, Volume 51, Issue 2, pp 113–140 | Cite as

Methane emissions from the Orinoco River floodplain, Venezuela

  • Lesley K. Smith
  • William M. LewisJr.
  • Jeffrey P. Chanton
  • Greg Cronin
  • Stephen K. Hamilton


Methane emissions were measured over a 17-monthinterval at 21 locations on the Orinoco fringingfloodplain and upper delta (total area,14,000 km2). Emissions totaled 0.17 Tgyr−1, or 7.1 mmol d−1 (114 mg d−1;standard deviation, ±18%) per m2 of watersurface. Ebullition accounted for 65% of emissions. Emission rates were about five times as high forfloodplain forest as for open water or macrophytemats. Emission rates were positively correlated withcarbon content of sediment and amount of methane inthe water column, and negatively correlated withdissolved oxygen, but the correlations were weak. Emission from floodplain soils occurred only when thewater content of soil exceeded 25%, which occurredwithin 20 m of standing water during floodplaindrainage (3 months/yr). Bare soils emitted 60mmol/day per m of shoreline length; soils covered bystranded macrophyte beds emitted five times thisamount. Total emissions were accounted for primarilyby flooded forest (94%); macrophyte mats, open water,and exposed soils made only small contributions. Theflux-weighted mean δ13C for the floodplainwas −62 ± 8‰; for δD the mean was −271 ± 27‰. The δ13C and δD were negativelycorrelated. Overall emission rates were notably lowerthan for the Amazon. The depth and duration offlooding are considerably less for the Orinoco thanfor the Amazon floodplain; oxygen over sediments isthe rule for the Orinoco but not for the Amazon. TheOrinoco data illustrate the difficulty of generalizingemission rates. Current information for tropicalAmerica, including revised estimates for inundatedarea along the Amazon, indicate that methane emissionsfrom tropical floodplains have been overestimated.

methane emissions tropical floodplains Orinoco River floodplain forest wetlands 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Bartlett KB, Crill PM, Sebacher DI, Harriss RC, Wilson JO & Melack JM (1988) Methane flux from Central Amazonian floodplain. J. Geophys. Res. 93: 1573–1582Google Scholar
  2. Bartlett KB, Crill PM, Bonassi JA, Richey JE & Harriss RC (1990) Methane flux from the Amazon River floodplain: Emissions during rising water. J. Geophys. Res. 95: 16773–1678Google Scholar
  3. Bartlett KB & Harriss RC (1993) Review and assessment of methane emissions from wetlands. Chemosphere 26: 261–320Google Scholar
  4. Burke RA, Martens CS, & Sackett W (1988a) Seasonal variations of D/H and 13C/12C ratios of microbial methane in surface sediments. Nature 332: 829–831Google Scholar
  5. Burke RA, Barber T & Sackett W(1988b) Methane flux and stable H and C isotope composition of the sedimentary methane from the Florida Everglades. Global Biogeochem. Cycles 2: 329–340Google Scholar
  6. Chanton JP & Dacey JWH (1991) Effects of vegetation on methane flux, reservoirs, and carbon isotopic composition. In: Sharkey TD, Holland EA & HA Mooney (Eds) Trace Gas Emissions by Plants (pp 65–91). Academic PressGoogle Scholar
  7. Chanton JP, Whiting GJ, Showers W & Crill PM (1992a) Methane flux from Peltandra virginica – stable isotope tracing and chamber effects. Global Biogeochemical Cycles 6: 15–33Google Scholar
  8. Chanton JP, Martens CS, Kelley CA, Crill PM and Showers WJ (1992b) Methane transport mechanisms and isotopic fractionation in emergent macrophytes of Alaskan tundra lakes. J. Geophys. Res. 97: 16681–16688Google Scholar
  9. Chanton JP & Smith LK (1993) Seasonal variations in the isotopic composition of methane associated with aquatic emergent macrophytes of the central Amazon basin. In: Oremland RS (Ed.) The Biogeochemistry of Global Change: Radiative Trace Gases (pp 619–633). Chapman & Hall, NYGoogle Scholar
  10. Cicerone RJ & Oremland RS (1988) Biogeochemical aspects of atmospheric methane. Global Biogeochem. Cycles 2: 299–327Google Scholar
  11. Coleman DD, Risatte JB & Schoell M (1981) Fractionation of carbon and hydrogen isotopes by methane-oxidizing bacteria. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta45: 1033–1037Google Scholar
  12. Coleman ML, Sheperd TJ, Durchman J, Rouse J & Moore G (1982) Reduction of water with zinc for hydrogen isotope analysis. Anal. Chem. 54: 993–995Google Scholar
  13. Craig H, Chou CC, Wehlan JA, Stevens cm & Engelkemeir A (1988) The isotopic composition of methane in polar ice cores. Science 242: 1535–1539Google Scholar
  14. Devol AH, Richey JE, Clark WA & King SL (1988) Methane emissions to the troposphere from the Amazon floodplain. J. Geophys. Res. 93: 1583–1592Google Scholar
  15. Devol AH, Richey JE, Forsberg BR & Martinelli LA (1990) Seasonal dynamics in methane emissions from the Amazon River floodplain to the troposphere. J. Geophys. Res. 95: 16417–16426Google Scholar
  16. Devol AH, Richey JE, King SL, Lansdown J & LA Martinelli (1996) Seasonal variations in the 13C-CH4 of Amazon floodplain waters. In: Adams DD, Seitzinger SP & Crill PM (Eds) Cycling of Reduced Gases in the Hydrosphere (pp 173–178). Internat. Verein. Theoret. LimnologieGoogle Scholar
  17. Fisher TR & Moline MA (1992) Seasonal plant cover on the Amazon River floodplain with aerial videography and image analysis. In: Blazquez CH (Ed.) Proc. 13th Biennial Workshop on Color Aerial Photography in Plant Sciences (pp 209–216). ASPRS, Bethesda, MDGoogle Scholar
  18. Gupta MS, Tyler S & Cicerone R (1996) Modeling atmospheric 13CH4 and the causes of recent changes in atmospheric CH4 amounts. J. Geophys. Res. 101: 22923–22932Google Scholar
  19. Hamilton SK & Lewis WM, Jr. (1987) Causes of seasonality in the chemistry of a lake on the Orinoco River floodplain. Limnol. Oceanogr. 32: 1277–1290Google Scholar
  20. Hamilton SK & Lewis WM, Jr. (1990a) Physical characteristics of the fringing floodplain of the Orinoco River, Venezuela. Interciencia 15: 491–500Google Scholar
  21. Hamilton SK & Lewis WM Jr. (1990b) Basin morphology in relation to chemical ecological characteristics of lakes on the Orinoco River floodplain, Venezuela. Arch. Hydrobiol. 119: 393–425Google Scholar
  22. Hamilton SK, Lewis WM Jr. & Sippel SJ (1992) Energy sources for aquatic animals in the Orinoco River floodplain: Evidence from stable isotopes. Oecologia 89: 324–330Google Scholar
  23. Hamilton SK, Sippel SJ & Melack JM (1995) Oxygen depletion and carbon dioxide and methane production in waters of the Pantanal wetland of Brazil. Biogeochemistry 30: 115–141Google Scholar
  24. Hamilton SK, Sippel SJ & Melack JM (1996) Inundation patterns in the Pantanal wetland of South America determined from passive microwave remote sensing. Archiv für Hydrobiologie 137: 1–23Google Scholar
  25. Hamilton SK, Sippel SJ, Calheiros DF & Melack JM (1997) An anoxic event and other biogeochemical effects of the Pantanal wetland on the Paraguay River. Limnol. Oceanogr. 42: 257–272Google Scholar
  26. Happell JD, Chanton JP & Showers W (1994) The influence of methane oxidation on the stable isotopic composition of methane emitted from Florida Swamp forests Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta. 58: 4377–4388Google Scholar
  27. Hoefs J (1987) Stable Isotope Geochemistry. SpringerGoogle Scholar
  28. Ioffe BV & Vitenberg AG (1984) Head-space Analysis and Related Methods in Gas Chromatography. Wiley, NY.Google Scholar
  29. Junk WJ (1970) Investigations on the ecology and production-biology of the “floating vegetation” and its ecology. Amazoniana 2: 449–495Google Scholar
  30. Junk WJ (1997)The Central Amazon Floodplain: Ecology of a Pulsing System. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  31. Lansdown JM, Quay PD & King SL (1992) CH4 production via CO2 reduction in a temperate bog: A source of 13C-depleted CH4. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 56: 3493–3503Google Scholar
  32. Lesack LFW & Melack JM (1991) The deposition, composition, and potential sources of major ionic solutes in rain of the Central Amazon basin. Water Resources Res. 27: 2953–2977Google Scholar
  33. Lewis WM Jr, Hamilton SK & Saunders JF III (1995) Rivers of Northern South America. In: Cushing C & Cummins K (Eds) Ecosystems of the World: Rivers (pp 219–256). Elsevier, NYGoogle Scholar
  34. Lowe D, Brenninkmeijer AC, Brailsford G, Lassey K & Gomez A (1994) Concentration and 13C records of atmospheric methane in New Zealand and Antarctica: Evidence for changes in methane sources. J. Geophys. Res. 99: 16913–16925Google Scholar
  35. Martens CS, Blair NE, Green CD & Des Marais DJ (1986) Seasonal variations in the stable carbon isotopic signature of biogenic methane in a coastal sediment. Science 233: 1300–1303Google Scholar
  36. Martens CS, Kelley CA, Chanton JP & Showers WJ (1992) Carbon and hydrogen isotopic composition of methane from wetlands and lakes of the Yukon-Kuskokwim Delta of the Alaskan tundra. J. Geophys. Res. 97: 16689–16701Google Scholar
  37. Matthews E & Fung I (1987) Methane emission from natural wetlands: Global distribution, area, and environmental characteristics of sources. Global Biogeochem. Cycles 1: 61–86Google Scholar
  38. McAuliffe C (1971) Gas chromatographic determination of solutes by multiple phase equilibrium. Chem. Technol. 1: 46–51Google Scholar
  39. Melack JM & Fisher TR (1983) Diel Oxygen variations and their implications for Amazon floodplain lakes. Arch. Hydrobiol. 98: 422–442Google Scholar
  40. Melack JM & Forsberg BR (in press) Biogeochemistry of Amazon floodplain lakes and associated wetlands. In: McClain ME and Richey JE (Eds) The Biogeochemistry of the Amazon Basin and its Role in a Changing World. OxfordGoogle Scholar
  41. Moore TR, Heyes A & Roulet NT (1994) Methane emissions from wetlands, southern Hudson Bay lowland. J. Geophys. Res. 99: 1455–1467Google Scholar
  42. Pannier F (1979) Mangroves impacted by human-induced disturbances: A case study of the Orinoco Delta mangrove ecosystem. Environ. Managt 3: 205–216Google Scholar
  43. Quay PD, King SL, Landsdown JM & Wilbur D (1988)Isotopic composition of methane released from wetlands: Implications for the increase in atmospheric methane. Global Biogeochem. Cycles 2: 385–397Google Scholar
  44. Quay PD, King SL, Stutsman J, Wilbur DO, Steele LP, Fung I, Gammon RH, Brown TA, Farwell, Grootes PM & Schmidt FH (1991) Carbon isotopic composition of atmospheric CH4: Fossil and biomass burning source strengths. Global Biogeochem. Cycles 5: 25–47Google Scholar
  45. Richey JE, Devol AH, Wofsy SC, Victoria R & Ribeiro MNG (1988) Biogenic gases and the oxidation and reduction of carbon in Amazon River and floodplain waters. Limnol. Oceanogr. 33: 551–561Google Scholar
  46. Schoell M (1988) Multiple origins of methane in the earth. Chem. Geol. 71: 1–10Google Scholar
  47. Sippel SJ, Hamilton SK & Melack JM (1994) Determination of inundation area in the Amazon River floodplain using the SMMR 37 Ghz polarization difference. Remote Sensing Environ. 48: 70–76Google Scholar
  48. Sippel SJ, Hamilton SK, Melack JM & Novo EMM (1998) Passive microwave observations of inundation area and the area/stage relation in the Amazon River. Int. J. Remote Sensing 19: 3055–3074Google Scholar
  49. Smith LK & Lewis WM Jr (1992) Seasonality of methane emissions from five lakes and associated wetlands of the Colorado Rockies. Global Biogeochem. Cycles 6: 323–338Google Scholar
  50. Stevens CM & Engelkemeir A (1988) Stable carbon isotopic composition of methane from some natural and anthropogenic sources. J. Geophys. Res. 93: 725–733Google Scholar
  51. Sugimoto A & Wada E (1993) Carbon isotopic composition of bacterial methane in a soil incubation experiment: contributions of acetate and CO2/H2. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 57: 4015–4027Google Scholar
  52. Sugimoto A & Wada E (1995) Hydrogen isotopic composition of bacterial methane, CO2 reduction, and acetate fermentation. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 59: 1339–1352Google Scholar
  53. Tundisi JG, Forsberg BR, Devol AH, Zaret TM, Tundisi TM, Dos Santos A, Ribeiro JS & Hardy ER (1984) Mixing patterns in Amazon floodplain lakes. Hydrobiologia 49: 309–327Google Scholar
  54. Tyler SC (1986) Stable carbon isotope ratios in atmospheric methane and some of its sources. J. Geophys. Res.91: 13232–13238Google Scholar
  55. Tyler SC (1991) 13C/12C ratios in atmospheric methane and some of its sources. In: Rogers JE & Whitman W (Eds) Microbial Production and Consumption of Greenhouse Gases (pp 395–409). American Society for Microbiology, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  56. Tyler SC, Zimmerman PR, Cumberbatch C, Greenberg JP, Westberg C & Darlington JPEC (1988) Measurements and interpretation of 13C of methane from termites, rice paddies, and wetlands in Kenya. Global Biogeochem. Cycles 2: 341–355Google Scholar
  57. Tyler SC, Bilek RS, Sass RL & Fisher FM (1997) Methane oxidation and pathways of production in a Texas paddy field deduced from measurements of flux 13C and D of CH4. Global Biogeochem. Cycles 11: 323–348Google Scholar
  58. van Andel TjH (1967) The Orinoco Delta. J. Sedimentary Petrol. 32: 297–310Google Scholar
  59. Vásquez E (1992) Temperature and dissolved oxygen in lakes of the Lower Orinoco River floodplain (Venezuela). Rev. Hydrobiol. Trop. 25: 23–33Google Scholar
  60. Waldron S, Watson-Clark I, Hall AJ & Fallick AE (1998) The carbon and hydrogen stable isotope composition of bacteriogenic methane: a laboratory study using a landfill inoculum. Geomicrobiology 15: 157–160Google Scholar
  61. Wassmann R, Thein UG, Whiticar MJ, Rennenberg H, Seiler W & Junk WJ (1992) Methane emissions from the Amazon floodplain: Characterization of production and transport. Global Biogeochem. Cycles 6: 3–13Google Scholar
  62. Whiticar GJ, Faber G & Schoell M (1986) Biogenic methane formation in marine and freshwater environments: CO2 reduction vs. acetate fermentation-Isotopic evidence. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta50: 693–709Google Scholar
  63. Woltemate I, Whiticar MJ & Schoell M (1984) Carbon and hydrogen isotopic composition of bacterial methane in a shallow freshwater lake. Limnol. Oceanogr. 29: 285–292Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lesley K. Smith
    • 1
  • William M. LewisJr.
    • 1
  • Jeffrey P. Chanton
    • 2
  • Greg Cronin
    • 3
  • Stephen K. Hamilton
    • 4
  1. 1.Center for Limnology, Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental SciencesUniversity of ColoradoBoulderU.S.A.
  2. 2.Department of OceanographyFlorida State UniversityTallahasseeU.S.A.
  3. 3.Department of BiologyUniversity of Colorado – DenverDenverU.S.A.
  4. 4.Kellogg Biological StationMichigan State UniversityHickory CornersU.S.A.

Personalised recommendations