘Changes in the process of family formation and women's growing independence: A comparison of nine countries’, in H.-P. Blossfeld (ed), The New Role of Women. Family Formation in Modern Societies. Westview Press, Boulder, 3–34.Google Scholar
  11. Blossfeld, H.-P. and Huinink, J., 1991. ‘Human capital investments or norms of role transition? How women's schooling and career affect the process of family formation’, American Journal of Sociology 97: 143–168.Google Scholar
  12. Blossfeld, H.-P. and Jaenichen, U., 1992. ‘Educational expansion and changes in women's entry into marriage and motherhood in the Federal Republic of Germany’, Journal of Marriage and the Family 54: 302–315.Google Scholar
  13. Bracher, M. and Santow, G., 1998. ‘Economic independence and union formation in Sweden’, Population Studies 52: 275–294.Google Scholar
  14. Butz, W. and Ward, M., 1979. ‘The emergence of countercyclical US fertility’, American Economic Review 69: 319–328.Google Scholar
  15. Büttner, T. and Lutz, W., 1990. ‘Estimating fertility responses to policy measures in the German Democratic Republic’, Population and Development Review 16: 539–555.Google Scholar
  16. Calot, G., 1998. ‘La fécondité en Europe et en Amérique du Nord’. Paper presented at the Regional Population Meeting in Budapest, 7-9 December 1998.Google Scholar
  17. Coleman, D., 1996. ‘New patterns and trends in European fertility: international and sub-national comparisons’, in D. Coleman (ed), Europe's Population in the 1990s. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1–61.Google Scholar
  18. Conrad, C., Lechner, M. and Werner, W., 1996. ‘East German fertility after unification: crisis or adaptation?’, Population and Development Review 22: 331–358.Google Scholar
  19. De Cooman, E., Ermisch, J. and Joshi, H., 1987. ‘The next birth and the labour market: A dynamic model of births in England and Wales’, Population Studies 41: 237–268.Google Scholar
  20. Decroly, J.-M. and Grasland, C., 1993. ‘Boundaries, political systems and fertility in Europe’, Population. An English Selection 5: 101–119.Google Scholar
  21. Duggan, L., 1995. ‘Restacking the deck: Family policy and women's fall-back position in Germany before and after unification’, Feminist Economics 1: 175–194.Google Scholar
  22. Easterlin, R., 1976. ‘The conflict between aspirations and resources’, Population and Development Review 2: 417–425.Google Scholar
  23. Eberstadt, N., 1994. ‘Demographic shocks after communism: Eastern Germany, 1989-93’, Population and Development Review 20: 137–152.Google Scholar
  24. Ellingsæter, A.L. and RØnsen, M., 1996. ‘The dual strategy: motherhood and the work contract in Scandinavia’, European Journal of Population 12: 239–260.Google Scholar
  25. Ermisch, J., 1989. ‘Purchased child care, optimal family size and mother's employment’, Journal of Population Economics 2: 79–102.Google Scholar
  26. Ermisch, J., 1996. ‘The economic environment for family formation’, in D. Coleman (ed), Europe's Population in the 1990s. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 144–162.Google Scholar
  27. Gauthier, A. H., 1996. ‘The measured and unmeasured effects of welfare benefits on families: implications for Europe's demographic trends’, in D. Coleman (ed), Europe's Population in the 1990s. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 297–331.Google Scholar
  28. Gauthier, A. H. and Hatzius, J., 1997. ‘Family benefits and fertility: an econometric analysis’, Population Studies 51: 295–306.Google Scholar
  29. Haas, L., 1992. Equal Parenthood and Social Policy: A Study of Parental Leave in Sweden. State University of New York Press, Albany.Google Scholar
  30. Hajnal, J., 1982. ‘Two kinds of preindustrial household formation system’, Population and Development Review 8: 449–494.Google Scholar
  31. Hantrais, L., 1997. ‘Exploring relationships between social policy and changing family forms within the European Union’, European Journal of Population 13: 339–379.Google Scholar
  32. Heckman, J. and Walker, J., 1990a. ‘The third birth in Sweden’, Journal of Population Economics 3: 235–275.Google Scholar
  33. Heckman, J. and Walker, J., 1990b. ‘The relationship between wages and income and the timing and spacing of births: evidence from Swedish longitudinal data’, Econometrica 58: 1411-1441.Google Scholar
  34. Heckman, J. and Walker, J., 1991. ‘Economic models of fertility dynamics: a study of Swedish fertility’, Research in Population Economics 7: 3–91.Google Scholar
  35. Hobcraft, J. and Kiernan, K., 1995. ‘Becoming a parent in Europe’, Welfare State programmes Discussion Paper Series No. 116. Suntory and Toyota International Centres for Economics and Related Disciplines, London.Google Scholar
  36. Hoem, B., 1993. ‘The compatibility of employment and childbearing in contemporary Sweden’, Acta Sociologica 36: 101–120.Google Scholar
  37. Hoem, B., 1998a. Barnafödande och sysselsättning. Upp-och nedgången i fruktsamheten 1985-1997. Demografiska rapporter 1998:1, Statistics Sweden, Stockholm.Google Scholar
  38. Hoem, B., 1998b. ‘Entry into motherhood in Sweden: the influence of economic factors on the rise and fall in fertility, 1986-1997’. Working paper, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock.Google Scholar
  39. Hoem, B. and Hoem, J. M., 1989. ‘The impact of women's employment on second and third births in modern Sweden’, Population Studies 43: 47–67.Google Scholar
  40. Hoem, B. and Hoem, J. M., 1996. ‘Sweden's family policies and roller-coaster fertility’, Jinko Mondai Kenkyu (Journal of Population Problems) 52: 1–22.Google Scholar
  41. Hoem, B. and Hoem, J.M., 1997. ‘Fertility trends in Sweden up to 1996’, Population Bulletin (United Nations), to appear.Google Scholar
  42. Hoem, J. M., 1990. ‘Social policy and recent fertility change in Sweden’, Population and Development Review 16: 735–748.Google Scholar
  43. Hoem, J. M., 1993. ‘Public policy as the fuel of fertility: effects of a policy reform on the pace of childbearing in Sweden in the 1980s’, Acta Sociologica 36: 19–31.Google Scholar
  44. Hotz, J., Klerman, J. A. and Willis, R., 1997. ‘The economics of fertility in developed countries’, in M. Rosenzweig and O. Stark (eds), Handbook of Population and Family Economics. Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, 275–347.Google Scholar
  45. Höhn, C., 1987. ‘Population policies in advanced societies: pronatalist and migration strategies’, European Journal of Population 3: 459–481.Google Scholar
  46. Ilmakunnas, S., 1997. ‘Public policy and childcare choice’, in I. Persson and C. Jonung (eds), Economics of the Family and Family Policies. Routledge, London, 178–193.Google Scholar
  47. Joshi, H., 1996. ‘Projections of European population decline: serious demography or false alarm?’, in D. Coleman (ed), Europe's Population in the 1990s. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 222–266.Google Scholar
  48. Joshi, H., 1998. ‘The opportunity costs of childbearing: More than mothers’ business’, Journal of Population Economics 11: 161–183.Google Scholar
  49. Katz, E., 1997. ‘The intra-household economics of voice and exit’, Feminist Economics 3: 25–46.Google Scholar
  50. Kiernan, K., 1988. ‘Who remains celibate?’, Journal of Biosocial Science 20: 253–263.Google Scholar
  51. Kravdal, Ø;., 1992. ‘The weak impact of female labour force participation on Norwegian third-birth rates’, European Journal of Population 8: 247–263.Google Scholar
  52. Kravdal, Ø;., 1994. ‘The importance of economic activity, economic potential and economic resources for the timing of first births in Norway’, Population Studies 48: 249–267.Google Scholar
  53. Lappegård, T., 1998. ‘Större ulikhet i barnetall’, Samfunnsspeilet No. 5: 42–48. Statistics Norway, Oslo.Google Scholar
  54. Liefbroer, A. and Corijn, M, 1999. ‘Who, what, where, and when? Specifying the impact of educational attainment and labour force participation on family formation’, European Journal of Population 15: 45–75.Google Scholar
  55. Macunovich, D., 1995. ‘The Butz-Ward fertility model in the light of more recent data’, The Journal of Human Resources 30: 229–255.Google Scholar
  56. Macunovich, D., 1996. ‘Relative income and price of time: Exploring their effects on US fertility and female labour force participation’, Population and Development Review. A Supplement to Vol. 22: 223–257.Google Scholar
  57. Macunovich, D., 1997. ‘A conversation with Richard Easterlin’, Journal of Population Economics 10: 119–136.Google Scholar
  58. Macunovich, D., 1998. ‘Race and relative income/price of time’, Journal of Socio-Economics 27: 365–401.Google Scholar
  59. Macunovich, D. and Easterlin, R., 1988. ‘Application of Granger-Sims causality tests to monthly fertility data, 1958-1984’, Journal of Population Economics 1: 71–88.Google Scholar
  60. Macunovich, D. and Lillard, L., 1989. ‘Income and substitution effects in the first birth interval in the U.S., 1967-1984’. Paper presented at the PSID Event-History Conference at Stanford University.Google Scholar
  61. Marini, M., 1985. ‘Determinants of the timing of adult role entry’, Social Science Research 14: 309–350.Google Scholar
  62. Meisaari-Polsa, T. and Söderström, L., 1995. ‘Recent Swedish fertility changes in perspective’, Scandinavian Population Studies 10: 11–27.Google Scholar
  63. Mikkola, M., 1991. ‘Finland: supporting parental choice’, in S. Kamerman and A. Kahn (eds), Child Care, Parental Leave, and the Under 3s: Policy Innovation in Europe. Auburn House, Westport, Connecticut, 145–170.Google Scholar
  64. Moen, P., 1989. Working Parents: Transformations in Gender Roles and Public Policies in Sweden. The University of Wisconsin Press, Wisconsin.Google Scholar
  65. Murphy, M., 1992. ‘Economic models of fertility in post-war Britain-A conceptual and statistical re-interpretation’, Population Studies 46: 235–258.Google Scholar
  66. Nelander, S. and Lindgren, V., 1998. Förändring av arbetstider och anställningsformer påolika delar av arbetsmarknaden. Ett faktamaterial om förhållandena vid 1990-talets slut, nr 36. Landsorganisationen i Sverige, Stockholm.Google Scholar
  67. Oláh, L. S., 1998. ‘Do public policies influence fertility? Evidence from Sweden and Hungary from a gender perspective’, Stockholm Research Reports in Demography No. 130. Stockholm University Demography Unit, Stockholm.Google Scholar
  68. Oppenheimer, V. K., 1994. ‘Women's rising employment and the future of the family in industrial societies’, Population and Development Review 20: 293–342.Google Scholar
  69. Oppenheimer, V. K., 1997. ‘Women's employment and the gain to marriage: The specialization and trading model’, Annual Review of Sociology 23: 431–453.Google Scholar
  70. Oppenheimer, V. K. and Lew, V., 1995. ‘American marriage formation in the 1980s: How important was women's economic independence?’, in K. O. Mason and A. M. Jensen (eds), Gender and Family Change in Industrialized Countries. Clarendon Press, Oxford, 105–138.Google Scholar
  71. Oppenheimer, V. K., Blossfeld, H.-P. and Wackerow, A., 1995. ‘Country-specific studies on the trends in family formation and the new role of women: United States of America’, in H.-P. Blossfeld (ed.), The New Role of Women. Family Formation in Modern Societies. Westview Press, Boulder, 150–173.Google Scholar
  72. Oppenheimer, V. K., Kalmijn, M. and Lim, N., 1997. ‘Men's career developments and marriage timing during a period of rising inequality’, Demography 34: 311–330.Google Scholar
  73. Pauti, A., 1992. ‘La politique familiale en Suède’, Population 47: 961–985.Google Scholar
  74. Pinnelli, A., 1995. ‘Women's condition, low fertility, and emerging union patterns in Europe’, in K. O. Mason and A. M. Jensen (eds), Gender and Family Change in Industrialized Countries. Clarendon Press, Oxford, 82–101.Google Scholar
  75. Pollak, R. and Watkins, S., 1993. ‘Cultural and economic approaches to fertility: proper marriage or mésalliance?’, Population and Development Review 19: 467–496.Google Scholar
  76. Rindfuss, R. and Brewster, K., 1996. ‘Childrearing and fertility’, Population and Development Review. A Supplement to Vol. 22: 258–289.Google Scholar
  77. Rindfuss, R., Morgan, P. and Swicegood, G., 1988. First Births in America. Changes in the Timing of Parenthood. University of California Press, Berkely and Los Angeles.Google Scholar
  78. Santow, G. and Bracher, M., 1999a. ‘Explaining trends in teenage childbearing in Sweden’, Studies in Family Planning 30: 169–182.Google Scholar
  79. Santow, G. and Bracher, M., 1999b. ‘Deferring the first birth in a climate of rising fertility: The Swedish experience’. Unpublished manuscript, Stockholm University Demography Unit, Stockholm. Forthcoming in Population Studies.Google Scholar
  80. SCB, 1998. ‘98. Statistical Yearbook of Sweden, Statistics Sweden, Stockholm.Google Scholar
  81. Schultz, P., 1986. ‘The value and allocation of time in high-income countries: implications for fertility’, Population and Development Review. A Supplement to Vol. 12: 87–108.Google Scholar
  82. Silver, M., 1965. ‘Births, marriages, and business cycles in the United States’, Journal of Population Economics 73: 237–255.Google Scholar
  83. Smith, R., 1981. ‘Fertility, economy, and household formation in England over three centuries’, Population and Development Review 7: 595–622.Google Scholar
  84. Sundström, M., 1991. ‘Sweden: supporting work, family, and gender equality’, in S. Kamerman and A. Kahn (eds), Child Care, Parental Leave, and the Under 3s: Policy Innovation in Europe. Auburn House, Westport, Connecticut, 171–200.Google Scholar
  85. Sundström, M. and Stafford, F. P., 1992. ‘Female labour force participation, fertility and public policy in Sweden’, European Journal of Population 8: 199–215.Google Scholar
  86. Söderström, L. and Meisaari-Polsa, T., 1995. ‘Swedish family policy: Economic aspects’, Scandinavian Population Studies 10: 178–199.Google Scholar
  87. Tasiran, A, 1995. Fertility Dynamics: Spacing and Timing of Births in Sweden and the United States. Elsevier, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  88. Thomas, D., 1925. Social Aspects of the Business Cycle. Routledge and Sons, London.Google Scholar
  89. Thomas, D., 1941. Social and Economic Aspects of Swedish Population Movements 1750-1933. The MacMillan Company, New York.Google Scholar
  90. Van de Kaa, D., 1996. ‘Anchored narratives: the story and findings of half a century of research into the determinants of fertility’, Population Studies 50: 389–432.Google Scholar
  91. Walker, J. R., 1995. ‘The effect of public policies on recent Swedish fertility behavior’, Journal of Population Economics 8: 223–251.Google Scholar
  92. Watkins, S., 1991. From Provinces into Nations: Demographic Integration in Western Europe, 1870-1960. Princeton University Press, New Jersey.Google Scholar
  93. Wilkinson, M., 1973. ‘An econometric analysis of fertility in Sweden, 1870-1965’, Econometrica 41: 633–642.Google Scholar
  94. Witte, J. and Wagner, G., 1995. ‘Declining fertility in East Germany after unification: A demographic response to socioeconomic change’, Population and Development Review 21: 387–397.Google Scholar
  95. Woolley, F., 1996. ‘Getting the better of Becker’, Feminist Economics 2: 114–120.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gunnar Andersson
    • 1
  1. 1.Max Planck Institute for Demographic ResearchRostockGermany

Personalised recommendations