Natural Language & Linguistic Theory

, Volume 18, Issue 4, pp 873–890 | Cite as

The Revolution Confused: A Response To Our Critics

  • Shalom Lappin
  • Robert D. Levine
  • David E. Johnson
Article

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. Brody, Michael. 1995. Lexico-Logical Form: A Radically Minimalist Theory, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  2. Chomsky, Noam. 1955/1975. The Logical Structure of Linguistic Theory, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
  3. Chomsky, Noam. 1957. Syntactic Structures, Janua Linguarum Series Minor 4, Mouton, The Hague.Google Scholar
  4. Chomsky, Noam. 1972. ‘Some Empirical Issues in the Theory of Transformational Grammar’, in P. S. Peters (ed.), Goals of Linguistic Theory, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: pp. 63-130.Google Scholar
  5. Chomsky, Noam. 1977. ‘On wh-Movement’, in Peter Culicover, Thomas Wasow, and Adrian Akmajian (eds.), Formal Syntax, Academic Press, New York, pp. 71-132.Google Scholar
  6. Chomsky, Noam. 1981. Lectures on Government and Binding. Studies in Generative Grammar, Vol. 9, Foris, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  7. Chomsky, Noam. 1991. ‘Some Notes on Economy of Derivation and Representation’, in Robert Freidin (ed.), Principles and Parameters in Comparative Grammar, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 417-454.Google Scholar
  8. Chomsky, Noam. 1993. ‘A Minimalist Program for Linguistic Theory’, in Kenneth Hale and Samuel Jay Keyser (eds.), The View from Building 20: Essays in Honor of Sylvain Bromberger, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 1-52.Google Scholar
  9. Chomsky, Noam. 1995. The Minimalist Program, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  10. Chomsky, Noam. 1998. Minimalist Inquiries: The Framework, unpublished ms., MIT.Google Scholar
  11. Chomsky, Noam. 1999. Derivation by Phase, Unpublished ms., MIT.Google Scholar
  12. Culicover, Peter W. and Wendy Wilkins. 1984. Locality in Linguistic Theory, Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  13. Johnson, David and Shalom Lappin. 1997. ‘A Critique of the Minimalist Program’, Linguistics and Philosophy 20, 273-333.Google Scholar
  14. Johnson, David and Shalom Lappin. 1999. Local Constraints vs. Economy, Stanford: CSLI JonesGoogle Scholar
  15. Michael. 1983. ‘Getting ‘tough’ with Wh-Movement’, Journal of Linguistics 19, 129-159.Google Scholar
  16. Lasnik, Howard and Robert Fiengo. 1974. ‘Complement-Object Deletion’, Linguistic Inquiry 5, 535-571.Google Scholar
  17. Levine, Robert D. 1984a. ‘Against Reanalysis Rules’, Linguistic Analysis 14, 3-30.Google Scholar
  18. Levine, Robert. 1984b. ‘A Note on Right Node Raising, ‘tough’ Constructions, and Reanalysis Rules‘, Linguistic Analysis 13, 857-870.Google Scholar
  19. Postal, Paul and Geoffrey Pullum. 1988. ‘Expletive Noun Phrases in Subcategorized Positions’, Linguistic Inquiry 19, 635-670.Google Scholar
  20. Sokal, Alan D. and Jean Bricmont. 1998. Fashionable Nonsense: Postmodern Intellectuals’ Abuse of Science, Picador, New York.Google Scholar
  21. Williams, Edwin. 1983. ‘Against Small Clauses’, Linguistic Inquiry 9, 287-308.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • Shalom Lappin
  • Robert D. Levine
  • David E. Johnson

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations