Agroforestry Systems

, Volume 50, Issue 1, pp 27–46 | Cite as

Interactions among cutting frequency, reserve carbohydrates, and post-cutting biomass production in Gliricidia sepium and Leucaena leucocephala

  • C. R. LattEmail author
  • P. K. R. Nair
  • B.T. Kang


The ability of trees and shrubs to coppice vigorously after being cut or pruned is of great importance in the management of agroforestry systems. In a study conducted in the seasonally dry climate of Ibadan, Nigeria, frequent cutting progressively decreased concentrations of starch and total reserve carbohydrates in Gliricidia sepium (Jacq.) Walp. and Leucaena leucocephala (Lam.) De Wit. In frequently cut trees, starch was severely reduced in the stumps of both species. In contrast, soluble sugar concentrations in roots and stems of both species were consistently maintained at or above the levels in uncut control trees, suggesting that sugar levels were maintained through the hydrolysis of starch reserves. No starch replenishment occurred during the six weeks after cutting. In trees that were cut and then allowed to grow undisturbed during the wet season, replenishment of stem starch began within three months after cutting. Shoot regrowth after cutting decreased starch levels first in stems and, only after additional cuts, in roots. Dry-season cuts had little effect on reserve carbohydrates in G. sepium but quickly reduced stem starch in L. leucocephala. Frequent cutting decreased dry matter production, and this decrease was correlated with reduced levels of reserve carbohydrates.

multipurpose trees Nigeria non-structural carbohydrates soluble sugar starch 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Atta-Krah AN and Sumberg JE (1988) Studies with Gliricidia sepium for crop/livestock production systems in West Africa. Agrofor Syst 6: 97–118Google Scholar
  2. Duguma B, Kang BT and Okali DUU (1988) Effect of pruning intensity of three woody leguminous species grown in alley cropping with maize and cowpea on an alfisol. Agrofor Syst 6: 19–35Google Scholar
  3. Ella A, Jacobsen C, Stür WW and Blair G (1989) Effect of plant density and cutting frequency on the productivity of four tree legumes. Trop Grasslands 23(1): 28–34Google Scholar
  4. Erdmann TK, Nair PKR and Kang BT (1993) Effects of cutting frequency and cutting height on reserve carbohydrates in Gliricidia sepium (Jacq.) Walp. For Ecol Manage 57: 45–60Google Scholar
  5. Guevarra AB, Whitney AS and Thompson JT (1978) Influence of intra-row spacing and cutting regimes on the growth and yield of Leucaena. Agronomy J 70: 1033–1037Google Scholar
  6. Harrington MG (1989) Gambel oak root response to spring, summer, and fall prescribed burning. J Range Manage 42: 504–507Google Scholar
  7. International Institute of Tropical Agriculture (1983) Annual Report. IITA, Ibadan, NigeriaGoogle Scholar
  8. Johansson T (1992) Sprouting of 2-to 5-year-old birches (Betula pubescens Ehrh. and Betula pendula Roth) in relation to stump height and felling time. For Ecol Manage 53: 263–281Google Scholar
  9. Juo ASR and Kang BT (1989) Nutrient effects of modification of shifting cultivation in West Africa. In: Proctor J (ed) Mineral Nutrients in Tropical Forest and Savanna Ecosystems, pp 289–300. Blackwell Scientific, London, UKGoogle Scholar
  10. Kandiah S, Wettasinghe DT and Wadasinghe G (1984) Root influence on shoot development in tea (Camellia sinensis (L.) O. Kuntze) following shoot pruning. J Hort Sci 59: 581–587Google Scholar
  11. Kang BT, Grimme H and Lawson TL (1985) Alley cropping sequentially cropped maize and cowpea with leucaena on a sandy soil in southern Nigeria. Plant Soil 85: 267–277Google Scholar
  12. Kramer PJ and Kozlowski TT (1979) Physiology of Woody Plants. Academic Press, Orlando, FloridaGoogle Scholar
  13. Latt CR (1996) Biomass Production in Agroforestry Trees as Influenced by Cutting Frequency and Reserve Carbohydrates. PhD dissertation. University of Florida, GainesvilleGoogle Scholar
  14. Loescher WH, McCamant T and Keller JD (1990) Carbohydrate reserves, translocation, and storage in woody plant roots. HortScience 25: 274–281Google Scholar
  15. McCready RM, Guggolz J, Silviera V and Owens HS (1950) Determination of starch and amylose in vegetables. Anal Chem 22(9): 1156–1158Google Scholar
  16. Mika A (1986) Physiological responses of fruit trees to pruning. Hortic Rev 8: 337–378Google Scholar
  17. Miyanishi K and Kellman M (1986) The role of nutrient reserves in regrowth of two savannah shrubs. Can J Bot 64: 1244–1248Google Scholar
  18. Morales JB, Perez-Jimenez A and Chiang F (1992) Fluctuation of starch in wood and bark of trees from the Pacific coast of Mexico. Diversity of Pacific Basin woods in past, present, and future, August 14-16, 1992. Lawaii, Hawaii. IAWA Bull 13: 241–242Google Scholar
  19. Nagarajah S and Pethiyagoda U (1965) The influence of lungs on carbohydrate reserves and growth of shoots. Tea Quart 36: 88–102Google Scholar
  20. Nair PKR, Buresh RJ, Mugendi DN and Latt CR (1999) Nutrient cycling in tropical agroforestry systems: myths and science. In: Buck LE, Lassoie JP and Fernandes ECM (eds) Agroforestry in Sustainable Agricultural Systems, pp 1–31. CRC Press/Lewis Publ., Boca Raton, Fl, USAGoogle Scholar
  21. Old KM, Gibbs R, Craig J, Meyers BJ and Yuan ZQ (1990) Effect of drought and defoliation on the susceptibility of eucalypts to cankers caused by Endothia gyrosa and Botryosphaeria ribis Google Scholar
  22. Priestley CA (1963) The carbohydrate resources of young apple trees under four levels of illumination. Ann Bot 27: 435–446Google Scholar
  23. Rodgers HL, Brakke MP and Ewel JJ (1995) Shoot damage effects on starch reserves of Cedrela odorata. Biotropica 27: 71–77Google Scholar
  24. Selvendran RR and Selvendran S (1972) Changes in the polysaccharides of the tea plant during post-prune growth. Phytochemistry 11: 3167–3171Google Scholar
  25. Sleigh PA, Collin HA and Hardwick K (1984) Distribution of assimilate during the flush cycle of growth in Theobroma cacao L. Pl. Growth Regul. 2: 381–391Google Scholar
  26. SAS Institute (1988) SAS/STAT User's Guide, Release 6.03 Edition. SAS Institute, Cary, North Carolina. 1028 ppGoogle Scholar
  27. Stür WW, Shelton HM and Gutteridge RC (1994) Defoliation management of forage tree legumes. In: Gutteridge RC and Shelton HM (eds) Forage Tree Legumes in Tropical Agriculture, pp 158–167. CAB International, Wallingford, UKGoogle Scholar
  28. Taylor JS, Blake TJ and Pharis RP (1982) The role of plant hormones and carbohydrates in the growth and survival of coppiced Eucalyptus seedlings. Physiol Plant 55: 421–430Google Scholar
  29. Tschaplinski TJ and Blake TJ (1989) Photosynthetic reinvigoration of leaves following shoot decapitation and accelerated growth of coppice shoots. Physiol Plant 75: 157–165Google Scholar
  30. Yemm EW and Willis AJ (1954) The estimation of carbohydrates in plant extracts by anthrone. Biochem J 57: 508–514Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Forest Resources and ConservationUniversity of FloridaGainesvilleUSA
  2. 2.International Institute of Tropical Agriculture (IITA)IbadanNigeria

Personalised recommendations